Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Manatt says Wayfarer has had the VanZan subpoena since March. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782.71.0.pdf[/quote]

Sorry, meant May. May 16 2025.[/quote]

Wow.  Guys!  Come on!  I thought getting Garofalo involved in this meant we were leaving the sh!tshow at the clown factory stuff behind us!  But Garofalo seems to be going in just as hard in misrepresenting information to the court as Freedman does.  Does this mean Garofalo is now asking three different entities to produce the subpoena and the documents Jonesworks produced in response to the subpoena?  The subpoena and the docs produced by Jones in response to it make up two of the five requests that are part of Garofalo's motion to compel here, and it is [u]certainly[/u] relevant to mention that Lively produced both of these to Liner Freedman more than a month ago.  It is frankly extremely misleading for these documents to have been produced by Lively to Liner Freedman in mid-May and for Garofalo to represent in her motion that Jones had not yet produced these documents while at the same time [b]NOT[/b] mentioning that Lively had.

It must just be the whole firm I guess.  What a bunch of jerks.  Kids, I wouldn't summer there.  Like, did Garofalo think nobody was going to say anything?  Sh!tshow at the clown factory all over again.

(Presumably Lively produced this under the ESI Stip that was in place in the main case rather than in the Abel v. Jones case?  I guess that's how they did this production before the ESI stip was filed there.)[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics