Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

THIS

Opposition research that includes paying foreign spies and getting false information from Russians? Yes. I see a difference. Especially, when there is some evidence that the political opponent had a strong conflict of interest and it is public information.

Funny. A network reporter (I think it is Richard Engel was in Ukraine tonight investigating the situation. Why didn't the reporters go to Ukraine years ago when it was first reported that Biden's son was getting paid such exorbitant amounts of money from the company? Why didn't they ask Biden about it at the time? Why wasn't this constantly on the front page? Just imagine if Pence's child were doing this. It would be constant front page.

IVANKA TRUMP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

Some of them can, some of them can't. But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

Some of them can, some of them can't. But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?

Sounds like your beef is with Fusion GPS. Or are you asserting the Clinton campaign hired Steele directly? If so please show us the documents that back it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

Some of them can, some of them can't. But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?

Difference between illegally asking a foreign country for help and a company legally paying another company for services.

[Anonymous]

Fusion GPS is an American company.
Thank you, next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

Some of them can, some of them can't. But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?

Difference between illegally asking a foreign country for help and a company legally paying another company for services.

What foreign country did the Trump campaign ask for help?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

THIS

Opposition research that includes paying foreign spies and getting false information from Russians? Yes. I see a difference. Especially, when there is some evidence that the political opponent had a strong conflict of interest and it is public information.

Funny. A network reporter (I think it is Richard Engel was in Ukraine tonight investigating the situation. Why didn't the reporters go to Ukraine years ago when it was first reported that Biden's son was getting paid such exorbitant amounts of money from the company? Why didn't they ask Biden about it at the time? Why wasn't this constantly on the front page? Just imagine if Pence's child were doing this. It would be constant front page.

Dear Dim Wit,
Do you understand that OUR intelligence agencies rely on foreign assets? That they pay them?
They do.
So, if Trump wants something investigated he is SUPPOSED to ask one of the many AMERICAN AGENCIES that do that sort of thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

Some of them can, some of them can't. But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?

Difference between illegally asking a foreign country for help and a company legally paying another company for services.

What foreign country did the Trump campaign ask for help?

Russia, if you are listening, and poof, within hours, a hack was made.

But since you asked, he also had help from Israel, Saudi Arabia and UAE.

[Anonymous]

It wasn't just the asking for help, it was the premeditation of weaponizing the content

https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/1180203217990406145

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

Some of them can, some of them can't. But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?

Difference between illegally asking a foreign country for help and a company legally paying another company for services.

What foreign country did the Trump campaign ask for help?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

Some of them can, some of them can't. But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?

Difference between illegally asking a foreign country for help and a company legally paying another company for services.

What foreign country did the Trump campaign ask for help?

Russia, if you are listening, and poof, within hours, a hack was made.

But since you asked, he also had help from Israel, Saudi Arabia and UAE.

So if the Trump campaign illegally asked all four of these countries for help, why did the 2 year long Mueller investigation not come to that conclusion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

Some of them can, some of them can't. But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?

Difference between illegally asking a foreign country for help and a company legally paying another company for services.

What foreign country did the Trump campaign ask for help?

Russia, if you are listening, and poof, within hours, a hack was made.

But since you asked, he also had help from Israel, Saudi Arabia and UAE.

So if the Trump campaign illegally asked all four of these countries for help, why did the 2 year long Mueller investigation not come to that conclusion?

These most recent allegations are just that, RECENT. we no longer need to guess how emboldened the president became after he managed to barely scoot past Mueller. And don’t forget that the report DIDN’T exonerate him. It just left it up to Congress. So.... we know how that went.

[Anonymous]

Mueller found a lot and individual 1 will be indicted as soon as he is out of office. May that day be soon!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you not see the difference between a candidate doing opposition research and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?

Some of them can, some of them can't. But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?

Difference between illegally asking a foreign country for help and a company legally paying another company for services.

What foreign country did the Trump campaign ask for help?

Russia, if you are listening, and poof, within hours, a hack was made.

But since you asked, he also had help from Israel, Saudi Arabia and UAE.

So if the Trump campaign illegally asked all four of these countries for help, why did the 2 year long Mueller investigation not come to that conclusion?

These most recent allegations are just that, RECENT. we no longer need to guess how emboldened the president became after he managed to barely scoot past Mueller. And don’t forget that the report DIDN’T exonerate him. It just left it up to Congress. So.... we know how that went.

From the Muller report: “investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly and intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operations”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

It's illegal to request "a thing of value" from a foreign government for campaign purposes. If you don't think that's illegal, why did Trump supporters say it was illegal when Hillary supposedly did it?

Asking for an investigation is not the same as paying foreign sources for fake dirt.

It's wrong to seek foreign help for a campaign. If you think it was wrong when Clinton did it, it's wrong for Trump to do it. It dorsn't matter if the dirt is real or fake.