Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

The main purpose of astroturf is sports

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny to see the nature of these posts (deliberately obtuse, bringing up the same points over and over even after they are directly addressed, deflecting) because I've seen these exact dynamics at play here on DCUM with certain other celebrities' haters. Now I wonder if they are all professional trolls or just deranged. It feels super familiar.

I still want to know what will satisfy Blake Lively in this case. I realize she has suffered the worst indignities that Hollywood has to offer. So what exactly does she want? Can one of her superfans tell me?

Look at her complaint?! How about she wants accountability? What kind of ridiculous question is.

And what is the definition of accountability? JB never working again? Blake is already on her way to that since no man who is considered desirable or sexy, or any man with a working dick, will want to direct her in a movie. Hopefully her sexy bohunk husband can get her some good parts.

Wtf is this comment?

No man that could potentially be accused of harrassment will want her in a movie. She will have to work with old guys and women only or her hunky lover.

One of her costars that stood up for her is man?! You're just trolling at this point

Yes but I am referring to future directors who will not want her drama.

WTH do you know about future directors and what they want? And there are plenty of female directors out there. Can you be any more out of touch?

I know that men don't want to deal with women who cause them a lot of problems. There are tons of other blond actresses who don't sue their directors. All things being equal they will go with a lower maintenance talent.

You want to pretend you are not misogynistic but your "sit down and shut up" post implies women should tolerate situations that are messed up because they will bother men who want to behave like douches. Bet you thought #metoo was just a bunch of whiny women. No patience for the "boys will be boys so women should not speak up" BS of your take on this. Glad Blake spoke up. Good for her. Shame on you.

Blake was happy to send sexy pictures to Harvey Weinsten and Ben Affleck when it helped her career. #Metoo.

Seems like Harvey is the one in jail and not his victims.

Yes, true. That does not change the fact that plenty of young actresses sent him photos because he could make their careers. Plenty of people in Hollywood kissed his butt for years because he made huge hits that won awards.

And you castigate these women who sent photos? Says more about you than them.

I don't feel sorry for any actresses who filmed themselves naked and intentionally sent the photos to Weinstein. How can you claim to be a victim when you are a willing participant in the exchange of sexual materials?

Oh so she deserves what happened on set? Shame on you.

So now you are admitting she filmed herself naked and sent it to Weinstein?

This you?? Same schtick!

No that is not me, that is Alex Jones. And you still have not explained what he did to Blake Lively.

Where is your proof of allegations against Blake Lively?

I am asking the poster what Alex Jones has to do with Blake Lively since it still has not been explained. The individual is unable to explain what Alex Jones has to do with the case involving Blake Lively and Baldoni. Yet, despite being unable to explain what he had to do with this, the person keeps talking about Alex Jones.

What it has to do with it is that you use similar tin foil hat fake claims to undermine someone and distract.

The Weinstein BS is 1) made up/unproven and 2) unrelated. Stop bringing it up.

Thanks for finally explaining what you mean. I do not care about Blake and Harvey. I stand by my position that she's screwing her career with this case, but I acknowledge she never has to work again because her husband is well off and his filns are popular.

You're pretty much the only one seeing it that way. But, ok. She doesn't have to tolerate abuse to have a career and it seems you think she does. Nobody wants what you want.

Wrong..Read the Daily Mail. Plenty of people are tired of hearing about this and don't feel sorry for Blake Lively.

Once again, Daily Mail is useless when it was already shown that Justin's PR is friends with folks there and used it to plant stories. You did not comment on this when pointed out repeatedly which indicates you are likely a paid poster.

So your position is that all 700 + commenter on DM are troll accounts created for Baldoni?

Probably, yes. It's generally estimated that 30-40 percent of online reviews are fake and I would wager that extends to rags like DM that are already revealed to deliberately accept planted articles tearing women apart as part of PR stunts for clickbait and "spinning a narrative." Part of spinning that narrative would include supporting the article through fake "grassroots" commenters to support the "narrative" sentiment provided by that article.

The PR blow up is possibly the biggest story of all.

DP to add, the 900+ comments on the NYT article are generally sympathetic toward Blake and I am far less inclined to think NYT uses planted commenters on it's articles and far more likely to think that Daily Mail, a horribly corrupt publication already implicated in the smear, uses planted commenters.

Nick Kriatoff’s op-ed felt purposely placed to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Going back through this thread, no posts from May 2023 then suddenly it was revived with a bunch of random anti Blake Lively posts the morning of Aug 13 2024, and not comments in relation to the movie issues.

I am convinced there is astroturfing in this forum.

What was she doing in the public eye in that year? Even the JLo thread dies down for long periods of time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Going back through this thread, no posts from May 2023 then suddenly it was revived with a bunch of random anti Blake Lively posts the morning of Aug 13 2024, and not comments in relation to the movie issues.

I am convinced there is astroturfing in this forum.

What was she doing in the public eye in that year? Even the JLo thread dies down for long periods of time.

Being smeared snd threatened with cancellation by some PR women who are now being sued. Duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The main purpose of astroturf is sports

I had not heard of this term before the BL V JB saga and at first rolled my eyes. However, when I looked up the meaning and usage on Wikipedia : I can see it is an excellent analogy for misusing the internet to create illusions of both positive and negative support for products/ celebrities online.

From wiki
"Astroturfing" on the internet refers to the practice of creating the illusion of widespread public support for a product, policy, or idea by using fake online identities to post positive comments or reviews, essentially making it appear like a grassroots movement when it's actually orchestrated by a single entity, like a company or political group; essentially, "fake grassroots" activity online.
Key points about astroturfing:

Origin of the term:
"Astroturf" is a brand name for artificial grass, so the term implies a fake, manufactured version of genuine public opinion.

How it's done:
Astroturfers often create multiple fake online accounts (sometimes called "sockpuppet" accounts) to post seemingly organic comments or reviews across different platforms, giving the impression of broad public support.

Why it's problematic:
Astroturfing can manipulate public perception by creating a false sense of consensus, potentially influencing people's opinions without them realizing the source of the information

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Going back through this thread, no posts from May 2023 then suddenly it was revived with a bunch of random anti Blake Lively posts the morning of Aug 13 2024, and not comments in relation to the movie issues.

I am convinced there is astroturfing in this forum.

You nitwit. It was during the peak of their press tour & moving coming out that week of August. Blake was coming across as an egomaniac mean girl. The movie ended up being #1 at box office in August.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main purpose of astroturf is sports

I had not heard of this term before the BL V JB saga and at first rolled my eyes. However, when I looked up the meaning and usage on Wikipedia : I can see it is an excellent analogy for misusing the internet to create illusions of both positive and negative support for products/ celebrities online.

From wiki
"Astroturfing" on the internet refers to the practice of creating the illusion of widespread public support for a product, policy, or idea by using fake online identities to post positive comments or reviews, essentially making it appear like a grassroots movement when it's actually orchestrated by a single entity, like a company or political group; essentially, "fake grassroots" activity online.
Key points about astroturfing:

Origin of the term:
"Astroturf" is a brand name for artificial grass, so the term implies a fake, manufactured version of genuine public opinion.

How it's done:
Astroturfers often create multiple fake online accounts (sometimes called "sockpuppet" accounts) to post seemingly organic comments or reviews across different platforms, giving the impression of broad public support.

Why it's problematic:
Astroturfing can manipulate public perception by creating a false sense of consensus, potentially influencing people's opinions without them realizing the source of the information

Thanks for this explanation. I never created a fake account on DCUM or the Daily Mail. Many commenter on DM are real people. I think it is hard for some people in entertainment to accept that they don't have a positive image with regular people. They think they can control and manipulate people into liking them because they are used to getting what they want. People either like you or they don't. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The main purpose of astroturf is sports

I had not heard of this term before the BL V JB saga and at first rolled my eyes. However, when I looked up the meaning and usage on Wikipedia : I can see it is an excellent analogy for misusing the internet to create illusions of both positive and negative support for products/ celebrities online.

From wiki
"Astroturfing" on the internet refers to the practice of creating the illusion of widespread public support for a product, policy, or idea by using fake online identities to post positive comments or reviews, essentially making it appear like a grassroots movement when it's actually orchestrated by a single entity, like a company or political group; essentially, "fake grassroots" activity online.
Key points about astroturfing:

Origin of the term:
"Astroturf" is a brand name for artificial grass, so the term implies a fake, manufactured version of genuine public opinion.

How it's done:
Astroturfers often create multiple fake online accounts (sometimes called "sockpuppet" accounts) to post seemingly organic comments or reviews across different platforms, giving the impression of broad public support.

Why it's problematic:
Astroturfing can manipulate public perception by creating a false sense of consensus, potentially influencing people's opinions without them realizing the source of the information

Thanks for this explanation. I never created a fake account on DCUM or the Daily Mail. Many commenter on DM are real people. I think it is hard for some people in entertainment to accept that they don't have a positive image with regular people. They think they can control and manipulate people into liking them because they are used to getting what they want. People either like you or they don't. Period.

DP - I think many of us had no personal opinion on either BL or JB before this blow up.

I still don’t have a personal opinion on them as people because I don’t know them. People either like their work or not - but even then many of us have more nuanced views on movies rather than like or don’t like. I neither loved nor hated the “It ends with us” movie.

I do think that online misogyny is demonstrated as a real phenomenon with far reaching consequences. The JB PR people were able to exploit online misogynistic tendencies to smear her reputation as an actress.

There are no doubt some people such as yourself who simply don’t like her work. She is not one of my favorite actresses but I applaud her and her husband for tackling the smear campaign that followed confronting sexual harassment on the movie set .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny to see the nature of these posts (deliberately obtuse, bringing up the same points over and over even after they are directly addressed, deflecting) because I've seen these exact dynamics at play here on DCUM with certain other celebrities' haters. Now I wonder if they are all professional trolls or just deranged. It feels super familiar.

I still want to know what will satisfy Blake Lively in this case. I realize she has suffered the worst indignities that Hollywood has to offer. So what exactly does she want? Can one of her superfans tell me?

Look at her complaint?! How about she wants accountability? What kind of ridiculous question is.

And what is the definition of accountability? JB never working again? Blake is already on her way to that since no man who is considered desirable or sexy, or any man with a working dick, will want to direct her in a movie. Hopefully her sexy bohunk husband can get her some good parts.

Wtf is this comment?

No man that could potentially be accused of harrassment will want her in a movie. She will have to work with old guys and women only or her hunky lover.

One of her costars that stood up for her is man?! You're just trolling at this point

Yes but I am referring to future directors who will not want her drama.

WTH do you know about future directors and what they want? And there are plenty of female directors out there. Can you be any more out of touch?

I know that men don't want to deal with women who cause them a lot of problems. There are tons of other blond actresses who don't sue their directors. All things being equal they will go with a lower maintenance talent.

You want to pretend you are not misogynistic but your "sit down and shut up" post implies women should tolerate situations that are messed up because they will bother men who want to behave like douches. Bet you thought #metoo was just a bunch of whiny women. No patience for the "boys will be boys so women should not speak up" BS of your take on this. Glad Blake spoke up. Good for her. Shame on you.

Blake was happy to send sexy pictures to Harvey Weinsten and Ben Affleck when it helped her career. #Metoo.

Seems like Harvey is the one in jail and not his victims.

Yes, true. That does not change the fact that plenty of young actresses sent him photos because he could make their careers. Plenty of people in Hollywood kissed his butt for years because he made huge hits that won awards.

And you castigate these women who sent photos? Says more about you than them.

I don't feel sorry for any actresses who filmed themselves naked and intentionally sent the photos to Weinstein. How can you claim to be a victim when you are a willing participant in the exchange of sexual materials?

Oh so she deserves what happened on set? Shame on you.

So now you are admitting she filmed herself naked and sent it to Weinstein?

This you?? Same schtick!

No that is not me, that is Alex Jones. And you still have not explained what he did to Blake Lively.

Where is your proof of allegations against Blake Lively?

I am asking the poster what Alex Jones has to do with Blake Lively since it still has not been explained. The individual is unable to explain what Alex Jones has to do with the case involving Blake Lively and Baldoni. Yet, despite being unable to explain what he had to do with this, the person keeps talking about Alex Jones.

What it has to do with it is that you use similar tin foil hat fake claims to undermine someone and distract.

The Weinstein BS is 1) made up/unproven and 2) unrelated. Stop bringing it up.

Thanks for finally explaining what you mean. I do not care about Blake and Harvey. I stand by my position that she's screwing her career with this case, but I acknowledge she never has to work again because her husband is well off and his filns are popular.

You're pretty much the only one seeing it that way. But, ok. She doesn't have to tolerate abuse to have a career and it seems you think she does. Nobody wants what you want.

Wrong..Read the Daily Mail. Plenty of people are tired of hearing about this and don't feel sorry for Blake Lively.

Once again, Daily Mail is useless when it was already shown that Justin's PR is friends with folks there and used it to plant stories. You did not comment on this when pointed out repeatedly which indicates you are likely a paid poster.

So your position is that all 700 + commenter on DM are troll accounts created for Baldoni?

Probably, yes. It's generally estimated that 30-40 percent of online reviews are fake and I would wager that extends to rags like DM that are already revealed to deliberately accept planted articles tearing women apart as part of PR stunts for clickbait and "spinning a narrative." Part of spinning that narrative would include supporting the article through fake "grassroots" commenters to support the "narrative" sentiment provided by that article.

The PR blow up is possibly the biggest story of all.

DP to add, the 900+ comments on the NYT article are generally sympathetic toward Blake and I am far less inclined to think NYT uses planted commenters on it's articles and far more likely to think that Daily Mail, a horribly corrupt publication already implicated in the smear, uses planted commenters.

Nick Kriatoff’s op-ed felt purposely placed to me.

How would you plant a story by a highly regarded journalist in an outlet of the Times’ caliber?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny to see the nature of these posts (deliberately obtuse, bringing up the same points over and over even after they are directly addressed, deflecting) because I've seen these exact dynamics at play here on DCUM with certain other celebrities' haters. Now I wonder if they are all professional trolls or just deranged. It feels super familiar.

I still want to know what will satisfy Blake Lively in this case. I realize she has suffered the worst indignities that Hollywood has to offer. So what exactly does she want? Can one of her superfans tell me?

Look at her complaint?! How about she wants accountability? What kind of ridiculous question is.

And what is the definition of accountability? JB never working again? Blake is already on her way to that since no man who is considered desirable or sexy, or any man with a working dick, will want to direct her in a movie. Hopefully her sexy bohunk husband can get her some good parts.

Wtf is this comment?

No man that could potentially be accused of harrassment will want her in a movie. She will have to work with old guys and women only or her hunky lover.

One of her costars that stood up for her is man?! You're just trolling at this point

Yes but I am referring to future directors who will not want her drama.

WTH do you know about future directors and what they want? And there are plenty of female directors out there. Can you be any more out of touch?

I know that men don't want to deal with women who cause them a lot of problems. There are tons of other blond actresses who don't sue their directors. All things being equal they will go with a lower maintenance talent.

You want to pretend you are not misogynistic but your "sit down and shut up" post implies women should tolerate situations that are messed up because they will bother men who want to behave like douches. Bet you thought #metoo was just a bunch of whiny women. No patience for the "boys will be boys so women should not speak up" BS of your take on this. Glad Blake spoke up. Good for her. Shame on you.

Blake was happy to send sexy pictures to Harvey Weinsten and Ben Affleck when it helped her career. #Metoo.

Seems like Harvey is the one in jail and not his victims.

Yes, true. That does not change the fact that plenty of young actresses sent him photos because he could make their careers. Plenty of people in Hollywood kissed his butt for years because he made huge hits that won awards.

And you castigate these women who sent photos? Says more about you than them.

I don't feel sorry for any actresses who filmed themselves naked and intentionally sent the photos to Weinstein. How can you claim to be a victim when you are a willing participant in the exchange of sexual materials?

Oh so she deserves what happened on set? Shame on you.

So now you are admitting she filmed herself naked and sent it to Weinstein?

This you?? Same schtick!

No that is not me, that is Alex Jones. And you still have not explained what he did to Blake Lively.

Where is your proof of allegations against Blake Lively?

I am asking the poster what Alex Jones has to do with Blake Lively since it still has not been explained. The individual is unable to explain what Alex Jones has to do with the case involving Blake Lively and Baldoni. Yet, despite being unable to explain what he had to do with this, the person keeps talking about Alex Jones.

What it has to do with it is that you use similar tin foil hat fake claims to undermine someone and distract.

The Weinstein BS is 1) made up/unproven and 2) unrelated. Stop bringing it up.

Thanks for finally explaining what you mean. I do not care about Blake and Harvey. I stand by my position that she's screwing her career with this case, but I acknowledge she never has to work again because her husband is well off and his filns are popular.

You're pretty much the only one seeing it that way. But, ok. She doesn't have to tolerate abuse to have a career and it seems you think she does. Nobody wants what you want.

Wrong..Read the Daily Mail. Plenty of people are tired of hearing about this and don't feel sorry for Blake Lively.

Once again, Daily Mail is useless when it was already shown that Justin's PR is friends with folks there and used it to plant stories. You did not comment on this when pointed out repeatedly which indicates you are likely a paid poster.

So your position is that all 700 + commenter on DM are troll accounts created for Baldoni?

Probably, yes. It's generally estimated that 30-40 percent of online reviews are fake and I would wager that extends to rags like DM that are already revealed to deliberately accept planted articles tearing women apart as part of PR stunts for clickbait and "spinning a narrative." Part of spinning that narrative would include supporting the article through fake "grassroots" commenters to support the "narrative" sentiment provided by that article.

The PR blow up is possibly the biggest story of all.

DP to add, the 900+ comments on the NYT article are generally sympathetic toward Blake and I am far less inclined to think NYT uses planted commenters on it's articles and far more likely to think that Daily Mail, a horribly corrupt publication already implicated in the smear, uses planted commenters.

Nick Kriatoff’s op-ed felt purposely placed to me.

How would you plant a story by a highly regarded journalist in an outlet of the Times’ caliber?

LOL! You’re hopelessly naive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny to see the nature of these posts (deliberately obtuse, bringing up the same points over and over even after they are directly addressed, deflecting) because I've seen these exact dynamics at play here on DCUM with certain other celebrities' haters. Now I wonder if they are all professional trolls or just deranged. It feels super familiar.

I still want to know what will satisfy Blake Lively in this case. I realize she has suffered the worst indignities that Hollywood has to offer. So what exactly does she want? Can one of her superfans tell me?

Look at her complaint?! How about she wants accountability? What kind of ridiculous question is.

And what is the definition of accountability? JB never working again? Blake is already on her way to that since no man who is considered desirable or sexy, or any man with a working dick, will want to direct her in a movie. Hopefully her sexy bohunk husband can get her some good parts.

Wtf is this comment?

No man that could potentially be accused of harrassment will want her in a movie. She will have to work with old guys and women only or her hunky lover.

One of her costars that stood up for her is man?! You're just trolling at this point

Yes but I am referring to future directors who will not want her drama.

WTH do you know about future directors and what they want? And there are plenty of female directors out there. Can you be any more out of touch?

I know that men don't want to deal with women who cause them a lot of problems. There are tons of other blond actresses who don't sue their directors. All things being equal they will go with a lower maintenance talent.

You want to pretend you are not misogynistic but your "sit down and shut up" post implies women should tolerate situations that are messed up because they will bother men who want to behave like douches. Bet you thought #metoo was just a bunch of whiny women. No patience for the "boys will be boys so women should not speak up" BS of your take on this. Glad Blake spoke up. Good for her. Shame on you.

Blake was happy to send sexy pictures to Harvey Weinsten and Ben Affleck when it helped her career. #Metoo.

Seems like Harvey is the one in jail and not his victims.

Yes, true. That does not change the fact that plenty of young actresses sent him photos because he could make their careers. Plenty of people in Hollywood kissed his butt for years because he made huge hits that won awards.

And you castigate these women who sent photos? Says more about you than them.

I don't feel sorry for any actresses who filmed themselves naked and intentionally sent the photos to Weinstein. How can you claim to be a victim when you are a willing participant in the exchange of sexual materials?

Oh so she deserves what happened on set? Shame on you.

So now you are admitting she filmed herself naked and sent it to Weinstein?

This you?? Same schtick!

No that is not me, that is Alex Jones. And you still have not explained what he did to Blake Lively.

Where is your proof of allegations against Blake Lively?

I am asking the poster what Alex Jones has to do with Blake Lively since it still has not been explained. The individual is unable to explain what Alex Jones has to do with the case involving Blake Lively and Baldoni. Yet, despite being unable to explain what he had to do with this, the person keeps talking about Alex Jones.

What it has to do with it is that you use similar tin foil hat fake claims to undermine someone and distract.

The Weinstein BS is 1) made up/unproven and 2) unrelated. Stop bringing it up.

Thanks for finally explaining what you mean. I do not care about Blake and Harvey. I stand by my position that she's screwing her career with this case, but I acknowledge she never has to work again because her husband is well off and his filns are popular.

You're pretty much the only one seeing it that way. But, ok. She doesn't have to tolerate abuse to have a career and it seems you think she does. Nobody wants what you want.

Wrong..Read the Daily Mail. Plenty of people are tired of hearing about this and don't feel sorry for Blake Lively.

Once again, Daily Mail is useless when it was already shown that Justin's PR is friends with folks there and used it to plant stories. You did not comment on this when pointed out repeatedly which indicates you are likely a paid poster.

So your position is that all 700 + commenter on DM are troll accounts created for Baldoni?

Probably, yes. It's generally estimated that 30-40 percent of online reviews are fake and I would wager that extends to rags like DM that are already revealed to deliberately accept planted articles tearing women apart as part of PR stunts for clickbait and "spinning a narrative." Part of spinning that narrative would include supporting the article through fake "grassroots" commenters to support the "narrative" sentiment provided by that article.

The PR blow up is possibly the biggest story of all.

DP to add, the 900+ comments on the NYT article are generally sympathetic toward Blake and I am far less inclined to think NYT uses planted commenters on it's articles and far more likely to think that Daily Mail, a horribly corrupt publication already implicated in the smear, uses planted commenters.

Nick Kriatoff’s op-ed felt purposely placed to me.

How would you plant a story by a highly regarded journalist in an outlet of the Times’ caliber?

Sweetheart, the US Gov and military contractors planted a fake, 6 trillion US dollar mass casualty war in the Middle East with “highly regarded” newspapers and columnists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Going back through this thread, no posts from May 2023 then suddenly it was revived with a bunch of random anti Blake Lively posts the morning of Aug 13 2024, and not comments in relation to the movie issues.

I am convinced there is astroturfing in this forum.

It’s almost as if *checks notes* their #1 movie came out in August 2024 and Lively was getting much deserved backlash for being a smug diva.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Going back through this thread, no posts from May 2023 then suddenly it was revived with a bunch of random anti Blake Lively posts the morning of Aug 13 2024, and not comments in relation to the movie issues.

I am convinced there is astroturfing in this forum.

It’s almost as if *checks notes* their #1 movie came out in August 2024 and Lively was getting much deserved backlash for being a smug diva.

Planter backlash after the director of the set had MULTIPLE HR complaints against him, not just from Blake? Discussing his p*rn habits and asking her if she climaxes together with her husband? Asking if she watches p*rn? Commenting on multiple women's appearances on set? Walking into her trailer without knocking? Crying to her about her weight?

There was a diva on set. It was a guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Going back through this thread, no posts from May 2023 then suddenly it was revived with a bunch of random anti Blake Lively posts the morning of Aug 13 2024, and not comments in relation to the movie issues.

I am convinced there is astroturfing in this forum.

It’s almost as if *checks notes* their #1 movie came out in August 2024 and Lively was getting much deserved backlash for being a smug diva.

Planter backlash after the director of the set had MULTIPLE HR complaints against him, not just from Blake? Discussing his p*rn habits and asking her if she climaxes together with her husband? Asking if she watches p*rn? Commenting on multiple women's appearances on set? Walking into her trailer without knocking? Crying to her about her weight?

There was a diva on set. It was a guy.

If you think this is or make one iota of a comment to justify this (again, MULTIPLE HR complaints, not just from Blake), you are a part of the problem.

#metoo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's funny to see the nature of these posts (deliberately obtuse, bringing up the same points over and over even after they are directly addressed, deflecting) because I've seen these exact dynamics at play here on DCUM with certain other celebrities' haters. Now I wonder if they are all professional trolls or just deranged. It feels super familiar.

I still want to know what will satisfy Blake Lively in this case. I realize she has suffered the worst indignities that Hollywood has to offer. So what exactly does she want? Can one of her superfans tell me?

Look at her complaint?! How about she wants accountability? What kind of ridiculous question is.

And what is the definition of accountability? JB never working again? Blake is already on her way to that since no man who is considered desirable or sexy, or any man with a working dick, will want to direct her in a movie. Hopefully her sexy bohunk husband can get her some good parts.

Wtf is this comment?

No man that could potentially be accused of harrassment will want her in a movie. She will have to work with old guys and women only or her hunky lover.

One of her costars that stood up for her is man?! You're just trolling at this point

Yes but I am referring to future directors who will not want her drama.

WTH do you know about future directors and what they want? And there are plenty of female directors out there. Can you be any more out of touch?

I know that men don't want to deal with women who cause them a lot of problems. There are tons of other blond actresses who don't sue their directors. All things being equal they will go with a lower maintenance talent.

You want to pretend you are not misogynistic but your "sit down and shut up" post implies women should tolerate situations that are messed up because they will bother men who want to behave like douches. Bet you thought #metoo was just a bunch of whiny women. No patience for the "boys will be boys so women should not speak up" BS of your take on this. Glad Blake spoke up. Good for her. Shame on you.

Blake was happy to send sexy pictures to Harvey Weinsten and Ben Affleck when it helped her career. #Metoo.

Seems like Harvey is the one in jail and not his victims.

Yes, true. That does not change the fact that plenty of young actresses sent him photos because he could make their careers. Plenty of people in Hollywood kissed his butt for years because he made huge hits that won awards.

And you castigate these women who sent photos? Says more about you than them.

I don't feel sorry for any actresses who filmed themselves naked and intentionally sent the photos to Weinstein. How can you claim to be a victim when you are a willing participant in the exchange of sexual materials?

Oh so she deserves what happened on set? Shame on you.

So now you are admitting she filmed herself naked and sent it to Weinstein?

This you?? Same schtick!

No that is not me, that is Alex Jones. And you still have not explained what he did to Blake Lively.

Where is your proof of allegations against Blake Lively?

I am asking the poster what Alex Jones has to do with Blake Lively since it still has not been explained. The individual is unable to explain what Alex Jones has to do with the case involving Blake Lively and Baldoni. Yet, despite being unable to explain what he had to do with this, the person keeps talking about Alex Jones.

What it has to do with it is that you use similar tin foil hat fake claims to undermine someone and distract.

The Weinstein BS is 1) made up/unproven and 2) unrelated. Stop bringing it up.

Thanks for finally explaining what you mean. I do not care about Blake and Harvey. I stand by my position that she's screwing her career with this case, but I acknowledge she never has to work again because her husband is well off and his filns are popular.

You're pretty much the only one seeing it that way. But, ok. She doesn't have to tolerate abuse to have a career and it seems you think she does. Nobody wants what you want.

Wrong..Read the Daily Mail. Plenty of people are tired of hearing about this and don't feel sorry for Blake Lively.

Once again, Daily Mail is useless when it was already shown that Justin's PR is friends with folks there and used it to plant stories. You did not comment on this when pointed out repeatedly which indicates you are likely a paid poster.

So your position is that all 700 + commenter on DM are troll accounts created for Baldoni?

Probably, yes. It's generally estimated that 30-40 percent of online reviews are fake and I would wager that extends to rags like DM that are already revealed to deliberately accept planted articles tearing women apart as part of PR stunts for clickbait and "spinning a narrative." Part of spinning that narrative would include supporting the article through fake "grassroots" commenters to support the "narrative" sentiment provided by that article.

The PR blow up is possibly the biggest story of all.

DP to add, the 900+ comments on the NYT article are generally sympathetic toward Blake and I am far less inclined to think NYT uses planted commenters on it's articles and far more likely to think that Daily Mail, a horribly corrupt publication already implicated in the smear, uses planted commenters.

Nick Kriatoff’s op-ed felt purposely placed to me.

How would you plant a story by a highly regarded journalist in an outlet of the Times’ caliber?

Sweetheart, the US Gov and military contractors planted a fake, 6 trillion US dollar mass casualty war in the Middle East with “highly regarded” newspapers and columnists.

Still trust the NYT way more than the Daily Mail which PPs were quite hilariously trying to use as gospel