Can someone explain AEM to me?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does the teacher basher think she has any right to comment on a post about teacher retention? WTAF?

She is just so vile.

+1000

Her post was hilarious. She feigned innocence and ignorance. What teacher bashing? Who me?

Teachers will not so soon forget.

[Anonymous]

Now so many teachers are leaving and I don't blame them after being bashed all year by APE.

And this doesn't even affect many of the APE teacher bashers because they have since left for private school.

So thanks APE for leaving this mess for the rest of us who can't afford private. Thanks, thanks, thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the big question is will the APE DBs ever take form their dumb signs? The county should fine them.

Agreed.

I don’t see how the county could fine them without coming down on all signs, including Black Lives Matter and the “In this house” one. Be careful what you wish for.

The signs in front of homes are fine, but the APE “open schools now” signs cluttering the medians and other county/state space should be gone by now. So should all Miranda signs, which are still hanging around 2 months post-caucus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love the post on APE about Duran's shift in attitude towards learning loss.. what a buffoon

APE is still a thing? Schools are opening! It’s just a b—tch session now?

Last summer at this time we were definitely opening in hybrid in the fall. We know how that turned out...

This sounds made up. Where/when did it say that hybrid was the go-to when school started. Where/when did APS make this promise? I'm genuinely not remembering it.

Here's the return to school update slide deck for 7/1/20: https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/arlington/Board.nsf/files/BR4GD8434376/$file/E-1%20Return%20to%20School%20Update%20070120.pdf

Two weeks later on 7/16/20 they announced an all-virtual start with a phased start of hybrid in October and November: https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/arlington/Board.nsf/files/BRKNHX600E6E/$file/D-1%20Return%20to%20School%20Status%20Update.pdf


That, of course, turned into full virtual until March.

Thank you. I’m a NP and so sick of all the APS apologists.

This is so funny to me! Y’all think there’s a conspiracy theory to keep the schools closed this fall? That this fall and last fall are the same at all? Really??

I'm betting that SR will start a delta variant campaign, at least for elementary, sometime soon. They aren't happy that APS is doing away with outdoor lunch. They're already unhappy that full DL is no longer school based. It's coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love the post on APE about Duran's shift in attitude towards learning loss.. what a buffoon

APE is still a thing? Schools are opening! It’s just a b—tch session now?

Last summer at this time we were definitely opening in hybrid in the fall. We know how that turned out...

This sounds made up. Where/when did it say that hybrid was the go-to when school started. Where/when did APS make this promise? I'm genuinely not remembering it.

Here's the return to school update slide deck for 7/1/20: https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/arlington/Board.nsf/files/BR4GD8434376/$file/E-1%20Return%20to%20School%20Update%20070120.pdf

Two weeks later on 7/16/20 they announced an all-virtual start with a phased start of hybrid in October and November: https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/arlington/Board.nsf/files/BRKNHX600E6E/$file/D-1%20Return%20to%20School%20Status%20Update.pdf


That, of course, turned into full virtual until March.

Thank you. I’m a NP and so sick of all the APS apologists.

This is so funny to me! Y’all think there’s a conspiracy theory to keep the schools closed this fall? That this fall and last fall are the same at all? Really??

I'm betting that SR will start a delta variant campaign, at least for elementary, sometime soon. They aren't happy that APS is doing away with outdoor lunch. They're already unhappy that full DL is no longer school based. It's coming.

When did APS say they were doing away with outdoor lunch?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got back in town and am catching up...

SJH may be a troll but she called out that voucher DB. Love it.

APE is basically a bunch of whiners will continue to complain about *anything* they can. They provide zero value.

You could just report SJH's profile to Facebook. Sock profiles are not allowed.

She's not worth my time. I've already blocked whoever they are.

OK I started this thread and surprised it's still going. WHO is SJH though? Is she the lobbyist people bash on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now so many teachers are leaving and I don't blame them after being bashed all year by APE.

And this doesn't even affect many of the APE teacher bashers because they have since left for private school.

So thanks APE for leaving this mess for the rest of us who can't afford private. Thanks, thanks, thanks.

APS treated its teachers horribly this year with lacking or misleading information. The whiplash and constant reversals were infuriating. Let's place blame with those actually responsible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love the post on APE about Duran's shift in attitude towards learning loss.. what a buffoon

APE is still a thing? Schools are opening! It’s just a b—tch session now?

Last summer at this time we were definitely opening in hybrid in the fall. We know how that turned out...

This sounds made up. Where/when did it say that hybrid was the go-to when school started. Where/when did APS make this promise? I'm genuinely not remembering it.

Here's the return to school update slide deck for 7/1/20: https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/arlington/Board.nsf/files/BR4GD8434376/$file/E-1%20Return%20to%20School%20Update%20070120.pdf

Two weeks later on 7/16/20 they announced an all-virtual start with a phased start of hybrid in October and November: https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/arlington/Board.nsf/files/BRKNHX600E6E/$file/D-1%20Return%20to%20School%20Status%20Update.pdf


That, of course, turned into full virtual until March.

Thank you. I’m a NP and so sick of all the APS apologists.

This is so funny to me! Y’all think there’s a conspiracy theory to keep the schools closed this fall? That this fall and last fall are the same at all? Really??

I'm betting that SR will start a delta variant campaign, at least for elementary, sometime soon. They aren't happy that APS is doing away with outdoor lunch. They're already unhappy that full DL is no longer school based. It's coming.

When did APS say they were doing away with outdoor lunch?

There was an email in the spring from Duran. It was in the info graphic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got back in town and am catching up...

SJH may be a troll but she called out that voucher DB. Love it.

APE is basically a bunch of whiners will continue to complain about *anything* they can. They provide zero value.

You could just report SJH's profile to Facebook. Sock profiles are not allowed.

She's not worth my time. I've already blocked whoever they are.

OK I started this thread and surprised it's still going. WHO is SJH though? Is she the lobbyist people bash on?

SJH is a prolific poster on AEM. Some believe that SJH's account is a troll account and not the poster's real name. At times, SJH has stated they are a teacher. They are very vocal and not shy about vehemently disagreeing with people, especially Rs and APEs. Personally I agree with the substance of a decent amount (but not all) of their posts, but I think they can be too aggressive in their responses. They always seem to need to have the last word and their tone and approach can be very divisive. But they are not the lobbyist people bash on. There a few of those, most of whom are, IMO, deserving of whatever bashing they receive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got back in town and am catching up...

SJH may be a troll but she called out that voucher DB. Love it.

APE is basically a bunch of whiners will continue to complain about *anything* they can. They provide zero value.

You could just report SJH's profile to Facebook. Sock profiles are not allowed.

She's not worth my time. I've already blocked whoever they are.

OK I started this thread and surprised it's still going. WHO is SJH though? Is she the lobbyist people bash on?

SJH is a prolific poster on AEM. Some believe that SJH's account is a troll account and not the poster's real name. At times, SJH has stated they are a teacher. They are very vocal and not shy about vehemently disagreeing with people, especially Rs and APEs. Personally I agree with the substance of a decent amount (but not all) of their posts, but I think they can be too aggressive in their responses. They always seem to need to have the last word and their tone and approach can be very divisive. But they are not the lobbyist people bash on. There a few of those, most of whom are, IMO, deserving of whatever bashing they receive.

If SJH is a nom de plume, they are already smarter than the morons who try to start braindead nonsense under their actual name. So there's that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got back in town and am catching up...

SJH may be a troll but she called out that voucher DB. Love it.

APE is basically a bunch of whiners will continue to complain about *anything* they can. They provide zero value.

You could just report SJH's profile to Facebook. Sock profiles are not allowed.

She's not worth my time. I've already blocked whoever they are.

OK I started this thread and surprised it's still going. WHO is SJH though? Is she the lobbyist people bash on?

SJH is a prolific poster on AEM. Some believe that SJH's account is a troll account and not the poster's real name. At times, SJH has stated they are a teacher. They are very vocal and not shy about vehemently disagreeing with people, especially Rs and APEs. Personally I agree with the substance of a decent amount (but not all) of their posts, but I think they can be too aggressive in their responses. They always seem to need to have the last word and their tone and approach can be very divisive. But they are not the lobbyist people bash on. There a few of those, most of whom are, IMO, deserving of whatever bashing they receive.

If SJH is a nom de plume, they are already smarter than the morons who try to start braindead nonsense under their actual name. So there's that.

And this includes the teacher-blamer who is terrified of organized labor, the DB APE idiots, and now the incredibly stupid woman who's posting about how masks can be dangerous and citing known charlatans and their debunked studies. Real names they are using!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got back in town and am catching up...

SJH may be a troll but she called out that voucher DB. Love it.

APE is basically a bunch of whiners will continue to complain about *anything* they can. They provide zero value.

You could just report SJH's profile to Facebook. Sock profiles are not allowed.

She's not worth my time. I've already blocked whoever they are.

OK I started this thread and surprised it's still going. WHO is SJH though? Is she the lobbyist people bash on?

SJH is a prolific poster on AEM. Some believe that SJH's account is a troll account and not the poster's real name. At times, SJH has stated they are a teacher. They are very vocal and not shy about vehemently disagreeing with people, especially Rs and APEs. Personally I agree with the substance of a decent amount (but not all) of their posts, but I think they can be too aggressive in their responses. They always seem to need to have the last word and their tone and approach can be very divisive. But they are not the lobbyist people bash on. There a few of those, most of whom are, IMO, deserving of whatever bashing they receive.

If SJH is a nom de plume, they are already smarter than the morons who try to start braindead nonsense under their actual name. So there's that.

And this includes the teacher-blamer who is terrified of organized labor, the DB APE idiots, and now the incredibly stupid woman who's posting about how masks can be dangerous and citing known charlatans and their debunked studies. Real names they are using!

This part gets me every time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got back in town and am catching up...

SJH may be a troll but she called out that voucher DB. Love it.

APE is basically a bunch of whiners will continue to complain about *anything* they can. They provide zero value.

You could just report SJH's profile to Facebook. Sock profiles are not allowed.

She's not worth my time. I've already blocked whoever they are.

OK I started this thread and surprised it's still going. WHO is SJH though? Is she the lobbyist people bash on?

SJH is a prolific poster on AEM. Some believe that SJH's account is a troll account and not the poster's real name. At times, SJH has stated they are a teacher. They are very vocal and not shy about vehemently disagreeing with people, especially Rs and APEs. Personally I agree with the substance of a decent amount (but not all) of their posts, but I think they can be too aggressive in their responses. They always seem to need to have the last word and their tone and approach can be very divisive. But they are not the lobbyist people bash on. There a few of those, most of whom are, IMO, deserving of whatever bashing they receive.

If SJH is a nom de plume, they are already smarter than the morons who try to start braindead nonsense under their actual name. So there's that.

And this includes the teacher-blamer who is terrified of organized labor, the DB APE idiots, and now the incredibly stupid woman who's posting about how masks can be dangerous and citing known charlatans and their debunked studies. Real names they are using!

This part gets me every time.

Of notable interest, the APE “Board Members” took their names of their site. At one point, they had the schools they “represented”, then removed them, now there names are gone completely. Maybe they’re embarrassed? I would be!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the big question is will the APE DBs ever take form their dumb signs? The county should fine them.

Agreed.

I don’t see how the county could fine them without coming down on all signs, including Black Lives Matter and the “In this house” one. Be careful what you wish for.

Are there BLM signs in public medians today?

They are only supposed to be up for 7 days.
https://arlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/38/2019/10/ACZO.pdf (13.11.2 - page 318)

Looks like it's $100/sign + cost to remove them for the state roads.

Hope those APE MFers get fined.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just got back in town and am catching up...

SJH may be a troll but she called out that voucher DB. Love it.

APE is basically a bunch of whiners will continue to complain about *anything* they can. They provide zero value.

You could just report SJH's profile to Facebook. Sock profiles are not allowed.

She's not worth my time. I've already blocked whoever they are.

OK I started this thread and surprised it's still going. WHO is SJH though? Is she the lobbyist people bash on?

SJH is a prolific poster on AEM. Some believe that SJH's account is a troll account and not the poster's real name. At times, SJH has stated they are a teacher. They are very vocal and not shy about vehemently disagreeing with people, especially Rs and APEs. Personally I agree with the substance of a decent amount (but not all) of their posts, but I think they can be too aggressive in their responses. They always seem to need to have the last word and their tone and approach can be very divisive. But they are not the lobbyist people bash on. There a few of those, most of whom are, IMO, deserving of whatever bashing they receive.

If SJH is a nom de plume, they are already smarter than the morons who try to start braindead nonsense under their actual name. So there's that.

And this includes the teacher-blamer who is terrified of organized labor, the DB APE idiots, and now the incredibly stupid woman who's posting about how masks can be dangerous and citing known charlatans and their debunked studies. Real names they are using!

This part gets me every time.

+1

Don't scream irrationally using your real name for thousands of people (former friends) to see. That's what DCUM is for.