Zip. |
Disagree. Looking at recent pictures, Kate has outlasted Rose. |
Outlasted? Kate looks more haggard than her. They live less than a mile from each other and both have three kids. Kate’s also been looking pissed for no reason.
|
Yes! Totally agree! |
Kate does look tired here, but she's still intrinsically cuter than Rose. |
Could just be bitchy resting face from fatigue and age and thinness. |
Fatigue, age and thinness? She’s 37 and you’re posting like she’s a 68-year-old with osteoporosis. |
OMG, Meghan looks absolutely matronly here! |
1. She’s undeniably thin. 2. She’s had three children in under five years, one of whom is still an infant, and had difficult pregnancies with each. That’s a lot, even with help. 3. Mid to late 30s is normally the time when women’s faces lose their youthful fat. Check out the aging backwards thread in the beauty forum that contains many accounts of posters’ experiences with this. Listen, I think she’s beautiful. Doesn’t mean there won’t be photos that sometimes capture a harsher expression. She is human, after all. |
Congrats! You found an unflattering picture of Kate. You know this is not what she usually looks like. She is undeniably and classically beautiful. But as others have pointed out, that doesn't really matter when it comes to cheating does it? |
| Kate will be Queen Consort and the mother of the Prince of Wales someday and Meghan will only be a Duchess. Rose won’t even be a footnote. |
|
I’m sure that’s what they said about Diana, Camilla, and Sarah. Thirty years later Diana is still not Queen, also dead, and divorced. Also not a mother of a King. Camilla is the future Queen, alive and on the arm of the Prince of Wales. Sarah is a cheater and laughingstock but accepted by the Royals. |
| Yikes, I hope this does not mean that Dany will be just a footnote someday! |
Who? |