Rumors that Will cheated on Kate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this is true then look for Baby #4 announcement from the Cambridges.

Haha. Kate has already signalled that she would love to have #4. Possibly that was just laying the groundwork, but I think she is the reason there's a #3. I think she likes children.

Yup there’s def going to be an announcement this fall. I’d bet money on it!

[Anonymous]

Is it pronounced Jessa or Jekka?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it pronounced Jessa or Jekka?

Jekka.

I always thought that Isabella Calthorpe was the one that got away for Will. Jecca always seemed like a one-sided devotion from William, but not a real romance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this is true then look for Baby #4 announcement from the Cambridges.

Haha. Kate has already signalled that she would love to have #4. Possibly that was just laying the groundwork, but I think she is the reason there's a #3. I think she likes children.

Yup there’s def going to be an announcement this fall. I’d bet money on it!

Me too. The Queen had 4.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this is true then look for Baby #4 announcement from the Cambridges.

Haha. Kate has already signalled that she would love to have #4. Possibly that was just laying the groundwork, but I think she is the reason there's a #3. I think she likes children.

Yup there’s def going to be an announcement this fall. I’d bet money on it!

Me too. The Queen had 4.

I can't imagine her waiting for the fall unless she has trouble conceiving. Kate always announces as soon as possible and takes off as long as possible.

I say by Wimbledon.

[Anonymous]

I never thought they’d have more than 4. I would be very surprised...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I never thought they’d have more than 4. I would be very surprised...

Sorry. I mean more than 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If this is true then look for Baby #4 announcement from the Cambridges.

Haha. Kate has already signalled that she would love to have #4. Possibly that was just laying the groundwork, but I think she is the reason there's a #3. I think she likes children.

Yup there’s def going to be an announcement this fall. I’d bet money on it!

Me too. The Queen had 4.

I can't imagine her waiting for the fall unless she has trouble conceiving. Kate always announces as soon as possible and takes off as long as possible.

I say by Wimbledon.

lol

That pesky HG excuse. So lazy. /s

My cousin had it during her pregnancies. I'm so grateful that I didn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I never thought they’d have more than 4. I would be very surprised...

Why are you surprised? Did she ever say she was done?

[Anonymous]

I hope Kate has another girl!

[Anonymous]

Posting because the English Rose has become none other than Rose Cholmondeley. Although the British tabloids are still avoiding the story like their house will be fire-bombed overnight if they speak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:See, I'm thinking that it's not so much an affair, as much as its Rose moving up the social ladder getting too close to the top in social circles. There's a trend with Kate, and I think it caused the rift with MM too.

Maybe Rose wasn't in the outskirts, but maybe in their own small circle, all the "friends" were more excited for Rose to attend stuff and be friends with Rose than they were with Kate. So Kate gets jealous and wants to push Rose out (or down a few pegs) so she says, let's not socialize with them as much.

Unfortunately, people read "affair" into that and he were are.

I think Kate just wants to be the skinniest star andy's anyone that gets too close. She wants to dull a bit.

I suppose that could be it. I've never heard anyone say that about Kate, though. Jealous, yes (and who could blame her?). Petty, no.

Do you have anything else to support this?

I totally believe Kate was jealous of Meghan and the open affection/love shown by a admiring spouse.

I have never seen William, not even when they were dating and certainly not after children, join Kate on just a casual day and affectionately support her - much less accompany her for a maternity massage.

At this point, I'd kill for William and Kate to just be casually seen getting a coffee together. You'd think with affair rumors swirling, they'd make an effort to seem in love...



https://www.popsugar.com/celebrity/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-Wellness-Store-March-2019-45980230

On what planet to parents of three little kids go out to "casually get coffee"? You seem really detached from reality.

And you seem like you haven’t a date night in years - fix that.

Neither William nor Kate work or have full-time jobs. 2 of their 3 kids are in schoool full time, they have a nanny and a care team.

Not hard to pop out, hold hands and chill at a cafe. Kate has been seen more times in the park with all three kids than she has been seen with William outside of an engagement (which is never).

I'm feeling prescient these days. Look who popped up WITH his wife and his kids....for fun. Never seen a photo of William voluntarily (not an engagement, not a photo op) hanging around Kate and kids. He even looks like a dad *shocker* and Kate's wearing the Diana ring!

[Anonymous]

I'd believe it. The friend is into being sexy. Kate is the pretty preppy who follows rules and is becoming stuffy. Put more simply, the friend shows boobie and lets her hair loose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys act like you've never taken a picture in your life. I used to be a photographer. I would always be surprised at how the people I knew and photographed would come across in the pictures. Unhappy, miserable couples would look in love because I CHOSE the best photo that capture a split of a second when they looked at each other and smiled. When you have professional gear, you can literally capture milliseconds! And then you choose what you share. If my goal is to share happy and in love people, I'm sharing the pictures that could highlight that even if the couple spent the whole session bitching at each other. Photos are not an objective scale of anything.

Stop trying be realistic! Kate's Best Mom Friend and the Harry & Meghan are so in love poster don't like anything that disturbs the fantasies.

I love you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys act like you've never taken a picture in your life. I used to be a photographer. I would always be surprised at how the people I knew and photographed would come across in the pictures. Unhappy, miserable couples would look in love because I CHOSE the best photo that capture a split of a second when they looked at each other and smiled. When you have professional gear, you can literally capture milliseconds! And then you choose what you share. If my goal is to share happy and in love people, I'm sharing the pictures that could highlight that even if the couple spent the whole session bitching at each other. Photos are not an objective scale of anything.

Stop trying be realistic! Kate's Best Mom Friend and the Harry & Meghan are so in love poster don't like anything that disturbs the fantasies.

I love you.

Unhappy, miserable couples tend to just look...unhappy and miserable unless societal conventions forces them to pretend they love each other. You’ll start to notice couples without kids in the nest don’t care at all after a certain time - separate vacations, multiple lovers, married in name only.

The usual timeline breaks down when you marry a man with such a disbalance of power in the relationship publicly and privately that he doesn’t care.

I mean it’s that or your Prince needs to be checked that’s not Data from Star Trek.