Pitt Jolie custody

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Jen and Brad will reunite and start a family together. I like them as a couple.

I agree with this, but they seem to be doing a good job of co-parenting without being together, which is also admirable.

FYI Jen has no children, thus no co-parenting.

The PP who posted that didn't realize we were talking about Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston.

[Anonymous]

Apparently poor Angelina is having to survive without "meaningful" child support. Who knows how she possibly manages? She must be suffering in her Louboutins.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/07/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-child-support/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently poor Angelina is having to survive without "meaningful" child support. Who knows how she possibly manages? She must be suffering in her Louboutins.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/07/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-child-support/index.html

He’s not exactly destitute either. Just because the custodial parent is rich, does not mean that the other parent shouldn’t have to provide adequate support for their children. Her favoured show brand is moot - he should be paying for HIS children, that he chose to adopt or fathered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently poor Angelina is having to survive without "meaningful" child support. Who knows how she possibly manages? She must be suffering in her Louboutins.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/07/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-child-support/index.html

He’s not exactly destitute either. Just because the custodial parent is rich, does not mean that the other parent shouldn’t have to provide adequate support for their children. Her favoured show brand is moot - he should be paying for HIS children, that he chose to adopt or fathered.

He claims this is not true, that he's paid her millions for the kids. I guess we'll see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently poor Angelina is having to survive without "meaningful" child support. Who knows how she possibly manages? She must be suffering in her Louboutins.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/07/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-child-support/index.html

He’s not exactly destitute either. Just because the custodial parent is rich, does not mean that the other parent shouldn’t have to provide adequate support for their children. Her favoured show brand is moot - he should be paying for HIS children, that he chose to adopt or fathered.

He claims this is not true, that he's paid her millions for the kids. I guess we'll see.

I haven’t read the article, but with 6 children, and the length of the separation, “millions” (whatever that means) might actually be less than equitable.

[Anonymous]

I literally have zero fvcks left to give for these two.

I think it's trashy when celebs go back & forth over finances. It's not like one party was an A-lister and the other party was a D-lister. I'm sure their earnings are pretty equal. I absolutely think he needs to pay, but this media attention to it is trashy. Keep it behind closed doors like 99% of divorced couples do.

[Anonymous]

She also needs to allow the kids access to their father and not disparage him in front of them.

[Anonymous]

Of all the things to fight about, I did not imagine they would be fighting over child support. So petty considering their wealth.

[Anonymous]

Pitt says he has paid over $9 million for the kids. Angelina's not looking great in all of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pitt says he has paid over $9 million for the kids. Angelina's not looking great in all of this.

She's not looking great at all. She's looking looney.
I read something that said he loaned Angelina $8 million to buy a house, and has paid $1.3 in "expenses." That doesn't seem like that much in the scheme of things for six kids in a super-rich family, perhaps. But maybe she should think about what's in the kids' best interest and stop airing all this dirty laundry in public. Child support determinations are not made by a jury; we don't need to witness the mudslinging, and the kids have now -- and will always have -- the ability to read all this crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She also needs to allow the kids access to their father and not disparage him in front of them.

Those kids are too old for the blame to be placed solely on Jolie for him not seeing them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She also needs to allow the kids access to their father and not disparage him in front of them.

Those kids are too old for the blame to be placed solely on Jolie for him not seeing them.

What are you talking about? Only one is over 18 and shes proven herself to be insane, so I'm sure she puts all kinds of emotional blackmail on them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She also needs to allow the kids access to their father and not disparage him in front of them.

Those kids are too old for the blame to be placed solely on Jolie for him not seeing them.

What are you talking about? Only one is over 18 and shes proven herself to be insane, so I'm sure she puts all kinds of emotional blackmail on them.

None of the kids are over 18. But I do agree with your comment on her preventing them from seeing him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She also needs to allow the kids access to their father and not disparage him in front of them.

Those kids are too old for the blame to be placed solely on Jolie for him not seeing them.

What are you talking about? Only one is over 18 and shes proven herself to be insane, so I'm sure she puts all kinds of emotional blackmail on them.

None of the kids are over 18. But I do agree with your comment on her preventing them from seeing him.

I believe pp wa refering to Angelina as the only 1 over 18. She may be insane, but she’s not the one required to have supervised visits. Brad Pitt is not as innocent as he tries to come across.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She also needs to allow the kids access to their father and not disparage him in front of them.

Those kids are too old for the blame to be placed solely on Jolie for him not seeing them.

What are you talking about? Only one is over 18 and shes proven herself to be insane, so I'm sure she puts all kinds of emotional blackmail on them.

None of the kids are over 18. But I do agree with your comment on her preventing them from seeing him.

The oldest is not 18 but they have reportedly agreed that he gets a say in visitation with Pitt.