The cost difference in the report was less than the price of a new build elementary school. Not $1 billion. Albers used subjective language in the actual report signed on 9/30/23 and ratings were done on best to worst- blue, green, yellow for each criteria. GSA came up with a simplistic rating system. Greenbelt has wetlands, is a triangular site, and has over 1.5 acres less buildable land than Springfield. Both of those sites totaled 42 months to start time with fudged numbers on GSA Federal Govt relocating crap in warehouse or warehouses. So what's in that GSA warehouse in springfield? Well it does have used furniture. https://hallways.cap.gsa.gov/app/#/gateway/office-management/3180/gsa-has-free-used-furniture-your-office What besides that furniture type of stuff does GSA have or had in the warehouses? Back in 2014 GSA tried to remove the Springfield site from consideration because of the warehouses. |
Yes, her shenanigans have made Springfield the choice and they can get started on the project now. Should have started years ago but the process was halted by TFG's earlier shenanigans. |
| MD won though I heard VA filed to stop it. Will it have childcare on-site? |
| There's also the TSA HQ in Springfield. Why wouldn't you build the FBI HQ next to it? |
| So much hopium. Lol. |
What I'm hearing is that your neighborhood is NOT safe. Glad I don't live there. |
Have you been to Springfield? |
PG is also near a major airport. And the NSA. Metro, MARC trains, and affordable housing. |
| I'm interested in what the GSA IG discovers. |
|
Well whatever the decision, it needs to be done quickly. The current headquarter is a disaster waiting to happen.
https://federalnewsnetwork.com/federal-newscast/2023/12/as-plans-for-a-new-fbi-hq-chug-along-the-old-building-falls-apart/
They need netting to avoid chunks of the building falling off and hitting pedestrians (a federal lawsuit waiting to kick the government for a lot of money), they have parts of the building falling onto employee workspaces (a potential OSHA lawsuit waiting to cost the government lots of money), damaged to equipment from building collapse and water pipe bursts. And if parts of the building are falling on employee workspaces, what's to say that a section of floor under a cubicle farm doesn't collapse onto the floor below, causing more than just a few injuries or deaths? This is a deathtrap and they need to move. This is one of the major reasons Albert overrode the panel recommendation. She said explicitly that the Metro site was shovel ready and could be developed on a faster time frame than Springfield. |
This is incorrect. The site itself is rectangular. Only the proposed HQ complex is triangular. They can still change those plans. It's only an artist's rendition, not blueprints or plans. The green area is the site available. The proposed building is just an artists concept, not an actual plan.
|