Reply to Fairfax versus PG for new FBI Headquarters gets ugly

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Fairfax versus PG for new FBI Headquarters gets ugly"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The proximity of greenbelt to “main Justice” misses the point.  This will BE main Justice.

And the person who said it’s above Nina Albers pay grade is basically admitting the decision became political.  I mean that’s exactly the problem.  It should not have been political.  Procurement is not supposed to be political and that is why this stinks. [/quote]

Well, her decision saved the taxpayers $1B and three years of construction time relative to Springfield. So, yay for Nina? [/quote]

The cost difference in the report was less than the price of a new build elementary school. Not $1 billion.  Albers used subjective language in the actual report signed on 9/30/23 and ratings were done on best to worst- blue, green, yellow for each criteria.  GSA came up with a simplistic rating system.  Greenbelt has wetlands, is a triangular site, and  has over 1.5 acres less buildable land than Springfield.  Both of those sites totaled 42 months to start time with fudged numbers on GSA Federal Govt relocating crap in warehouse or warehouses.

So what's in that GSA warehouse in springfield?  Well it does have used furniture.  https://hallways.cap.gsa.gov/app/#/gateway/office-management/3180/gsa-has-free-used-furniture-your-office
What besides that furniture type of stuff does GSA have  or had in the warehouses?  Back in 2014 GSA tried to remove the Springfield site from consideration because of the warehouses.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics