Thomas Massie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone who nobody has ever heard of, declined 8 debates, and took $20 million in donations from Israel supporters “won” a primary from an 8 year constituent. They've created a model to remove anyone who gets in their way.

Not for long

Fox News and AI slop has completely taken over that age group. My grandmother cannot distinguish real images from AI, it’s frightening. On the flip side Gen Z is acutely aware that social media is loaded to the brim with propaganda.

Odd post above. Trump at Congressional picnic commenting on Massie's loss. We just learned of the loss last night. This was posted at 1 a.m. They had a picnic at 1 am?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone who nobody has ever heard of, declined 8 debates, and took $20 million in donations from Israel supporters “won” a primary from an 8 year constituent. They've created a model to remove anyone who gets in their way.

+1 no one knew anything about this guy but they voted for him because Fox, Trump and ads told them to. Sheep drowning in a sea of AI slop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone break down exactly why MAGA liked Gallrein better and booted out someone who wants justice for the Epstein victims? What is so wonderful about Gallrein-- is it just the Trump devotion that wins them over?

They played some clips of them on The Daily yesterday. These people think Trump knows best and has better knowledge than anyone else in the country. So anyone who defies him must be wrong. It’s not about Gallrein, it is just completely inexplicable devotion to Trump.

[Anonymous]

We need serious campaign finance reform.

If we’re serious about fixing American politics, the solution isn’t complicated, it’s affordability, transparency, and hard caps that apply to everyone. Here’s the model:

1. Cap all political donations at $25 per candidate, per cycle. (To be indexed to median income)
Not $3,300. Not $500.
Twenty‑five bucks: an amount the average American can actually afford.
If a candidate can’t build a movement on small donors, they shouldn’t be buying one with big ones.

2. Cap total political giving at $100 per person per cycle.
No more donor‑class loopholes where the billionaire class is dominating our politics.
Everyone gets the same $100 political voice, period.

3. Ban SuperPACs and dark‑money groups outright.
No 501(c)(4) “social welfare” fronts.
No shell LLCs.
No billionaire‑funded SuperPACs pretending to be “independent.”
If you want to influence elections, you do it with your own name and your own $25.

4. Allow one issue‑PAC donation per person, capped at $25.
People should still be able to support a cause, but not bankroll an entire ecosystem of influence groups.

5. Real‑time disclosure and felony‑level enforcement.
Every dollar reported within 24 hours.
No more $10 million fines that campaigns treat as rounding errors.
Intentional violations = criminal charges.
If money is power, then cheating with money is corruption.

Why this works and why it is needed:
It restores political equality by making every citizen’s donation worth the same.

It eliminates the donor class without eliminating free speech.

It shuts down dark‑money pipelines that have distorted elections for decades.

It forces candidates to campaign for people, not for checkbooks.

This is the simplest, fairest, and most enforceable way to rebuild trust in the system, and it’s built around a number every American can actually afford.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Massie voters cross lines a Democrat could actually win that seat.

Or you could just write in Massie in general election and actually win the seat.

[Anonymous]

Republicans have lost the forest for the trees and all of this putting up bad candidates for Trump’s retaliation will backfire in November. Bring it on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone who nobody has ever heard of, declined 8 debates, and took $20 million in donations from Israel supporters “won” a primary from an 8 year constituent. They've created a model to remove anyone who gets in their way.

Not for long

Fox News and AI slop has completely taken over that age group. My grandmother cannot distinguish real images from AI, it’s frightening. On the flip side Gen Z is acutely aware that social media is loaded to the brim with propaganda.

Odd post above. Trump at Congressional picnic commenting on Massie's loss. We just learned of the loss last night. This was posted at 1 a.m. They had a picnic at 1 am?

The exit poll data he posted at 1 am wasn’t available immediately. That’s why it’s in a later post quoting the earlier post with the picnic footage. The picnic footage video was from earlier in the day and copied directly from and credited to News Nation’s White House correspondent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We need serious campaign finance reform.

If we’re serious about fixing American politics, the solution isn’t complicated, it’s affordability, transparency, and hard caps that apply to everyone. Here’s the model:

1. Cap all political donations at $25 per candidate, per cycle. (To be indexed to median income)
Not $3,300. Not $500.
Twenty‑five bucks: an amount the average American can actually afford.
If a candidate can’t build a movement on small donors, they shouldn’t be buying one with big ones.

2. Cap total political giving at $100 per person per cycle.
No more donor‑class loopholes where the billionaire class is dominating our politics.
Everyone gets the same $100 political voice, period.

3. Ban SuperPACs and dark‑money groups outright.
No 501(c)(4) “social welfare” fronts.
No shell LLCs.
No billionaire‑funded SuperPACs pretending to be “independent.”
If you want to influence elections, you do it with your own name and your own $25.

4. Allow one issue‑PAC donation per person, capped at $25.
People should still be able to support a cause, but not bankroll an entire ecosystem of influence groups.

5. Real‑time disclosure and felony‑level enforcement.
Every dollar reported within 24 hours.
No more $10 million fines that campaigns treat as rounding errors.
Intentional violations = criminal charges.
If money is power, then cheating with money is corruption.

Why this works and why it is needed:
It restores political equality by making every citizen’s donation worth the same.

It eliminates the donor class without eliminating free speech.

It shuts down dark‑money pipelines that have distorted elections for decades.

It forces candidates to campaign for people, not for checkbooks.

This is the simplest, fairest, and most enforceable way to rebuild trust in the system, and it’s built around a number every American can actually afford.

This all sounds great until the Supreme Court strikes it down.

[Anonymous]

Just watched part of Massie’s concession speech and he is not going away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We need serious campaign finance reform.

If we’re serious about fixing American politics, the solution isn’t complicated, it’s affordability, transparency, and hard caps that apply to everyone. Here’s the model:

1. Cap all political donations at $25 per candidate, per cycle. (To be indexed to median income)
Not $3,300. Not $500.
Twenty‑five bucks: an amount the average American can actually afford.
If a candidate can’t build a movement on small donors, they shouldn’t be buying one with big ones.

2. Cap total political giving at $100 per person per cycle.
No more donor‑class loopholes where the billionaire class is dominating our politics.
Everyone gets the same $100 political voice, period.

3. Ban SuperPACs and dark‑money groups outright.
No 501(c)(4) “social welfare” fronts.
No shell LLCs.
No billionaire‑funded SuperPACs pretending to be “independent.”
If you want to influence elections, you do it with your own name and your own $25.

4. Allow one issue‑PAC donation per person, capped at $25.
People should still be able to support a cause, but not bankroll an entire ecosystem of influence groups.

5. Real‑time disclosure and felony‑level enforcement.
Every dollar reported within 24 hours.
No more $10 million fines that campaigns treat as rounding errors.
Intentional violations = criminal charges.
If money is power, then cheating with money is corruption.

Why this works and why it is needed:
It restores political equality by making every citizen’s donation worth the same.

It eliminates the donor class without eliminating free speech.

It shuts down dark‑money pipelines that have distorted elections for decades.

It forces candidates to campaign for people, not for checkbooks.

This is the simplest, fairest, and most enforceable way to rebuild trust in the system, and it’s built around a number every American can actually afford.

Please add no union donations --like the NEA and AFT

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thus proving the GOP is the pro-pedophile party.

x 1,000,000

"MAGA will rape your children."
--The Dem ads write themselves

Please go with that!!

[Anonymous]

Seemed like he was chasing clout given how inconsistent his views were on things like Epstein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need serious campaign finance reform.

If we’re serious about fixing American politics, the solution isn’t complicated, it’s affordability, transparency, and hard caps that apply to everyone. Here’s the model:

1. Cap all political donations at $25 per candidate, per cycle. (To be indexed to median income)
Not $3,300. Not $500.
Twenty‑five bucks: an amount the average American can actually afford.
If a candidate can’t build a movement on small donors, they shouldn’t be buying one with big ones.

2. Cap total political giving at $100 per person per cycle.
No more donor‑class loopholes where the billionaire class is dominating our politics.
Everyone gets the same $100 political voice, period.

3. Ban SuperPACs and dark‑money groups outright.
No 501(c)(4) “social welfare” fronts.
No shell LLCs.
No billionaire‑funded SuperPACs pretending to be “independent.”
If you want to influence elections, you do it with your own name and your own $25.

4. Allow one issue‑PAC donation per person, capped at $25.
People should still be able to support a cause, but not bankroll an entire ecosystem of influence groups.

5. Real‑time disclosure and felony‑level enforcement.
Every dollar reported within 24 hours.
No more $10 million fines that campaigns treat as rounding errors.
Intentional violations = criminal charges.
If money is power, then cheating with money is corruption.

Why this works and why it is needed:
It restores political equality by making every citizen’s donation worth the same.

It eliminates the donor class without eliminating free speech.

It shuts down dark‑money pipelines that have distorted elections for decades.

It forces candidates to campaign for people, not for checkbooks.

This is the simplest, fairest, and most enforceable way to rebuild trust in the system, and it’s built around a number every American can actually afford.

This all sounds great until the Supreme Court strikes it down.

It won't even get that far because the legislators who could implement your solution were mostly elected with dark money.

[Anonymous]

anyone who has a problem with Trump's pedo war is automatically a "radical Islamist." Massie, the Pope, Jesus Christ.

Pedos rule!

[Anonymous]

Shocking how a foreign country can spend 14 million in a US primary. This has to stop.