King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title

[Anonymous]

Andrew needs to be clapped into the Tower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should bug off to Thailand or Dubai or some place and just keep a low profile.

He could have all the underage girls he wanted there.

Was Guiffre underage? She was 17 and age of consent in UK is 16.

Andrew was tried in NY. They were photographed together in the US.

There was no trial. He (or Charles) paid her to go away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is a sociopath.

He is indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve got to believe these two were paid off and signed an NDA in exchange for housing, protection, etc. And it was made clear to them this is the only way their daughters would keep their titles.

And I bet they have strict rules to follow in order to avoid anything happening to their girls’ titles.

Maybe but the optics of punishing his nieces for something his pervert brother did is pretty bad.

His obligation is broader than to his nieces, who are not important, productive public figures by any definition. Those women benefited from the Epstein money, and one of those snotty, stupid pigs also started a podcast about trafficking. It seems pretty likely the podcast was an attempt to shift SEO results over time from “York” and “sex trafficking” from Andrew’s obvious crimes to a do-nothing podcast.

To be grown, you need to keep the same energy for all the royals, beloved.

[Anonymous]

All the stories will come out now that the Crown isn’t suppressing them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All the stories will come out now that the Crown isn’t suppressing them.

The crown is still suppressing stories, there’s been lots of reporting about this. Starmer called for an investigation of ALL crown estate leases (which would include some of Charles’ and the Waleses’ homes) but a palace statement said Parliament shouldn’t be “distracted” from budget and policy issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course Andrew isn’t the only one but good to see them going down like dominoes.

Trump next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course Andrew isn’t the only one but good to see them going down like dominoes.

Trump next.

🎯

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve got to believe these two were paid off and signed an NDA in exchange for housing, protection, etc. And it was made clear to them this is the only way their daughters would keep their titles.

And I bet they have strict rules to follow in order to avoid anything happening to their girls’ titles.

Maybe but the optics of punishing his nieces for something his pervert brother did is pretty bad.

They can easily strip the girls of their titles down the road and spin it as streamlining the monarchy to a tight group in the spirit of simplicity, cost-cutting, etc.

And they can absolutely do this if Andrew and Fergie do anything outside of whatever rules they obviously agreed to in exchange for housing, security, etc.

I think the days of entitlement are over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve got to believe these two were paid off and signed an NDA in exchange for housing, protection, etc. And it was made clear to them this is the only way their daughters would keep their titles.

And I bet they have strict rules to follow in order to avoid anything happening to their girls’ titles.

Maybe but the optics of punishing his nieces for something his pervert brother did is pretty bad.

They can easily strip the girls of their titles down the road and spin it as streamlining the monarchy to a tight group in the spirit of simplicity, cost-cutting, etc.

And they can absolutely do this if Andrew and Fergie do anything outside of whatever rules they obviously agreed to in exchange for housing, security, etc.

I think the days of entitlement are over.

I highly doubt Beatrice and Eugenie would ever be stripped of their titles barring similar behavior. They are blood princesses and have represented the crown well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He looks way older than 65.

Oh FFS. No.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you think this will affect how King treats Trump now?

The King must treat Trump with respect as any head of state. Why would he do any differently?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think this will affect how King treats Trump now?

The King must treat Trump with respect as any head of state. Why would he do any differently?

Somehow I don't think Charles will have a lot of interaction with Trump for the rest of Trump's term. Trump has invited Charles to the 4th of July celebrations next year, but Charles would be insane to attend. Plus, Charles is still undergoing weekly cancer treatment, so there's his excuse.

[Anonymous]

The royal family is gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you think this will affect how King treats Trump now?

The King must treat Trump with respect as any head of state. Why would he do any differently?

Because trump is just as guilty as Andrew? If not more so? And Melania?