King Charles strips Andrew’s prince title

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

If Andrew had sex with a girl that was shipped to London then yes, that's illegal. But the original comment was about young women lining up outside the palace, which as long as they were 16, was not illegal. Very unlikely too as the RF don't actually live there.

This is incorrect. The RF did live in Buckingham Palace.

They live in many places. Hard to imagine though that young girls were lining up outside the palace for Andy to let them in. Where were they lining up, on the roads around the palace or did they climb over the gates and stand by the back door while the police and guards watched them? The British aren't that lenient with the RF. There would have been a huge outcry from the media if any of this was true.

Well the media is only now reporting that when he was foreign convoy he was getting 40 Thai prostitutes delivered to his 5 star hotel room over 4 days. That was when he was 41 and he's now 65.

A lot of things happen that plenty of people can verify .They are not only verified when they are printed in newspapers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should bug off to Thailand or Dubai or some place and just keep a low profile.

Just shut up. No, he shouldn’t travel to where he can rape kids. Yes, he’s a pedophile.

No more essays about how 16 is ok, please, guys. Do none of you have ethics, compassion, or daughters?

100%. Plus, Virginia was trafficked to Andrew, and Andrew knew Epstein ran a trafficking operation. Virginia wrote a whole book about how this destroyed her life. So whoever is defending sex with young teens can bog off themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

If Andrew had sex with a girl that was shipped to London then yes, that's illegal. But the original comment was about young women lining up outside the palace, which as long as they were 16, was not illegal. Very unlikely too as the RF don't actually live there.

This is incorrect. The RF did live in Buckingham Palace.

They live in many places. Hard to imagine though that young girls were lining up outside the palace for Andy to let them in. Where were they lining up, on the roads around the palace or did they climb over the gates and stand by the back door while the police and guards watched them? The British aren't that lenient with the RF. There would have been a huge outcry from the media if any of this was true.

Oh for God’s sake, stop defending this pervert. Former palace security guy explains how Andrew had frequent women visitors and security was required to make an exception to all their rules and let these women in without knowing their names or doing checks: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2j1ZcGKoJcU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should bug off to Thailand or Dubai or some place and just keep a low profile.

Just shut up. No, he shouldn’t travel to where he can rape kids. Yes, he’s a pedophile.

No more essays about how 16 is ok, please, guys. Do none of you have ethics, compassion, or daughters?

Andrew and Fergie aren’t the only ones involved with Epstein. Epstein was a gross, disgusting pedo but he was also a guy who knew lots of other powerful and influential people and used his access to set honey traps for powerful, gross men. He sex trafficked young women to powerful men so he had leverage over them. All of these men don’t want the Epstein files released. I’m sure Andrew agreed to go along and will keep quiet IF he gets $$$ and a place to live for himself and Sarah.

You have no point. We can all agree Andrew was not the only one. But Charles has direct concern and power over Andrew’s status… so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve got to believe these two were paid off and signed an NDA in exchange for housing, protection, etc. And it was made clear to them this is the only way their daughters would keep their titles.

And I bet they have strict rules to follow in order to avoid anything happening to their girls’ titles.

Maybe but the optics of punishing his nieces for something his pervert brother did is pretty bad.

They can easily strip the girls of their titles down the road and spin it as streamlining the monarchy to a tight group in the spirit of simplicity, cost-cutting, etc.

And they can absolutely do this if Andrew and Fergie do anything outside of whatever rules they obviously agreed to in exchange for housing, security, etc.

I think the days of entitlement are over.

[Anonymous]

Do you think this will affect how King treats Trump now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He looks way older than 65.

Oh FFS. No.

[Anonymous]

Of course Andrew isn’t the only one but good to see them going down like dominoes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

If Andrew had sex with a girl that was shipped to London then yes, that's illegal. But the original comment was about young women lining up outside the palace, which as long as they were 16, was not illegal. Very unlikely too as the RF don't actually live there.

This is incorrect. The RF did live in Buckingham Palace.

They live in many places. Hard to imagine though that young girls were lining up outside the palace for Andy to let them in. Where were they lining up, on the roads around the palace or did they climb over the gates and stand by the back door while the police and guards watched them? The British aren't that lenient with the RF. There would have been a huge outcry from the media if any of this was true.

Oh for God’s sake, stop defending this pervert. Former palace security guy explains how Andrew had frequent women visitors and security was required to make an exception to all their rules and let these women in without knowing their names or doing checks: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2j1ZcGKoJcU

I'm not defending Andrew at all. To be honest, I don't care about any of this or Andrew. If the allegations against him are ever proven in a court of law, then he deserves whatever gets thrown at him. I was merely pointing out that it was unlikely that there was a string of young women lining up at the palace to see Andrew. How many women could Andrew go through per night? I used to live in London. The few times I drove past the palace, I never saw young women "lined up around the palace".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

If Andrew had sex with a girl that was shipped to London then yes, that's illegal. But the original comment was about young women lining up outside the palace, which as long as they were 16, was not illegal. Very unlikely too as the RF don't actually live there.

This is incorrect. The RF did live in Buckingham Palace.

They live in many places. Hard to imagine though that young girls were lining up outside the palace for Andy to let them in. Where were they lining up, on the roads around the palace or did they climb over the gates and stand by the back door while the police and guards watched them? The British aren't that lenient with the RF. There would have been a huge outcry from the media if any of this was true.

Well the media is only now reporting that when he was foreign convoy he was getting 40 Thai prostitutes delivered to his 5 star hotel room over 4 days. That was when he was 41 and he's now 65.

A lot of things happen that plenty of people can verify .They are not only verified when they are printed in newspapers.

It must have been fun being his Control Officer. All I ever got to do was airport pick ups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was an 18 yr old in London I met a 28 yr old American model (very beautiful, like Andie Macdowell) who told me that for YEARS Prince A had young women lining up outside the palace, waiting to be let in. By him.

In the UK, the age of consent is 16. So as long as the young women were of that age, then Andrew was not breaking any laws.

He had sex with a girl he knew was trafficked, which is illegal. Apparently Epstein had a look-book, and Andrew ordered up a girl--Virginia--to be shipped to London.

If Andrew had sex with a girl that was shipped to London then yes, that's illegal. But the original comment was about young women lining up outside the palace, which as long as they were 16, was not illegal. Very unlikely too as the RF don't actually live there.

This is incorrect. The RF did live in Buckingham Palace.

They live in many places. Hard to imagine though that young girls were lining up outside the palace for Andy to let them in. Where were they lining up, on the roads around the palace or did they climb over the gates and stand by the back door while the police and guards watched them? The British aren't that lenient with the RF. There would have been a huge outcry from the media if any of this was true.

Oh for God’s sake, stop defending this pervert. Former palace security guy explains how Andrew had frequent women visitors and security was required to make an exception to all their rules and let these women in without knowing their names or doing checks: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2j1ZcGKoJcU

I'm not defending Andrew at all. To be honest, I don't care about any of this or Andrew. If the allegations against him are ever proven in a court of law, then he deserves whatever gets thrown at him. I was merely pointing out that it was unlikely that there was a string of young women lining up at the palace to see Andrew. How many women could Andrew go through per night? I used to live in London. The few times I drove past the palace, I never saw young women "lined up around the palace".

Stop trying to deflect by flogging the red herring about women lined up around the palace. The former palace security guard at the link above explains very clearly, if you bothered to listen, that Andrew's women were brought in by drivers and bypassed the security guards. Andrew's women visitors didn't even have to tell security officers their names, the cars didn't have to be cleared in, and Andrew shouted insults ("fatty!") from his window at any security guard who tried to stop them.

[Anonymous]

He is a sociopath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course Andrew isn’t the only one but good to see them going down like dominoes.

Yep. It would be great if Trump released the Epstein files like he promised during his campaign. But Andrew's what we have now, and Andrew hung around with Trump and Epstein at Mar al Lago: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/portrait-of-from-left-american-real-estate-developer-donald-news-photo/1192330903.

So maybe investigating Andrew could lead to Andrew dropping the dime on Trump and other famous men. In fact, some of Andrew's disgusting defenders here are probably scared of exactly that--Andrew dropping the dime on Trump.

[Anonymous]

He could be joined in jail by someone else. They will be finally reunited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course Andrew isn’t the only one but good to see them going down like dominoes.

A NY judge just unsealed hundreds of pages of JP Morgan suspicious activity reports about Epstein-related transactions. JP Morgan filed the SAR in 2019 when Trump was president, but nothing was done about it then. Guess Andrew's defenders here, who are worried about an investigation into Andrew being bad for Trump, can start sweating about this, too.