Shooting at Dallas ICE Facility

[Anonymous]

We're supposed to believe the shooter wrote "Anti-ICE" in pen on a bullet and then shot detainees but not ICE officers?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who is the DogRightGirl spreading lies?

No clue, but not a fan of the PP who keeps posting random tweets as sources. No wonder this country is in shambles.

Was someone posting the ridiculous Noem and Vance tweets?

As much as I dislike them both, there’s value in knowing what they say. Some rando on X? Not so much, and anyone who can’t discern between the two is part of the problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so immigrants were killed, probably people who had "papers" to be here and the officials standing before the cameras as simply lying and gaslighting.

Hey MAGA...THIS is gaslighting.

Papers like phony asylum cases set for 5+ years in the future that everyone No Shows for.

Meanwhile they get auto- asylum welfare, work permits, drivers licenses w no testing, take on a fake ID/ ID fraud, and remit most of their money back home to build new houses or to fund more illegal immigration?

Congress and Biden at least tried to address some of these issues in a bipartisan immigration bill last year. Trump told Republicans to tank it, so they did.

The bill would also end the practice of “catch and release.” If passed into law, the bill would allow migrants who come to the border through lawful ports of entry and families to enter the U.S. under federal supervision for 90 days while they complete asylum interviews. Those who pass would receive work permits as they await adjudication of their claims. Those who fail would be removed from the U.S. and repatriated to their home countries or to Mexico.

The bill would mandate detaining migrants who try to enter the U.S. outside of official ports of entry, pending any asylum claims. Those who fail would also be removed.

The bill allocates funding for repatriation flights up to 77 per day.

The bill also raises the “credible fear” standard during interviews for asylum claims, largely by front-loading consideration of whether migrants have disqualifying criminal histories, whether they lived safely in third countries before trying to cross into the U.S. and whether they could safely relocate within their own countries.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/new-immigration-asylum-reform-bill-released-senate-text-rcna136602

That’s why we need Single Issue bills, not 200 issue bills with horse trading and 800 pages of BS.

It was a GOP Senate bill that the Dem House and Dem White House agreed to support...until Trump tanked it.

And did you check out what else was in that bill?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what other actual attacks on ice are out there? i just googled and other than alot of suspect stuff from ice framing protests as attacks it looks like there was an attack in mexico not the us

Based on available public records, court documents, and news reports, the ten individuals charged in the July 4, 2025, shooting at the Prairieland Detention Facility appear to share left-wing political leanings, often aligned with anti-fascist (Antifa), anarchist, or progressive activism. This is evidenced by materials found at the scene (e.g., flyers reading "FIGHT ICE TERROR WITH CLASS WAR!" and "FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS," and a flag stating "RESIST FASCISM – FIGHT OLIGARCHY"), prior protest involvement, and associations with left-leaning causes. Some sources explicitly describe the group as part of a North Texas Antifa cell. No evidence of conservative or right-wing affiliations was found for any of them.

uMpoSSible !

aNtIfa DoEs nOT eXiSt !! (herp derp)

Antifa exists, it simply isn't an organization. You are deeply stupid.

It's not like any antifa groups have never been sued by the government for contributing to violence...

https://www.nlg.org/represented-by-nlg-central-va-attorneys-redneck-revolt-reaches-settlement-in-charlottesville-lawsuit/

Again, ANTIFA is not an organization. ANTIFA is an idea, that many different people and different groups support, including, at one time, the American military.

ANTIFA - AntiFascist

So if you are opposed to ANTIFA then...(fill in the blank)

Oh? Tell that to the victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what other actual attacks on ice are out there? i just googled and other than alot of suspect stuff from ice framing protests as attacks it looks like there was an attack in mexico not the us

Based on available public records, court documents, and news reports, the ten individuals charged in the July 4, 2025, shooting at the Prairieland Detention Facility appear to share left-wing political leanings, often aligned with anti-fascist (Antifa), anarchist, or progressive activism. This is evidenced by materials found at the scene (e.g., flyers reading "FIGHT ICE TERROR WITH CLASS WAR!" and "FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS," and a flag stating "RESIST FASCISM – FIGHT OLIGARCHY"), prior protest involvement, and associations with left-leaning causes. Some sources explicitly describe the group as part of a North Texas Antifa cell. No evidence of conservative or right-wing affiliations was found for any of them.

uMpoSSible !

aNtIfa DoEs nOT eXiSt !! (herp derp)

Antifa exists, it simply isn't an organization. You are deeply stupid.

It's not like any antifa groups have never been sued by the government for contributing to violence...

https://www.nlg.org/represented-by-nlg-central-va-attorneys-redneck-revolt-reaches-settlement-in-charlottesville-lawsuit/

Again, ANTIFA is not an organization. ANTIFA is an idea, that many different people and different groups support, including, at one time, the American military.

ANTIFA - AntiFascist

So if you are opposed to ANTIFA then...(fill in the blank)

Oh? Tell that to the victims.

You mean the German troops they killed 8 years ago?

[Anonymous]

*80

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so immigrants were killed, probably people who had "papers" to be here and the officials standing before the cameras as simply lying and gaslighting.

Hey MAGA...THIS is gaslighting.

Papers like phony asylum cases set for 5+ years in the future that everyone No Shows for.

Meanwhile they get auto- asylum welfare, work permits, drivers licenses w no testing, take on a fake ID/ ID fraud, and remit most of their money back home to build new houses or to fund more illegal immigration?

Congress and Biden at least tried to address some of these issues in a bipartisan immigration bill last year. Trump told Republicans to tank it, so they did.

The bill would also end the practice of “catch and release.” If passed into law, the bill would allow migrants who come to the border through lawful ports of entry and families to enter the U.S. under federal supervision for 90 days while they complete asylum interviews. Those who pass would receive work permits as they await adjudication of their claims. Those who fail would be removed from the U.S. and repatriated to their home countries or to Mexico.

The bill would mandate detaining migrants who try to enter the U.S. outside of official ports of entry, pending any asylum claims. Those who fail would also be removed.

The bill allocates funding for repatriation flights up to 77 per day.

The bill also raises the “credible fear” standard during interviews for asylum claims, largely by front-loading consideration of whether migrants have disqualifying criminal histories, whether they lived safely in third countries before trying to cross into the U.S. and whether they could safely relocate within their own countries.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/new-immigration-asylum-reform-bill-released-senate-text-rcna136602

That’s why we need Single Issue bills, not 200 issue bills with horse trading and 800 pages of BS.

It was a GOP Senate bill that the Dem House and Dem White House agreed to support...until Trump tanked it.

And did you check out what else was in that bill?

This site is for outrage porn. Not reason and logic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so immigrants were killed, probably people who had "papers" to be here and the officials standing before the cameras as simply lying and gaslighting.

Hey MAGA...THIS is gaslighting.

Papers like phony asylum cases set for 5+ years in the future that everyone No Shows for.

Meanwhile they get auto- asylum welfare, work permits, drivers licenses w no testing, take on a fake ID/ ID fraud, and remit most of their money back home to build new houses or to fund more illegal immigration?

The compliance for showing up for hearings was really high, actually.

And the GOP shot down the bill that would have authorized and funded hundreds of new administrative judges to hear the immigration cases more quickly. In fact, trump has fired over 100 of them this year...why?

Cite the last 20 years of data on that PP. Even Pew and Brookings aren’t pretending that’s true.

Data from academic and human rights organizations show that asylum seekers in the US have a high court appearance rate, with studies indicating that well over 80% of asylum seekers attend their hearings
. Compliance rates are significantly higher for those with legal representation, often exceeding 95%. Official government numbers sometimes inflate "no-show" figures because of flawed reporting methods, such as counting only completed cases rather than all pending hearings.
Overall attendance rate

Over 80%: A multi-year study by the American Immigration Council found that 83% of non-detained immigrants with pending or completed removal cases appeared for all of their court hearings between fiscal years 2008 and 2018.
Over 90% for asylum applicants: Another analysis by the American Immigration Council found that from 2001 to 2016, 92% of asylum-seeking families released from detention had attended all their required court hearings.

Impact of legal representation
Legal counsel is the most significant factor affecting compliance rates.

96% to 98% with legal counsel: Multiple analyses of government data reveal that non-detained immigrants with legal representation have court appearance rates of 96% or higher. For families and unaccompanied children with lawyers, compliance rates are nearly 98%.
.

“Cite” your source, which would also cite the data used and methodology applied.

Common sense stats 101

https://humanrightsfirst.org/library/fact-check-asylum-seekers-regularly-attend-immigration-court-hearings/

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/report/measuring-absentia-removal-immigration-court/

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/immigrants-appear-in-court/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/06/26/how-many-migrants-show-up-immigration-court-hearings/

Happy to cite. Maybe your common sense needs an adjustment?

Why are you only citing attendance of final court date amongst those who even showed up for annual court date?

Isn’t the real question who shows up whatsoever vs who doesn’t?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Antifa messages left behind by the violent, leftist, assassin:

https://www.newsmax.com/us/ice-shooting-dallas/2025/09/24/id/1227629/

LOL, this is such a load of crap. This makes at least 19 detainees who have died in ICE custody.

DP. I fact checked that number (have to fact check everything these days) and you are right.

https://www.npr.org/2025/09/23/nx-s1-5549411/ossoff-warnock-noem-immigration-detention-death

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what other actual attacks on ice are out there? i just googled and other than alot of suspect stuff from ice framing protests as attacks it looks like there was an attack in mexico not the us

Based on available public records, court documents, and news reports, the ten individuals charged in the July 4, 2025, shooting at the Prairieland Detention Facility appear to share left-wing political leanings, often aligned with anti-fascist (Antifa), anarchist, or progressive activism. This is evidenced by materials found at the scene (e.g., flyers reading "FIGHT ICE TERROR WITH CLASS WAR!" and "FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS," and a flag stating "RESIST FASCISM – FIGHT OLIGARCHY"), prior protest involvement, and associations with left-leaning causes. Some sources explicitly describe the group as part of a North Texas Antifa cell. No evidence of conservative or right-wing affiliations was found for any of them.

uMpoSSible !

aNtIfa DoEs nOT eXiSt !! (herp derp)

Antifa exists, it simply isn't an organization. You are deeply stupid.

It's not like any antifa groups have never been sued by the government for contributing to violence...

https://www.nlg.org/represented-by-nlg-central-va-attorneys-redneck-revolt-reaches-settlement-in-charlottesville-lawsuit/

Again, ANTIFA is not an organization. ANTIFA is an idea, that many different people and different groups support, including, at one time, the American military.

ANTIFA - AntiFascist

So if you are opposed to ANTIFA then...(fill in the blank)

Antifa calls anything that isn't anarchist or communist, fascist.

It's a word game so that they're always the good guys. It's no different than calling themselves the good guys club and anyone who isn't in the good guy club is a bad guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what other actual attacks on ice are out there? i just googled and other than alot of suspect stuff from ice framing protests as attacks it looks like there was an attack in mexico not the us

Based on available public records, court documents, and news reports, the ten individuals charged in the July 4, 2025, shooting at the Prairieland Detention Facility appear to share left-wing political leanings, often aligned with anti-fascist (Antifa), anarchist, or progressive activism. This is evidenced by materials found at the scene (e.g., flyers reading "FIGHT ICE TERROR WITH CLASS WAR!" and "FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS," and a flag stating "RESIST FASCISM – FIGHT OLIGARCHY"), prior protest involvement, and associations with left-leaning causes. Some sources explicitly describe the group as part of a North Texas Antifa cell. No evidence of conservative or right-wing affiliations was found for any of them.

uMpoSSible !

aNtIfa DoEs nOT eXiSt !! (herp derp)

Antifa exists, it simply isn't an organization. You are deeply stupid.

It's not like any antifa groups have never been sued by the government for contributing to violence...

https://www.nlg.org/represented-by-nlg-central-va-attorneys-redneck-revolt-reaches-settlement-in-charlottesville-lawsuit/

Again, ANTIFA is not an organization. ANTIFA is an idea, that many different people and different groups support, including, at one time, the American military.

ANTIFA - AntiFascist

So if you are opposed to ANTIFA then...(fill in the blank)

Antifa calls anything that isn't anarchist or communist, fascist.

It's a word game so that they're always the good guys. It's no different than calling themselves the good guys club and anyone who isn't in the good guy club is a bad guy.

It shouldn’t be controversial to oppose fascism. It’s not word play to say opposing fascism is a good stance to take.

[Anonymous]

When they said the bullets had Anti ICE on them, I assumed that it was something like "F*ck ICE" not *literally* Anti-ICE.

I mean, let's be reality here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When they said the bullets had Anti ICE on them, I assumed that it was something like "F*ck ICE" not *literally* Anti-ICE.

I mean, let's be reality here.

I don't know anything about guns or ammo. How common and easy is it to engage or write messages on bullets? Why is this a trend all of a sudden? Seems odd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what other actual attacks on ice are out there? i just googled and other than alot of suspect stuff from ice framing protests as attacks it looks like there was an attack in mexico not the us

Based on available public records, court documents, and news reports, the ten individuals charged in the July 4, 2025, shooting at the Prairieland Detention Facility appear to share left-wing political leanings, often aligned with anti-fascist (Antifa), anarchist, or progressive activism. This is evidenced by materials found at the scene (e.g., flyers reading "FIGHT ICE TERROR WITH CLASS WAR!" and "FREE ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS," and a flag stating "RESIST FASCISM – FIGHT OLIGARCHY"), prior protest involvement, and associations with left-leaning causes. Some sources explicitly describe the group as part of a North Texas Antifa cell. No evidence of conservative or right-wing affiliations was found for any of them.

uMpoSSible !

aNtIfa DoEs nOT eXiSt !! (herp derp)

Antifa exists, it simply isn't an organization. You are deeply stupid.

It's not like any antifa groups have never been sued by the government for contributing to violence...

https://www.nlg.org/represented-by-nlg-central-va-attorneys-redneck-revolt-reaches-settlement-in-charlottesville-lawsuit/

Again, ANTIFA is not an organization. ANTIFA is an idea, that many different people and different groups support, including, at one time, the American military.

ANTIFA - AntiFascist

So if you are opposed to ANTIFA then...(fill in the blank)

Antifa calls anything that isn't anarchist or communist, fascist.

It's a word game so that they're always the good guys. It's no different than calling themselves the good guys club and anyone who isn't in the good guy club is a bad guy.

That's what your grandpa was calling the allies in WWII?