If you are a US born citizen and a working member of the upper middle class

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yikes, seems like a touched a nerve! I’m not ageist, sexist, or MAGA. And I’m not saying there were no swing voters there. I’m just saying that on average, these protests w older and whiter than most and had more present and former federal bureaucrats than most. And that these post-election protests were less impressive to swing voters and flyover state voters than a real Democratic primary , a good Democratic candidate, and a popular Democratic policy platform would have been.

Oh, honey. You are MAGA, you just might be wrapped in Jill Stein clothing. Look at all those RW talking points you hit.

Exactly. Still spinning a false narrative about the turnout too.

Lol. Why call something a false narrative when you could take two seconds to look on wikipedia and see that it’s a true narrative. If you talk like a know it all, accusing people of lying, you really shouldn’t substitute your feelings for easily available facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yikes, seems like a touched a nerve! I’m not ageist, sexist, or MAGA. And I’m not saying there were no swing voters there. I’m just saying that on average, these protests w older and whiter than most and had more present and former federal bureaucrats than most. And that these post-election protests were less impressive to swing voters and flyover state voters than a real Democratic primary , a good Democratic candidate, and a popular Democratic policy platform would have been.

Oh, honey. You are MAGA, you just might be wrapped in Jill Stein clothing. Look at all those RW talking points you hit.

Exactly. Still spinning a false narrative about the turnout too.

Lol. Why call something a false narrative when you could take two seconds to look on wikipedia and see that it’s a true narrative. If you talk like a know it all, accusing people of lying, you really shouldn’t substitute your feelings for easily available facts.

Show me the Wikipedia page that says the 3-5m people who came out on 4/5 in every state in the US were white, elderly, federal workers, which in an of itself is impossible since the elderly are largely retired. Oh wait, on rereading, you said there were no protests in flyover states…

You have so much potential. To waste it trolling is a shame. Get some sunshine today. ((Hugs))

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden, Trump, and Harris all got vastly more votes than any Clinton, Obama, or Bush ever did.

Well that's obviously because Clinton, Obama, and Bush were unfit, elderly, weak POTUSs.

Trump and Biden are clearly God's gift to America. Their gracefulness, intelligence and selflessness are unmatched in American history. I'd take Trump and Biden over Lincoln, FDR, or GW any day!!! Talk about great orators and just fantastic overall leaders- Trump and Biden.

Just go on youtube and watch the amazing POTUS debates between the great Trump and Biden and then compare those to past debates with those lame awful presidents from a few decades ago and you'll quickly see how amazing T & B are compared to the clowns we used to call POTUS.

lol... lord have mercy I do reckon. Bless our hearts.

[Anonymous]

People, people. We all agree that Trump is bad and Democrats are good. But that doesn’t mean we’re in good shape right now. We shouldn’t get angry at facts. A few facts:
1) Voter turnout was not a problem for Biden and Harris. In 2020, the number of votes cast exceeded 95% of the number of registered voters. Crazy but true. Turnout is not a problem. (Although voter registration might be.)
2) Almost every Demographic shifted away from Democrats and toward Republicans in 2024.
3) The recent protests were, on average, older and whiter than most protests
4) Most Americans oppose illegal immigration, support deportations, and prefer Republican policies on immigration.
5) Most Americans support bans on biological males in girls’ locker rooms, and prefer Republican policies on this issue
6) According to Democratic pollster David Shor, in 2024, most voters trusted Republicans more than Democrats on most of the issues voters considered important. Notably, the extended Covid response under Biden completely erased Democrats’ previous trust advantage on education and health care.

None of these points are wrong or debatable. These are the givens. The question is, what should we do given the situation we’re in? Do we want to keep standing on certain unpopular principles even if it hurts us in elections? Do we want to adopt new policies more popular with voters? Should we focus on short term anti-Trumpism or long term election planning? Do we have any good candidates for 2028? Etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People, people. We all agree that Trump is bad and Democrats are good. But that doesn’t mean we’re in good shape right now. We shouldn’t get angry at facts. A few facts:
1) Voter turnout was not a problem for Biden and Harris. In 2020, the number of votes cast exceeded 95% of the number of registered voters. Crazy but true. Turnout is not a problem. (Although voter registration might be.)
2) Almost every Demographic shifted away from Democrats and toward Republicans in 2024.
3) The recent protests were, on average, older and whiter than most protests
4) Most Americans oppose illegal immigration, support deportations, and prefer Republican policies on immigration.
5) Most Americans support bans on biological males in girls’ locker rooms, and prefer Republican policies on this issue
6) According to Democratic pollster David Shor, in 2024, most voters trusted Republicans more than Democrats on most of the issues voters considered important. Notably, the extended Covid response under Biden completely erased Democrats’ previous trust advantage on education and health care.

None of these points are wrong or debatable. These are the givens. The question is, what should we do given the situation we’re in? Do we want to keep standing on certain unpopular principles even if it hurts us in elections? Do we want to adopt new policies more popular with voters? Should we focus on short term anti-Trumpism or long term election planning? Do we have any good candidates for 2028? Etc

I don’t have the time, this is so laughable!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yikes, seems like a touched a nerve! I’m not ageist, sexist, or MAGA. And I’m not saying there were no swing voters there. I’m just saying that on average, these protests w older and whiter than most and had more present and former federal bureaucrats than most. And that these post-election protests were less impressive to swing voters and flyover state voters than a real Democratic primary , a good Democratic candidate, and a popular Democratic policy platform would have been.

Oh, honey. You are MAGA, you just might be wrapped in Jill Stein clothing. Look at all those RW talking points you hit.

Look, by all left-wing logic Trump should have been kicked to the curb 60-40 or worse. He wasn't.
He was barely elected in 2016, and made an absolute hash of his first term.

What was the reason he won his second term?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People, people. We all agree that Trump is bad and Democrats are good. But that doesn’t mean we’re in good shape right now. We shouldn’t get angry at facts. A few facts:
1) Voter turnout was not a problem for Biden and Harris. In 2020, the number of votes cast exceeded 95% of the number of registered voters. Crazy but true. Turnout is not a problem. (Although voter registration might be.)
2) Almost every Demographic shifted away from Democrats and toward Republicans in 2024.
3) The recent protests were, on average, older and whiter than most protests
4) Most Americans oppose illegal immigration, support deportations, and prefer Republican policies on immigration.
5) Most Americans support bans on biological males in girls’ locker rooms, and prefer Republican policies on this issue
6) According to Democratic pollster David Shor, in 2024, most voters trusted Republicans more than Democrats on most of the issues voters considered important. Notably, the extended Covid response under Biden completely erased Democrats’ previous trust advantage on education and health care.

None of these points are wrong or debatable. These are the givens. The question is, what should we do given the situation we’re in? Do we want to keep standing on certain unpopular principles even if it hurts us in elections? Do we want to adopt new policies more popular with voters? Should we focus on short term anti-Trumpism or long term election planning? Do we have any good candidates for 2028? Etc

You could save much time and energy by just saying "hey guys & gals, let's never again be duped into another Biden situation so that we never again have to worry about losing to an awful Trump era opposition candidate". Dems don't currently have a problem. We HAD a Biden problem. Move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I saw a good sign that said “Childless cat lady seeks President with brain”. Pretty funny. But it did make me wonder why childless cat ladies are so likely to be Democrats. What causes that?

Many Urban areas are essentially childless zones. It's a horrible place to raise a kid (everything is great if you have money though). Many dinks too. Don't forget the LGTBQ. It's annoying because all of these non-parental people get to vote for the school boards and what not. Move to the burbs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yikes, seems like a touched a nerve! I’m not ageist, sexist, or MAGA. And I’m not saying there were no swing voters there. I’m just saying that on average, these protests w older and whiter than most and had more present and former federal bureaucrats than most. And that these post-election protests were less impressive to swing voters and flyover state voters than a real Democratic primary , a good Democratic candidate, and a popular Democratic policy platform would have been.

Oh, honey. You are MAGA, you just might be wrapped in Jill Stein clothing. Look at all those RW talking points you hit.

Look, by all left-wing logic Trump should have been kicked to the curb 60-40 or worse. He wasn't.
He was barely elected in 2016, and made an absolute hash of his first term.

What was the reason he won his second term?

Were you alive and paying attention last year? Trump's opponent in the 2024 election collapsed just 3 months before Election Day. Donald Duck could have been the 2024 GOP nominee and the GOP still would have been victorious. We'd probably be better off if Donald Duck was the 2024 GOP nominee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a good sign that said “Childless cat lady seeks President with brain”. Pretty funny. But it did make me wonder why childless cat ladies are so likely to be Democrats. What causes that?

Many Urban areas are essentially childless zones. It's a horrible place to raise a kid (everything is great if you have money though). Many dinks too. Don't forget the LGTBQ. It's annoying because all of these non-parental people get to vote for the school boards and what not. Move to the burbs.

Many urban areas are childless because women are ugly there and men have erectile dysfunction; the rest are LGTBQ....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a good sign that said “Childless cat lady seeks President with brain”. Pretty funny. But it did make me wonder why childless cat ladies are so likely to be Democrats. What causes that?

Many Urban areas are essentially childless zones. It's a horrible place to raise a kid (everything is great if you have money though). Many dinks too. Don't forget the LGTBQ. It's annoying because all of these non-parental people get to vote for the school boards and what not. Move to the burbs.

Many urban areas are childless because women are ugly there and men have erectile dysfunction; the rest are LGTBQ....

Do you think we didn’t grow up in rural areas or never drive through them?

I grew up in MAGA land and everyone looks unhealthy and frumpy. Most people are overweight and dress terribly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a good sign that said “Childless cat lady seeks President with brain”. Pretty funny. But it did make me wonder why childless cat ladies are so likely to be Democrats. What causes that?

Many Urban areas are essentially childless zones. It's a horrible place to raise a kid (everything is great if you have money though). Many dinks too. Don't forget the LGTBQ. It's annoying because all of these non-parental people get to vote for the school boards and what not. Move to the burbs.

Many urban areas are childless because women are ugly there and men have erectile dysfunction; the rest are LGTBQ....

Oh look, the banjo kid from Deliverance has some opinions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a good sign that said “Childless cat lady seeks President with brain”. Pretty funny. But it did make me wonder why childless cat ladies are so likely to be Democrats. What causes that?

Many Urban areas are essentially childless zones. It's a horrible place to raise a kid (everything is great if you have money though). Many dinks too. Don't forget the LGTBQ. It's annoying because all of these non-parental people get to vote for the school boards and what not. Move to the burbs.

Many urban areas are childless because women are ugly there and men have erectile dysfunction; the rest are LGTBQ....

Do you think we didn’t grow up in rural areas or never drive through them?

I grew up in MAGA land and everyone looks unhealthy and frumpy. Most people are overweight and dress terribly.

And nevertheless, somehow you were conceived.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw a good sign that said “Childless cat lady seeks President with brain”. Pretty funny. But it did make me wonder why childless cat ladies are so likely to be Democrats. What causes that?

Many Urban areas are essentially childless zones. It's a horrible place to raise a kid (everything is great if you have money though). Many dinks too. Don't forget the LGTBQ. It's annoying because all of these non-parental people get to vote for the school boards and what not. Move to the burbs.

Many urban areas are childless because women are ugly there and men have erectile dysfunction; the rest are LGTBQ....

Oh look, the banjo kid from Deliverance has some opinions.

Dude, it's fine to tease MTG a little but we're not supposed to talk about her special cousin like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because this administration has shown they are willing to break laws and deny due process to get revenge on people they decide are a problem. I am not interested in ending up on some list. I might already end up on one due to my line of work. No need to tempt fate. I have children at home who need me to be around. If they were grown I might be more fearless.

This.

Who wants to be in the crosshairs of Elon Musk et al? Ask the Maryland man who's enjoying the comforts of an El Salvador prison.

The fascists use facial recognition software, just as China does to surveil its citizens and suppress any dissent immediately.

That's the goal of this administration. Total control of all Americans.