Montgomery County BOE election results

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it will mean further craziness as the new BOE members will need to get up to speed. We already have a new Superintendent, so this means he just got three new bosses midway thru his first year.

Yes, and Yang and Rivera-Oven are pretty new and still getting up to speed too. Only Silvestre and Wolff will have been there more than 2 years.

Silvestere and Wolff need to go next.

+1

Would be glad to see Wolff leaving BOE.

I wonder if she'll decide not to seek reelection.

But but but they need a person of darker pigment skin color on the Board, aside from a SMOB.

Doesn't have to be Wolff. New candidates should think about running.

Right, anyone is fine as long as they're owned by MCEA. Just like the three new board members.

It's time for Brenda to go. I'd be glad to see a primary full of strong candidates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Montoya, Zimmerman and Stewart all won with comfortable margins.

Looks like the people have spoken. Evans, two-term incumbent, lost by a shocking 16 points.

How are we feeling about this shakeup?

This school board unanimously approved Monifa despite the teachers, principals telling them it was a bad move. Many of the incumbents on the ballot and members of the BOE approved of the disastrous regime of Jack Smith. You keep making terrible decisions and wrecking MCPS, you're going to be out. The fact that Evans and Harris were surprised they lost shows how far out of touch they really are. Good riddance and keep taking out the trash next election cycle. Got to get that robot Silvestre out.

A unanimous vote in support of McKnight doesn't mean anything but a united front to the public. Not everyone was a McKnight fan, but majority rules.

BOE members need to stop prioritizing that “united front” to the public. We did not ask for nor do we want it. It would have been helpful if BOE members voiced their disapproval or concerns about McKnight and her appointment had been debated and discussed in public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it will mean further craziness as the new BOE members will need to get up to speed. We already have a new Superintendent, so this means he just got three new bosses midway thru his first year.

Yes, and Yang and Rivera-Oven are pretty new and still getting up to speed too. Only Silvestre and Wolff will have been there more than 2 years.

Silvestere and Wolff need to go next.

+1

Would be glad to see Wolff leaving BOE.

I wonder if she'll decide not to seek reelection.

But but but they need a person of darker pigment skin color on the Board, aside from a SMOB.

Doesn't have to be Wolff. New candidates should think about running.

Right, anyone is fine as long as they're owned by MCEA. Just like the three new board members.

It's time for Brenda to go. I'd be glad to see a primary full of strong candidates.

Problem is how do you get a pipeline of strong candidates to sign up to run for a part-time job with full-time hours with garbage pay?

This is why we need a full-time BOE with an accompanying full-time salary to attract a higher quality and more diverse pool of candidates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it will mean further craziness as the new BOE members will need to get up to speed. We already have a new Superintendent, so this means he just got three new bosses midway thru his first year.

Yes, and Yang and Rivera-Oven are pretty new and still getting up to speed too. Only Silvestre and Wolff will have been there more than 2 years.

Silvestere and Wolff need to go next.

+1

Would be glad to see Wolff leaving BOE.

I wonder if she'll decide not to seek reelection.

But but but they need a person of darker pigment skin color on the Board, aside from a SMOB.

Doesn't have to be Wolff. New candidates should think about running.

Right, anyone is fine as long as they're owned by MCEA. Just like the three new board members.

It's time for Brenda to go. I'd be glad to see a primary full of strong candidates.

Problem is how do you get a pipeline of strong candidates to sign up to run for a part-time job with full-time hours with garbage pay?

This is why we need a full-time BOE with an accompanying full-time salary to attract a higher quality and more diverse pool of candidates.

Agree 100%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it will mean further craziness as the new BOE members will need to get up to speed. We already have a new Superintendent, so this means he just got three new bosses midway thru his first year.

Yes, and Yang and Rivera-Oven are pretty new and still getting up to speed too. Only Silvestre and Wolff will have been there more than 2 years.

Silvestere and Wolff need to go next.

+1

Would be glad to see Wolff leaving BOE.

I wonder if she'll decide not to seek reelection.

But but but they need a person of darker pigment skin color on the Board, aside from a SMOB.

Doesn't have to be Wolff. New candidates should think about running.

Right, anyone is fine as long as they're owned by MCEA. Just like the three new board members.

It's time for Brenda to go. I'd be glad to see a primary full of strong candidates.

More likely we'll see something like this year, where the new candidates are worse than the incumbents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it will mean further craziness as the new BOE members will need to get up to speed. We already have a new Superintendent, so this means he just got three new bosses midway thru his first year.

Yes, and Yang and Rivera-Oven are pretty new and still getting up to speed too. Only Silvestre and Wolff will have been there more than 2 years.

Silvestere and Wolff need to go next.

+1

Would be glad to see Wolff leaving BOE.

I wonder if she'll decide not to seek reelection.

But but but they need a person of darker pigment skin color on the Board, aside from a SMOB.

Doesn't have to be Wolff. New candidates should think about running.

Right, anyone is fine as long as they're owned by MCEA. Just like the three new board members.

It's time for Brenda to go. I'd be glad to see a primary full of strong candidates.

More likely we'll see something like this year, where the new candidates are worse than the incumbents.

I’m really not sure the new kids can be worse than the incumbents. The incumbents who were pushed out were really from the bottom of the barrel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it will mean further craziness as the new BOE members will need to get up to speed. We already have a new Superintendent, so this means he just got three new bosses midway thru his first year.

Yes, and Yang and Rivera-Oven are pretty new and still getting up to speed too. Only Silvestre and Wolff will have been there more than 2 years.

Silvestere and Wolff need to go next.

+1

Would be glad to see Wolff leaving BOE.

I wonder if she'll decide not to seek reelection.

But but but they need a person of darker pigment skin color on the Board, aside from a SMOB.

Doesn't have to be Wolff. New candidates should think about running.

Right, anyone is fine as long as they're owned by MCEA. Just like the three new board members.

It's time for Brenda to go. I'd be glad to see a primary full of strong candidates.

More likely we'll see something like this year, where the new candidates are worse than the incumbents.

I’m really not sure the new kids can be worse than the incumbents. The incumbents who were pushed out were really from the bottom of the barrel.

And replaced with the actual bottom of the barrel. I think history is likely to repeat itself. I don't see us getting better candidates next time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Montoya, Zimmerman and Stewart all won with comfortable margins.

Looks like the people have spoken. Evans, two-term incumbent, lost by a shocking 16 points.

How are we feeling about this shakeup?

This school board unanimously approved Monifa despite the teachers, principals telling them it was a bad move. Many of the incumbents on the ballot and members of the BOE approved of the disastrous regime of Jack Smith. You keep making terrible decisions and wrecking MCPS, you're going to be out. The fact that Evans and Harris were surprised they lost shows how far out of touch they really are. Good riddance and keep taking out the trash next election cycle. Got to get that robot Silvestre out.

A unanimous vote in support of McKnight doesn't mean anything but a united front to the public. Not everyone was a McKnight fan, but majority rules.

BOE members need to stop prioritizing that “united front” to the public. We did not ask for nor do we want it. It would have been helpful if BOE members voiced their disapproval or concerns about McKnight and her appointment had been debated and discussed in public.

PP here. I agree with you, but it is a tricky issue in a strong superintendent state. BOE members don't have much real power, except to hire and fire a superintendent. What's left is the soft power of advising.

It's clear to me that throughout McKnight's tenure as super (and even before that), most people who came into contact with her suffered greatly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it will mean further craziness as the new BOE members will need to get up to speed. We already have a new Superintendent, so this means he just got three new bosses midway thru his first year.

Yes, and Yang and Rivera-Oven are pretty new and still getting up to speed too. Only Silvestre and Wolff will have been there more than 2 years.

Silvestere and Wolff need to go next.

+1

Would be glad to see Wolff leaving BOE.

I wonder if she'll decide not to seek reelection.

But but but they need a person of darker pigment skin color on the Board, aside from a SMOB.

Doesn't have to be Wolff. New candidates should think about running.

Right, anyone is fine as long as they're owned by MCEA. Just like the three new board members.

It's time for Brenda to go. I'd be glad to see a primary full of strong candidates.

More likely we'll see something like this year, where the new candidates are worse than the incumbents.

I’m really not sure the new kids can be worse than the incumbents. The incumbents who were pushed out were really from the bottom of the barrel.

And replaced with the actual bottom of the barrel. I think history is likely to repeat itself. I don't see us getting better candidates next time.

This. I'm pretty far left but Stewart and Zimmerman are nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it will mean further craziness as the new BOE members will need to get up to speed. We already have a new Superintendent, so this means he just got three new bosses midway thru his first year.

Yes, and Yang and Rivera-Oven are pretty new and still getting up to speed too. Only Silvestre and Wolff will have been there more than 2 years.

Silvestere and Wolff need to go next.

+1

Would be glad to see Wolff leaving BOE.

I wonder if she'll decide not to seek reelection.

But but but they need a person of darker pigment skin color on the Board, aside from a SMOB.

Doesn't have to be Wolff. New candidates should think about running.

Right, anyone is fine as long as they're owned by MCEA. Just like the three new board members.

It's time for Brenda to go. I'd be glad to see a primary full of strong candidates.

More likely we'll see something like this year, where the new candidates are worse than the incumbents.

I’m really not sure the new kids can be worse than the incumbents. The incumbents who were pushed out were really from the bottom of the barrel.

And replaced with the actual bottom of the barrel. I think history is likely to repeat itself. I don't see us getting better candidates next time.

This. I'm pretty far left but Stewart and Zimmerman are nuts.

I think Montoya is the one who is nuts. We'll see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Montoya, Zimmerman and Stewart all won with comfortable margins.

Looks like the people have spoken. Evans, two-term incumbent, lost by a shocking 16 points.

How are we feeling about this shakeup?

This school board unanimously approved Monifa despite the teachers, principals telling them it was a bad move. Many of the incumbents on the ballot and members of the BOE approved of the disastrous regime of Jack Smith. You keep making terrible decisions and wrecking MCPS, you're going to be out. The fact that Evans and Harris were surprised they lost shows how far out of touch they really are. Good riddance and keep taking out the trash next election cycle. Got to get that robot Silvestre out.

A unanimous vote in support of McKnight doesn't mean anything but a united front to the public. Not everyone was a McKnight fan, but majority rules.

BOE members need to stop prioritizing that “united front” to the public. We did not ask for nor do we want it. It would have been helpful if BOE members voiced their disapproval or concerns about McKnight and her appointment had been debated and discussed in public.

PP here. I agree with you, but it is a tricky issue in a strong superintendent state. BOE members don't have much real power, except to hire and fire a superintendent. What's left is the soft power of advising.

It's clear to me that throughout McKnight's tenure as super (and even before that), most people who came into contact with her suffered greatly.

Taylor hides behind the board putting all responsibility on them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Montoya, Zimmerman and Stewart all won with comfortable margins.

Looks like the people have spoken. Evans, two-term incumbent, lost by a shocking 16 points.

How are we feeling about this shakeup?

This school board unanimously approved Monifa despite the teachers, principals telling them it was a bad move. Many of the incumbents on the ballot and members of the BOE approved of the disastrous regime of Jack Smith. You keep making terrible decisions and wrecking MCPS, you're going to be out. The fact that Evans and Harris were surprised they lost shows how far out of touch they really are. Good riddance and keep taking out the trash next election cycle. Got to get that robot Silvestre out.

A unanimous vote in support of McKnight doesn't mean anything but a united front to the public. Not everyone was a McKnight fan, but majority rules.

BOE members need to stop prioritizing that “united front” to the public. We did not ask for nor do we want it. It would have been helpful if BOE members voiced their disapproval or concerns about McKnight and her appointment had been debated and discussed in public.

PP here. I agree with you, but it is a tricky issue in a strong superintendent state. BOE members don't have much real power, except to hire and fire a superintendent. What's left is the soft power of advising.

It's clear to me that throughout McKnight's tenure as super (and even before that), most people who came into contact with her suffered greatly.

Taylor hides behind the board putting all responsibility on them.

The power the BOE has is to direct the Superintendent and when presented with info by CO, to directly question and put dates to when they want followup shared with them AND the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Montoya, Zimmerman and Stewart all won with comfortable margins.

Looks like the people have spoken. Evans, two-term incumbent, lost by a shocking 16 points.

How are we feeling about this shakeup?

This school board unanimously approved Monifa despite the teachers, principals telling them it was a bad move. Many of the incumbents on the ballot and members of the BOE approved of the disastrous regime of Jack Smith. You keep making terrible decisions and wrecking MCPS, you're going to be out. The fact that Evans and Harris were surprised they lost shows how far out of touch they really are. Good riddance and keep taking out the trash next election cycle. Got to get that robot Silvestre out.

A unanimous vote in support of McKnight doesn't mean anything but a united front to the public. Not everyone was a McKnight fan, but majority rules.

BOE members need to stop prioritizing that “united front” to the public. We did not ask for nor do we want it. It would have been helpful if BOE members voiced their disapproval or concerns about McKnight and her appointment had been debated and discussed in public.

PP here. I agree with you, but it is a tricky issue in a strong superintendent state. BOE members don't have much real power, except to hire and fire a superintendent. What's left is the soft power of advising.

It's clear to me that throughout McKnight's tenure as super (and even before that), most people who came into contact with her suffered greatly.

Taylor hides behind the board putting all responsibility on them.

If so, that would be a rookie move. Perhaps this school district is too big for him, given his prior professional experience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Montoya, Zimmerman and Stewart all won with comfortable margins.

Looks like the people have spoken. Evans, two-term incumbent, lost by a shocking 16 points.

How are we feeling about this shakeup?

This school board unanimously approved Monifa despite the teachers, principals telling them it was a bad move. Many of the incumbents on the ballot and members of the BOE approved of the disastrous regime of Jack Smith. You keep making terrible decisions and wrecking MCPS, you're going to be out. The fact that Evans and Harris were surprised they lost shows how far out of touch they really are. Good riddance and keep taking out the trash next election cycle. Got to get that robot Silvestre out.

A unanimous vote in support of McKnight doesn't mean anything but a united front to the public. Not everyone was a McKnight fan, but majority rules.

BOE members need to stop prioritizing that “united front” to the public. We did not ask for nor do we want it. It would have been helpful if BOE members voiced their disapproval or concerns about McKnight and her appointment had been debated and discussed in public.

PP here. I agree with you, but it is a tricky issue in a strong superintendent state. BOE members don't have much real power, except to hire and fire a superintendent. What's left is the soft power of advising.

It's clear to me that throughout McKnight's tenure as super (and even before that), most people who came into contact with her suffered greatly.

Taylor hides behind the board putting all responsibility on them.

The power the BOE has is to direct the Superintendent and when presented with info by CO, to directly question and put dates to when they want followup shared with them AND the public.

You assume that the BOE always gets information from the CO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Montoya, Zimmerman and Stewart all won with comfortable margins.

Looks like the people have spoken. Evans, two-term incumbent, lost by a shocking 16 points.

How are we feeling about this shakeup?

This school board unanimously approved Monifa despite the teachers, principals telling them it was a bad move. Many of the incumbents on the ballot and members of the BOE approved of the disastrous regime of Jack Smith. You keep making terrible decisions and wrecking MCPS, you're going to be out. The fact that Evans and Harris were surprised they lost shows how far out of touch they really are. Good riddance and keep taking out the trash next election cycle. Got to get that robot Silvestre out.

A unanimous vote in support of McKnight doesn't mean anything but a united front to the public. Not everyone was a McKnight fan, but majority rules.

BOE members need to stop prioritizing that “united front” to the public. We did not ask for nor do we want it. It would have been helpful if BOE members voiced their disapproval or concerns about McKnight and her appointment had been debated and discussed in public.

PP here. I agree with you, but it is a tricky issue in a strong superintendent state. BOE members don't have much real power, except to hire and fire a superintendent. What's left is the soft power of advising.

It's clear to me that throughout McKnight's tenure as super (and even before that), most people who came into contact with her suffered greatly.

Taylor hides behind the board putting all responsibility on them.

If so, that would be a rookie move. Perhaps this school district is too big for him, given his prior professional experience.

Listen to his forums. He regularly says the BOE makes these decisions and its up to them.