What I don't get is how she has 2 full-time employees, and neither of them are making dinner. I had "only" a nanny when my kids were young and she still found time to cook 2x a week at least. |
And then she rescinded telework for all her employees. |
My neighbor was a political appointee during the Obama administration and they didn’t have family money so she would have been one of those people. But it was a temporary phase. |
I am the earlier PP and yes I agree politicals, high level ppl at NGOs etc could work those long hrs without a high salary but OP description of the promotion coming with more $$$ did not read to me like those situations. |
+1 When I had a nanny, my kids cried when she left for the day. On one hand, it made me glad how much they liked (loved her). OTOH, it broke my heart how much they liked/loved her. Little kids get attached to people they spend the most time with. I told DH we needed to make some changes, that I could not handle trying to give 100% to the kids, our marriage and work. Our marriage was also not in a great place. So, we moved to a cheaper house so I could pull back from work and be home with the kids, and I'm not a sahm type. It was boring, but we were all generally much happier. My kids are now in HS/college, and I'm back to work, albeit in a diminished role. |
+1. You really can’t have it all. Even with outsourcing meals, or driving etc you still can’t physically be present in your kids lives then what good is all that money? We fool ourselves thinking we are doing all this work for our kids but in reality kids only need your attention and love. |
Yes, that's possible. I'm this mom that you're quoting, and I had my kids later in life so they're still young. Many of my colleagues had their kids earlier and they are now in college or headed there soon - that gives me a view into the future and I'm telling you that they are not damaged the say you're describing. |
i really felt that whole book and time in the 2010s was really unfair to women. like holding up marissa mayer and sheryl sandberg as these "ideal working parent" types was really detrimental to my mental well being at the time. what marissa and sheryl dont tell you is the amount of money it took for them to be supported in "doing it all." and i didnt get that as a 25 year old woman starting out in my career. i held them up as the example of what i needed to be, not taking into account that the three of us are not playing the game on the same field or with the same equipment. |
While I agree with most of the feedback here, there is definitely selection bias. If you're leaning in at your big important job, you probably don't have time to be browsing and commenting on DCUM.... This is the difference between me (leaned out) and a good friend (still chasing the next big promotion): she would never be wasting time on DCUM like I am! She manages ok with a very hands-on husband, a nanny and a full-time housekeeper, and two kids. She does vent to me from time to time about the guilt of missing out on time with her kids. For reference, she is in the C-suite of a mid-sized tech company. |
Amen! |
|
Read this book or take his class on coursera
https://www.amazon.com/Total-Leadership-Better-Leader-Richer/dp/1422103285 You do NOT need to leave at 7am and return home at 7pm 5 days a week to be successful. 2 days yes, 5 no. Think. What can u do better? People talk about getting help at home but are you delegating low level work to others? You are not. Delegate Work before the kids wake and do morning routine a few days a week. Get home early 2 days a week and work after their bedtime, not every day. You can do this if you are more strategic. |
| Some PP have hinted at it, but I think a key fact is OPs age. It’s one of the things we can delude ourselves about - that’s we will never get old and tired. But there’s a big difference for me between mid 30s and mid 40s. OP strikes me as somewhat young for her professional role and that she’s relying on maintaining the physical energy that she previously had. Take it from the older folks, you can’t keep going on sheer force and you need to navigate to sustainable roles before you get old and tired or it will be painful. |
To OP, I'm the other gender but have been there during early pre-school years for a multiple-year stretch (DW works as well). Some of what you describe is just learning a new role, and feeling secure in it. I eventually got better at planning/managing/delegating (as others suggest) and also just got comfortable in the role without needing to push for more or prove myself. I work much less now, spend multiple hours with kids per night, spend most of every weekend with family, take true vacations, and live a mostly healthy lifestyle -- all in the same job, same pay, etc. Do you think you can get to that point? If so, the job may be worth grinning and bearing it until you can get to that point. If not, your situation does not sound sustainable (to me). And the fact that you are reaching out for advice in this way suggests you already feel the same (again, unless you feel that the future may be different). |
Everyone is on their phones all the time. You really think that just because someone has a big job they stop mindlessly scrolling through something on their phone? |
+1 Go to any park in the DMV area with toddlers. Every woman takes time to use their phone. A few months ago I was at the park, and a toddler face planted off a climbing structure and started to shriek. It took a few minutes to find the mom and get her attention because she was engrossed in her phone. Moms aren't the saints of good parenting behavior any more than nannies are. |