So, the Dems new talking point is that Trump and Vance are “weird”

[Anonymous]

Trump is too old to pay attention to what's going on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, nothing weird about Vance and his “defense” of his wife against the racist MAGA trash.

How very Ginny Thomas’ sh*t family of him to say:

“Obviously she’s not a white person…but I love Usha, she’s such a good mom.”

She’s like, one of the good ones!

+1. Not— she’s a good person, wife, lawyer, partner, human, etc. She’s a good mom. The woman clerked for John Roberts. It’s great that she’s a good mom. But if you’re entire defense of the compete human being you dated and married before you had kids is “a good mom”? I have two kids. By far my biggest and best accomplishment was raising them. But, wow would I be pissed if people attacked me and my husband said “good mom,” instead of “amazing, interesting, accomplished person who has also been a great parent to our kids”. There is a huge difference. To him, his wife is a uterus. That it. It’s gross.

Weirdo.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Americans don't mind or even care about perceptions that someone is weird if their policies make sense. What's weird to some people is "cool" to other people (or is conveniently ignored). Biden was accused of sniffing people, Harris has a strange laugh and word salad when she gets nervous.

Biden also stutters. But those are tics in other wise normal people. TV aren’t overall. normal people with tics. They are full on wierdo.

Plus, maybe I’m the only one. But I love that Harris smiles and laughs. The last 8-10 years in US politics. have been a grim, nasty slog. Maybe that’s why smiling and laughing by a candidate seems out of place. Even when Biden made a joke and smiled it was low energy. She has positive energy, and I’m here for it. Such a nice break from all the awfulness we’ve seen for so dang long.

You're not the only one. I love her positive energy. Such a contrast to Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is too old to pay attention to what's going on.

He wasn’t old enough to pay attention to a bullet and duck when the younger crowd didn’t even realize it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think "weird" is accurate and a good talking point. It points out how detached from reality they are without giving power to their ridiculousness.

"Dangerous" would just feed the MAGA power fantasies. "Unlawful" and "unconstitutional" are too complicated for some folks, and words like "racist" and "homophobic" definitely have their place but don't really affect people who are racist and homophobic. "Bootlicker" is too crude.

"Creepy" might work, especially with all of the time they spend thinking about others' genitals, but "weird" is good.

It’s also the description that’s going to get under Trump’s skin far more than any of these other descriptors you mentioned.

I think it's a perfect description and it will speak to certain demographics that don't want to be part of a "weird" anything....

Were you asleep the past 5 years? Gen Z is all about embracing weirdness

[Anonymous]

Individual quirks are celebrated by Gen Z so weird doesn’t have the negative connotation you think it does

[Anonymous]

Well they are being polite. Weird in that they are out of mainstream or fringe in their policies, but crazy or bonkers would be more accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Individual quirks are celebrated by Gen Z so weird doesn’t have the negative connotation you think it does

Not gonna work. Trump being a weird old man and Vance just being overtly weird and repressed aren’t the quirks Gen Z is looking for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Individual quirks are celebrated by Gen Z so weird doesn’t have the negative connotation you think it does

As someone with lots of Gen Z kids in her orbit, I can assure you that that 'weird' does have negative connotation, and they definitely distinguish between weird and quirky.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is too old to pay attention to what's going on.

He wasn’t old enough to pay attention to a bullet and duck when the younger crowd didn’t even realize it

Um, the audience was pointing out the gunman on the roof for something like 2 or 3 minutes before he took the shot. Trump was oblivious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is too old to pay attention to what's going on.

He wasn’t old enough to pay attention to a bullet and duck when the younger crowd didn’t even realize it

Um, the audience was pointing out the gunman on the roof for something like 2 or 3 minutes before he took the shot. Trump was oblivious.

You are the oblivious one. The people pointing out the gunman were outside the fence. Anyone in the immediate audience that may have seen him was a distance away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is too old to pay attention to what's going on.

He wasn’t old enough to pay attention to a bullet and duck when the younger crowd didn’t even realize it

Um, the audience was pointing out the gunman on the roof for something like 2 or 3 minutes before he took the shot. Trump was oblivious.

You are the oblivious one. The people pointing out the gunman were outside the fence. Anyone in the immediate audience that may have seen him was a distance away.

And Trump didn't have a clue. He's senile.

[Anonymous]

First I saw the t-shirt, then I saw the golden diaper, and then I saw Trump's face over his crotch.

OMG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:First I saw the t-shirt, then I saw the golden diaper, and then I saw Trump's face over his crotch.

OMG.

And that's how genuine Trump fans think they can celebrate him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think "weird" is accurate and a good talking point. It points out how detached from reality they are without giving power to their ridiculousness.

"Dangerous" would just feed the MAGA power fantasies. "Unlawful" and "unconstitutional" are too complicated for some folks, and words like "racist" and "homophobic" definitely have their place but don't really affect people who are racist and homophobic. "Bootlicker" is too crude.

"Creepy" might work, especially with all of the time they spend thinking about others' genitals, but "weird" is good.

It’s also the description that’s going to get under Trump’s skin far more than any of these other descriptors you mentioned.

I think it's a perfect description and it will speak to certain demographics that don't want to be part of a "weird" anything....

Were you asleep the past 5 years? Gen Z is all about embracing weirdness

Ehhh. You misunderstand Gen Z. Their is “be your authentic self” weird… up to the point of Ick. And Vance’s authentic self is way past ick. (His authentic self jhas also shape shifted a dozen times).


And before the right starts, because they will, people are wary of a stellar, married gay man with two kids and a funny AF husband. No one thinks America is ready for a Gen Z my authentic self uses the pronouns zhe/zha either.