NYT and WaPo report Biden is close to stepping down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's elect our first women president.

Agree! But not Harris.

I’m worried she’ll win and then be her super weird, giggly, rambling self and we will never elect another woman President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems very unfair. He's no more feeble or senile than Trump, and he at least has sane, smart advisors. I understand why this is necessary, but it feels like the the bad guys are winning.

No, and even if that were the case, just because the other guy is feeble or senile, doesn't mean you should be OK with your candidate being feeble or senile. The reality is that Biden is much more physically diminished than Trump. Mentally, they're both in decline, but in different ways. And from a moral perspective, Biden is well and Trump has always been pathological.

Biden's time is over. Harris will do a great job.

Harris is less qualified to lead than Biden right now. And she's less likely to win.

She was fantastic in NC today. She is absolutely qualified. You’re not a Democrat nor a Biden supporter.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's elect our first women president.

Agree! But not Harris.

I’m worried she’ll win and then be her super weird, giggly, rambling self and we will never elect another woman President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's elect our first women president.

Agree! But not Harris.

I’m worried she’ll win and then be her super weird, giggly, rambling self and we will never elect another woman President.

I’m not worried at all that she will win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems very unfair. He's no more feeble or senile than Trump, and he at least has sane, smart advisors. I understand why this is necessary, but it feels like the the bad guys are winning.

No, and even if that were the case, just because the other guy is feeble or senile, doesn't mean you should be OK with your candidate being feeble or senile. The reality is that Biden is much more physically diminished than Trump. Mentally, they're both in decline, but in different ways. And from a moral perspective, Biden is well and Trump has always been pathological.

Biden's time is over. Harris will do a great job.

Harris is less qualified to lead than Biden right now. And she's less likely to win.

She was fantastic in NC today. She is absolutely qualified. You’re not a Democrat nor a Biden supporter.

There are millions of Democrats and Biden supporters, and we don't all feel exactly the same way about Harris, or anything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This seems very unfair. He's no more feeble or senile than Trump, and he at least has sane, smart advisors. I understand why this is necessary, but it feels like the the bad guys are winning.

No, and even if that were the case, just because the other guy is feeble or senile, doesn't mean you should be OK with your candidate being feeble or senile. The reality is that Biden is much more physically diminished than Trump. Mentally, they're both in decline, but in different ways. And from a moral perspective, Biden is well and Trump has always been pathological.

Biden's time is over. Harris will do a great job.

Harris is less qualified to lead than Biden right now. And she's less likely to win.

She was fantastic in NC today. She is absolutely qualified. You’re not a Democrat nor a Biden supporter.

Why do posters like you attack the person rather than their argument? It’s so tiring.

- not PP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Of equal importance, if not more so, is what will happen with the Biden/Harris campaign funds. They have something like $90 million. My understanding is that only Harris can access it if Biden drops out. If that is true, she is really the only option to replace him.

Do you really think she can win?

Yes, and fairly easily.

But Americans are brutal to female leaders.

Yes but times have changed and she is running against a sketchy guy.

The last time we had a female nominee was against the same sketchy guy. And it wasn't very long ago.

Dems screwed up. Hillary was too arrogant to campaign harder in states that weren’t a shoe in for her. She never should have been complacent in such a critical race.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Of equal importance, if not more so, is what will happen with the Biden/Harris campaign funds. They have something like $90 million. My understanding is that only Harris can access it if Biden drops out. If that is true, she is really the only option to replace him.

Do you really think she can win?

Yes, and fairly easily.

I agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's elect our first women president.

Agree! But not Harris.

I’m worried she’ll win and then be her super weird, giggly, rambling self and we will never elect another woman President.

I think she is on the spectrum. The repetitive phrases, the laughter , word salad.. Very underdiagnosed in WOC. I do feel bad for her because I think she was shafted and thrown under the bus by the current administration. I hear she pushed Biden to be more supportive of Gazan humanitarian aid which is good and surprised me given she has a Jewish husband . Blinken deserves a great job as well if she wins as he’s had a tough year trying to negotiate with the region with Bidens careless remarks . I suspect a Kamala as Pres would need a dynamite VP- perhaps even a celebrity to really shake things up. The Dem Party needs to change from its image as the party of the status quo and political elite

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Of equal importance, if not more so, is what will happen with the Biden/Harris campaign funds. They have something like $90 million. My understanding is that only Harris can access it if Biden drops out. If that is true, she is really the only option to replace him.

Do you really think she can win?

Yes, and fairly easily.

But Americans are brutal to female leaders.

Yes but times have changed and she is running against a sketchy guy.

The last time we had a female nominee was against the same sketchy guy. And it wasn't very long ago.

Dems screwed up. Hillary was too arrogant to campaign harder in states that weren’t a shoe in for her. She never should have been complacent in such a critical race.

She was set up for failure by Robby Mook-her data obsessed campaign manager who over relied on the polls. She should’ve listened to Bill. Bill didn’t like Robby and told Hillary to keep campaigning and talking to people. The millennials running the campaign told Bill he was old fashioned and they were running a new “modern campaign” where the data told all the info they needed . Huge huge huge fail.

Trump ran an old fashioned campaign and earned every vote . He went to every back water town and flyover state you can think of

[Anonymous]

Why won’t he endorse Harris??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's elect our first women president.

Agree! But not Harris.

I’m worried she’ll win and then be her super weird, giggly, rambling self and we will never elect another woman President.

I think she is on the spectrum. The repetitive phrases, the laughter , word salad.. Very underdiagnosed in WOC. I do feel bad for her because I think she was shafted and thrown under the bus by the current administration. I hear she pushed Biden to be more supportive of Gazan humanitarian aid which is good and surprised me given she has a Jewish husband . Blinken deserves a great job as well if she wins as he’s had a tough year trying to negotiate with the region with Bidens careless remarks . I suspect a Kamala as Pres would need a dynamite VP- perhaps even a celebrity to really shake things up. The Dem Party needs to change from its image as the party of the status quo and political elite

It’s fun to see MAGA heads exploding.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Why won’t he endorse Harris??

I would not take anything coming from Halperin at face value. Everyone in the know has their pet reporters and Halperin is not one of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why won’t he endorse Harris??

Because he knows that she's no more likely to win than he is. He'll endorse someone he believes can win.