fcps family life education

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

Wow.
Was the last time you were actually in a room with 10-14 year olds back when YOU were 10-14?
Because you sure don’t seem to get social behaviors of mixed genders and sex Ed.
They won’t pay attention, won’t ask the questions they need to ask, will act as though they are dying of embarrassment. and will leave the lesson just as ignorant as they entered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

You realize most parents do talk to their kids about sex and reproduction at an age appropriate time, right? They do so by speaking to them with the facts of biology, and according to their own boundaries for each child. They rarely outsource this to third parties, such as the school system. They also speak with them with the facts, and that’s why they end up making the right choices. Of course, once you have children of your own you’ll understand that.

On the contrary, the proposed FCPS changes to the FLE program will confuse some children in that it will teach them that men have periods and can get pregnant.

The data doesn't support your assertion and clear lack of many parent's knowledge of sex education shows that we are harming kids if they do not have school based resources. Please don't lie about what FCPS teaches, b/c you statement is complete bull. See recent Parent's magazine survey that says that 70% of parents want comprehensive sex education in schools. https://www.parents.com/the-state-of-sex-education-today-7497738

Parents who trust FCPS to impart science based Sex Ed are oblivious to the fact that
school based resources rely on the following organizations:
GLSEN
Planned Parenthood
Gender Spectrum
The Human Rights Campaign
The Trevor Project
Advocates for Youth
The GSA Network
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

To learn more about what these for-profit entities stand for:

https://defendinged.org/resources/special-interest-groups-pushing-extreme-ideologies/

Fun fact: you just quoted a hate group to support your regressive ideals. The groups you cited are respected experts and the ONLY ones who have done research and studies supporting sex ed.

You pridefully reiterate that FCPS relies on these for-profit groups for Sex Ed content, and not on science based education as many parents are led to believe, while you call the source a hate group because their approach on issues differ from yours? Let me remind you that the most recent results of the FCPS survey reflect that the majority prefers to maintain the current setting with boys and girls in different groups when introducing certain topics that pertain each sex. Also, the majority prefers to delay the introduction of lessons on sexuality to younger students.

More on these groups from another source:
https://catholicvote.org/8-groups-pushing-gender-ideology-in-american-schools/

And, you may want to get some exposure on other more reliable research available on these topics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

In the survey last year, the kids had a far higher response against coed sex ed than the parents and teachers.

the kids do not want combined sex ed

We need to quit letting creeps and predators like this poster from getting so much control over our kids and public school.

What a nasty comment. You are also wrong. It was kids and parents who asked for this. The survey results were unfortunately overwhelmed by folks who didn't want FLE in school at all. There is no way to tell if the "students" who responded were actually students, so your statement is meaningless.

The 4-6 students do not want this. -6th grade teacher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

You realize most parents do talk to their kids about sex and reproduction at an age appropriate time, right? They do so by speaking to them with the facts of biology, and according to their own boundaries for each child. They rarely outsource this to third parties, such as the school system. They also speak with them with the facts, and that’s why they end up making the right choices. Of course, once you have children of your own you’ll understand that.

On the contrary, the proposed FCPS changes to the FLE program will confuse some children in that it will teach them that men have periods and can get pregnant.

The data doesn't support your assertion and clear lack of many parent's knowledge of sex education shows that we are harming kids if they do not have school based resources. Please don't lie about what FCPS teaches, b/c you statement is complete bull. See recent Parent's magazine survey that says that 70% of parents want comprehensive sex education in schools. https://www.parents.com/the-state-of-sex-education-today-7497738

Parents who trust FCPS to impart science based Sex Ed are oblivious to the fact that
school based resources rely on the following organizations:
GLSEN
Planned Parenthood
Gender Spectrum
The Human Rights Campaign
The Trevor Project
Advocates for Youth
The GSA Network
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

To learn more about what these for-profit entities stand for:

https://defendinged.org/resources/special-interest-groups-pushing-extreme-ideologies/

Fun fact: you just quoted a hate group to support your regressive ideals. The groups you cited are respected experts and the ONLY ones who have done research and studies supporting sex ed.

Disagreeing with your left wing biases does not make something a hate group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

Wow.
Was the last time you were actually in a room with 10-14 year olds back when YOU were 10-14?
Because you sure don’t seem to get social behaviors of mixed genders and sex Ed.
They won’t pay attention, won’t ask the questions they need to ask, will act as though they are dying of embarrassment. and will leave the lesson just as ignorant as they entered.

You really don't know teenagers at all.
Combined sex ed has veen taught in surrounding counties at public schools and at the United Church of Christ for decades. No problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

You realize most parents do talk to their kids about sex and reproduction at an age appropriate time, right? They do so by speaking to them with the facts of biology, and according to their own boundaries for each child. They rarely outsource this to third parties, such as the school system. They also speak with them with the facts, and that’s why they end up making the right choices. Of course, once you have children of your own you’ll understand that.

On the contrary, the proposed FCPS changes to the FLE program will confuse some children in that it will teach them that men have periods and can get pregnant.

The data doesn't support your assertion and clear lack of many parent's knowledge of sex education shows that we are harming kids if they do not have school based resources. Please don't lie about what FCPS teaches, b/c you statement is complete bull. See recent Parent's magazine survey that says that 70% of parents want comprehensive sex education in schools. https://www.parents.com/the-state-of-sex-education-today-7497738

Parents who trust FCPS to impart science based Sex Ed are oblivious to the fact that
school based resources rely on the following organizations:
GLSEN
Planned Parenthood
Gender Spectrum
The Human Rights Campaign
The Trevor Project
Advocates for Youth
The GSA Network
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

To learn more about what these for-profit entities stand for:

https://defendinged.org/resources/special-interest-groups-pushing-extreme-ideologies/

Fun fact: you just quoted a hate group to support your regressive ideals. The groups you cited are respected experts and the ONLY ones who have done research and studies supporting sex ed.

You pridefully reiterate that FCPS relies on these for-profit groups for Sex Ed content, and not on science based education as many parents are led to believe, while you call the source a hate group because their approach on issues differ from yours? Let me remind you that the most recent results of the FCPS survey reflect that the majority prefers to maintain the current setting with boys and girls in different groups when introducing certain topics that pertain each sex. Also, the majority prefers to delay the introduction of lessons on sexuality to younger students.

More on these groups from another source:
https://catholicvote.org/8-groups-pushing-gender-ideology-in-american-schools/

And, you may want to get some exposure on other more reliable research available on these topics.

You are quoting a far right publication that rejects science and all comprehensive sex education to prove your point?
You are starting to make the hate group, Parents Defending Education, look informed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

You realize most parents do talk to their kids about sex and reproduction at an age appropriate time, right? They do so by speaking to them with the facts of biology, and according to their own boundaries for each child. They rarely outsource this to third parties, such as the school system. They also speak with them with the facts, and that’s why they end up making the right choices. Of course, once you have children of your own you’ll understand that.

On the contrary, the proposed FCPS changes to the FLE program will confuse some children in that it will teach them that men have periods and can get pregnant.

The data doesn't support your assertion and clear lack of many parent's knowledge of sex education shows that we are harming kids if they do not have school based resources. Please don't lie about what FCPS teaches, b/c you statement is complete bull. See recent Parent's magazine survey that says that 70% of parents want comprehensive sex education in schools. https://www.parents.com/the-state-of-sex-education-today-7497738

Parents who trust FCPS to impart science based Sex Ed are oblivious to the fact that
school based resources rely on the following organizations:
GLSEN
Planned Parenthood
Gender Spectrum
The Human Rights Campaign
The Trevor Project
Advocates for Youth
The GSA Network
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

To learn more about what these for-profit entities stand for:

https://defendinged.org/resources/special-interest-groups-pushing-extreme-ideologies/

OMG … the lies. The sex ed taught in FCPS comes VERBATIM from the state. And it’s all publicly available.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

In the survey last year, the kids had a far higher response against coed sex ed than the parents and teachers.

the kids do not want combined sex ed

We need to quit letting creeps and predators like this poster from getting so much control over our kids and public school.

What a nasty comment. You are also wrong. It was kids and parents who asked for this. The survey results were unfortunately overwhelmed by folks who didn't want FLE in school at all. There is no way to tell if the "students" who responded were actually students, so your statement is meaningless.

The 4-6 students do not want this. -6th grade teacher.

+1. -5th grade teacher

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

You realize most parents do talk to their kids about sex and reproduction at an age appropriate time, right? They do so by speaking to them with the facts of biology, and according to their own boundaries for each child. They rarely outsource this to third parties, such as the school system. They also speak with them with the facts, and that’s why they end up making the right choices. Of course, once you have children of your own you’ll understand that.

On the contrary, the proposed FCPS changes to the FLE program will confuse some children in that it will teach them that men have periods and can get pregnant.

The data doesn't support your assertion and clear lack of many parent's knowledge of sex education shows that we are harming kids if they do not have school based resources. Please don't lie about what FCPS teaches, b/c you statement is complete bull. See recent Parent's magazine survey that says that 70% of parents want comprehensive sex education in schools. https://www.parents.com/the-state-of-sex-education-today-7497738

Parents who trust FCPS to impart science based Sex Ed are oblivious to the fact that
school based resources rely on the following organizations:
GLSEN
Planned Parenthood
Gender Spectrum
The Human Rights Campaign
The Trevor Project
Advocates for Youth
The GSA Network
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

To learn more about what these for-profit entities stand for:

https://defendinged.org/resources/special-interest-groups-pushing-extreme-ideologies/

OMG … the lies. The sex ed taught in FCPS comes VERBATIM from the state. And it’s all publicly available.

Really? Then why is it that FCPS FLE and Sex Ed are not in alignment with the state of Virginia?

https://sexeducationcollaborative.org/states/virginia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

In the survey last year, the kids had a far higher response against coed sex ed than the parents and teachers.

the kids do not want combined sex ed

We need to quit letting creeps and predators like this poster from getting so much control over our kids and public school.

What a nasty comment. You are also wrong. It was kids and parents who asked for this. The survey results were unfortunately overwhelmed by folks who didn't want FLE in school at all. There is no way to tell if the "students" who responded were actually students, so your statement is meaningless.

The 4-6 students do not want this. -6th grade teacher.

+1. -5th grade teacher

1,000 teachers don’t want to teach mixed gender groups either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

You realize most parents do talk to their kids about sex and reproduction at an age appropriate time, right? They do so by speaking to them with the facts of biology, and according to their own boundaries for each child. They rarely outsource this to third parties, such as the school system. They also speak with them with the facts, and that’s why they end up making the right choices. Of course, once you have children of your own you’ll understand that.

On the contrary, the proposed FCPS changes to the FLE program will confuse some children in that it will teach them that men have periods and can get pregnant.

The data doesn't support your assertion and clear lack of many parent's knowledge of sex education shows that we are harming kids if they do not have school based resources. Please don't lie about what FCPS teaches, b/c you statement is complete bull. See recent Parent's magazine survey that says that 70% of parents want comprehensive sex education in schools. https://www.parents.com/the-state-of-sex-education-today-7497738

Parents who trust FCPS to impart science based Sex Ed are oblivious to the fact that
school based resources rely on the following organizations:
GLSEN
Planned Parenthood
Gender Spectrum
The Human Rights Campaign
The Trevor Project
Advocates for Youth
The GSA Network
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

To learn more about what these for-profit entities stand for:

https://defendinged.org/resources/special-interest-groups-pushing-extreme-ideologies/

OMG … the lies. The sex ed taught in FCPS comes VERBATIM from the state. And it’s all publicly available.

OMG … the lies. The sex ed taught in FCPS comes VERBATIM from the activists at the School Board and the Superintendent. And it’s all publicly available:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/community-family/3057122/fairfax-county-public-schools-leadership-defy-parents-sex-education-program/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

You realize most parents do talk to their kids about sex and reproduction at an age appropriate time, right? They do so by speaking to them with the facts of biology, and according to their own boundaries for each child. They rarely outsource this to third parties, such as the school system. They also speak with them with the facts, and that’s why they end up making the right choices. Of course, once you have children of your own you’ll understand that.

On the contrary, the proposed FCPS changes to the FLE program will confuse some children in that it will teach them that men have periods and can get pregnant.

The data doesn't support your assertion and clear lack of many parent's knowledge of sex education shows that we are harming kids if they do not have school based resources. Please don't lie about what FCPS teaches, b/c you statement is complete bull. See recent Parent's magazine survey that says that 70% of parents want comprehensive sex education in schools. https://www.parents.com/the-state-of-sex-education-today-7497738

Parents who trust FCPS to impart science based Sex Ed are oblivious to the fact that
school based resources rely on the following organizations:
GLSEN
Planned Parenthood
Gender Spectrum
The Human Rights Campaign
The Trevor Project
Advocates for Youth
The GSA Network
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

To learn more about what these for-profit entities stand for:

https://defendinged.org/resources/special-interest-groups-pushing-extreme-ideologies/

OMG … the lies. The sex ed taught in FCPS comes VERBATIM from the state. And it’s all publicly available.

Really? Then why is it that FCPS FLE and Sex Ed are not in alignment with the state of Virginia?

https://sexeducationcollaborative.org/states/virginia

Absolutely NOTHING on that link says FCPS is not aligned with the state. And FLE is “sex ed” FYI. Neither FCPS nor Virginia have “sex ed”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

You realize most parents do talk to their kids about sex and reproduction at an age appropriate time, right? They do so by speaking to them with the facts of biology, and according to their own boundaries for each child. They rarely outsource this to third parties, such as the school system. They also speak with them with the facts, and that’s why they end up making the right choices. Of course, once you have children of your own you’ll understand that.

On the contrary, the proposed FCPS changes to the FLE program will confuse some children in that it will teach them that men have periods and can get pregnant.

The data doesn't support your assertion and clear lack of many parent's knowledge of sex education shows that we are harming kids if they do not have school based resources. Please don't lie about what FCPS teaches, b/c you statement is complete bull. See recent Parent's magazine survey that says that 70% of parents want comprehensive sex education in schools. https://www.parents.com/the-state-of-sex-education-today-7497738

Parents who trust FCPS to impart science based Sex Ed are oblivious to the fact that
school based resources rely on the following organizations:
GLSEN
Planned Parenthood
Gender Spectrum
The Human Rights Campaign
The Trevor Project
Advocates for Youth
The GSA Network
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

To learn more about what these for-profit entities stand for:

https://defendinged.org/resources/special-interest-groups-pushing-extreme-ideologies/

OMG … the lies. The sex ed taught in FCPS comes VERBATIM from the state. And it’s all publicly available.

Really? Then why is it that FCPS FLE and Sex Ed are not in alignment with the state of Virginia?

https://sexeducationcollaborative.org/states/virginia

Absolutely NOTHING on that link says FCPS is not aligned with the state. And FLE is “sex ed” FYI. Neither FCPS nor Virginia have “sex ed”.

https://www.washingtonblade.com/2018/06/15/fairfax-school-board-approves-lgbt-inclusive-sex-ed-curriculum/

[Anonymous]

Opt out. Just opt out. FCPS shouldn’t be parenting in the first place.

What about those who don’t get it from home? Then offer parental support. The end.

[Anonymous]

Why do we allow childless, far left avtivists with no ties to fcps to be involved in any aspect of our fle curriculum?