Fights at school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They won’t be expelled because, equity. So film away.

Then don't come to DCUM and complain if your DC gets a consequence.

Oh no, not RJ! no big deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No consequences. Just like with everything else in MCPS.

Sorry about your kid, OP. Hope he is okay.

Too bad they don't have RJ at your school. That usually works wonders with these situations.

[Anonymous]

Didn’t MCPS choose to kick all police out of their schools?

[Anonymous]

Violating the “privacy” of others is so vague. It can mean many things. IMO it should mean taking photos of someone while they’re changing in the locker room

But it can be (mis)construed as something as simple as taking a photo of your friend while on school property.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t MCPS choose to kick all police out of their schools?

City council had some say in that one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Violating the “privacy” of others is so vague. It can mean many things. IMO it should mean taking photos of someone while they’re changing in the locker room

But it can be (mis)construed as something as simple as taking a photo of your friend while on school property.

It’s probably written that way because you never can predict what kids will do that could potentially violate privacy. Who knows what new tech device will be out in the next couple of years too.

[Anonymous]

Removing SROs from MCPS was an enormous mistake.

[Anonymous]

If a young person had NOT videographed what happened to George Floyd (or insert name here), the world would never know how the police treat (some) U.S citizens.

If Palestinians did not video the Isreal army bombing the Palestinians hospitals and now the southern Gaza 'safe space' then the world would never know and this Holocaust is happening.

...maybe MCPS is teaching kids how to brush injustice under the table?

https://www.wgbh.org/news/commentary/2021-05-26/a-teenagers-video-of-george-floyds-murder-changed-the-world-it-should-change-journalism-too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If a young person had NOT videographed what happened to George Floyd (or insert name here), the world would never know how the police treat (some) U.S citizens.

If Palestinians did not video the Isreal army bombing the Palestinians hospitals and now the southern Gaza 'safe space' then the world would never know and this Holocaust is happening.

...maybe MCPS is teaching kids how to brush injustice under the table?

https://www.wgbh.org/news/commentary/2021-05-26/a-teenagers-video-of-george-floyds-murder-changed-the-world-it-should-change-journalism-too

It’s a catch-22. If you don’t film, then it’s one’s word against another’s, and the police or court will ask, where’s your evidence? I would personally film because I can delete it later if necessary. Better to have then to not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Violating the “privacy” of others is so vague. It can mean many things. IMO it should mean taking photos of someone while they’re changing in the locker room

But it can be (mis)construed as something as simple as taking a photo of your friend while on school property.

It’s probably written that way because you never can predict what kids will do that could potentially violate privacy. Who knows what new tech device will be out in the next couple of years too.

That's part of the problem. The tech is way ahead of the adults in the room

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Removing SROs from MCPS was an enormous mistake.

Sorry. It's what voters wanted. We have voted for politicians and BOE members who supported removing SROs from schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t MCPS choose to kick all police out of their schools?

The police are responsible for enforcing our laws throughout the county even at places where they may not be stationed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Removing SROs from MCPS was an enormous mistake.

Sorry. It's what voters wanted. We have voted for politicians and BOE members who supported removing SROs from schools.

Yes, sensible voters wanted people with guns out of schools because that makes schools less safe. This doesn't mean police can't work with schools or other places throughout the county to ensure people are safe. That's their job.