Even worse … he got a Nobel !!! Lololololzzz |
| Even fox covers the response of the insurance industry to climate change. Go ahead and search it. The insurance industry does give a crap about Pulitzer prizes. They want to analyze the risk from the changing climate and they do. |
This is patently false. Every fu----ing word of it. Shame on you. https://www.policygenius.com/homeowners-insurance/florida-home-insurance-crisis/ There are many other articles out there also explaining it to charlatans like yourself. |
^^^ definite warmer. Still wearing a mask and on 8th booster. |
^ Can we please block this racist troll who was advocating for slavery claiming that is the alternative to fossil fuel? And he needs some educating on the fact that in the 1800s most of the heavy industry was in the NORTH, where slavery had already been abolished and that instead of fossil fuel, many of the factories and mills in the Northeast were in fact powered by water wheels and water turbines? This idiotic trolling is pointless, contributes nothing, and is completely divorced from all facts and reality. |
That is not even relevant. The whole problem here is that the GOP made it a central part of its energy and environment platform to base its decisions on idiotic "logic" that is PROVEN that climate change isn't happening, because you might still be able to make a snowball on a February day. They spent BILLIONS of dollars on that "logic," via messaging, via conservative media, via lobbying, via sham "think tanks" like Heartland Institute, via campaign funding and everything else. They ran HUNDREDS of candidates on that "logic." However, by that exact same "logic" if the presence of a snowball on a February morning "PROVES" that climate change isn't happening, then the fact of an 80 degree day in January "PROVES" that it is. It's your own logic. The same logic you spent billions of dollars on and which is the core of your energy and environment platform. And it's all undone by an 80 degree day. |
I hate slavery, abortion and all evil inflicted upon innocents. I believe people are not moral and never have been. I would bet money that anybody willing to abort a baby for a better standard of living would make up some excuse for having slaves if there was no fossil fuels or corresponding machinery. I wouldn’t do either. |
False premise. Again, pre civil war, most of America's manufacturing and heavy industry was in the north and it was done without slaves or fossil fuel. How about you just keep backpedaling yourself right off of this platform altogether, you dishonest fossil grifter? |
You are not smart Coal was critical to the war effort. As one of the largest raw material industries, coal was used to power locomotives; produce iron, steel, and electricity; and keep Americans' homes heated. Without an abundant supply of coal, Americans at home and abroad would suffer. |
Yep. The north took up fossil fuels and machinery before the south and didn’t need slavery anymore. The south was far more carbon neutral but since people are immoral they said slaves “were not full humans” the way we today say an unborn baby “is not full human”. People never change. |
It's great that we have more and more non-fossil alternatives to coal. Especially since we're running out of coal. |
Only a brain-muddled person would be mixing up modern energy policy for the future with abortion and 150 year old slavery policy. |
Same kinds of brain-muddled people who think a snowball on a February day somehow proves something to justify national energy and environmental policy for decades. |
|
Yeah just stick to growing Antarctic ice and record cold December in the northern hemisphere plus freezing deaths outnumbering warmth deaths 9-1. Warmers want freezing to win 10-1. |
Please learn the difference between weather and climate. You can do it. |