Woman charged with felony for having a stillbirth

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The report states the child’s corpse showed signs of injury.

It was a non-viable fetus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That poor woman. She was probably in shock.

So shocked she went on about her day and later tried to plunge the clogged toilet? They told her twice her baby wasn't viable at the hospital.

Unless they told her something else to do with the body, what else was she supposed to do? Fish it out of the toilet and bury it in her back yard? Call a funeral home? She probably didn’t even know how big it was or want to look.

There’s a reason that women in her position used to be offered therepeutic abortions - to spare them the trauma of having to deal with delivering a stillbirth. But Ohio outlawed this, so this is what happened.

Call for help.

Nice try though trying to blame this on an entire state.

Well the last time she tried to get help at the hospital she got sent home. So maybe she felt like she was basically supposed to handle this alone. And it’s not like she was in a physically and mentally great condition.

Can you quote exactly where, in the article, it says the hospital sent her home? And then where it says what exactly the hospital told her? Or did or didn’t do for her?
Tia!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The report states the child’s corpse showed signs of injury.

It was a non-viable fetus.

A non viable fetus doesn’t show signs of injury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The report states the child’s corpse showed signs of injury.

It was a non-viable fetus.

A non viable fetus doesn’t show signs of injury.

of course it can. do you know what happens to a dead fetus in utero? it disintegrates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a woman who delivered two babies at 20 weeks and I can promise you, that woman did not sit on the toilet and just pop that dead baby out into the toilet and surprisingly hear a splash. Delivering a baby at that term, dead or alive, is every bit as painful as a full-term delivery--I know this, as I have done both, multiple times. You don't just go, oh, I have to pee, and then, hey what was that splash, oh, a baby! Then flush. This wasn't shock. This was foul play. She tried to flush a dead baby down the toilet. And everyone here knows why but won't say. She was very likely covering up a dead baby who had drugs in its system.

You are full on baloney! "Foul play"? The fetus was ALREADY DEAD. How do you commit foul play to the already dead contents of your uterus? Since when does a dead fetus have the same legal status as a corpse?

Although you got me there - corpses do have more legal rights to their bodies than women.

I think the PP is saying that the baby was alive until the mom did something to do to make it non viable. It’s hard to believe someone would flush a baby down the toilet if they weren’t trying to get rid of evidence of something bad that they’d done like drugs.

ABSOLUTELY NONE OF THAT IS TRUE. She has multiple sets of medical record proving that the fetus was dead in utero.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That poor woman. She was probably in shock.

So shocked she went on about her day and later tried to plunge the clogged toilet? They told her twice her baby wasn't viable at the hospital.

Unless they told her something else to do with the body, what else was she supposed to do? Fish it out of the toilet and bury it in her back yard? Call a funeral home? She probably didn’t even know how big it was or want to look.

There’s a reason that women in her position used to be offered therepeutic abortions - to spare them the trauma of having to deal with delivering a stillbirth. But Ohio outlawed this, so this is what happened.

Call for help.

Nice try though trying to blame this on an entire state.

Well the last time she tried to get help at the hospital she got sent home. So maybe she felt like she was basically supposed to handle this alone. And it’s not like she was in a physically and mentally great condition.

Can you quote exactly where, in the article, it says the hospital sent her home? And then where it says what exactly the hospital told her? Or did or didn’t do for her?
Tia!

it says she went twice and they told her the pregnancy was not viable. One article mentioned premature rupture of membranes. in any state/country that was not completely barbaric like Ohio, she would have been admitted for a therepeutic abortion.

[Anonymous]

where is her gofundme?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She should definitely be suing the hospital(s) and the state. This is a complete horror.

The facts that people are just simply making up here to fit their agenda is astounding. She is not being arrested for having a stillbirth. She is being charged with attempting to flush a dead baby down the toilet. And it doesn't sound like that fact is in dispute. What is in dispute here is whether or not it is fine and dandy to flush a dead baby down the toilet. Those of you who keep saying she had a "miscarriage" into the toilet are getting that wrong. One previous poster accurately described the size and appearance of a baby at 22 weeks gestation (and yes, the facts seem to indicate that it was a baby at 22 weeks gestation, not that she had been carrying a fetus that had already stopped gestating weeks earlier as at least one poster claims--that is not the fact. The baby was 22 weeks). Also, at 22 weeks it is not really a miscarriage. Some will call it that. Mine was diagnosed officially as spontaneous abortion, not miscarriage. There was a reason the police were called, and maybe we will learn of that some day, maybe we won't. But OP, you need to stop using this story to promote your pro-abortion agenda. This woman is not charged with a felony for a stillbirth. She is charged with a felony for attempting to flush her stillborn baby down the toilet. It sounds horrible for her and I can sympathize somewhat, having also had a mid-term birth of a baby. I think that's why I find OP's and other's attempts to use this story to fit their own agendas so offensive. They have absolutely no idea what a baby is like at 22 weeks gestation. I do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The report states the child’s corpse showed signs of injury.

It was a non-viable fetus.

A non viable fetus doesn’t show signs of injury.

of course it can. do you know what happens to a dead fetus in utero? it disintegrates.

Of course it does. And that is called fetal disintegration. A medical examiner will know what that is, and state that on the report. They will not call it injury. So you are 100% incorrect.

[Anonymous]

I hope they bothered to give her medical care after the fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That poor woman. She was probably in shock.

So shocked she went on about her day and later tried to plunge the clogged toilet? They told her twice her baby wasn't viable at the hospital.

Unless they told her something else to do with the body, what else was she supposed to do? Fish it out of the toilet and bury it in her back yard? Call a funeral home? She probably didn’t even know how big it was or want to look.

There’s a reason that women in her position used to be offered therepeutic abortions - to spare them the trauma of having to deal with delivering a stillbirth. But Ohio outlawed this, so this is what happened.

Call for help.

Nice try though trying to blame this on an entire state.

Well the last time she tried to get help at the hospital she got sent home. So maybe she felt like she was basically supposed to handle this alone. And it’s not like she was in a physically and mentally great condition.

Can you quote exactly where, in the article, it says the hospital sent her home? And then where it says what exactly the hospital told her? Or did or didn’t do for her?
Tia!

it says she went twice and they told her the pregnancy was not viable. One article mentioned premature rupture of membranes. in any state/country that was not completely barbaric like Ohio, she would have been admitted for a therepeutic abortion.

You didn’t give the information I was looking for. But thanks for trying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The report states the child’s corpse showed signs of injury.

It was a non-viable fetus.

A non viable fetus doesn’t show signs of injury.

of course it can. do you know what happens to a dead fetus in utero? it disintegrates.

Of course it does. And that is called fetal disintegration. A medical examiner will know what that is, and state that on the report. They will not call it injury. So you are 100% incorrect.

They found no injuries upon examination. Read the article again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mike Johnson the new speaker has terrible things planned for women

Might want to start pay attention

Start by looking up the organization he has a flag outside his office

Republicans are coming for all women’s rights if you think they won’t you are dumb.

It will be worse than abortion and BC

And by the time Republican voters realize they're screwing themselves, it will be too late to reverse direction. They are already engaging in and planning to dismantle fair elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The report states the child’s corpse showed signs of injury.

It was a non-viable fetus.

A non viable fetus doesn’t show signs of injury.

of course it can. do you know what happens to a dead fetus in utero? it disintegrates.

Of course it does. And that is called fetal disintegration. A medical examiner will know what that is, and state that on the report. They will not call it injury. So you are 100% incorrect.

They found no injuries upon examination. Read the article again.

Oh no I did read that. I get it. I was just correcting the PP that fetal disintegration would not be classified as an injury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope they bothered to give her medical care after the fact.

Why would they bother to do that? The fetus is the only thing that matters to them.