| My son has a September bday; we did not redshirt. He is the top band as a freshman. |
Shame? Ridiculous. The orchestra and the math results have nothing to do with a November birthday. The classes must have been filled with kids who waited a year and those that didn’t. If he had been born a few months earlier then he would have started kindergarten at 5 years old . He’d still be the same student. My youngest has a November birthday. They have changed the cut off date to September so she’s one of the oldest. Not yet in high school I know she won’t be taking calculus because she has not interest in and puts no effort into it. Her music skills would allow her to be accepted with her class. I graduated college in five years because I couldn’t handle six classes a semester which were required some semesters with 5 classes the remaining semesters. I felt no shame and I did what I could. Don’t blame his age on everything. He did fine. |
Ours was too. It has nothing to do with age, but talent and practice. |
A November birthday isn't relevant. The point people are making is its better to hold back so they can be at the top of the class for things like math and orchestra or band, but a smart, talented kid will do those regardless of age. Math and Band go by ability when you get to HS so you will have a huge range of kids in different classes, so holding back to put them at the top of the class is more about you than them. A kid who struggles in school will struggle regardless. But, struggling a year older may impact their self esteem. My fall kid, who went "early" has always been at the top for music and math. They will hopefully graduate with linear algebra if we can make the transportation work as their school doesn't offer it. Who cares? They just happen to be good at those areas. Holding them back a year would not have made any difference. They are also short. Its all genetics. Holding back would not have made them taller. Why are you so hostile over it? |
There are absolutely skills tied to development, including abstract reasoning, attention span and coordination. Being a year older does matter for nearly everything. |
All kids are immature. They should not be mature at age 5. They go to K to learn those things. And, this is why those play based preschools aren't great as they don't prepare the kids nor do the parents. We did an academic preschool and it prepared the kids, and one of mine had SN and very delayed. We started at a play based and I could see the older ones not prepared and switched. Holding back a smart kid makes less sense, as they can thrive academically. |
No, how would being a year older have helped if they aready are on the advanced track. This is your bias. |
|
Who sends their kid to kindergarten at 4?
sorry Op, you were an extreme outliner no need to advise ordinary folks on this |
| Our kid was the opposite. Youngest in the class and learned to compete for every little thing. Was in grade school classes with redshirted students two years older. Our kid was a true 5, 6, 7. That was our fault, it's the school district's for allowing parents to game the system. Our kid got dinged for not being able to comport like classmates two years old -- duh. We played the long game. Now this kid is in the honors college. I don't think we can stereotype either way. It comes down to each kid. Our kid thrived on being told they couldn't compete with the kids one or two years older. Our kid said, "oh yeah, watch me." |
| That **wasn't** our fault, it's the school district's for allowing parents to game the system. |
Some babies walk at 9 months. Others walk at 20 months. The age that a baby walks has no correlation at all to their odds of being a D1 track athlete. It's the same in math. Some kids develop abstract algebraic reasoning at 13 and others at 15 yo. Neither determines if the kid will grow up to be brilliant and teach math at MIT. My kid is on the advanced math track with Algebra in 7th, despite being 11 yo at the beginning of 7th grade. But I have no doubts that her abstract math skills are still developing and she'd find this class easier if she was a year older. |
I wasn’t socially isolated at all. Quite the opposite. Maybe that’s why I wasn’t bothered. |
| It depends. Our DS was youngest in class, went to T20 school, had great internships, and now is making lots of $$. |
Plenty of districts have cut-offs late enough for fall born kids to start at 4. |
The examples of band and math are so weird...it makes me think this really has to be a troll. I understand the discussions about sports, but math ability is really not a maturity thing. I have a late December birthday, and I started on time when the cut off was 12/31. My best friend was more than a year older than me (early December birthday), and it really never hurt me socially to get my license my junior year. I had plenty of friends who could drive. I'm not a prodigy, but I was extremely advanced in math (have a STEM PhD now). I was already driving the teachers at my Montessori crazy asking for more and more advanced math, so I think holding me back would have been worse. DH also has a December birthday (a few weeks older than me), and he's excellent at math. We met in grad school. He started K when he was 5, and we ended up with basically the same outcome. I think it just depends on the kid. |