What is the future of heterosexual dating when the number of men attending college continues to drop

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should support our young men more so that they grow into the adult men that we want?

Absolutely but telling them that their model is Trump with his multiple wives, infidelities, international wives, and poor business deals isn't really doing the job.

Lol yes tell us what you think of a SAHD or a man who makes less vs wife or a man without a college degree? Bottom line men are disposable. If a man needs support he is not type of man you want. Tell that to your sons!

At what age? Men should not need support typically at such a young age. They are cared for in their old age by women and in their young age by women. They are supported enough by women in middle age, but they should be able to carry and equal or greater burden during these years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the data that shows that blue collar professions on average make more than white collar ones after paying back college loans?

You are missing the point. People without college aren’t the financial Berden that people think because they are making as much or more than their counterparts so stop using college as be all to end all, was the point.

So where's the data on this? Particularly for the millennials who should have enough data on this by now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you have to date a college educated male? College education doesn’t equate to intelligence or success.

It doesn’t, but it certainly correlates with being more politically liberal. And women are more liberal than men, so they prefer to partner with liberal men.

Um, yes, it does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you have to date a college educated male? College education doesn’t equate to intelligence or success.

It doesn’t, but it certainly correlates with being more politically liberal. And women are more liberal than men, so they prefer to partner with liberal men.

And men are more conservative than women and most would prefer a conservative woman over a liberal one. Someone’s gotta compromise

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you have to date a college educated male? College education doesn’t equate to intelligence or success.

It doesn’t, but it certainly correlates with being more politically liberal. And women are more liberal than men, so they prefer to partner with liberal men.

And men are more conservative than women and most would prefer a conservative woman over a liberal one. Someone’s gotta compromise

Men will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the data that shows that blue collar professions on average make more than white collar ones after paying back college loans?

You are missing the point. People without college aren’t the financial Berden that people think because they are making as much or more than their counterparts so stop using college as be all to end all, was the point.

So where's the data on this? Particularly for the millennials who should have enough data on this by now.

I can only go on my own data. I make about 220 k with no college whatsoever, but have done great without it.

[Anonymous]

I’m not really sure what the issue is.
A man could be college educated and still be an amoral scuzzball just as easily as he could be a successful blue collar worker. Having sat through a course on Elizabethan poetry doesn't make one any more or less suitable to raise a child or act as a loving partner.
My lack of formal education is something that Im a little insecure about however I make an excellent honest living and can hold a conversation with pretty much anyone, looking at our current friend roster pretty much every one of them has a degree, there’s a few doctors in there too but they don’t seem any more or less happy then my wife and I; as I think about it the more high powered the job either of them has the more miserable they seem.

I can’t find the exact quote but it was something along the lines of, “if your job is one they had 300 years ago chances are it’s a pretty good job”; builders of all sorts, people who make things and those that care for others seem to me to have a more satisfactory life then my friends who work in insurance, finance or those lost in the middle of a large organization praying not to get fired when their job function is replaced by software.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the data that shows that blue collar professions on average make more than white collar ones after paying back college loans?

You are missing the point. People without college aren’t the financial Berden that people think because they are making as much or more than their counterparts so stop using college as be all to end all, was the point.

So where's the data on this? Particularly for the millennials who should have enough data on this by now.

I can only go on my own data. I make about 220 k with no college whatsoever, but have done great without it.

Good example of why, in general, college is correlated more with success PP. You appear to have never been taught how to extrapolate beyond your own experiences. Of course, some people who don't go to college do great. And some people who go to college end up as failures. But statistically, the group who goes to college is much more likely to be successful. And your solo experience does not disprove that point.

[Anonymous]

College isn’t worth much anymore.

With AI pretty soon it will be just for fun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the data that shows that blue collar professions on average make more than white collar ones after paying back college loans?

You are missing the point. People without college aren’t the financial Berden that people think because they are making as much or more than their counterparts so stop using college as be all to end all, was the point.

So where's the data on this? Particularly for the millennials who should have enough data on this by now.

I can only go on my own data. I make about 220 k with no college whatsoever, but have done great without it.

Good example of why, in general, college is correlated more with success PP. You appear to have never been taught how to extrapolate beyond your own experiences. Of course, some people who don't go to college do great. And some people who go to college end up as failures. But statistically, the group who goes to college is much more likely to be successful. And your solo experience does not disprove that point.

DP you sound very arrogant. Why don’t you post your resume and w2 for comparison?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m not really sure what the issue is.
A man could be college educated and still be an amoral scuzzball just as easily as he could be a successful blue collar worker. Having sat through a course on Elizabethan poetry doesn't make one any more or less suitable to raise a child or act as a loving partner.
My lack of formal education is something that Im a little insecure about however I make an excellent honest living and can hold a conversation with pretty much anyone, looking at our current friend roster pretty much every one of them has a degree, there’s a few doctors in there too but they don’t seem any more or less happy then my wife and I; as I think about it the more high powered the job either of them has the more miserable they seem.

I can’t find the exact quote but it was something along the lines of, “if your job is one they had 300 years ago chances are it’s a pretty good job”; builders of all sorts, people who make things and those that care for others seem to me to have a more satisfactory life then my friends who work in insurance, finance or those lost in the middle of a large organization praying not to get fired when their job function is replaced by software.

So basically you hang around people that have degrees and not other blue collar workers. Gotcha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should support our young men more so that they grow into the adult men that we want?

Absolutely but telling them that their model is Trump with his multiple wives, infidelities, international wives, and poor business deals isn't really doing the job.

Lol yes tell us what you think of a SAHD or a man who makes less vs wife or a man without a college degree? Bottom line men are disposable. If a man needs support he is not type of man you want. Tell that to your sons!

At what age? Men should not need support typically at such a young age. They are cared for in their old age by women and in their young age by women. They are supported enough by women in middle age, but they should be able to carry and equal or greater burden during these years.

Man you have some really bazaar views of how the world works. Are you saying men have no role in raising children? Are you saying old men never take care of their sick wives? Where do you come up with this sh#t?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should support our young men more so that they grow into the adult men that we want?

Absolutely but telling them that their model is Trump with his multiple wives, infidelities, international wives, and poor business deals isn't really doing the job.

Lol yes tell us what you think of a SAHD or a man who makes less vs wife or a man without a college degree? Bottom line men are disposable. If a man needs support he is not type of man you want. Tell that to your sons!

At what age? Men should not need support typically at such a young age. They are cared for in their old age by women and in their young age by women. They are supported enough by women in middle age, but they should be able to carry and equal or greater burden during these years.

Man you have some really bazaar views of how the world works. Are you saying men have no role in raising children? Are you saying old men never take care of their sick wives? Where do you come up with this sh#t?

They have a lesser role than women generally just like they have a greater role in making money for the family. It's a generalization. Didn't learn that in trade school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not really sure what the issue is.
A man could be college educated and still be an amoral scuzzball just as easily as he could be a successful blue collar worker. Having sat through a course on Elizabethan poetry doesn't make one any more or less suitable to raise a child or act as a loving partner.
My lack of formal education is something that Im a little insecure about however I make an excellent honest living and can hold a conversation with pretty much anyone, looking at our current friend roster pretty much every one of them has a degree, there’s a few doctors in there too but they don’t seem any more or less happy then my wife and I; as I think about it the more high powered the job either of them has the more miserable they seem.

I can’t find the exact quote but it was something along the lines of, “if your job is one they had 300 years ago chances are it’s a pretty good job”; builders of all sorts, people who make things and those that care for others seem to me to have a more satisfactory life then my friends who work in insurance, finance or those lost in the middle of a large organization praying not to get fired when their job function is replaced by software.

So basically you hang around people that have degrees and not other blue collar workers. Gotcha.

Lol, yeah I guess I do but the most fun ones don’t have degrees.

[Anonymous]

I have yet to find a “tradesman” who isn’t a raving misogynist.