Frumin vs. Krucoff vs. that Libertarian

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frumin definitely comes across as squishy. He’s already used a lot of political capital and good will on the criminal code. Not off to a great start.

As grandmama says “He’s old enough to know better.” He lived here in the 80s and 90s. He knows how bad things can get in DC once families and businesses start to flee. The other council members came of age during the golden Obama years. They don’t know any better. But Frumin sure does. And now we wake up to a shooting in the heart of Cleveland Park. Complete lack of leadership on his part. Totally spineless. I would take Krukoff or Goulet over Frumin or at this point. I miss Mary.

Mary would be there right now talking to the community. Frumin is where, hiding?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frumin definitely comes across as squishy. He’s already used a lot of political capital and good will on the criminal code. Not off to a great start.

As grandmama says “He’s old enough to know better.” He lived here in the 80s and 90s. He knows how bad things can get in DC once families and businesses start to flee. The other council members came of age during the golden Obama years. They don’t know any better. But Frumin sure does. And now we wake up to a shooting in the heart of Cleveland Park. Complete lack of leadership on his part. Totally spineless. I would take Krukoff or Goulet over Frumin or at this point. I miss Mary.

You know crime is actually down in DC, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frumin definitely comes across as squishy. He’s already used a lot of political capital and good will on the criminal code. Not off to a great start.

As grandmama says “He’s old enough to know better.” He lived here in the 80s and 90s. He knows how bad things can get in DC once families and businesses start to flee. The other council members came of age during the golden Obama years. They don’t know any better. But Frumin sure does. And now we wake up to a shooting in the heart of Cleveland Park. Complete lack of leadership on his part. Totally spineless. I would take Krukoff or Goulet over Frumin or at this point. I miss Mary.

You know crime is actually down in DC, right?

I don’t think that is true. Here’s why:

1. Post COVID there are significantly fewer people in DC, permanent residents, commuters, or tourists. So absolute reported crimes may be down, but on a per capita basis crime is actually much higher.
2. Due to decriminalization, there are fewer crimes to enforce (public drug use, turnstile jumping, public camping, etc.). So the absolute number is lower than in prior years.
3. There are 20% fewer police than in recent years, combined with the Ferguson effect, all suppress the number of crimes reported.
4. Large retail chains (the ones that have not left yet) are less link to report property crimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frumin will likely meet with anyone as time warrants, but he does have his opinions as to how things shake out, and he will likely stick to them.

Yeah, I listened into his "listening session" on Saturday. He had all the time in the world for the Foxhallers who want to scuttle the new school at Hardy Park, but he politely told them he still supports it.

Me, too, but I'm glad he's slowly killing the bike lanes via death by a thousand cuts.

There are so many new commitments, requirements, additional studies, alternative design considerations, traffic calming, etc that this thing is going to get pushed out to 2026 for the next mayor to decide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frumin definitely comes across as squishy. He’s already used a lot of political capital and good will on the criminal code. Not off to a great start.

I don’t think you really understand the criminal code rewrite. It redefines and reclassifies crimes and that makes it challenging for all those unwilling to invest more time than the likes of the WaPo EdBo could muster to compare penalties for the same crime between the two codes. You may consider it politically fashionable to paint the rewrite as weakening criminal penalties, but to do so without understanding it is quite silly. And if you’re not silly, you would acknowledge that the time between now and the new code coming in to effect allows a lot of time for the Council to engage meaningfully on the more controversial aspects and amend where need be. There are some aspects of the new legislation I don’t like - such as the potential to place further strain on the courts as those charged with misdemeanors request jury trails - but I’d much rather that gets debated and voted on directly by the Council than by further delaying the implementation of what all informed observers agree was a very necessary and long overdue overhaul of the code.

[Anonymous]

All you need to know about the RCCA is that it reduces maximum penalties for carjacking and gun crimes at a time when those crimes are rapidly increasing.

Everything else that people say is just motivated reasoning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the RCCA is that it reduces maximum penalties for carjacking and gun crimes at a time when those crimes are rapidly increasing.

Everything else that people say is just motivated reasoning.

You are like a dog chasing a bone that was never thrown.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/01/washington-dc-crime-reform-sentencing-fox-news.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the RCCA is that it reduces maximum penalties for carjacking and gun crimes at a time when those crimes are rapidly increasing.

Everything else that people say is just motivated reasoning.

You are like a dog chasing a bone that was never thrown.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/01/washington-dc-crime-reform-sentencing-fox-news.html

They won't read it. Has too many words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the RCCA is that it reduces maximum penalties for carjacking and gun crimes at a time when those crimes are rapidly increasing.

Everything else that people say is just motivated reasoning.

You are like a dog chasing a bone that was never thrown.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/01/washington-dc-crime-reform-sentencing-fox-news.html

That article uses a lot of words to distract from and does not dispute the truth. Here is what the mayor said when she vetoed the bill.

“RCCA reduces sentences for illegally carrying guns on our streets.”

“The US Attorney and I have raised objections that the Council has substantially reduced penalties for robberies, carjacking and home invasion burglaries.”
https://twitter.com/MayorBowser/status/1610676878402256898

Who do you think has more credibility here? The mayor and US Attorney or a hyper partisan liberal activist opinion writer who does not even deny these basic facts but only tries to obscure them through paragraphs of dreck?

Anyway, Frumin now owns every carjacking and act of gun violence in his Ward. What a way to start a career, by jumping off a ledge in a suicide pact.

[Anonymous]

It’s amazing. On Sunday the Mayor holds an all hands on deck meeting crime focused meeting for all the ANC commissioners that worked so hard to elect Frumin. The meeting where she, a lifelong city resident, said she feels less safe than in the 80s. And on Monday, the very next day, the ANC commissioners send the mayor a sharply worded joint letter about. . . . . parking passes! We’re all doomed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frumin definitely comes across as squishy. He’s already used a lot of political capital and good will on the criminal code. Not off to a great start.

As grandmama says “He’s old enough to know better.” He lived here in the 80s and 90s. He knows how bad things can get in DC once families and businesses start to flee. The other council members came of age during the golden Obama years. They don’t know any better. But Frumin sure does. And now we wake up to a shooting in the heart of Cleveland Park. Complete lack of leadership on his part. Totally spineless. I would take Krukoff or Goulet over Frumin or at this point. I miss Mary.

You know crime is actually down in DC, right?

If the cops don't respond or file a report, it looks like crime is down. In reality, crime is most certainly not down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the RCCA is that it reduces maximum penalties for carjacking and gun crimes at a time when those crimes are rapidly increasing.

Everything else that people say is just motivated reasoning.

You are like a dog chasing a bone that was never thrown.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/01/washington-dc-crime-reform-sentencing-fox-news.html

That article uses a lot of words to distract from and does not dispute the truth. Here is what the mayor said when she vetoed the bill.

“RCCA reduces sentences for illegally carrying guns on our streets.”

“The US Attorney and I have raised objections that the Council has substantially reduced penalties for robberies, carjacking and home invasion burglaries.”
https://twitter.com/MayorBowser/status/1610676878402256898

Who do you think has more credibility here? The mayor and US Attorney or a hyper partisan liberal activist opinion writer who does not even deny these basic facts but only tries to obscure them through paragraphs of dreck?

Anyway, Frumin now owns every carjacking and act of gun violence in his Ward. What a way to start a career, by jumping off a ledge in a suicide pact.

1) the new rules don't take place for two years, so the status quo remains in effect until then, so I suppose Mary Cheh owns those
2) you haven't read the new rules, which have been more than a decade in the making.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the RCCA is that it reduces maximum penalties for carjacking and gun crimes at a time when those crimes are rapidly increasing.

Everything else that people say is just motivated reasoning.

You are like a dog chasing a bone that was never thrown.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/01/washington-dc-crime-reform-sentencing-fox-news.html

That article uses a lot of words to distract from and does not dispute the truth. Here is what the mayor said when she vetoed the bill.

“RCCA reduces sentences for illegally carrying guns on our streets.”

“The US Attorney and I have raised objections that the Council has substantially reduced penalties for robberies, carjacking and home invasion burglaries.”
https://twitter.com/MayorBowser/status/1610676878402256898

Who do you think has more credibility here? The mayor and US Attorney or a hyper partisan liberal activist opinion writer who does not even deny these basic facts but only tries to obscure them through paragraphs of dreck?

Anyway, Frumin now owns every carjacking and act of gun violence in his Ward. What a way to start a career, by jumping off a ledge in a suicide pact.

Have you seen any of the videos by the YouTube personality, Scambaiter? He intercepts scam calls and tries to warn the victims that they are not talking to an Amazon rep or whatever, but rather a scammer. Some of the victims refuse his intervention, insist they are not being scammed, and continue to send thousands of dollars to the scammers. You kinda remind me of them. I'm sorry to inform you that tour ignorance is being exploited for profit by morally corrupt politicians and media personalities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the RCCA is that it reduces maximum penalties for carjacking and gun crimes at a time when those crimes are rapidly increasing.

Everything else that people say is just motivated reasoning.

You are like a dog chasing a bone that was never thrown.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/01/washington-dc-crime-reform-sentencing-fox-news.html

That article uses a lot of words to distract from and does not dispute the truth. Here is what the mayor said when she vetoed the bill.

“RCCA reduces sentences for illegally carrying guns on our streets.”

“The US Attorney and I have raised objections that the Council has substantially reduced penalties for robberies, carjacking and home invasion burglaries.”
https://twitter.com/MayorBowser/status/1610676878402256898

Who do you think has more credibility here? The mayor and US Attorney or a hyper partisan liberal activist opinion writer who does not even deny these basic facts but only tries to obscure them through paragraphs of dreck?

Anyway, Frumin now owns every carjacking and act of gun violence in his Ward. What a way to start a career, by jumping off a ledge in a suicide pact.

1) the new rules don't take place for two years, so the status quo remains in effect until then, so I suppose Mary Cheh owns those
2) you haven't read the new rules, which have been more than a decade in the making.

Do you believe criminal penalties serve as a deterrent effect?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the RCCA is that it reduces maximum penalties for carjacking and gun crimes at a time when those crimes are rapidly increasing.

Everything else that people say is just motivated reasoning.

You are like a dog chasing a bone that was never thrown.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/01/washington-dc-crime-reform-sentencing-fox-news.html

That article uses a lot of words to distract from and does not dispute the truth. Here is what the mayor said when she vetoed the bill.

“RCCA reduces sentences for illegally carrying guns on our streets.”

“The US Attorney and I have raised objections that the Council has substantially reduced penalties for robberies, carjacking and home invasion burglaries.”
https://twitter.com/MayorBowser/status/1610676878402256898

Who do you think has more credibility here? The mayor and US Attorney or a hyper partisan liberal activist opinion writer who does not even deny these basic facts but only tries to obscure them through paragraphs of dreck?

Anyway, Frumin now owns every carjacking and act of gun violence in his Ward. What a way to start a career, by jumping off a ledge in a suicide pact.

Have you seen any of the videos by the YouTube personality, Scambaiter? He intercepts scam calls and tries to warn the victims that they are not talking to an Amazon rep or whatever, but rather a scammer. Some of the victims refuse his intervention, insist they are not being scammed, and continue to send thousands of dollars to the scammers. You kinda remind me of them. I'm sorry to inform you that tour ignorance is being exploited for profit by morally corrupt politicians and media personalities.

Thanks for letting everyone know that you are a child so that we can ignore your opinion.