Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm really curious about what he stole from the white house. This can't be just like the Clintons taking a couple of tables or what not. I feel like it must be related to national security.

They said it was classified documents.

I don’t think they charge him here. They got their documents back, it’s done. It takes balls to charge an ex president with basically document theft (which he could have declassified when he was President), Garland doesn’t have it in him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm really curious about what he stole from the white house. This can't be just like the Clintons taking a couple of tables or what not. I feel like it must be related to national security.

They said it was classified documents.

Maybe TFG was planning to tell us all who really killed JFK! And the FBI has swooped in to take back the docs before Trump can self-publish the truth!

[Anonymous]

So Desantis knew about it and did not let Donald know.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm really curious about what he stole from the white house. This can't be just like the Clintons taking a couple of tables or what not. I feel like it must be related to national security.

They said it was classified documents.

Who is They?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm really curious about what he stole from the white house. This can't be just like the Clintons taking a couple of tables or what not. I feel like it must be related to national security.

They said it was classified documents.

I don’t think they charge him here. They got their documents back, it’s done. It takes balls to charge an ex president with basically document theft (which he could have declassified when he was President), Garland doesn’t have it in him.

I agree that just having classified documents (including military information or other nat sec info) doesn't seem to be worth the fuss. Depends on what he has done/will do with the information...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fact:

Suck it the F**K UP. He’s a F**KING criminal. We all know it.

This is what happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm really curious about what he stole from the white house. This can't be just like the Clintons taking a couple of tables or what not. I feel like it must be related to national security.

They said it was classified documents.

I don’t think they charge him here. They got their documents back, it’s done. It takes balls to charge an ex president with basically document theft (which he could have declassified when he was President), Garland doesn’t have it in him.

The problem seems to be that they didn't get their documents back.

[Anonymous]

guys we’ve been together through a lot over the last 457,000 years since trump first rode down that gdforsaken escalator. and here we are still!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Desantis knew about it and did not let Donald know.

Why would DeSantis know about this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

An FBI raid on a former president sets a dangerous precedent by implying the rule of law applies equally to everyone.

[Anonymous]

So Trump is an idiot savant multi-decade criminal mastermind mafia boss laundering money for foreign countries, selling national secrets, tax fraud, on and on and on… but the most they can get on him is some alleged document theft from his last few hours in the WH?

Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Be careful cheering on the witch hunt, one day they may be hunting you.

You should really, really be careful w/ threats, child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm really curious about what he stole from the white house. This can't be just like the Clintons taking a couple of tables or what not. I feel like it must be related to national security.

They said it was classified documents.

I don’t think they charge him here. They got their documents back, it’s done. It takes balls to charge an ex president with basically document theft (which he could have declassified when he was President), Garland doesn’t have it in him.

What if there is evidence classified documents were shared illegally with third parties? Still "done?"