20 months isn’t too early. It’s been done for centuries. You’re just silly. |
+2, 3 is average the average age in a developed society. |
| Some posters appear to own stock in Huggies/Pampers. |
20 months is too early and if you want to stick what’s been done for centuries for health related issues, you’d be dead. |
Now that’s a lie. |
Potty training a 1 year old, I don’t think so. Go back to your 1700’s where they didn’t bathe daily for centuries. |
Pp not lying. I was recently told by my pediatrician that three is on point. And a little later for boys. |
Yeah, my precious one was trained before leaving the birthing ward. |
Why don’t you care about our environment? Or climate change? |
There’s absolutely zero evidence to support that nonsense. |
Why do you have an electronic device that you are using that is harmful to the environment? Why? Don’t you care? |
Neither do you have evidence to support your “argument.” Btw, there is evidence if you just do a small search on when it’s appropriate from a medical standpoint. So yeah, there is evidence. |
Do you drive, use toothpaste, purchase meat, fly, use electronics, have children? |
For centuries people didn't have modern plumbing or underwear. Kids ran around naked and learned to go behind a tree. People had lower standards of cleanliness and hygiene. Learning to use a modern toilet is a totally different deal and it actually makes sense that most kids take a bit longer because going to the bathroom sitting down is a weird modern convenience that we force on them, which is why doing so very early is entirely about parental preference and can cause issues. Toilet put kids in an unnatural position to eliminate. |
You really are twisting yourself into knots because you're ashamed you waited until 3.5 years old to potty train. |