Democrats for Education Reform (Bowser, Goulet etc)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Charters operated by churches.

There are over 60 charter organizations in DC, but can you point out one that's operated by a church? You're making sh*t up!

Not in DC, PP said "nationally."

Please don't accuse people of making stuff up if you don't understand what they're saying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Charters operated by churches.

There are over 60 charter organizations in DC, but can you point out one that's operated by a church? You're making sh*t up!

Not in DC, PP said "nationally."

Please don't accuse people of making stuff up if you don't understand what they're saying.

gaslighting 101

[Anonymous]

I'm the PP that said stop making sh*t up. Sorry if I misunderstood. So DFER is trying to support a national system of putting money in religious schools? And my point that NO charters in DC are religious is gaslighting? Ok

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am supporting Frumin. He has a more nuanced approach to the education issue that makes a lot of sense to me. But he is also better on issues like transportation and affordable housing than the others.

This is why I'm supporting Finley - better than Frumin on housing and transportation and toe-to-toe with him on education. He's also closer to my age than Cheh's age and I think it's time for a changing of the guard.

I’m a parent at John Eaton, which is located in the ANC that Beau Finley currently chairs. I can say with rather high confidence that Beau Finley couldn’t find Eaton if he had a map. He never expressed interest in education issues until he began his long shot campaign for the Council.

BS. He and Dubois were the only commissioners pushing for a larger renovation to Eaton years ago so that it wouldn't be at capacity so soon. Historic preservationists won out, though, saying any further renovation would be unsightly.

Finley is the ANC chair but much of the time he lives in MD. We’d like a real DC resident serving on the city counsel, please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP that said stop making sh*t up. Sorry if I misunderstood. So DFER is trying to support a national system of putting money in religious schools? And my point that NO charters in DC are religious is gaslighting? Ok

camel's nose in tent

[Anonymous]

I mean, what I'm taking from the thread is that I should follow DFER and support them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, what I'm taking from the thread is that I should follow DFER and support them.

If you favor the consolidation of church and state in the form of public monies going to religious schools, then sure. Who needs a First Amendment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

If you favor the consolidation of church and state in the form of public monies going to religious schools, then sure. Who needs a First Amendment.

This is just bonkers. I'm a charter parent and an avid proponent of strengthening the Establishment Clause. The two have nothing to do with each other. If that's your argument against groups like DFER then you're on very shaky ground.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If you favor the consolidation of church and state in the form of public monies going to religious schools, then sure. Who needs a First Amendment.

This is just bonkers. I'm a charter parent and an avid proponent of strengthening the Establishment Clause. The two have nothing to do with each other. If that's your argument against groups like DFER then you're on very shaky ground.

The people opposed to DFER seem way way way more bonkers than DFER.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If you favor the consolidation of church and state in the form of public monies going to religious schools, then sure. Who needs a First Amendment.

This is just bonkers. I'm a charter parent and an avid proponent of strengthening the Establishment Clause. The two have nothing to do with each other. If that's your argument against groups like DFER then you're on very shaky ground.

That is their national agenda. Own it.

Obviously, we don't have that problem in DC....yet.

By any politician who is willing to court, much less accept their support is getting in bed with the agenda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If you favor the consolidation of church and state in the form of public monies going to religious schools, then sure. Who needs a First Amendment.

This is just bonkers. I'm a charter parent and an avid proponent of strengthening the Establishment Clause. The two have nothing to do with each other. If that's your argument against groups like DFER then you're on very shaky ground.

That is their national agenda. Own it.

Obviously, we don't have that problem in DC....yet.

By any politician who is willing to court, much less accept their support is getting in bed with the agenda.

I'm lost where DFER says it wants public monies to go to religious schools. Can you show me?

[Anonymous]

I'm reading here and I don't see that as a goal: https://ballotpedia.org/Democrats_for_Education_Reform

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm reading here and I don't see that as a goal: https://ballotpedia.org/Democrats_for_Education_Reform

Well, if they didn't write it explicitly into their documents then it's unpossible for it to be true!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm reading here and I don't see that as a goal: https://ballotpedia.org/Democrats_for_Education_Reform

Well, if they didn't write it explicitly into their documents then it's unpossible for it to be true!

Those aren't their documents, by and large. Those are documents from other sources. ballotpedia just tries to provide an unbiased look at the stances of various groups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm reading here and I don't see that as a goal: https://ballotpedia.org/Democrats_for_Education_Reform

Well, if they didn't write it explicitly into their documents then it's unpossible for it to be true!

So your evidence that is true is the fact that there's no evidence? neato