Youngkin supports overturning Roe v Wade

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for Youngkin. Glad I voted for him.

Same. When Roe was decided we didn't have the scientific evidence of pre-natal development we do today. Of course, overturning Roe will not end abortion. That is a heart issue.

Irrelevant as long as reproduction still requires women’s bodies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for Youngkin. Glad I voted for him.

Same. When Roe was decided we didn't have the scientific evidence of pre-natal development we do today. Of course, overturning Roe will not end abortion. That is a heart issue.

Irrelevant as long as reproduction still requires women’s bodies

+1. The only scientific development that would have any relevance is the creation of an artificial womb. Still, I would argue there is a right to not have your genetic material floating out there in the world.

[Anonymous]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/24/virginia-youngkin-abortion-15-week-ruling/

Youngkin to seek 15-week abortion law in Virginia after Supreme Court ruling



The VA GOP is coming after our freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FML.... Where are my people?!? The social liberals, financially conservative? I just don't see myself in either party.

What does financially conservative mean to you? The Dems tend to be more fiscally responsible than republicans so I always find it odd that public perception is the opposite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FML.... Where are my people?!? The social liberals, financially conservative? I just don't see myself in either party.

What does financially conservative mean to you? The Dems tend to be more fiscally responsible than republicans so I always find it odd that public perception is the opposite.

Seriously. The GOP just says something entirely untrue, and their lemming followers believe it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FML.... Where are my people?!? The social liberals, financially conservative? I just don't see myself in either party.

What does financially conservative mean to you? The Dems tend to be more fiscally responsible than republicans so I always find it odd that public perception is the opposite.

Seriously. The GOP just says something entirely untrue, and their lemming followers believe it.

+1

They say whatever they think they need to say to get elected, but are always full of crap.

And the idiots believe them again and again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/24/virginia-youngkin-abortion-15-week-ruling/

Youngkin to seek 15-week abortion law in Virginia after Supreme Court ruling



The VA GOP is coming after our freedom.

Why do you need more than 3 1/2 months to decide, except in the exception cases Youngkin already identifies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/24/virginia-youngkin-abortion-15-week-ruling/

Youngkin to seek 15-week abortion law in Virginia after Supreme Court ruling



The VA GOP is coming after our freedom.

Why do you need more than 3 1/2 months to decide, except in the exception cases Youngkin already identifies?

That's not your business. If you believe people have the rights to control their own body, that's not for you to decide that you know more than a woman does about her childbearing decisions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/24/virginia-youngkin-abortion-15-week-ruling/

Youngkin to seek 15-week abortion law in Virginia after Supreme Court ruling



The VA GOP is coming after our freedom.

Why do you need more than 3 1/2 months to decide, except in the exception cases Youngkin already identifies?

That's not your business. If you believe people have the rights to control their own body, that's not for you to decide that you know more than a woman does about her childbearing decisions.

There was a woman in Ireland with a non-viable pregnancy at 5 months, and while doctors at her Catholic hospital argued over whether her life was truly in danger if they didn't remove the fetus right away, she fell into sepsis and died. The outcry was so great that now Ireland allows abortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/24/virginia-youngkin-abortion-15-week-ruling/

Youngkin to seek 15-week abortion law in Virginia after Supreme Court ruling



The VA GOP is coming after our freedom.

Why do you need more than 3 1/2 months to decide, except in the exception cases Youngkin already identifies?

That's not your business. If you believe people have the rights to control their own body, that's not for you to decide that you know more than a woman does about her childbearing decisions.

There was a woman in Ireland with a non-viable pregnancy at 5 months, and while doctors at her Catholic hospital argued over whether her life was truly in danger if they didn't remove the fetus right away, she fell into sepsis and died. The outcry was so great that now Ireland allows abortion.

But here in the US after 20 5,6 yr olds died from a school shooter, the Rs still didn't want to do anything about gun violence. So, really, one woman dying of sepsis from a miscarriage is NBD in the grand scheme of things in their minds. It was God's will. I mean.. if they think it's fine to force a 13 yr old girl to birth her rapist's baby, you really think they care about a woman dying of a miscarriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/24/virginia-youngkin-abortion-15-week-ruling/

Youngkin to seek 15-week abortion law in Virginia after Supreme Court ruling



The VA GOP is coming after our freedom.

Why do you need more than 3 1/2 months to decide, except in the exception cases Youngkin already identifies?

That's not your business. If you believe people have the rights to control their own body, that's not for you to decide that you know more than a woman does about her childbearing decisions.

There was a woman in Ireland with a non-viable pregnancy at 5 months, and while doctors at her Catholic hospital argued over whether her life was truly in danger if they didn't remove the fetus right away, she fell into sepsis and died. The outcry was so great that now Ireland allows abortion.

But here in the US after 20 5,6 yr olds died from a school shooter, the Rs still didn't want to do anything about gun violence. So, really, one woman dying of sepsis from a miscarriage is NBD in the grand scheme of things in their minds. It was God's will. I mean.. if they think it's fine to force a 13 yr old girl to birth her rapist's baby, you really think they care about a woman dying of a miscarriage.

So what's your point? Line up all our women and children like lambs to slaughter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/24/virginia-youngkin-abortion-15-week-ruling/

Youngkin to seek 15-week abortion law in Virginia after Supreme Court ruling



The VA GOP is coming after our freedom.

Why do you need more than 3 1/2 months to decide, except in the exception cases Youngkin already identifies?

Because serious defects, including one's rather threatening the woman's life, often don't show up until the 20 week scan.

I have two friends for whom this was true. Both married women, planned pregnancies, both sailed through every other test. Both went into their 20nweek scan hoping to see pictures of their baby, got gut wrenching news. Both risked serious health issues or death without abortion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/24/virginia-youngkin-abortion-15-week-ruling/

Youngkin to seek 15-week abortion law in Virginia after Supreme Court ruling



The VA GOP is coming after our freedom.

Why do you need more than 3 1/2 months to decide, except in the exception cases Youngkin already identifies?

That's not your business. If you believe people have the rights to control their own body, that's not for you to decide that you know more than a woman does about her childbearing decisions.

There was a woman in Ireland with a non-viable pregnancy at 5 months, and while doctors at her Catholic hospital argued over whether her life was truly in danger if they didn't remove the fetus right away, she fell into sepsis and died. The outcry was so great that now Ireland allows abortion.

But here in the US after 20 5,6 yr olds died from a school shooter, the Rs still didn't want to do anything about gun violence. So, really, one woman dying of sepsis from a miscarriage is NBD in the grand scheme of things in their minds. It was God's will. I mean.. if they think it's fine to force a 13 yr old girl to birth her rapist's baby, you really think they care about a woman dying of a miscarriage.

So what's your point? Line up all our women and children like lambs to slaughter?

If God wants you to die of sepsis due to a miscarriage, then it's God's will, according to Rs.

If your 13 yr old daughter gets raped and impregnated by her rapist, then it's God's will.

If your baby has severe deformities such that they will suffer for a few weeks, then die a painful death, it's God's will.

This is what Rs believe.

[Anonymous]

Guess y’all shoulda reigned in your far leftists before the gubernatorial election. Live and learn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guess y’all shoulda reigned in your far leftists before the gubernatorial election. Live and learn.

Oh yes this is the leftists’ fault. Make it make sense.