Already discussed here, slick. Go back a page. Real lawyers have no issues with her decisions. Some might suggest that the GOP cleanse itself of the child predators they’re currently protecting. |
LOL. "Real lawyers." You mean members of Congress who happen to have law degrees? |
|
One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on. Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago? |
Appoint a serious candidate, get a serious discussion. |
This is a BS response. The Democrats have shown themselves to be anything but civil in past confirmation hearings. From the parade of protesters at the hearings to the inane questions asked by Democratic Senators - it is embarrassing. |
You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him. I don't remember any circus with Barrett |
You give me an example of an embarrassing question by a Democratic Senator and I'll give you an example of an embarrassing question by a Republican Senator. Let the internet judge with is more embarrassing. |
No Gorsuch circus either. |
Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's. Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted. |