Ketanji Brown Jackson will be a great justice!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

How did Merrick Garland’s confirmation hearings go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's.

Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted.

How do you figure that seat should have been Garland's? Obama didn't have the senate votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's.

Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted.

How do you figure that seat should have been Garland's? Obama didn't have the senate votes.

You mean in the olden days when people would cross the aisle to vote for a qualified candidate? No Republican would have voted for Garland?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's.

Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted.

How do you figure that seat should have been Garland's? Obama didn't have the senate votes.

You mean in the olden days when people would cross the aisle to vote for a qualified candidate? No Republican would have voted for Garland?

+1 He got a 76-23 vote in a Republican-controlled Senate when he was confirmed for the DC Circuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

Appoint a serious candidate, get a serious discussion.

+1. Odd how no one complains that the Gorsuch hearing were uncivilized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

And certainly not with Gorsuch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's.

Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted.

+1. You nominate a gu who was beat red and yelling “I like beer” at the conformation hearing. What did you expect?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's.

Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted.

How do you figure that seat should have been Garland's? Obama didn't have the senate votes.

You don’t know that. Because Mitch refused to allow hearings to occur. For a full year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's.

Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted.

+1. You nominate a gu who was beat red and yelling “I like beer” at the conformation hearing. What did you expect?

And accused a senator of being an alcoholic, don’t forget that part.

[Anonymous]

Jackson can see the future, that’s a pretty good trait for a Justice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's.

Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted.

+1. You nominate a gu who was beat red and yelling “I like beer” at the conformation hearing. What did you expect?

And angrily talking over female senators in disrespectful matter and credibly accused of sexual assault. Biff-Kav was the height of incivility.

[Anonymous]

Ketanji looked good in her purple suit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

How did Merrick Garland’s confirmation hearings go?

This. At least your nominees got an up down vote, hon. So spare me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's.

Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted.

How do you know? He got no vote.

How do you figure that seat should have been Garland's? Obama didn't have the senate votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing we know...... these hearings will not be the absolute circus that Democrats forced us to endure just a few years ago.
They will be focused on her judicial philosophy and her past rulings. Unlike the things the Democrats focused on.

Funny that Dems are calling for "civility" now. Where were these Democrats just a few years ago?

You mean Kavanaugh? He seems to be the lightning rod for the circus that followed him.

I don't remember any circus with Barrett

Or Gorsuch even though he was in the seat that should have been Garland's.

Yeah, appoint a clown, get a circus. No one's fault but your own - and you dummies got exactly the reaction you wanted.

+1. You nominate a gu who was beat red and yelling “I like beer” at the conformation hearing. What did you expect?

Yeah, he is such an embarrassment. During the hearings, I was texting with my brother who is the same age as BK, also went to Catholic high school, also a straight white guy with kids, former Republican (pre-trump), has never lived in or near the Beltway, and he was basically saying “this is not normal, right? Who would act this way at a Senate hearing?” It was a good reality check for me. The only clown in that hearing was the nominee, unfortunately.