Youngkin and his AG come out in favor of overturning Roe v Wade

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if this type of extremism will scare off businesses in the short run - they might bank on sanity being restored in the next election. However, I, as a neighbor in DC, won't be visiting or spending a dime in Virginia as long as Youngkin is in charge.

Enjoy flying out of Baltimore for the next4 years

Actually BWI and National / Reagan are both really nice and beat driving over thru the Tysons hellscape.

Reagan is nice, Dulles is great - and BWI is a cesspool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if this type of extremism will scare off businesses in the short run - they might bank on sanity being restored in the next election. However, I, as a neighbor in DC, won't be visiting or spending a dime in Virginia as long as Youngkin is in charge.

Enjoy flying out of Baltimore for the next4 years

Actually BWI and National / Reagan are both really nice and beat driving over thru the Tysons hellscape.

Reagan is nice, Dulles is great - and BWI is a cesspool.

No one is forcing you to come to Maryland, thank goodness. For me, I enjoy taking my low cost bus transportation to BWI and my ability to park for free in one of the MoCo bus lots. Pretty low stress.

[Anonymous]

Exactly how is this "in favor of overturning Roe v Wade"? Up to 20 weeks sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

A bill filed in the Virginia House of Delegates this week would ban abortions after 20 weeks of gestation except in cases where the pregnant woman is at risk of death or “substantial and irreversible” damage to her health.

The bill bans abortions at the halfway point of pregnancy, unless the procedure is necessary to prevent the woman’s death, or “substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.”

https://richmond.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/update-miyares-says-roe-v-wade-was-wrongly-decided-and-va-now-views-constitution-as/article_2e86f72a-0bbb-5d2a-9733-70a4e55d9a2f.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if this type of extremism will scare off businesses in the short run - they might bank on sanity being restored in the next election. However, I, as a neighbor in DC, won't be visiting or spending a dime in Virginia as long as Youngkin is in charge.

Enjoy flying out of Baltimore for the next4 years

Actually BWI and National / Reagan are both really nice and beat driving over thru the Tysons hellscape.

Pssst….Reagan Airport is in Virginia - the state that PP said she wouldn’t spend a dime in while Youngkin is Governor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if this type of extremism will scare off businesses in the short run - they might bank on sanity being restored in the next election. However, I, as a neighbor in DC, won't be visiting or spending a dime in Virginia as long as Youngkin is in charge.

Enjoy flying out of Baltimore for the next4 years

I live in DC. BWI is closer to me than IAD, so I am fine with it. Enjoy having to go to another state to enjoy things that liberals enjoy.

Yes, liberals do seem to enjoy abortions

No one enjoys abortions. However, one should have to travel tens or hundreds of miles to get one.

You are a sick pup to make such a suggestion.

Dems sure love talking about abortions! I won’t call them a bunch of ghouls, but some people feel that way

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how is this "in favor of overturning Roe v Wade"? Up to 20 weeks sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

A bill filed in the Virginia House of Delegates this week would ban abortions after 20 weeks of gestation except in cases where the pregnant woman is at risk of death or “substantial and irreversible” damage to her health.

The bill bans abortions at the halfway point of pregnancy, unless the procedure is necessary to prevent the woman’s death, or “substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.”

https://richmond.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/update-miyares-says-roe-v-wade-was-wrongly-decided-and-va-now-views-constitution-as/article_2e86f72a-0bbb-5d2a-9733-70a4e55d9a2f.html

Miyares literally joined the Mississippi Attorney General in the lawsuit designed to overturn Roe v. Wade. It’s literally the topic of this thread. The bill filed in the legislature is different (though also bad.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how is this "in favor of overturning Roe v Wade"? Up to 20 weeks sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

A bill filed in the Virginia House of Delegates this week would ban abortions after 20 weeks of gestation except in cases where the pregnant woman is at risk of death or “substantial and irreversible” damage to her health.

The bill bans abortions at the halfway point of pregnancy, unless the procedure is necessary to prevent the woman’s death, or “substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.”

https://richmond.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/update-miyares-says-roe-v-wade-was-wrongly-decided-and-va-now-views-constitution-as/article_2e86f72a-0bbb-5d2a-9733-70a4e55d9a2f.html

Miyares literally joined the Mississippi Attorney General in the lawsuit designed to overturn Roe v. Wade. It’s literally the topic of this thread. The bill filed in the legislature is different (though also bad.)

Thread on the abortion bill here: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1031272.page

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You get what you vote for, Virginia. Bunch of idiots.

+1. Thanks for nothing, you stupid fools. You've set back civil rights 50 years.

48% of us voted for McAuliffe. Don’t blame us all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You get what you vote for, Virginia. Bunch of idiots.

+1. Thanks for nothing, you stupid fools. You've set back civil rights 50 years.

48% of us voted for McAuliffe. Don’t blame us all.

And there goes one in face of the playground bully. Don’t yell at me - it was them. We are on your side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how is this "in favor of overturning Roe v Wade"? Up to 20 weeks sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

A bill filed in the Virginia House of Delegates this week would ban abortions after 20 weeks of gestation except in cases where the pregnant woman is at risk of death or “substantial and irreversible” damage to her health.

The bill bans abortions at the halfway point of pregnancy, unless the procedure is necessary to prevent the woman’s death, or “substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.”

https://richmond.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/update-miyares-says-roe-v-wade-was-wrongly-decided-and-va-now-views-constitution-as/article_2e86f72a-0bbb-5d2a-9733-70a4e55d9a2f.html

Partially, because a lot of women don't find out about serious fetal abnormalities until their 18-23 week ultrasounds.
Virginia already restricts abortion in the third trimester unless the woman's life is in jeopardy. Only about 1.3 percent of abortions are even performed this late.
This is just cruel to women and men who find out their babies are going to die or be seriously deformed. And if you don't know women who have had this issue, you haven't known enough pregnant women. Because not only did it happen to me, it happened to two of my friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how is this "in favor of overturning Roe v Wade"? Up to 20 weeks sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

A bill filed in the Virginia House of Delegates this week would ban abortions after 20 weeks of gestation except in cases where the pregnant woman is at risk of death or “substantial and irreversible” damage to her health.

The bill bans abortions at the halfway point of pregnancy, unless the procedure is necessary to prevent the woman’s death, or “substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.”

https://richmond.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/update-miyares-says-roe-v-wade-was-wrongly-decided-and-va-now-views-constitution-as/article_2e86f72a-0bbb-5d2a-9733-70a4e55d9a2f.html

Partially, because a lot of women don't find out about serious fetal abnormalities until their 18-23 week ultrasounds.
Virginia already restricts abortion in the third trimester unless the woman's life is in jeopardy. Only about 1.3 percent of abortions are even performed this late.
This is just cruel to women and men who find out their babies are going to die or be seriously deformed. And if you don't know women who have had this issue, you haven't known enough pregnant women. Because not only did it happen to me, it happened to two of my friends.

I'm the PP right above this. "Luckily," I didn't have to make the choice because my baby just died. The same thing happened to one of my friends. The other chose to induce early after stopping the baby's heart. The baby had hydrocephaly, among other things. It would never have lived past delivery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how is this "in favor of overturning Roe v Wade"? Up to 20 weeks sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

A bill filed in the Virginia House of Delegates this week would ban abortions after 20 weeks of gestation except in cases where the pregnant woman is at risk of death or “substantial and irreversible” damage to her health.

The bill bans abortions at the halfway point of pregnancy, unless the procedure is necessary to prevent the woman’s death, or “substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.”

https://richmond.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/update-miyares-says-roe-v-wade-was-wrongly-decided-and-va-now-views-constitution-as/article_2e86f72a-0bbb-5d2a-9733-70a4e55d9a2f.html

Partially, because a lot of women don't find out about serious fetal abnormalities until their 18-23 week ultrasounds.
Virginia already restricts abortion in the third trimester unless the woman's life is in jeopardy. Only about 1.3 percent of abortions are even performed this late.
This is just cruel to women and men who find out their babies are going to die or be seriously deformed. And if you don't know women who have had this issue, you haven't known enough pregnant women. Because not only did it happen to me, it happened to two of my friends.

I'm the PP right above this. "Luckily," I didn't have to make the choice because my baby just died. The same thing happened to one of my friends. The other chose to induce early after stopping the baby's heart. The baby had hydrocephaly, among other things. It would never have lived past delivery.

I'm so sorry. I can't think of many things crueler than making a woman carry a dead baby for months, risking her own life and ability to have living kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a great week for Virginia! You go, Gov Youngkin.

What a joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Exactly how is this "in favor of overturning Roe v Wade"? Up to 20 weeks sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

A bill filed in the Virginia House of Delegates this week would ban abortions after 20 weeks of gestation except in cases where the pregnant woman is at risk of death or “substantial and irreversible” damage to her health.

The bill bans abortions at the halfway point of pregnancy, unless the procedure is necessary to prevent the woman’s death, or “substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.”

https://richmond.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/update-miyares-says-roe-v-wade-was-wrongly-decided-and-va-now-views-constitution-as/article_2e86f72a-0bbb-5d2a-9733-70a4e55d9a2f.html

Partially, because a lot of women don't find out about serious fetal abnormalities until their 18-23 week ultrasounds.
Virginia already restricts abortion in the third trimester unless the woman's life is in jeopardy. Only about 1.3 percent of abortions are even performed this late.
This is just cruel to women and men who find out their babies are going to die or be seriously deformed. And if you don't know women who have had this issue, you haven't known enough pregnant women. Because not only did it happen to me, it happened to two of my friends.

I'm the PP right above this. "Luckily," I didn't have to make the choice because my baby just died. The same thing happened to one of my friends. The other chose to induce early after stopping the baby's heart. The baby had hydrocephaly, among other things. It would never have lived past delivery.

I'm so sorry. I can't think of many things crueler than making a woman carry a dead baby for months, risking her own life and ability to have living kids.

I'm the PP whose baby died. You don't have to carry it once it's dead. That can make you really sick. And I guess it wouldn't be against the law. Right? But it can make you have to carry a baby that you KNOW is going to die or be born and then die in pain.

[Anonymous]

I literally don’t care. Give my kids a normal childhood back and we’re good. My daughters can get their abortions if needed in a neighboring state.