Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote:Do they have a clear explanation of how they do the local norming of the MAP scores? What is the percent cutoff this year for the map scores, last year was 85%. Yes it was the top 15% but that was the top 15% of a local school which may be a bit higher or lower than national or county norms. I think it's the top 15% of home HS cluster. My 99%er got in so I'm fine with it. Resigning myself that my other 99%er may not. Somehow, it seems 1 in 10 people around here have a 99%er. Shame that isn't reflected in the usual discourse.
Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote:Do they have a clear explanation of how they do the local norming of the MAP scores? What is the percent cutoff this year for the map scores, last year was 85%. Yes it was the top 15% but that was the top 15% of a local school which may be a bit higher or lower than national or county norms. I think it's the top 15% of home HS cluster. My 99%er got in so I'm fine with it. Resigning myself that my other 99%er may not.
Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote:Do they have a clear explanation of how they do the local norming of the MAP scores? What is the percent cutoff this year for the map scores, last year was 85%. Yes it was the top 15% but that was the top 15% of a local school which may be a bit higher or lower than national or county norms.
Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote:Do they have a clear explanation of how they do the local norming of the MAP scores? What is the percent cutoff this year for the map scores, last year was 85%.
Anonymous wrote:Do they have a clear explanation of how they do the local norming of the MAP scores?
Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics