The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both are terrible humans. William more so for faking he was nice to his brother for the cameras but snubbing him the rest of the time.
Scaling down the statue ceremony just to upset his brother and not give him more publicity.
Enough with the monarchy.

Nothing they’ve done indicates that they’re terrible human beings. On the contrary, both have done extraordinary things for charities. William especially with his earth shot prize. Harry and William have some family issues - but who doesn’t? If you hate the monarchy fine, but to call these people terrible human beings makes you sound sort of stupid.

Puke. Is that the best you can do, call me stupid? Imperial colonists and racist, a plague upon this earth that THIS family brought. Atrocities, murders around the world of indigenous people, stealing Indian's textile industry, murdering around Asia and Africa. All their wealth should be taken away and distributed to descendants of their victims around the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both are terrible humans. William more so for faking he was nice to his brother for the cameras but snubbing him the rest of the time.
Scaling down the statue ceremony just to upset his brother and not give him more publicity.
Enough with the monarchy.

It's posts like this that bring up Meghan and Harry all the time. We get it you're obsessed with them but take it to the other threads. There are so many of them.

Why are you bringing Meg on this thread then? Saying she would care to be at Wimbledon? Cause you all are so much "better!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both are terrible humans. William more so for faking he was nice to his brother for the cameras but snubbing him the rest of the time.
Scaling down the statue ceremony just to upset his brother and not give him more publicity.
Enough with the monarchy.

It's posts like this that bring up Meghan and Harry all the time. We get it you're obsessed with them but take it to the other threads. There are so many of them.

Why are you bringing Meg on this thread then? Saying she would care to be at Wimbledon? Cause you all are so much "better!"

Meg? Is she your BFF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both are terrible humans. William more so for faking he was nice to his brother for the cameras but snubbing him the rest of the time.
Scaling down the statue ceremony just to upset his brother and not give him more publicity.
Enough with the monarchy.

Nothing they’ve done indicates that they’re terrible human beings. On the contrary, both have done extraordinary things for charities. William especially with his earth shot prize. Harry and William have some family issues - but who doesn’t? If you hate the monarchy fine, but to call these people terrible human beings makes you sound sort of stupid.

Puke. Is that the best you can do, call me stupid? Imperial colonists and racist, a plague upon this earth that THIS family brought. Atrocities, murders around the world of indigenous people, stealing Indian's textile industry, murdering around Asia and Africa. All their wealth should be taken away and distributed to descendants of their victims around the world.

Blah blah. Go complain somewhere else. This is the entertainment board not politics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To the person on here who rambles on and on about William being a cheater - THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE to support this! Do you live in some fictional land where lies are real or is this just in your head?

Well there was the fact that the person who first tweeted about it heard the rumor from an Earl’s daughter who presumably is much more likely to know the Cambridges than you are. So certainly a shred more than you have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the person on here who rambles on and on about William being a cheater - THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE to support this! Do you live in some fictional land where lies are real or is this just in your head?

I live in the land where the Palace lied every single day for two decades about the Prince of Wales having a relationship with Camilla Parker-Bowles.

They even tried to say she was a f**king causal acquaintance.

Do you have PTSD from this one incident? Seems like William's relationship is a far cry from his father's who was forced to marry a 19 year old virgin he barely knew. But, yes, so many similarities! Like father like son.

DP. It’s actually like father like son like grandfather like great grandfather. And you may want to open a psychology textbook and look up the importance of the parental role models and statistics regarding people who come from (1) divorced families and (2) families in which infidelity occurs.

And by the way the plebes don’t need evidence for something to be true. As samuel Jackson said in pulp fiction the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. It’s not a criminal trial. So I’m not sure why you are so intent on policing other people’s opinions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the person on here who rambles on and on about William being a cheater - THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE to support this! Do you live in some fictional land where lies are real or is this just in your head?

Well there was the fact that the person who first tweeted about it heard the rumor from an Earl’s daughter who presumably is much more likely to know the Cambridges than you are. So certainly a shred more than you have.

Well there you have it! iron clad proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the person on here who rambles on and on about William being a cheater - THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE to support this! Do you live in some fictional land where lies are real or is this just in your head?

I live in the land where the Palace lied every single day for two decades about the Prince of Wales having a relationship with Camilla Parker-Bowles.

They even tried to say she was a f**king causal acquaintance.

Do you have PTSD from this one incident? Seems like William's relationship is a far cry from his father's who was forced to marry a 19 year old virgin he barely knew. But, yes, so many similarities! Like father like son.

DP. It’s actually like father like son like grandfather like great grandfather. And you may want to open a psychology textbook and look up the importance of the parental role models and statistics regarding people who come from (1) divorced families and (2) families in which infidelity occurs.

And by the way the plebes don’t need evidence for something to be true. As samuel Jackson said in pulp fiction the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. It’s not a criminal trial. So I’m not sure why you are so intent on policing other people’s opinions.

I’m laughing at you old bag, not policing you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was set to be here with William and now she’s not. Odd.

Hmmm if the wife I was sharing a bed and a home with every night was told to self-isolate on Friday, would I as a husband be interacting maskless with medical professionals? I don’t think so…

I don’t think he was putting anyone at risk because I don’t think they “share a bed every night.” When he had covid there was never any story about Kate isolating either. In contrast to when Charles got covid and Camilla also had to self-quarantine.

Because Charles had Covid, dimwit. Kate does not have Covid was only exposed. If she tests positive, then it changes. We didn't hear about Kate isolating b/c we didn't even know William had Covid until 6 months after the fact.

Reading isn’t your strong suit. Or perhaps you are unfamiliar with the past tense? Even when we learned that William had covid there wasn’t a single story saying Kate and the kids isolated at that time. Presumably if they had that fact wouldn’t magically evaporate because 6 months elapsed. Also why do you think we found out that he had covid 6 months later? Is he somehow more important than his father and Boris Johnson or any of the other more important people in the UK who contemporaneously announced it? Also Prince Phillip spent his final years living separately from QEII so it wouldn’t really be that earth shattering for the Cambridges to also be living separately.

But only one person on this thread constantly brings it up. Why so interested if its not earth shattering? You (or someone with a similar one track mind) don't miss a beat to tie everything back to Rose. Why are you so obsessed? You seem to think Rose is at the center of every news item, rumor, decision, public outing, and on and on. So what? If she's a side piece she's going to stay a side piece. William isn't going to leave his wife for her, he's not going to repeat his father's mistake. He seemingly cares a lot more about his image to let that happen. But someone here seems to be breathlessly anticipating a divorce that will never happen.

Wills comes from an established bloodline of cheaters and monarchs who rule with impunity who cast aside wives like used napkins. Even Charles is trying to get his favorite mistress the title he insisted she never have and that's all due to him thinking his will is the most important.

What makes you think William isn't genetically pre-disposed to do the same?

Does William really come across as some partying play boy? Were you also the one who came running in here with the gossip about a royal household member known be out partying late into the night and were like "OMG that totally has to be William" When it was perfectly obvious it was about Edo. If so, your idea of William tends to be way more off the mark than right.

Yes… https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/new-photos-emerge-of-prince-william-gyrating-with-two-blondes-on-notorious-bender-in-the-alps/news-story/4518613a16b94bc80cf9f49c66605a5d

Prince Charles wasn’t even behaving like this post-kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the person on here who rambles on and on about William being a cheater - THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE to support this! Do you live in some fictional land where lies are real or is this just in your head?

Well there was the fact that the person who first tweeted about it heard the rumor from an Earl’s daughter who presumably is much more likely to know the Cambridges than you are. So certainly a shred more than you have.

Well there you have it! iron clad proof.

Since when does a shred of evidence mean iron clad proof?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was set to be here with William and now she’s not. Odd.

Hmmm if the wife I was sharing a bed and a home with every night was told to self-isolate on Friday, would I as a husband be interacting maskless with medical professionals? I don’t think so…

I don’t think he was putting anyone at risk because I don’t think they “share a bed every night.” When he had covid there was never any story about Kate isolating either. In contrast to when Charles got covid and Camilla also had to self-quarantine.

Because Charles had Covid, dimwit. Kate does not have Covid was only exposed. If she tests positive, then it changes. We didn't hear about Kate isolating b/c we didn't even know William had Covid until 6 months after the fact.

Reading isn’t your strong suit. Or perhaps you are unfamiliar with the past tense? Even when we learned that William had covid there wasn’t a single story saying Kate and the kids isolated at that time. Presumably if they had that fact wouldn’t magically evaporate because 6 months elapsed. Also why do you think we found out that he had covid 6 months later? Is he somehow more important than his father and Boris Johnson or any of the other more important people in the UK who contemporaneously announced it? Also Prince Phillip spent his final years living separately from QEII so it wouldn’t really be that earth shattering for the Cambridges to also be living separately.

But only one person on this thread constantly brings it up. Why so interested if its not earth shattering? You (or someone with a similar one track mind) don't miss a beat to tie everything back to Rose. Why are you so obsessed? You seem to think Rose is at the center of every news item, rumor, decision, public outing, and on and on. So what? If she's a side piece she's going to stay a side piece. William isn't going to leave his wife for her, he's not going to repeat his father's mistake. He seemingly cares a lot more about his image to let that happen. But someone here seems to be breathlessly anticipating a divorce that will never happen.

Wills comes from an established bloodline of cheaters and monarchs who rule with impunity who cast aside wives like used napkins. Even Charles is trying to get his favorite mistress the title he insisted she never have and that's all due to him thinking his will is the most important.

What makes you think William isn't genetically pre-disposed to do the same?

Does William really come across as some partying play boy? Were you also the one who came running in here with the gossip about a royal household member known be out partying late into the night and were like "OMG that totally has to be William" When it was perfectly obvious it was about Edo. If so, your idea of William tends to be way more off the mark than right.

Yes… https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/new-photos-emerge-of-prince-william-gyrating-with-two-blondes-on-notorious-bender-in-the-alps/news-story/4518613a16b94bc80cf9f49c66605a5d

Prince Charles wasn’t even behaving like this post-kids.

Oh noes dad dancing at a club 4 years ago. Stop the presses!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the person on here who rambles on and on about William being a cheater - THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE to support this! Do you live in some fictional land where lies are real or is this just in your head?

I live in the land where the Palace lied every single day for two decades about the Prince of Wales having a relationship with Camilla Parker-Bowles.

They even tried to say she was a f**king causal acquaintance.

Do you have PTSD from this one incident? Seems like William's relationship is a far cry from his father's who was forced to marry a 19 year old virgin he barely knew. But, yes, so many similarities! Like father like son.

DP. It’s actually like father like son like grandfather like great grandfather. And you may want to open a psychology textbook and look up the importance of the parental role models and statistics regarding people who come from (1) divorced families and (2) families in which infidelity occurs.

And by the way the plebes don’t need evidence for something to be true. As samuel Jackson said in pulp fiction the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. It’s not a criminal trial. So I’m not sure why you are so intent on policing other people’s opinions.

I’m laughing at you old bag, not policing you.

I guess paradoxical laughter is technically still laughter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the person on here who rambles on and on about William being a cheater - THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE to support this! Do you live in some fictional land where lies are real or is this just in your head?

Well there was the fact that the person who first tweeted about it heard the rumor from an Earl’s daughter who presumably is much more likely to know the Cambridges than you are. So certainly a shred more than you have.

Well there you have it! iron clad proof.

Since when does a shred of evidence mean iron clad proof?

Speculating on someone’s marriage and trawling gossip sites for proof is extremely pathetic but you will never admit it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was set to be here with William and now she’s not. Odd.

Hmmm if the wife I was sharing a bed and a home with every night was told to self-isolate on Friday, would I as a husband be interacting maskless with medical professionals? I don’t think so…

I don’t think he was putting anyone at risk because I don’t think they “share a bed every night.” When he had covid there was never any story about Kate isolating either. In contrast to when Charles got covid and Camilla also had to self-quarantine.

Because Charles had Covid, dimwit. Kate does not have Covid was only exposed. If she tests positive, then it changes. We didn't hear about Kate isolating b/c we didn't even know William had Covid until 6 months after the fact.

Reading isn’t your strong suit. Or perhaps you are unfamiliar with the past tense? Even when we learned that William had covid there wasn’t a single story saying Kate and the kids isolated at that time. Presumably if they had that fact wouldn’t magically evaporate because 6 months elapsed. Also why do you think we found out that he had covid 6 months later? Is he somehow more important than his father and Boris Johnson or any of the other more important people in the UK who contemporaneously announced it? Also Prince Phillip spent his final years living separately from QEII so it wouldn’t really be that earth shattering for the Cambridges to also be living separately.

But only one person on this thread constantly brings it up. Why so interested if its not earth shattering? You (or someone with a similar one track mind) don't miss a beat to tie everything back to Rose. Why are you so obsessed? You seem to think Rose is at the center of every news item, rumor, decision, public outing, and on and on. So what? If she's a side piece she's going to stay a side piece. William isn't going to leave his wife for her, he's not going to repeat his father's mistake. He seemingly cares a lot more about his image to let that happen. But someone here seems to be breathlessly anticipating a divorce that will never happen.

Wills comes from an established bloodline of cheaters and monarchs who rule with impunity who cast aside wives like used napkins. Even Charles is trying to get his favorite mistress the title he insisted she never have and that's all due to him thinking his will is the most important.

What makes you think William isn't genetically pre-disposed to do the same?

Until the recent generation divorce has been exceedingly rare.

Because divorce was socially unacceptable and beheadings even more so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was set to be here with William and now she’s not. Odd.

Hmmm if the wife I was sharing a bed and a home with every night was told to self-isolate on Friday, would I as a husband be interacting maskless with medical professionals? I don’t think so…

I don’t think he was putting anyone at risk because I don’t think they “share a bed every night.” When he had covid there was never any story about Kate isolating either. In contrast to when Charles got covid and Camilla also had to self-quarantine.

Because Charles had Covid, dimwit. Kate does not have Covid was only exposed. If she tests positive, then it changes. We didn't hear about Kate isolating b/c we didn't even know William had Covid until 6 months after the fact.

Reading isn’t your strong suit. Or perhaps you are unfamiliar with the past tense? Even when we learned that William had covid there wasn’t a single story saying Kate and the kids isolated at that time. Presumably if they had that fact wouldn’t magically evaporate because 6 months elapsed. Also why do you think we found out that he had covid 6 months later? Is he somehow more important than his father and Boris Johnson or any of the other more important people in the UK who contemporaneously announced it? Also Prince Phillip spent his final years living separately from QEII so it wouldn’t really be that earth shattering for the Cambridges to also be living separately.

But only one person on this thread constantly brings it up. Why so interested if its not earth shattering? You (or someone with a similar one track mind) don't miss a beat to tie everything back to Rose. Why are you so obsessed? You seem to think Rose is at the center of every news item, rumor, decision, public outing, and on and on. So what? If she's a side piece she's going to stay a side piece. William isn't going to leave his wife for her, he's not going to repeat his father's mistake. He seemingly cares a lot more about his image to let that happen. But someone here seems to be breathlessly anticipating a divorce that will never happen.

Wills comes from an established bloodline of cheaters and monarchs who rule with impunity who cast aside wives like used napkins. Even Charles is trying to get his favorite mistress the title he insisted she never have and that's all due to him thinking his will is the most important.

What makes you think William isn't genetically pre-disposed to do the same?

Until the recent generation divorce has been exceedingly rare.

Because divorce was socially unacceptable and beheadings even more so.

Its 2021. What century are you in?