The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the person on here who rambles on and on about William being a cheater - THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE to support this! Do you live in some fictional land where lies are real or is this just in your head?

Well there was the fact that the person who first tweeted about it heard the rumor from an Earl’s daughter who presumably is much more likely to know the Cambridges than you are. So certainly a shred more than you have.

Well there you have it! iron clad proof.

Since when does a shred of evidence mean iron clad proof?

Speculating on someone’s marriage and trawling gossip sites for proof is extremely pathetic but you will never admit it.

Also - no. The first guy who tweeted it Giles Coren, made it up. Then deleted it after he was threatened with legal action when Williams lawyer wrote this:

“in addition to being false and highly damaging, the publication of false speculation in respect of our clients’ private life also constitutes a breach of his privacy pursuant to Article 8 of the European Convention to Human Rights.”

Just repeating some nasty conspiracy theory doesn’t make it true. Nice try though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was set to be here with William and now she’s not. Odd.

Hmmm if the wife I was sharing a bed and a home with every night was told to self-isolate on Friday, would I as a husband be interacting maskless with medical professionals? I don’t think so…

I don’t think he was putting anyone at risk because I don’t think they “share a bed every night.” When he had covid there was never any story about Kate isolating either. In contrast to when Charles got covid and Camilla also had to self-quarantine.

Because Charles had Covid, dimwit. Kate does not have Covid was only exposed. If she tests positive, then it changes. We didn't hear about Kate isolating b/c we didn't even know William had Covid until 6 months after the fact.

Reading isn’t your strong suit. Or perhaps you are unfamiliar with the past tense? Even when we learned that William had covid there wasn’t a single story saying Kate and the kids isolated at that time. Presumably if they had that fact wouldn’t magically evaporate because 6 months elapsed. Also why do you think we found out that he had covid 6 months later? Is he somehow more important than his father and Boris Johnson or any of the other more important people in the UK who contemporaneously announced it? Also Prince Phillip spent his final years living separately from QEII so it wouldn’t really be that earth shattering for the Cambridges to also be living separately.

But only one person on this thread constantly brings it up. Why so interested if its not earth shattering? You (or someone with a similar one track mind) don't miss a beat to tie everything back to Rose. Why are you so obsessed? You seem to think Rose is at the center of every news item, rumor, decision, public outing, and on and on. So what? If she's a side piece she's going to stay a side piece. William isn't going to leave his wife for her, he's not going to repeat his father's mistake. He seemingly cares a lot more about his image to let that happen. But someone here seems to be breathlessly anticipating a divorce that will never happen.

Wills comes from an established bloodline of cheaters and monarchs who rule with impunity who cast aside wives like used napkins. Even Charles is trying to get his favorite mistress the title he insisted she never have and that's all due to him thinking his will is the most important.

What makes you think William isn't genetically pre-disposed to do the same?

Until the recent generation divorce has been exceedingly rare.

Because divorce was socially unacceptable and beheadings even more so.

Its 2021. What century are you in?

I'm in 2021. Divorce became more socially acceptable in Charles' generation. Prior to that, it was stigmatized at best, and scandalous frequently. No fault divorce laws only came about in the 1970s, a reflection of attitudes toward divorce undergoing a sea change.

[Anonymous]

Canada just appointed a female Inuit Governor General. The first indigenous representative of the Queen for her largest realm. Interesting times. That post has been vacant since January. I'm guessing the statues being pulled down really scared the U.K.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was set to be here with William and now she’s not. Odd.

Hmmm if the wife I was sharing a bed and a home with every night was told to self-isolate on Friday, would I as a husband be interacting maskless with medical professionals? I don’t think so…

I don’t think he was putting anyone at risk because I don’t think they “share a bed every night.” When he had covid there was never any story about Kate isolating either. In contrast to when Charles got covid and Camilla also had to self-quarantine.

Because Charles had Covid, dimwit. Kate does not have Covid was only exposed. If she tests positive, then it changes. We didn't hear about Kate isolating b/c we didn't even know William had Covid until 6 months after the fact.

Reading isn’t your strong suit. Or perhaps you are unfamiliar with the past tense? Even when we learned that William had covid there wasn’t a single story saying Kate and the kids isolated at that time. Presumably if they had that fact wouldn’t magically evaporate because 6 months elapsed. Also why do you think we found out that he had covid 6 months later? Is he somehow more important than his father and Boris Johnson or any of the other more important people in the UK who contemporaneously announced it? Also Prince Phillip spent his final years living separately from QEII so it wouldn’t really be that earth shattering for the Cambridges to also be living separately.

But only one person on this thread constantly brings it up. Why so interested if its not earth shattering? You (or someone with a similar one track mind) don't miss a beat to tie everything back to Rose. Why are you so obsessed? You seem to think Rose is at the center of every news item, rumor, decision, public outing, and on and on. So what? If she's a side piece she's going to stay a side piece. William isn't going to leave his wife for her, he's not going to repeat his father's mistake. He seemingly cares a lot more about his image to let that happen. But someone here seems to be breathlessly anticipating a divorce that will never happen.

Wills comes from an established bloodline of cheaters and monarchs who rule with impunity who cast aside wives like used napkins. Even Charles is trying to get his favorite mistress the title he insisted she never have and that's all due to him thinking his will is the most important.

What makes you think William isn't genetically pre-disposed to do the same?

Until the recent generation divorce has been exceedingly rare.

Because divorce was socially unacceptable and beheadings even more so.

Its 2021. What century are you in?

I'm in 2021. Divorce became more socially acceptable in Charles' generation. Prior to that, it was stigmatized at best, and scandalous frequently. No fault divorce laws only came about in the 1970s, a reflection of attitudes toward divorce undergoing a sea change.

Your head is going to explode if they don't get divorced. Divorce may be less stigmatized but divorce rates are actually going down, not up. After 10 years of marriage and several years of dating keep wishing and hoping they will become one of the declining stats. People getting married this days (not the 1980s and not 1580s) are more likely to stay married than ever before.

[Anonymous]

I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

But looking at the Swedish royal family, Frederik and Mary of Denmark, Letizia and Felipe of Spain, Willem-Alexander and Maxima of the Netherlands, Philippe and Mathilde of Belgium, etc and seems like the younger royals are having far better luck than their parents and the older generation. Prince Albert of Monaco is in his 60s with multiple illegitimate children, I'm not sure I'd lump him in with the other young royals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

But looking at the Swedish royal family, Frederik and Mary of Denmark, Letizia and Felipe of Spain, Willem-Alexander and Maxima of the Netherlands, Philippe and Mathilde of Belgium, etc and seems like the younger royals are having far better luck than their parents and the older generation. Prince Albert of Monaco is in his 60s with multiple illegitimate children, I'm not sure I'd lump him in with the other young royals.

Felipe is 53. Phillipe is 62. Willlem-Alexander is 54. Frederik is 53. All of them are in Albert's age range who is 63.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

PP here. I think she'll take it to the end. I think they had a pretty striking power imbalance when he was stringing her along for years before Charles (Charles!) basically told him to sh+t or get off the pot. William always seemed to want one of the aristochicks and they all rebuffed him; I think he felt kind of backed into a corner. Whenever he goes out partying or has rumored affairs, it's always with those women who I think were, generally speaking, his first choice. Apparently they still think she is kind of lower. Kate was ok with all that and willing to turn a blind eye. She also just seems to try SO HARD in her role (well, not with things like number of engagements or whatever, but with following every rule to a T) I don't see her bursting out and breaking free. I think it would have to be REALLY bad to do so, and as long as they both stay in their lanes, no reason to really. I think her family supports that choice too. There is nothing inherently wrong with this arrangement btw, but I do think it is an arrangement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

But looking at the Swedish royal family, Frederik and Mary of Denmark, Letizia and Felipe of Spain, Willem-Alexander and Maxima of the Netherlands, Philippe and Mathilde of Belgium, etc and seems like the younger royals are having far better luck than their parents and the older generation. Prince Albert of Monaco is in his 60s with multiple illegitimate children, I'm not sure I'd lump him in with the other young royals.

Felipe is 53. Phillipe is 62. Willlem-Alexander is 54. Frederik is 53. All of them are in Albert's age range who is 63.

And do they have multiple illegitimate children and much younger wives?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

But looking at the Swedish royal family, Frederik and Mary of Denmark, Letizia and Felipe of Spain, Willem-Alexander and Maxima of the Netherlands, Philippe and Mathilde of Belgium, etc and seems like the younger royals are having far better luck than their parents and the older generation. Prince Albert of Monaco is in his 60s with multiple illegitimate children, I'm not sure I'd lump him in with the other young royals.

Felipe is 53. Phillipe is 62. Willlem-Alexander is 54. Frederik is 53. All of them are in Albert's age range who is 63.

And do they have multiple illegitimate children and much younger wives?

RE the illegitimate children - we don't know. Interesting you bring it up because last year for the first time the King of Belgium (since you mention their royal family) was forced to formally acknowledge his illegitimate daughter.

One that he insisted that he didn't have and the public wasn't aware of until she brought a paternity suit in the early 2000s. She's now an official Princess of the Belgians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

But looking at the Swedish royal family, Frederik and Mary of Denmark, Letizia and Felipe of Spain, Willem-Alexander and Maxima of the Netherlands, Philippe and Mathilde of Belgium, etc and seems like the younger royals are having far better luck than their parents and the older generation. Prince Albert of Monaco is in his 60s with multiple illegitimate children, I'm not sure I'd lump him in with the other young royals.

Felipe is 53. Phillipe is 62. Willlem-Alexander is 54. Frederik is 53. All of them are in Albert's age range who is 63.

And do they have multiple illegitimate children and much younger wives?

RE the illegitimate children - we don't know. Interesting you bring it up because last year for the first time the King of Belgium (since you mention their royal family) was forced to formally acknowledge his illegitimate daughter.

One that he insisted that he didn't have and the public wasn't aware of until she brought a paternity suit in the early 2000s. She's now an official Princess of the Belgians.

Look if it's very important to include Albert, who is a boomer, in a list of people he doesn't have much in common with, then suit yourself. I'm just not seeing the track record of failing marriages and rampant divorce in the current crop of royals who aren't boomers or silent generation. Nobody said they all had to have happy happy marriages, but they aren't all divorced either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

But looking at the Swedish royal family, Frederik and Mary of Denmark, Letizia and Felipe of Spain, Willem-Alexander and Maxima of the Netherlands, Philippe and Mathilde of Belgium, etc and seems like the younger royals are having far better luck than their parents and the older generation. Prince Albert of Monaco is in his 60s with multiple illegitimate children, I'm not sure I'd lump him in with the other young royals.

Felipe is 53. Phillipe is 62. Willlem-Alexander is 54. Frederik is 53. All of them are in Albert's age range who is 63.

And do they have multiple illegitimate children and much younger wives?

RE the illegitimate children - we don't know. Interesting you bring it up because last year for the first time the King of Belgium (since you mention their royal family) was forced to formally acknowledge his illegitimate daughter.

One that he insisted that he didn't have and the public wasn't aware of until she brought a paternity suit in the early 2000s. She's now an official Princess of the Belgians.

Look if it's very important to include Albert, who is a boomer, in a list of people he doesn't have much in common with, then suit yourself. I'm just not seeing the track record of failing marriages and rampant divorce in the current crop of royals who aren't boomers or silent generation. Nobody said they all had to have happy happy marriages, but they aren't all divorced either.

Let me clarify an addition - the 'boomers' had pretty nice marriages (on paper or in public anyway) throughout the 60s and 70s and into the 80s. They only went off the rails about 3 decades in when even their PR couldn't cover it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

But looking at the Swedish royal family, Frederik and Mary of Denmark, Letizia and Felipe of Spain, Willem-Alexander and Maxima of the Netherlands, Philippe and Mathilde of Belgium, etc and seems like the younger royals are having far better luck than their parents and the older generation. Prince Albert of Monaco is in his 60s with multiple illegitimate children, I'm not sure I'd lump him in with the other young royals.

Felipe is 53. Phillipe is 62. Willlem-Alexander is 54. Frederik is 53. All of them are in Albert's age range who is 63.

And do they have multiple illegitimate children and much younger wives?

RE the illegitimate children - we don't know. Interesting you bring it up because last year for the first time the King of Belgium (since you mention their royal family) was forced to formally acknowledge his illegitimate daughter.

One that he insisted that he didn't have and the public wasn't aware of until she brought a paternity suit in the early 2000s. She's now an official Princess of the Belgians.

Look if it's very important to include Albert, who is a boomer, in a list of people he doesn't have much in common with, then suit yourself. I'm just not seeing the track record of failing marriages and rampant divorce in the current crop of royals who aren't boomers or silent generation. Nobody said they all had to have happy happy marriages, but they aren't all divorced either.

Let me clarify an addition - the 'boomers' had pretty nice marriages (on paper or in public anyway) throughout the 60s and 70s and into the 80s. They only went off the rails about 3 decades in when even their PR couldn't cover it up.

Do you acknowledge the fact that divorce rates are down especially amongst the elite? You seem to be arguing without basic facts.
Here are some for your reading pleasure.

"Divorce among college-educated couples who married before they had children is at levels as low as in the 1970s, before the wide adoption of the no-fault statutes made divorce much less of a legal nightmare."

https://time.com/5434949/divorce-rate-children-marriage-benefits/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think they'll ever get divorced but I also don't think that says much about the state of their marriage. I think Kate long ago agreed she would put up and shut up. Affairs? Whatever, part of the bargain, just don't let it be public and embarrassing, don't humiliate her. I believe she fully intends to fulfill the role Diana could/would not and will go along with whatever he sets. She knows and plays by "the rules" in all aspects of her personal and public life.

On this I agree. I just wonder how far she'll take it. Probably to the end. But several royal spouses have been 'acting out' in the 21st century. The Queen of Denmark's husband was such a rude, pouting man that not only did he die just after a six-month 'vacation' in Egypt but he also refused to be buried beside her in death because she wouldn't name him King.

The Queen of Spain's husband abdicated and left the country after controversy. He's been living abroad for a year and she didn't leave with him.

And then there's Monaco which is the middle of a messy split at the moment but no word on divorce.

But looking at the Swedish royal family, Frederik and Mary of Denmark, Letizia and Felipe of Spain, Willem-Alexander and Maxima of the Netherlands, Philippe and Mathilde of Belgium, etc and seems like the younger royals are having far better luck than their parents and the older generation. Prince Albert of Monaco is in his 60s with multiple illegitimate children, I'm not sure I'd lump him in with the other young royals.

Felipe is 53. Phillipe is 62. Willlem-Alexander is 54. Frederik is 53. All of them are in Albert's age range who is 63.

And do they have multiple illegitimate children and much younger wives?

RE the illegitimate children - we don't know. Interesting you bring it up because last year for the first time the King of Belgium (since you mention their royal family) was forced to formally acknowledge his illegitimate daughter.

One that he insisted that he didn't have and the public wasn't aware of until she brought a paternity suit in the early 2000s. She's now an official Princess of the Belgians.

Look if it's very important to include Albert, who is a boomer, in a list of people he doesn't have much in common with, then suit yourself. I'm just not seeing the track record of failing marriages and rampant divorce in the current crop of royals who aren't boomers or silent generation. Nobody said they all had to have happy happy marriages, but they aren't all divorced either.

Let me clarify an addition - the 'boomers' had pretty nice marriages (on paper or in public anyway) throughout the 60s and 70s and into the 80s. They only went off the rails about 3 decades in when even their PR couldn't cover it up.

Do you acknowledge the fact that divorce rates are down especially amongst the elite? You seem to be arguing without basic facts.
Here are some for your reading pleasure.

"Divorce among college-educated couples who married before they had children is at levels as low as in the 1970s, before the wide adoption of the no-fault statutes made divorce much less of a legal nightmare."

https://time.com/5434949/divorce-rate-children-marriage-benefits/

Did you read your article? The divorce rate is dropping because marriage rates are dropping. (And its still pretty high imo at 40% of couples divorcing).