Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Popcorn Planet is a snooze, let's talk about how Blake is so awful that a female AD got fired because of her.

Just to set the record straight she got 2 female ADs fired. They were both named in the latest dump. One is Julie Bloom and The Other his first name Alex. It’s a little confusing because Alex Sak is also producer who’s involved from the Sony side but the second AD was definitely named Alex.

And I’m going to remind everyone Blake was literally on set for a handful of days. A good half of this movie is focusing on the young cast and she was not there for that part of the shoot. I believe people have named the number of days that she’s on and it’s absurd, something like 14 days on set and she managed to get two people fired.

Wait, 14 days on set? Are you serious? That’s even less than I thought.

How many days pre-strike, and how many post strike-?

[Anonymous]

Blake is now desperately fighting for the application of CA law. They should have filed case in California state court.

[Anonymous]

Blake’s opposition is a real snooze. There really is no there there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blake is now desperately fighting for the application of CA law. They should have filed case in California state court.

What was the original plan for BL team for why wanted NY law/courts? Is NY law more favorable for SH?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is now desperately fighting for the application of CA law. They should have filed case in California state court.

What was the original plan for BL team for why wanted NY law/courts? Is NY law more favorable for SH?

No but it was a good location for NY times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is now desperately fighting for the application of CA law. They should have filed case in California state court.

What was the original plan for BL team for why wanted NY law/courts? Is NY law more favorable for SH?

No but it was a good location for NY times.

Do you know how this case would've shaken out if she filed in California? Like could Justin have gone farther with his case against the Times? Still find it despicable that Meghan Twohey won't be held accountable for that article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is now desperately fighting for the application of CA law. They should have filed case in California state court.

What was the original plan for BL team for why wanted NY law/courts? Is NY law more favorable for SH?

No but it was a good location for NY times.

Do you know how this case would've shaken out if she filed in California? Like could Justin have gone farther with his case against the Times? Still find it despicable that Meghan Twohey won't be held accountable for that article.

It’s a moot point. She didn’t file in CA because there is no reason to - she lives in NY and the film was shot in NY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is now desperately fighting for the application of CA law. They should have filed case in California state court.

What was the original plan for BL team for why wanted NY law/courts? Is NY law more favorable for SH?

No but it was a good location for NY times.

Do you know how this case would've shaken out if she filed in California? Like could Justin have gone farther with his case against the Times? Still find it despicable that Meghan Twohey won't be held accountable for that article.

It’s a moot point. She didn’t file in CA because there is no reason to - she lives in NY and the film was shot in NY.

It’s not a moot point— if the Judge applies NY law, a healthy chunk of her claims are cooked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is now desperately fighting for the application of CA law. They should have filed case in California state court.

What was the original plan for BL team for why wanted NY law/courts? Is NY law more favorable for SH?

No but it was a good location for NY times.

Do you know how this case would've shaken out if she filed in California? Like could Justin have gone farther with his case against the Times? Still find it despicable that Meghan Twohey won't be held accountable for that article.

It’s a moot point. She didn’t file in CA because there is no reason to - she lives in NY and the film was shot in NY.

It’s not a moot point— if the Judge applies NY law, a healthy chunk of her claims are cooked.

No I mean you can’t cherry pick jurisdictions right? You can’t just decide where you want to file right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is now desperately fighting for the application of CA law. They should have filed case in California state court.

What was the original plan for BL team for why wanted NY law/courts? Is NY law more favorable for SH?

No but it was a good location for NY times.

Do you know how this case would've shaken out if she filed in California? Like could Justin have gone farther with his case against the Times? Still find it despicable that Meghan Twohey won't be held accountable for that article.

It’s a moot point. She didn’t file in CA because there is no reason to - she lives in NY and the film was shot in NY.

It’s not a moot point— if the Judge applies NY law, a healthy chunk of her claims are cooked.

No I mean you can’t cherry pick jurisdictions right? You can’t just decide where you want to file right?

Of course you can.

[Anonymous]

I don't see why Lively didn't file in California since she could establish jurisdiction over all the defendants there including Wallace, and she wants to use California law anyway. She's an actress so flying there for a trial shouldn't be an issue for her.

[Anonymous]

Ah, so she does have a nanny after all. More than one, in fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't see why Lively didn't file in California since she could establish jurisdiction over all the defendants there including Wallace, and she wants to use California law anyway. She's an actress so flying there for a trial shouldn't be an issue for her.

She definitely has a home there as well. But clearly it wasn’t well thought up by her egalitarian team, and they went with NY for convenience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see why Lively didn't file in California since she could establish jurisdiction over all the defendants there including Wallace, and she wants to use California law anyway. She's an actress so flying there for a trial shouldn't be an issue for her.

She definitely has a home there as well. But clearly it wasn’t well thought up by her egalitarian team, and they went with NY for convenience.

Legal team

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake is now desperately fighting for the application of CA law. They should have filed case in California state court.

What was the original plan for BL team for why wanted NY law/courts? Is NY law more favorable for SH?

No but it was a good location for NY times.

Do you know how this case would've shaken out if she filed in California? Like could Justin have gone farther with his case against the Times? Still find it despicable that Meghan Twohey won't be held accountable for that article.

It’s a moot point. She didn’t file in CA because there is no reason to - she lives in NY and the film was shot in NY.

It’s not a moot point— if the Judge applies NY law, a healthy chunk of her claims are cooked.

No I mean you can’t cherry pick jurisdictions right? You can’t just decide where you want to file right?

Explain more please. If you are getting divorced in VA but want CA law to apply, you can just make it so?

Really don’t understand this.