And the Commanders used to have a long long waiting list. So not only do they generally not sell out, they also have no waiting list for tickets. |
Youngkin doesn't control the Alexandria city council, nor does he have any goodwill with the state assembly. There are plenty in office who have begun to question the deal and as the facts trickle out, it gets worse and worse for the voters/taxpayers. |
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1992/07/23/toxic-cleanup-could-delay-new-stadium/63b6ba95-1506-4590-aae8-1d3f4b708028/ TOXIC CLEANUP COULD DELAY NEW STADIUM July 23, 1992 “ The multimillion-dollar effort required to clean up a broad range of toxic pollutants that contaminate the site of a proposed Redskins stadium in Alexandria could delay the opening date set by team owner Jack Kent Cooke. The pollution of the 86-year-old rail yard site includes toxic metals and PCBs, both possible causes of cancer in humans. In some places, arsenic levels are 1,000 times higher than the federal safety ceiling. An underground spill of diesel oil -- seven feet thick in one spot -- contaminates a locomotive-refueling area. A 15-foot layer of fly ash, which contains traces of potentially hazardous metals, is buried there.“ |
http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/news/2012/may/03/south-potomac-yard-area-certified-safe/ |
Yup. It was a multi-year cleanup. |
Lots of bad things for voters and taxpayers happen all the time, though. Especially when stadium deals are involved. Again, I would love to be proven wrong, but as a D.C. resident (and therefore someone with no ability to influence the decision at all), I am not going to bother to hope this one turns into a surprise. |
However, it's done. There's nothing left to worry about. |
I worked on this deal. There was an extensive clean up. |
Just correcting an earlier comment that said “Any cleanup was minimal and just took a few months at most, maybe less.” |
Still probably safer than DC. |
| Five-plus acres to redevelop in the heart of DC sounds great for missing middle housing! |
Somehow townhouses don't seem optimal at the arena site. |
The taxpayers are likely already being pushed into a having to cough up a minimum of $2 billion in taxes (and likely much more) to pay for building the stadium and whatever other ongoing subsidies. They should have some say in that. Beyond that, what else do they get, and using realistic numbers? So local restaurants and businesses might get more visitors? I don't think that alone makes up for it. Did local business opportunity in SW DC suddenly skyrocket and the community become flush with money when Audi Field opened? Not exactly. And, it also brought a huge amount of traffic congestion (like complete standstill, 40 minutes to travel a single block, god forbid someone has a heart attack because an ambulance will never make it there in time) and other issues during the more popular events. Who exactly pays? Just Alexandria? Does Youngkin chip in state funds and everyone in VA pays? Is there a bond issue? And why are we subsidizing billionaires anyhow? If these sports teams are making enough money to pay their players millions, why are we having to pay for a stadium for them to play in? https://www.spotrac.com/nhl/washington-capitals/yearly/cap/ https://www.spotrac.com/nba/washington-wizards/yearly/cap/ https://www.forbes.com/nhl-valuations/list/#tab:overall https://www.forbes.com/lists/nba-valuations/?sh=3cf3254f6982 Why are they crying poverty and demanding subsidies at all? Taxpayers are being punked on all of this. NBA and NHL are massive multi-billion dollar industries. We shouldn't be subsidizing them. |
Totally agree with you! I have D.C. United season tickets but still opposed D.C. spending any money on building Audi Field (technically, the team paid for the stadium, but the city kicked in almost as much money in "infrastructure" as the team did). I am opposed to subsidies for sports teams and, in this case, I would prefer the teams stay in my city than move to Alexandria. I'm not ENDORSING the move, I'm only saying it's probably going to happen despite the many, many good arguments against it. |