Why do people get so much angrier at women having babies over 45 than men?

[Anonymous]

I don’t get it.

No one bats an eye if a man is 48 but if a woman is then it’s somehow unacceptable

[Anonymous]

I mean, I've known a few:
2 out of 3 - lost the babies and their uteruses
1 out of 3 had major complications but the baby lived

[Anonymous]

It's not natural. And it's not healthy for the mom or baby.

[Anonymous]

You already know the answer OP...sexism, misogyny, patriarchal society, etc. * My dad was 50 when I was born + my mom was 33 (first marriage for both). I don't think anyone should have kids that old ( men or women).

[Anonymous]

Because how dare a woman do what she wants to do with her body.

[Anonymous]

Literally every woman we know who had a child around or after 40 has a child with health complications - from allergies to extreme disabilities.

Health issues with the child are nowhere close to the same with the fathers over 40.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Literally every woman we know who had a child around or after 40 has a child with health complications - from allergies to extreme disabilities.

Health issues with the child are nowhere close to the same with the fathers over 40.

*nods grimly*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because how dare a woman do what she wants to do with her body.

If the Epstein files have not taught us that people (ESPECIALLY other women) hate women, I don't know what will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Literally every woman we know who had a child around or after 40 has a child with health complications - from allergies to extreme disabilities.

Health issues with the child are nowhere close to the same with the fathers over 40.

How odd. That's the exact opposite of my experience.

[Anonymous]

All the women I know who have had children at that age had to buy an egg from a younger woman.
I feel strongly that buying reproductive materials, and the invasive process that requires, is fundamentally harmful to women. And morally wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Literally every woman we know who had a child around or after 40 has a child with health complications - from allergies to extreme disabilities.

Health issues with the child are nowhere close to the same with the fathers over 40.

Autism is correlated to older fathers. I’d rather have a kid with food allergies than autism but you do you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally every woman we know who had a child around or after 40 has a child with health complications - from allergies to extreme disabilities.

Health issues with the child are nowhere close to the same with the fathers over 40.

How odd. That's the exact opposite of my experience.

+1
Me too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally every woman we know who had a child around or after 40 has a child with health complications - from allergies to extreme disabilities.

Health issues with the child are nowhere close to the same with the fathers over 40.

How odd. That's the exact opposite of my experience.

+1
Me too

Yep count me in this bucket. Zero issues. Maybe 9 or 10 I know.

[Anonymous]

Men can't have babies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it.

No one bats an eye if a man is 48 but if a woman is then it’s somehow unacceptable

Who are these people getting angry? I think you made that up.