Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The information on Kavanaugh isn't going to stop coming. Just because he's confirmed doesn't mean the spigot is suddenly shut off. There's just too much.

I think so too. There is a reason they did a limited scope and limited time investigation. He wouldn't have passed otherwise.

I think there will be enough that he could be impeached and removed later.

I don't think he'll be impeached, but he will forever have a stain on his name and record.

It's not just the drinking and the whipping out his penis in a woman's face and the assault of Ford. There are:

--finances
--lies under oath
--questions of temperament
--hyper-partisanship of his Bush days

[Anonymous]

Collins represents fewer constituents than a single Los Angeles County Supervisor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe the MT senator will skip the vote thinking they are all set, then Sasse or Munchin feel guilty and flip their projected vote. Suddenly, they see what the legal scholars see and they realize the significance of the vote and change their mind.

Betting odds are now running 95% in favor of confirmation. So there are at least a few souls who are putting money down on their views who believe such a scenario could come about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm done having any social or business connections to Republicans

+1

Fine. Don’t come to work on Tuesday.

I don't work with dumbasses fortunately so I won't run into any kavanaugh supporters

Thanks for your concern though

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The information on Kavanaugh isn't going to stop coming. Just because he's confirmed doesn't mean the spigot is suddenly shut off. There's just too much.

I think so too. There is a reason they did a limited scope and limited time investigation. He wouldn't have passed otherwise.

I think there will be enough that he could be impeached and removed later.

You would think with the ABA reopening their decision, Collins and manchin would respect their authority and realize it is best to be safe, vote no and choose someone else.
Their opinion would be from an expert with sound legal reasoning according to ethics guidelines etc. It would not be a political opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The information on Kavanaugh isn't going to stop coming. Just because he's confirmed doesn't mean the spigot is suddenly shut off. There's just too much.

I think so too. There is a reason they did a limited scope and limited time investigation. He wouldn't have passed otherwise.

I think there will be enough that he could be impeached and removed later.

I don't think he'll be impeached, but he will forever have a stain on his name and record.

It's not just the drinking and the whipping out his penis in a woman's face and the assault of Ford. There are:

--finances
--lies under oath
--questions of temperament
--hyper-partisanship of his Bush days

YEs, I agree, don't forget when all his papers are available.
Also he definitely had and forwarded stolen emails and lied under oath about it - that is the one that could get him out.


I think there will be enough to get him impeached, but it depends on other factors if that happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm done having any social or business connections to Republicans

+1

Fine. Don’t come to work on Tuesday.

I don't work with dumbasses fortunately so I won't run into any kavanaugh supporters

Thanks for your concern though

yep me neither, thank goodness

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The fact is, they're all dishonest. Show me one honest person among them. All they can do is vote in their best interests and cover up their lack of moral compass with high-sounding speeches.

That's the lot of a politician. Faustian bargain indeed.

What Dr. Blasey Ford did is not for naught, however. She showed up, she was credible, she was heard. Even though the nominee is going to be confirmed, the cause of women advanced a little, from where it was with Anita Hill. Hopefully the next time this happens, enough people will agree that the accused cannot take the job.

How did you feel about the sworn statement from a man who had a relationship with her for approximately 10 years?

it was a letter, not a sworn statement. He felt compelled to write that she hadn't told him of the assault - yeah, we got that because that is exactly what she testified. She didn't say, and I told my ex too, did she? He was just looking to be an ass.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/03/us/politics/blasey-ford-republicans-kavanaugh.html

BTW...how can one tout the unsubstantiated that seems to contradict one and ignore the same against the other?

I wish it weren't so but there is a HELL of a lot of that on both sides of this.

It would have been nice to have a REAL FBI INVESTIGATION because they would have gone to interview him. Something like 1/4 of PTSD is delayed onset. Her not being claustrophobic or needing two exits may not have been an issue for her back then, that doesn't mean it isn't an issue later. https://www.verywellmind.com/delayed-onset-ptsd-meaning-and-reasons-2797636

The only thing in his letter that it suspicious is the polygraph, but her friend has already put on the record that she did NOT prep her for it. He sounds like an ass to come forward and act like she is lying because she didn't tell him about the assault, so I find him questionable in his reliability anyway.

Read his letter.

Did she not claim that the assault derailed her for years? That if further caused her issues beyond that?

Bottom line is simple, no one has proven anything either way. Well, I think it is pretty much as established fact that the lot of them were involved in a great deal of underage drinking. Which makes me wonder about their parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm done having any social or business connections to Republicans

+1

Fine. Don’t come to work on Tuesday.

I don't work with dumbasses fortunately so I won't run into any kavanaugh supporters

Thanks for your concern though

My only concern for you is your lack of reading skills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The information on Kavanaugh isn't going to stop coming. Just because he's confirmed doesn't mean the spigot is suddenly shut off. There's just too much.

I think so too. There is a reason they did a limited scope and limited time investigation. He wouldn't have passed otherwise.

I think there will be enough that he could be impeached and removed later.

So after all this time we might get something from the last two decades that is relevant and can be substantiated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The information on Kavanaugh isn't going to stop coming. Just because he's confirmed doesn't mean the spigot is suddenly shut off. There's just too much.

I think so too. There is a reason they did a limited scope and limited time investigation. He wouldn't have passed otherwise.

I think there will be enough that he could be impeached and removed later.

I don't think he'll be impeached, but he will forever have a stain on his name and record.

It's not just the drinking and the whipping out his penis in a woman's face and the assault of Ford. There are:

--finances
--lies under oath
--questions of temperament
--hyper-partisanship of his Bush days

YEs, I agree, don't forget when all his papers are available.
Also he definitely had and forwarded stolen emails and lied under oath about it - that is the one that could get him out.


I think there will be enough to get him impeached, but it depends on other factors if that happens.

Impeached, but will he be removed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The information on Kavanaugh isn't going to stop coming. Just because he's confirmed doesn't mean the spigot is suddenly shut off. There's just too much.

I think so too. There is a reason they did a limited scope and limited time investigation. He wouldn't have passed otherwise.

I think there will be enough that he could be impeached and removed later.

I don't think he'll be impeached, but he will forever have a stain on his name and record.

It's not just the drinking and the whipping out his penis in a woman's face and the assault of Ford. There are:

--finances
--lies under oath
--questions of temperament
--hyper-partisanship of his Bush days

YEs, I agree, don't forget when all his papers are available.
Also he definitely had and forwarded stolen emails and lied under oath about it - that is the one that could get him out.


I think there will be enough to get him impeached, but it depends on other factors if that happens.

Impeached, but will he be removed?

I hope so. Impeachment and removal depends on if there are enough democratic senators.

As for information, yes, I think this will not be forgotten and people will work on it to find the proof. I think there is already proof on some of the things. Also there has never been a SCJ charged with perjury and impeached so it is new territory.

[Anonymous]

Will be interesting to see how senators vote to acquit him when he is impeached with 100% proof of perjury

We just have to keep asking... How low can the GOP go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The information on Kavanaugh isn't going to stop coming. Just because he's confirmed doesn't mean the spigot is suddenly shut off. There's just too much.

I think so too. There is a reason they did a limited scope and limited time investigation. He wouldn't have passed otherwise.

I think there will be enough that he could be impeached and removed later.

I don't think he'll be impeached, but he will forever have a stain on his name and record.

It's not just the drinking and the whipping out his penis in a woman's face and the assault of Ford. There are:

--finances
--lies under oath
--questions of temperament
--hyper-partisanship of his Bush days

YEs, I agree, don't forget when all his papers are available.
Also he definitely had and forwarded stolen emails and lied under oath about it - that is the one that could get him out.


I think there will be enough to get him impeached, but it depends on other factors if that happens.

Impeached, but will he be removed?

I hope so. Impeachment and removal depends on if there are enough democratic senators.

As for information, yes, I think this will not be forgotten and people will work on it to find the proof. I think there is already proof on some of the things. Also there has never been a SCJ charged with perjury and impeached so it is new territory.

There is an obvious lack of knowledge about impeachment. Getting a majority in the House is doable in the mid terms, which would then be enough to advance impeachment over to the Senate. But do you really believe they can achieve a super majority to remove him with the hyper partisanship that exists in both parties? I don't.

[Anonymous]

Everything Trump touches is corroded.
Including now the SCOTUS.