Duggar son allegedly molested girls including sisters

[Anonymous]

To the "shut up josh" poster, ENOUGH! It's getting annoying, it's not funny, it's making you look like a fool. You're making you're people look bad. Stop it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that politicians are defending him. Would they also have defended him if he had raped them?

Raped? You need to stop being outrageous. Not a word to make light of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To the "shut up josh" poster, ENOUGH! It's getting annoying, it's not funny, it's making you look like a fool. You're making you're people look bad. Stop it.

Who are exactly are "my" people? And please, your poor grammar and syntax is far more irritating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that politicians are defending him. Would they also have defended him if he had raped them?

Raped? You need to stop being outrageous. Not a word to make light of.

I tried to make the same point about 20 pages ago and was called a lot of very unpleasant things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that politicians are defending him. Would they also have defended him if he had raped them?

Raped? You need to stop being outrageous. Not a word to make light of.

I tried to make the same point about 20 pages ago and was called a lot of very unpleasant things.

I'm serious. Not making light of anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that politicians are defending him. Would they also have defended him if he had raped them?

Raped? You need to stop being outrageous. Not a word to make light of.

I tried to make the same point about 20 pages ago and was called a lot of very unpleasant things.

I'm serious. Not making light of anything.

I know. I was also serious, but got called a supporter of pedophiles for making the distinction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that politicians are defending him. Would they also have defended him if he had raped them?

Raped? You need to stop being outrageous. Not a word to make light of.

I don't think this person is "making light of" rape. In addition, Josh was 4 years old, what he did would be considered rape.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that politicians are defending him. Would they also have defended him if he had raped them?

Raped? You need to stop being outrageous. Not a word to make light of.

I don't think this person is "making light of" rape. In addition, Josh was 4 years old, what he did would be considered rape.

By who?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP -- the Duggars are heartbroken this happened and they dealt with it in a dignified and responsible manner. the way they handled it allowed their family to survive. Josh has not re-offended. The sisters seem okay. Josh also survived and has a family of his own. What -- he should be thrown in jail for life? Killed? What?


What the heck is it that you all want from this family?

It is as if you are all saying - ha ha ha they are a bunch of idiots and deserve all this.

Bad stuff happens in the best of families.

This family handled it well.


Leave them alone.

They handled it well, huh? Seriously, all the discussion about religion and political involvement avoids the central question. If someone molested your daughter would you think it sufficient for that person to go work construction for a few months and get a stern talking to? If you separate out everything else and answer that question honestly I think you will see beyond the noise and understand what the furor is all about.

I would like to hear one supporter answer that question honestly.

Has any of the supporters answered this question yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that politicians are defending him. Would they also have defended him if he had raped them?

Raped? You need to stop being outrageous. Not a word to make light of.

I tried to make the same point about 20 pages ago and was called a lot of very unpleasant things.

A lot of hate on this thread. Some pretty miserable people who are obsessed with a family that they hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the "shut up josh" poster, ENOUGH! It's getting annoying, it's not funny, it's making you look like a fool. You're making you're people look bad. Stop it.

Who are exactly are "my" people? And please, your poor grammar and syntax is far more irritating.

Yes grammar police, can you just write me a ticket and be done with it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP -- the Duggars are heartbroken this happened and they dealt with it in a dignified and responsible manner. the way they handled it allowed their family to survive. Josh has not re-offended. The sisters seem okay. Josh also survived and has a family of his own. What -- he should be thrown in jail for life? Killed? What?


What the heck is it that you all want from this family?

It is as if you are all saying - ha ha ha they are a bunch of idiots and deserve all this.

Bad stuff happens in the best of families.

This family handled it well.


Leave them alone.

They handled it well, huh? Seriously, all the discussion about religion and political involvement avoids the central question. If someone molested your daughter would you think it sufficient for that person to go work construction for a few months and get a stern talking to? If you separate out everything else and answer that question honestly I think you will see beyond the noise and understand what the furor is all about.

I would like to hear one supporter answer that question honestly.

Has any of the supporters answered this question yet?

No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's now being reported that Josh Duggar sued the Arkansas DHS in 2007 - after the investigation of his wrongdoing. Sure sounds like he was remorseful about what he did.

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's now being reported that Josh Duggar sued the Arkansas DHS in 2007 - after the investigation of his wrongdoing. Sure sounds like he was remorseful about what he did.

Link?

It's possible he was suing to stop the CPS monitoring, or to remove his name from a private register. Both reasonable things to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's now being reported that Josh Duggar sued the Arkansas DHS in 2007 - after the investigation of his wrongdoing. Sure sounds like he was remorseful about what he did.

Link?

Never mind, found it.
http://m.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/josh-duggar-sued-agency-molestation-probe-report-article-1.2237112