Duggar son allegedly molested girls including sisters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Quiverfull movement does not value women. Its evident from all the focus on Josh, his forgiveness or his redemption. The girls do not matter to the parents or the members of this cult.

Women are sex slaves and baby makers. The movement adheres to an extreme patriarchy model. A girl is owned by her father until he finds a husband to take over her command. She has no freedom to choose her own path. She must obey every command given by them. She is not allowed to ever say no and must always be available - marital rape is the husband's right. She is told what to wear, is never allowed to work outside the home, and is not allowed to be educated on anything outside the approved curriculum for females.

If Josh had molested his younger brothers then they would have more of an issue with it but the girls are a different story.

They sound like a faction of ISIS or the Taliban-how does such backwardass belefs and treatment of women happin in the USA in 2015? Any extreme religion is dangerous and this proves it! Also, how the hell do the Duggars know so many child molesters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is interesting how all the pro-Duggar posters have the same poor syntax and grammar and spelling.

You are truly pathetic if you think there is one lonely pathetic poster supporting the Duggars, I mean really. I'd think it was a whole lot more interesting if you bothered to point out one (or more!) example of the poor grammar and spelling. Back up your accusation.

Ha! This is the one poster! It is obvious to the rest of us, with our fancy high school degrees from actual public schools.

Why don't you take a break from dcum and do something to make the world a better place if this is how you honestly feel about low income people, you are truly a sick piece of trash if this is how you really think. I'm serious. Get some perspective.

You mentioned low income people, PP didn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is interesting how all the pro-Duggar posters have the same poor syntax and grammar and spelling.

You are truly pathetic if you think there is one lonely pathetic poster supporting the Duggars, I mean really. I'd think it was a whole lot more interesting if you bothered to point out one (or more!) example of the poor grammar and spelling. Back up your accusation.

Ha! This is the one poster! It is obvious to the rest of us, with our fancy high school degrees from actual public schools.

Why don't you take a break from dcum and do something to make the world a better place if this is how you honestly feel about low income people, you are truly a sick piece of trash if this is how you really think. I'm serious. Get some perspective.

Shut up Josh!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone is having fun flaming this family, which I think is unfair.
The son is not sick. He was misguided and probably had a normal curiosity that teen boys have. Many kids have played these types of games, but in his case, it was not a game since the victims did not have equal power. He was a minor as were his victims. His parents took action (in their own way). All families have issues.
If I had to bet, easily 40% of our sons will/would act out in a bizarre sexual way if not properly educated (are you educating your sons and daughters?)

I want to comment on this as the mother of a 14 year old boy (who has a younger sister). My son heard about this incident and brought it up last night at dinner. His exact word were "there was something seriously wrong with him. that is disgusting" If my CHILD can see the wrong in this at 14, why can't you?

PP here - I want to add that we never had to "properly educate" him for him to know that is disgusting. The fact that you think that says a lot not only about you, but your view of men. 99% of men, young and old, do NOT need to be "properly educated" to see the wrong in touching children, some as young as 5, is very, very wrong.

As a parent, it is my responsibility to properly educate my children intellectually, emotionally, socially. This includes teaching them about sex, boundaries, respect for themselves and for others, right from wrong, good citizenship, kindness, healthy forms of love and communication, and critical thinking. If one of my adolescent kids thought that forcing themselves sexually on a 4 year old was normal, or a "mistake", I would be terrified that they had been abused themselves, and heartbroken for their victims. I would get them treatment, and face whatever legal and therapeutic consequences need to be faced. And I would NEVER pimp this out on TV for money. So yes, I am educating my son AND daughters to be independent, strong, caring individuals. Not setting them up to become sexual predators or victims.

Sorry, what you just said and this quote: If I had to bet, easily 40% of our sons will/would act out in a bizarre sexual way if not properly educated (are you educating your sons and daughters?) Are completely different. I was responding to that quote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone is having fun flaming this family, which I think is unfair.
The son is not sick. He was misguided and probably had a normal curiosity that teen boys have.Many kids have played these types of games, but in his case, it was not a game since the victims did not have equal power. He was a minor as were his victims. His parents took action (in their own way). All families have issues.
If I had to bet, easily 40% of our sons will/would act out in a bizarre sexual way if not properly educated (are you educating your sons and daughters?)

So "normal curiosity" in teen boys means fondling their sisters' vaginas and breasts? Is that what you reqally mean to say?

Living in such a sexually repressive household and culture, yes. Where masterbation, sex before marriage and what he did is on equal footing, yes.

There's no indication that any other brothers in the family molested their sisters.

Not yet!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if any of these wackadoodle Duggarites are trolling boards in other cities? DC isn't exactly the epicenter of the Duggar demo, so they are trolling out of the bible belt to boost? It's so weird. I just cannot fathom anyone in their right mind defending what this family does, and how they earn their money. Seriously, some of these posts are abso-fucking-lutely insane.

News flash:

Many Americans all over the country, and in Wash, DC, support the Duggar family.

Only left minded mean bitches are tearing this family apart because they don't agree with the family's religion. Their posts are abso-fucking-lutely insane.

No, we are tering this family apart because we don't agree with molesting young children and then sweeping it under the rug to prostitute those same victims out for money!!!!!! The Duggars are frauuds and child exploiters and abusers! They are the insane ones!

[Anonymous]

tearing!

[Anonymous]

I just read some poll that said 81 percent of people are NOT in support of the Duggars-the 19 percent who do support this are likely from the same or similar sick cult, uneducated, retarded, mentally ill, and/or into molesting kids, child pornography, and making money off the backs (or private areas) of their kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just read some poll that said 81 percent of people are NOT in support of the Duggars-the 19 percent who do support this are likely from the same or similar sick cult, uneducated, retarded, mentally ill, and/or into molesting kids, child pornography, and making money off the backs (or private areas) of their kids.

I said earlier that I think most of the people who support the Duggars do so because they don't really understand what the Quiverfull movement is and stands for and because they're the same people who enjoy a good anti-liberal knee jerk reaction. You've really got to make your brain into a pretzel to defend their actions post the sexual assault revelations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is interesting how all the pro-Duggar posters have the same poor syntax and grammar and spelling.

You are truly pathetic if you think there is one lonely pathetic poster supporting the Duggars, I mean really. I'd think it was a whole lot more interesting if you bothered to point out one (or more!) example of the poor grammar and spelling. Back up your accusation.

Ha! This is the one poster! It is obvious to the rest of us, with our fancy high school degrees from actual public schools.

Why don't you take a break from dcum and do something to make the world a better place if this is how you honestly feel about low income people, you are truly a sick piece of trash if this is how you really think. I'm serious. Get some perspective.

You mentioned low income people, PP didn't.

No, I never mentioned low income people. Pp, and probably you, since you are jumping to her defense, are just mean and full of hate.

[Anonymous]

Ages 14-15 are pretty old to be molesting girls 5-8. I mean, this isn't the age of curiosity. But it points to Josh being a pedophile.

So I guess I'm confused how ANYONE can be saying this was a "mistake". Are we really saying that we should have a show preaching family values in which one of the family members is a pedophile? Is that the new normal?

[Anonymous]

It's now being reported that Josh Duggar sued the Arkansas DHS in 2007 - after the investigation of his wrongdoing. Sure sounds like he was remorseful about what he did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone is having fun flaming this family, which I think is unfair.
The son is not sick. He was misguided and probably had a normal curiosity that teen boys have. Many kids have played these types of games, but in his case, it was not a game since the victims did not have equal power. He was a minor as were his victims. His parents took action (in their own way). All families have issues.
If I had to bet, easily 40% of our sons will/would act out in a bizarre sexual way if not properly educated (are you educating your sons and daughters?)

I want to comment on this as the mother of a 14 year old boy (who has a younger sister). My son heard about this incident and brought it up last night at dinner. His exact word were "there was something seriously wrong with him. that is disgusting" If my CHILD can see the wrong in this at 14, why can't you?

PP here - I want to add that we never had to "properly educate" him for him to know that is disgusting. The fact that you think that says a lot not only about you, but your view of men. 99% of men, young and old, do NOT need to be "properly educated" to see the wrong in touching children, some as young as 5, is very, very wrong.

As a parent, it is my responsibility to properly educate my children intellectually, emotionally, socially. This includes teaching them about sex, boundaries, respect for themselves and for others, right from wrong, good citizenship, kindness, healthy forms of love and communication, and critical thinking. If one of my adolescent kids thought that forcing themselves sexually on a 4 year old was normal, or a "mistake", I would be terrified that they had been abused themselves, and heartbroken for their victims. I would get them treatment, and face whatever legal and therapeutic consequences need to be faced. And I would NEVER pimp this out on TV for money. So yes, I am educating my son AND daughters to be independent, strong, caring individuals. Not setting them up to become sexual predators or victims.

Sorry, what you just said and this quote: If I had to bet, easily 40% of our sons will/would act out in a bizarre sexual way if not properly educated (are you educating your sons and daughters?) Are completely different. I was responding to that quote.

I totally knew what you were quoting - and agree with you. +1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is interesting how all the pro-Duggar posters have the same poor syntax and grammar and spelling.

You are truly pathetic if you think there is one lonely pathetic poster supporting the Duggars, I mean really. I'd think it was a whole lot more interesting if you bothered to point out one (or more!) example of the poor grammar and spelling. Back up your accusation.

Shut up Josh!

[Anonymous]

It's amazing that politicians are defending him. Would they also have defended him if he had raped them?