You make it sound like intimacy coordinators just meet once or twice with actors during preproduction and that's it. Lively's allegation is not that there was no intimacy coordinator. Nor is it that the intimacy coordinator was not engaged to choreograph certain scripted sex scenes. Her allegation is that Baldoni added intimate scenes and intimate elements to existing scenes, that were not scripted and were not choreographed with the IC, and that the IC was not on set when those scenes were filmed. Baldoni asked Lively to meet with the IC during preproduction to discuss certain scripted sex scenes and Lively declined, saying she already felt comfortable with those scenes. That was before Lively had worked with Baldoni on set and realized that he would push the envelope with intimacy in other scenes. |
SEXISM ALERT SEXISM ALERT |
This was a movie, fantasy and not Blake’s first rodeo. |
NP. Not sure. It’s documented she declined attempts by Baldoni to meeting with the coordinator when he was meeting with her to construct intimate scenes. Said she was comfortable with him doing it, |
Just keep blaming the woman. You haven't used, 'she asked for it with what she was wearing' yet, you should fit that in somewhere |
No that is not correct. She decline ONE meeting with the IC during preproduction for the film. That's like saying if an actor declines a bottle of water during a script read through, she can never again drink water during the entire production of the film. |
I mean, I have issues with people claiming SH during a film. Are porn stars going to start claiming they are SH now? They are making a choice to participate in this, Blake chose to partake in this film. This is fantasy. |
Then you say no. She had loads of power on this set. It became an issue when she wanted the rights to the second movie. |
I think for many people, it's just hard to imagine her being pressured into anything. But absolutely that comment above was not good. |
They were all playing roles. This was not real life. Not really understanding what the issue is here with Blake. |
SEXISM ALERT SEXISM ALERT |
We don’t have to even have this debate as she not nude or partially nude. A gown, briefs and pregnancy suit is fully clothed. |
At the end of the day, Blake is a seasoned actress and a strong woman. She had tremendous power in this set. None of this was an issue until she didn’t have the control she wanted on this set, and wanted rights for the second movie. It’s obvious from previous interviews that she’s combative and easily offended. |
Her door locked, no? |
She did say no. That's part of the case -- she's saying that she repeatedly "said no" and objected to the way Baldoni handled intimate scenes on set, and advocated for herself. Lively started raising objections to things Baldoni was doing on the first or second day of shooting -- she said "no" repeatedly and frequently. Then there was a pause in filming due to the strikes. Before coming back, Lively asked Baldoni, Heath, and Wayfarer to agree that the behavior she'd objected to during the first part of filming would cease, that there would be an IC with Lively at all times on set, and that they would not attempt to retaliate against her for raising her concerns. And then Baldoni hired a PR team that engaged Jed Wallace to try and destroy Lively's reputation online. So she sued for sexual harassment, retaliation, breach of contract, violation of her nudity rider, etc. |