Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mostly just lurk here (because there are posters who give good analysis - and yes, notes! - that you don't see elsewhere). But I just want to point out, because I'm itching to point it out to someone, that the Reddit account that made that "The conspiracy theory energy is getting out of control" post is very, very sus. And I am NOT someone who thinks most Reddit support for JB is inauthentic or accuses people willy nilly of being bots. But that account ONLY posts/seeds content that would support Wayfarer's exact narrative and planned defenses (none of the "judge is corrupt" stuff, which I do believe emerged organically) and the timing of when that account became active after a long period of dormancy is...very interesting.

Not sure if they have the basis in existing discovery yet (and they want strong basis in discovery for any Reddit subpoenas because Reddit WILL fight), but if I'm Wilkie's Kalinda-type investigator and I'm compiling my list of suggested accounts I want info on, that account is top of my list. And the fact that that account is specifically seeking to discredit (as tinfoil-hat) the theory that creators communicated with and made content on behalf of TAG without knowing it was TAG is very telling.

I was wondering whether they were going to subpoena any redditors, it should be the old head mod who erased their entire history and maybe left town altogether? That seemed weird to me but I was barely on reddit at that point. I will look at the one you mention, for funsies.

The reddit subs are weird to me and I wish there was an incognito reddit sub to talk about them and how to deal with them because, like, apparently if you sh!ttalk the mods from Sub 1 on Sub 2, the mods from Sub 1 can read it and then come back to your conversations on Sub 2 and sh!ttalk and police you on Sub 2! And also people on Sub 2 can seem totally normal on Sub 2 but then when you look at their comments on Sub 1, they are full of insults and conspiracy talk, so it does change your opinion of them. Maybe the reddit mods will see this comment and track my location (/s) and ban me! It all just goes back to how impossible it sort of is to talk reasonably about this case because even the reasonable-seeming people are pretty dug whereby everything that happens just supports their position. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Baldoni should subpoena you

[Anonymous]

Not sure about that head mod (I've seen theories about them, but not enough firsthand observation to say). But that account that made the "conspiracy theory energy" post is legitimately WHOA. Especially if you look at their deleted posts, including their first on this case claiming to have insider info from set (I remember CCs making content about that post):

https://arctic-shift.photon-reddit.com/search?fun=posts_search&author=Gabrielahearst&before=2025-05-29T16%3A31%3A39&limit=10&sort=desc

I seriously hope Mike Gottlieb or Esra Hudson sent a preservation notice to Reddit for this account's subscriber info.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure about that head mod (I've seen theories about them, but not enough firsthand observation to say). But that account that made the "conspiracy theory energy" post is legitimately WHOA. Especially if you look at their deleted posts, including their first on this case claiming to have insider info from set (I remember CCs making content about that post):

https://arctic-shift.photon-reddit.com/search?fun=posts_search&author=Gabrielahearst&before=2025-05-29T16%3A31%3A39&limit=10&sort=desc

I seriously hope Mike Gottlieb or Esra Hudson sent a preservation notice to Reddit for this account's subscriber info.

I think you are really, really mad that they accurately clocked the personalities of Blake supporters like you and your unhinged, MAGA Qanon theories. It's hilarious watching you seethe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mostly just lurk here (because there are posters who give good analysis - and yes, notes! - that you don't see elsewhere). But I just want to point out, because I'm itching to point it out to someone, that the Reddit account that made that "The conspiracy theory energy is getting out of control" post is very, very sus. And I am NOT someone who thinks most Reddit support for JB is inauthentic or accuses people willy nilly of being bots. But that account ONLY posts/seeds content that would support Wayfarer's exact narrative and planned defenses (none of the "judge is corrupt" stuff, which I do believe emerged organically) and the timing of when that account became active after a long period of dormancy is...very interesting.

Not sure if they have the basis in existing discovery yet (and they want strong basis in discovery for any Reddit subpoenas because Reddit WILL fight), but if I'm Wilkie's Kalinda-type investigator and I'm compiling my list of suggested accounts I want info on, that account is top of my list. And the fact that that account is specifically seeking to discredit (as tinfoil-hat) the theory that creators communicated with and made content on behalf of TAG without knowing it was TAG is very telling.

I was wondering whether they were going to subpoena any redditors, it should be the old head mod who erased their entire history and maybe left town altogether? That seemed weird to me but I was barely on reddit at that point. I will look at the one you mention, for funsies.

The reddit subs are weird to me and I wish there was an incognito reddit sub to talk about them and how to deal with them because, like, apparently if you sh!ttalk the mods from Sub 1 on Sub 2, the mods from Sub 1 can read it and then come back to your conversations on Sub 2 and sh!ttalk and police you on Sub 2! And also people on Sub 2 can seem totally normal on Sub 2 but then when you look at their comments on Sub 1, they are full of insults and conspiracy talk, so it does change your opinion of them. Maybe the reddit mods will see this comment and track my location (/s) and ban me! It all just goes back to how impossible it sort of is to talk reasonably about this case because even the reasonable-seeming people are pretty dug whereby everything that happens just supports their position. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This is like the 20th comment in the past week coming from Blake supporters or Blake supporters claiming to be neutral who lament the quality of discussion on DCUM and Reddit. Genuine question: Why don't you start your own subreddit? Not being snarky, but it does seem like the Blake supporter who's constantly writing multi-paragraph theories about this case has a ton of time on her hands, so why don't you or her (if she's a different person) make one? You can set whatever parameters and rules you want, and calibrate the discussion to your liking. It can be a little pet project for you guys. I truly think it would be more fruitful than spamming this thread talking about why you don't like the quality of the discussion anywhere.

[Anonymous]

There is allegedly a discord channel for Blake Diehards so maybe look into that.

[Anonymous]

I would think BaldoniFiles would be a pretty representative place for the ardent Livelyists? They have a Liman appreciation post and are avidly posting about how the content creators got what they deserved for what they say (big yikes, even if I find those CCs obnoxious). I can't imagine having somewhere more pro-Blake than that.

I don't post on reddit, just lurk, but I think the ItEndsWithLawsuits one improved a lot the past couple of weeks. It used to be filled with snarky memes and now there seem to be more actual case updates and I can usually find reasonable arguments from posters on either side along with histrionics.

I like it here because there's no login and I hate how reddit is organized. I'm sure I have argued with some posters here one minute and agreed with them the next. It seems healthier not to know.

[Anonymous]

I am an actual neutral poster (truly don't even care who wins this thing -- I think they are both ridiculous people) and that Redditor is indeed a nut job. I frequent the neutral sub and generally the discussion there is decent (though it's been very weird lately with the change in mods though I do think the new mods are doing their very best) but there are a handful of posters who regularly engage in these low-effort posts that are just rumor mongering or attacking other commenters or boards-on-boards stuff, and the one you guys are talking about is one of the worst offenders. I don't think this person works for Baldoni, I just think they are crazy and obnoxious and wish they'd get banned from that sub.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am an actual neutral poster (truly don't even care who wins this thing -- I think they are both ridiculous people) and that Redditor is indeed a nut job. I frequent the neutral sub and generally the discussion there is decent (though it's been very weird lately with the change in mods though I do think the new mods are doing their very best) but there are a handful of posters who regularly engage in these low-effort posts that are just rumor mongering or attacking other commenters or boards-on-boards stuff, and the one you guys are talking about is one of the worst offenders. I don't think this person works for Baldoni, I just think they are crazy and obnoxious and wish they'd get banned from that sub.

You’re adopting your “neutral”’persona now, I see. There is no one who is truly neutral about this case who has continued to follow it up until this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure about that head mod (I've seen theories about them, but not enough firsthand observation to say). But that account that made the "conspiracy theory energy" post is legitimately WHOA. Especially if you look at their deleted posts, including their first on this case claiming to have insider info from set (I remember CCs making content about that post):

https://arctic-shift.photon-reddit.com/search?fun=posts_search&author=Gabrielahearst&before=2025-05-29T16%3A31%3A39&limit=10&sort=desc

I seriously hope Mike Gottlieb or Esra Hudson sent a preservation notice to Reddit for this account's subscriber info.

Example of CC (Dave Neal) making content based on that Redditor's now-deleted "Information from the set of It Ends with Us" post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IriUOehSNrM . 20-minute video, nearly 100K views.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is allegedly a discord channel for Blake Diehards so maybe look into that.

+1000 highly recommend they go -- and preferably stay -- there

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is allegedly a discord channel for Blake Diehards so maybe look into that.

+1000 highly recommend they go -- and preferably stay -- there

Why?

If you want a pro-JB echo chamber, they already exist. Why is it important to you that pro-Lively people isolate themselves? You can always just not participate in discussions that attract both sides if you prefer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mostly just lurk here (because there are posters who give good analysis - and yes, notes! - that you don't see elsewhere). But I just want to point out, because I'm itching to point it out to someone, that the Reddit account that made that "The conspiracy theory energy is getting out of control" post is very, very sus. And I am NOT someone who thinks most Reddit support for JB is inauthentic or accuses people willy nilly of being bots. But that account ONLY posts/seeds content that would support Wayfarer's exact narrative and planned defenses (none of the "judge is corrupt" stuff, which I do believe emerged organically) and the timing of when that account became active after a long period of dormancy is...very interesting.

Not sure if they have the basis in existing discovery yet (and they want strong basis in discovery for any Reddit subpoenas because Reddit WILL fight), but if I'm Wilkie's Kalinda-type investigator and I'm compiling my list of suggested accounts I want info on, that account is top of my list. And the fact that that account is specifically seeking to discredit (as tinfoil-hat) the theory that creators communicated with and made content on behalf of TAG without knowing it was TAG is very telling.

I was wondering whether they were going to subpoena any redditors, it should be the old head mod who erased their entire history and maybe left town altogether? That seemed weird to me but I was barely on reddit at that point. I will look at the one you mention, for funsies.

The reddit subs are weird to me and I wish there was an incognito reddit sub to talk about them and how to deal with them because, like, apparently if you sh!ttalk the mods from Sub 1 on Sub 2, the mods from Sub 1 can read it and then come back to your conversations on Sub 2 and sh!ttalk and police you on Sub 2! And also people on Sub 2 can seem totally normal on Sub 2 but then when you look at their comments on Sub 1, they are full of insults and conspiracy talk, so it does change your opinion of them. Maybe the reddit mods will see this comment and track my location (/s) and ban me! It all just goes back to how impossible it sort of is to talk reasonably about this case because even the reasonable-seeming people are pretty dug whereby everything that happens just supports their position. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This is like the 20th comment in the past week coming from Blake supporters or Blake supporters claiming to be neutral who lament the quality of discussion on DCUM and Reddit. Genuine question: Why don't you start your own subreddit? Not being snarky, but it does seem like the Blake supporter who's constantly writing multi-paragraph theories about this case has a ton of time on her hands, so why don't you or her (if she's a different person) make one? You can set whatever parameters and rules you want, and calibrate the discussion to your liking. It can be a little pet project for you guys. I truly think it would be more fruitful than spamming this thread talking about why you don't like the quality of the discussion anywhere.

Meanwhile someone from your end keeps posting untrue paranoia about "personas" and how we are all the same person so thank for the comment tips but we're having an actual conversation and if you don't like it maybe just skip the posts. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure about that head mod (I've seen theories about them, but not enough firsthand observation to say). But that account that made the "conspiracy theory energy" post is legitimately WHOA. Especially if you look at their deleted posts, including their first on this case claiming to have insider info from set (I remember CCs making content about that post):

https://arctic-shift.photon-reddit.com/search?fun=posts_search&author=Gabrielahearst&before=2025-05-29T16%3A31%3A39&limit=10&sort=desc

I seriously hope Mike Gottlieb or Esra Hudson sent a preservation notice to Reddit for this account's subscriber info.

Example of CC (Dave Neal) making content based on that Redditor's now-deleted "Information from the set of It Ends with Us" post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IriUOehSNrM . 20-minute video, nearly 100K views.

Sorry, not following here. What is the implication? That this redditor might be feeding pro-JB narratives at the behest if someone in that side?

Not being snarky, genuinely asking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is allegedly a discord channel for Blake Diehards so maybe look into that.

+1000 highly recommend they go -- and preferably stay -- there

Why?

If you want a pro-JB echo chamber, they already exist. Why is it important to you that pro-Lively people isolate themselves? You can always just not participate in discussions that attract both sides if you prefer.

I don’t mind different opinions, it’s that some oversensitive lunatic has been complaining about the quality of discussion on DCUM. Meta talk is very different than wanting someone to leave just for having different opinions, so stop playing dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure about that head mod (I've seen theories about them, but not enough firsthand observation to say). But that account that made the "conspiracy theory energy" post is legitimately WHOA. Especially if you look at their deleted posts, including their first on this case claiming to have insider info from set (I remember CCs making content about that post):

https://arctic-shift.photon-reddit.com/search?fun=posts_search&author=Gabrielahearst&before=2025-05-29T16%3A31%3A39&limit=10&sort=desc

I seriously hope Mike Gottlieb or Esra Hudson sent a preservation notice to Reddit for this account's subscriber info.

Example of CC (Dave Neal) making content based on that Redditor's now-deleted "Information from the set of It Ends with Us" post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IriUOehSNrM . 20-minute video, nearly 100K views.

Sorry, not following here. What is the implication? That this redditor might be feeding pro-JB narratives at the behest if someone in that side?

Not being snarky, genuinely asking.

Anyone who makes posts that are pro-JB are part of the untraceable smear campaign according to the deluded BL supporters who post here.