Anonymous wrote:It appears that we may have the good fortune of receiving offers from Trinity and Dalton for kindergarten. Daughter is bright and loves school. Seems to have an emerging interest in STEM, but she is 4, who knows where she will go as she gets older. Logistically, both schools are convenient to us.
Would appreciate the group's opinions. The prior posts have been helpful to us - any fresh comments appreciated.
I’m actually a trinity grad with family currently at dalton. Recently had family make the choice between trinity and dalton. Chose Dalton in the end.
There’s a weird consensus among certain parents that Dalton STEM is slightly weaker than other TT’s, which I don’t agree with, but who knows?
I always think that if i could go back, I would have chosen dalton for myself, but that’s only because I tend to do better with less supervision and more academic freedom. Family there now is in Little Dalton and they absolutely adore it. I can give more specifics if you’re curious.
This is purely anecdotal, but I’ll say quickly that I wasn’t ‘happy’ at Trinity (i was a lifer), and i think that was true for a lot of us. But i wasn’t necessarily unhappy either. I did get a great education and went on to a good college, though, which was the point, i guess.
Really helpful, thanks so much! Any specifics you can share about their experience at Little Dalton would be much appreciated.
Sure!
So there were many reasons why dalton was ultimately chosen and why it’s so beloved now. I’ll list a few good and a couple bad.
First is one small deciding factor: the amount of care dalton put in once they were admitted. The acceptance letter they wrote was truly wonderful, which is a small, but pretty telling, expression of the care they put into choosing the kindergarten class. It was more than a page long and included remarkable insights into our kiddo. TBH, we sort of expected to get into trinity due to multi-generational legacy, etc., but they displayed no enthusiasm or genuine interest, which is fine. Again, when you’re applying, the schools keep a safe distance from parents. Once you’re admitted, though, dalton instantly made an effort to create a sense of community which trinity neglected. Is this the most important thing? Of course not. But it does make a bit of difference when you’re trying to decide between schools like these.
Second, when we did the visit, we loved Little Dalton’s physical space. It’s a special place. Lots of nooks and crannies, hidden hallways, a surprisingly large gym, tons of classrooms, and a sense of joyous, albeit organized, chaos in which a kid can thrive. It feels fun! Big Dalton also holds regular events for Little Dalton, which are lovely, and the older students host the younger ones - not entirely uncommon at other schools, but we like what dalton does, international day, etc. We love house system, too.
Third, their learning philosophy and the structure of their courses is more conducive to learning for youth imo. The fluidity between classes helps: ours is an advanced reader; they got to move up groups in order to stay challenged beginning in K, and the staff were wonderful in encouraging them to progress with their weekly library book all through k. The teachers are absolutely exceptional; ours still exchanges letters to his K teacher, and it’s such a nice little thing.
Fourth, the community is pretty wonderful. Parents are as involved as they want to be: there’s no pressure to be a joiner, but there certainly are more and less involved people. More than that, though, we’ve noticed that there’s an extreme lack of snootiness despite the caliber of some of the parents we’ve met. Most everyone, with a couple of notable exceptions, have been lovely, as are the kids. At Trinity, this has not always been the case, and this dates back to my dad’s days there.
Fifth, fin aid is generous, all things considered. We’re full-pay, but for tons of students and families we’re close with now, dalton has been exceedingly good at ensuring that admitted kids could attend regardless of need. One of the things we loved most about it was how they made it seem that if your child was admitted, it was for a good reason and they truly want you to be able to go.
There are downsides to dalton. For example, afterschool activities fill up FAST. The signup goes up, and the spots for certain classes go in, like, two minutes. It took us 2x to get STEAM and chess (dalton chess is extremely competitive though), and 3x to get tennis. Again, at dalton as anywhere, rich kids will have an advantage in certain things. But we do believe that Dalton puts in sincere effort to make things as fair as possible.
Most importantly, the kiddo loves it there. Still hates getting going in the morning, but by the time they get to school, they’re off to the races, and when they come home, they’re full of stories about things they’ve learned, etc. There’s a lot more, but that’s enough for now. We just love dalton. Like I said above, it’ll be great for some people, not so great for others, but for us, it’s a perfect fit. And I won’t taint your judgment with my memories as a trinity survivor, but there were lots of lows and a few highs…
Could you say more about what it was like as a Trinity survivor? The lower school seems so happy
The lower school is totally fine. I have very happy memories through fifth grade or so. Around seventh grade, the pressure starts to pick up. Then it becomes unrelenting. It gets truly bad, and the competition is so extreme.
I want to mention something quickly: everyone seems to think that purely rich kids get into ivies, that they’re unqualified and that they inflate the number of acceptances to ivy+ schools. 1) That’s not (entirely) true. Occasionally it is - i have some excellent examples from families you’ve definitely heard. But so many of the VERY rich kids/nepobabies did extraordinarily well in school and deserved to get into the schools they did. 2) In my year, around 40% went ivy+. The vast majority of us did not have our names on campus buildings or the NYPL or have parents on the nightly news, etc.
I’m pretty definitively not a genius, so I had to work nonstop from age 13-graduation to ensure that I’d get into a good college. The stress at times could be overwhelming, and there were moments of pretty profound darkness and failure. It didn’t help that my sibling, who very much is a genius, breezed through school like it was a sunday brunch. But, as so many survivors point out, it did make college much, much more tolerable, and I don’t think I could’ve gotten into the colleges i did had i gone somewhere else.
For me, I’m pretty social, so that aspect of the school was never a problem. But there are definitely people who thrive in trinity’s social environment. Others sink. Deep. There are definitely issues with bullying along class (sometimes racial) lines, which i was lucky to avoid, and there are the usual high school things like hotness rankings and some grosser stuff which i won’t go into here. Class and social cache were quite important to life at trinity though. I’m not sure how I avoided the worst of it.
There’s also a trinity bubble. You can literally go your whole school life socializing only with trinity kids, and that can leave you with a pretty warped sense of reality. I certainly suffered it a bit I’m afraid to say. But I was also so busy that my social life mostly consisted of doing things related to EC interests or schoolwork.
There are definitely good things though. I’m still friends with a ton of my fellow survivors - they’re my best and truest friends, actually. I wound up at an HYP, and after that I went to a good grad school. A lot of my current success I have to say I can attribute to some of the ethic Trinity dragged out of me, and I’ve benefited from the networks all the schools afforded me. Still, if i could do it all over again, i think i would have gone to dalton. I actually talked to my mom (a spence grad) about it recently and she agreed. My dad went to trinity, but transferred to exeter b/c he stopped enjoying it and I think he would have loved if I’d gone there.
Oh, well… next life.
Do you think things have changed at Trinity since you were there? Lower School and early years of Middle School seem quite slow though the environment is certainly very warm and welcoming for students. Have heard that the ramp up to High School is intense and new admits in 9th grade for High School overwhelmingly dominate academically. Did the surveyors who weren't from donor families, URM or recruited athletes in your class do well with college admissions? I imagine the admit rate for that cohort would be well below the 40% that's often ascribed to the overall class.
Honestly, no. I want to be careful with how I phrase things. I don’t want to discourage anyone from attending, because certain people do thrive there, although i don’t think anyone actually loves trinity. I saw another parent talking about their child entering the upper school and that they’ve had a largely positive experience with the school so far, and that’s great. But being a parent is enormously different than being a student, obviously, and the student experience is extraordinarily intense.
It’s not solely because of the academics - the trinity parent said they’re manageable, and they’re exactly right: they’re just barely manageable. But so many students are miserable trying to manage their academics and extracurriculars. It’s constant stress, and teachers, while top rate, have incredibly high expectations and aren’t the most welcoming. They’re actually strangely cliquish and have clear favorites. All of this is fine: i actually benefited from this and in some sick way, I enjoyed the stress of the academics and always being busy. But most of my friends were capital U unhappy. So was i. At certain points, I probably edged on full-blown depression. I just eked my way through. And the emphasis and pressure to make it look easy is just as important. I stopped going to ad hocs for help at the beginning of sophomore year cause i didn’t want to make it look like i needed help.
You’ll say, as a parent and a fully-matured adult, that this was a stupid thing to do. It was my fault to inflict harm on myself this way. You’re right. It was, and it made my life harder. But I was 15, and the environment made me feel and my friends feel like this was something you needed to do for respect.
I’m not going to get into the social aspects of it. Not gonna talk about the swamp, the partying, homecoming, etc. A lot of it is just par for the course in high school. But there is ABSOLUTELY a social hierarchy at trinity, and even though i graduated more than a decade ago, i still believe it exists. I don’t think trinity cares about changing these things as long as they continue to have the results they have. I also think that, since trinity has such a collection of fabulously wealthy and famous families, everything heightened. You feel the social pressure much more acutely than you would at another school. But again, it just comes with the territory of going to a school like trinity. My best friend left sophomore year to go to choate, which she LOVED fwiw, and there was a hierarchy there, too, however it was far less pronounced, according to her.
My point is the experience of a student and parent are vastly different, and the differences between lower, middle, and upper school are drastic and pronounced. Trinity can actually do damage to you if you let it. But if you manage to make it through, the results can be worth it. Like i said before, I got into an HYP (the same as my sibling), went to a good grad school afterward, and have had a successful career so far. Could i have done that without having a kind of shitty high school experience? I don’t know. But I will say that, deep, deep down, I’d be very concerned with sending my kid to trinity for high school.
I'm a Trinity grad from the 1990s - who upthread said I had PTSD from the experience. I realize I went a long time ago but I wanted to chime in about going to school with really wealthy and famous families. It was incredibly demoralizing how much these kids were favored by the administration when I was there. They were appointed leadership roles that they did not deserve but got solely because they needed more for their applications. Every.single.one went onto an Ivy. I will say, it was not just Trinity kids. I had friends in other schools who were the children of famous CEOs and the like who all did extremely well in college admissions. Yes, some of them definitely deserved it but not all. That's what you get for living in NYC and being in the private school world so you have to accept it but it's a bitter pill to swallow.
That definitely does sound brutal. However would you say that the downside from these social dynamics outweigh the benefits that these TT NYC private schools purportedly provide in terms of fostering better critical thinking, writing, soft skills, etc. We have two kids in Lower School at a NYC private and we weigh moving to a top suburb all the time (slower pace, >$200k in annual post-tax savings and we don't have to commute). We've stayed for the time being because suburban HS seems like a meaningless grind to see who can eke out a 0.1 higher weighted GPA while taking 15 APs. It seems like all students at a top school have to grind it out in some shape or form so better to do it on things that actually foster critical thinking and in an environment with good teachers rather than spend 4 years memorizing textbooks?
You have a point. My kids just went through a suburban public school in a supposed top district and I think their education was horrible. Would I do send them there again over Trinity? I really don't know.
Another point of reference - my husband went to a top suburban public school and on to an Ivy. He is smarter than me and has better critical thinking skills. But, he will tell you that I am by far, better educated. I did not go to an Ivy.
We had our kids in a crappy suburban public school, and now they're in slightly less crappy urban public schools, and our philosophy throughout has been Grant Allen's "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education" - there's a lot more to life than school.
One of them is a performing arts kid, which has also given her all sorts of useful related skills (if she ends up on a debate team in high school she'll be absolutely terrifying), and the other one is a coding whiz and a promising novelist; they can do algebra and churn out a 5-paragraph theme with the best of them, but that's not what their lives revolve around.
Anonymous wrote:It appears that we may have the good fortune of receiving offers from Trinity and Dalton for kindergarten. Daughter is bright and loves school. Seems to have an emerging interest in STEM, but she is 4, who knows where she will go as she gets older. Logistically, both schools are convenient to us.
Would appreciate the group's opinions. The prior posts have been helpful to us - any fresh comments appreciated.
I’m actually a trinity grad with family currently at dalton. Recently had family make the choice between trinity and dalton. Chose Dalton in the end.
There’s a weird consensus among certain parents that Dalton STEM is slightly weaker than other TT’s, which I don’t agree with, but who knows?
I always think that if i could go back, I would have chosen dalton for myself, but that’s only because I tend to do better with less supervision and more academic freedom. Family there now is in Little Dalton and they absolutely adore it. I can give more specifics if you’re curious.
This is purely anecdotal, but I’ll say quickly that I wasn’t ‘happy’ at Trinity (i was a lifer), and i think that was true for a lot of us. But i wasn’t necessarily unhappy either. I did get a great education and went on to a good college, though, which was the point, i guess.
Really helpful, thanks so much! Any specifics you can share about their experience at Little Dalton would be much appreciated.
Sure!
So there were many reasons why dalton was ultimately chosen and why it’s so beloved now. I’ll list a few good and a couple bad.
First is one small deciding factor: the amount of care dalton put in once they were admitted. The acceptance letter they wrote was truly wonderful, which is a small, but pretty telling, expression of the care they put into choosing the kindergarten class. It was more than a page long and included remarkable insights into our kiddo. TBH, we sort of expected to get into trinity due to multi-generational legacy, etc., but they displayed no enthusiasm or genuine interest, which is fine. Again, when you’re applying, the schools keep a safe distance from parents. Once you’re admitted, though, dalton instantly made an effort to create a sense of community which trinity neglected. Is this the most important thing? Of course not. But it does make a bit of difference when you’re trying to decide between schools like these.
Second, when we did the visit, we loved Little Dalton’s physical space. It’s a special place. Lots of nooks and crannies, hidden hallways, a surprisingly large gym, tons of classrooms, and a sense of joyous, albeit organized, chaos in which a kid can thrive. It feels fun! Big Dalton also holds regular events for Little Dalton, which are lovely, and the older students host the younger ones - not entirely uncommon at other schools, but we like what dalton does, international day, etc. We love house system, too.
Third, their learning philosophy and the structure of their courses is more conducive to learning for youth imo. The fluidity between classes helps: ours is an advanced reader; they got to move up groups in order to stay challenged beginning in K, and the staff were wonderful in encouraging them to progress with their weekly library book all through k. The teachers are absolutely exceptional; ours still exchanges letters to his K teacher, and it’s such a nice little thing.
Fourth, the community is pretty wonderful. Parents are as involved as they want to be: there’s no pressure to be a joiner, but there certainly are more and less involved people. More than that, though, we’ve noticed that there’s an extreme lack of snootiness despite the caliber of some of the parents we’ve met. Most everyone, with a couple of notable exceptions, have been lovely, as are the kids. At Trinity, this has not always been the case, and this dates back to my dad’s days there.
Fifth, fin aid is generous, all things considered. We’re full-pay, but for tons of students and families we’re close with now, dalton has been exceedingly good at ensuring that admitted kids could attend regardless of need. One of the things we loved most about it was how they made it seem that if your child was admitted, it was for a good reason and they truly want you to be able to go.
There are downsides to dalton. For example, afterschool activities fill up FAST. The signup goes up, and the spots for certain classes go in, like, two minutes. It took us 2x to get STEAM and chess (dalton chess is extremely competitive though), and 3x to get tennis. Again, at dalton as anywhere, rich kids will have an advantage in certain things. But we do believe that Dalton puts in sincere effort to make things as fair as possible.
Most importantly, the kiddo loves it there. Still hates getting going in the morning, but by the time they get to school, they’re off to the races, and when they come home, they’re full of stories about things they’ve learned, etc. There’s a lot more, but that’s enough for now. We just love dalton. Like I said above, it’ll be great for some people, not so great for others, but for us, it’s a perfect fit. And I won’t taint your judgment with my memories as a trinity survivor, but there were lots of lows and a few highs…
Could you say more about what it was like as a Trinity survivor? The lower school seems so happy
The lower school is totally fine. I have very happy memories through fifth grade or so. Around seventh grade, the pressure starts to pick up. Then it becomes unrelenting. It gets truly bad, and the competition is so extreme.
I want to mention something quickly: everyone seems to think that purely rich kids get into ivies, that they’re unqualified and that they inflate the number of acceptances to ivy+ schools. 1) That’s not (entirely) true. Occasionally it is - i have some excellent examples from families you’ve definitely heard. But so many of the VERY rich kids/nepobabies did extraordinarily well in school and deserved to get into the schools they did. 2) In my year, around 40% went ivy+. The vast majority of us did not have our names on campus buildings or the NYPL or have parents on the nightly news, etc.
I’m pretty definitively not a genius, so I had to work nonstop from age 13-graduation to ensure that I’d get into a good college. The stress at times could be overwhelming, and there were moments of pretty profound darkness and failure. It didn’t help that my sibling, who very much is a genius, breezed through school like it was a sunday brunch. But, as so many survivors point out, it did make college much, much more tolerable, and I don’t think I could’ve gotten into the colleges i did had i gone somewhere else.
For me, I’m pretty social, so that aspect of the school was never a problem. But there are definitely people who thrive in trinity’s social environment. Others sink. Deep. There are definitely issues with bullying along class (sometimes racial) lines, which i was lucky to avoid, and there are the usual high school things like hotness rankings and some grosser stuff which i won’t go into here. Class and social cache were quite important to life at trinity though. I’m not sure how I avoided the worst of it.
There’s also a trinity bubble. You can literally go your whole school life socializing only with trinity kids, and that can leave you with a pretty warped sense of reality. I certainly suffered it a bit I’m afraid to say. But I was also so busy that my social life mostly consisted of doing things related to EC interests or schoolwork.
There are definitely good things though. I’m still friends with a ton of my fellow survivors - they’re my best and truest friends, actually. I wound up at an HYP, and after that I went to a good grad school. A lot of my current success I have to say I can attribute to some of the ethic Trinity dragged out of me, and I’ve benefited from the networks all the schools afforded me. Still, if i could do it all over again, i think i would have gone to dalton. I actually talked to my mom (a spence grad) about it recently and she agreed. My dad went to trinity, but transferred to exeter b/c he stopped enjoying it and I think he would have loved if I’d gone there.
Oh, well… next life.
Do you think things have changed at Trinity since you were there? Lower School and early years of Middle School seem quite slow though the environment is certainly very warm and welcoming for students. Have heard that the ramp up to High School is intense and new admits in 9th grade for High School overwhelmingly dominate academically. Did the surveyors who weren't from donor families, URM or recruited athletes in your class do well with college admissions? I imagine the admit rate for that cohort would be well below the 40% that's often ascribed to the overall class.
Honestly, no. I want to be careful with how I phrase things. I don’t want to discourage anyone from attending, because certain people do thrive there, although i don’t think anyone actually loves trinity. I saw another parent talking about their child entering the upper school and that they’ve had a largely positive experience with the school so far, and that’s great. But being a parent is enormously different than being a student, obviously, and the student experience is extraordinarily intense.
It’s not solely because of the academics - the trinity parent said they’re manageable, and they’re exactly right: they’re just barely manageable. But so many students are miserable trying to manage their academics and extracurriculars. It’s constant stress, and teachers, while top rate, have incredibly high expectations and aren’t the most welcoming. They’re actually strangely cliquish and have clear favorites. All of this is fine: i actually benefited from this and in some sick way, I enjoyed the stress of the academics and always being busy. But most of my friends were capital U unhappy. So was i. At certain points, I probably edged on full-blown depression. I just eked my way through. And the emphasis and pressure to make it look easy is just as important. I stopped going to ad hocs for help at the beginning of sophomore year cause i didn’t want to make it look like i needed help.
You’ll say, as a parent and a fully-matured adult, that this was a stupid thing to do. It was my fault to inflict harm on myself this way. You’re right. It was, and it made my life harder. But I was 15, and the environment made me feel and my friends feel like this was something you needed to do for respect.
I’m not going to get into the social aspects of it. Not gonna talk about the swamp, the partying, homecoming, etc. A lot of it is just par for the course in high school. But there is ABSOLUTELY a social hierarchy at trinity, and even though i graduated more than a decade ago, i still believe it exists. I don’t think trinity cares about changing these things as long as they continue to have the results they have. I also think that, since trinity has such a collection of fabulously wealthy and famous families, everything heightened. You feel the social pressure much more acutely than you would at another school. But again, it just comes with the territory of going to a school like trinity. My best friend left sophomore year to go to choate, which she LOVED fwiw, and there was a hierarchy there, too, however it was far less pronounced, according to her.
My point is the experience of a student and parent are vastly different, and the differences between lower, middle, and upper school are drastic and pronounced. Trinity can actually do damage to you if you let it. But if you manage to make it through, the results can be worth it. Like i said before, I got into an HYP (the same as my sibling), went to a good grad school afterward, and have had a successful career so far. Could i have done that without having a kind of shitty high school experience? I don’t know. But I will say that, deep, deep down, I’d be very concerned with sending my kid to trinity for high school.
What is the social hierarchy at Trinity? How would a normal NYC rich but nothing mind blowing family fit in?
I’ve been writing really long posts, so I’ll keep this one short. The social hierarchy at trinity is exactly what you’d expect with a few small quirks which may be a bit unique to it. It would take a full academic study to explain what i mean.
When you ask how a normal nyc rich family would fit in, are you asking about parents or students? I’m not a trinity parent (Go Ivan!), but my parents had some friends. They weren’t really joiners, though. For students, I think i have an interesting perspective on this. When my sibling and i started at trinity, we were comfortably upper middle class. By the time we got to high school, we’d become probably middle of the upper echelon of trinity rich. The truth is wealth does play a role in trinity student life. It’s omnipresent. It’s easier to fit in and be accepted if you come from a wealthy family. It also helps if you’re a guy.
I’m going to contradict myself quickly here: all of this is only true to an extent. All of this is generalized and based on my own observations, experiences and conversations i’ve had with friends over the years - maybe it’s a sign of the “trauma” we experienced, but survivors often speak of surviving trinity when we get together. Trinity will be great for certain kids from a variety of different backgrounds. It’s a hard school which will provide you with an excellent education. The students are smart, the teachers challenge you, and, like i’ve said elsewhere, if you do well, you’ll be able to write your own acceptance letter. But that’s hard to do. And where trinity has a glut (smart, ambitious kids and resources for them to pursue their interests, whatever they may be), they have a severe dearth of care and compassion or any concern about a holistic education. And that is totally fine for some people.
Anonymous wrote:We had our kids in a crappy suburban public school, and now they're in slightly less crappy urban public schools, and our philosophy throughout has been Grant Allen's "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education" - there's a lot more to life than school.
One of them is a performing arts kid, which has also given her all sorts of useful related skills (if she ends up on a debate team in high school she'll be absolutely terrifying), and the other one is a coding whiz and a promising novelist; they can do algebra and churn out a 5-paragraph theme with the best of them, but that's not what their lives revolve around.
The concern I have as a fellow public school parent with a similar family philosophy is that, come high school, the choice becomes between brutally competitive pressure-cooker environments, like Stuy/LaGuardia, where the overwhelming amount of work and focus does indeed interfere with broader extra-curricular education, and the lackluster publics where a lot of kids are coasting, perhaps doing drugs, etc and your talented whiz kids would be swimming upstream. Top privates, at least in theory, give a promise of a better balance, but of course, there are many counterexamples and caveats to that as well.
Anonymous wrote:I have a really bright kid and we largely resisted the TT pressure and focused on fit. So we did a mix of TT and non-TT schools. Admittedly we might regret this come college app time, but my kid is actually happy and calm while still working pretty hard, getting excellent grades, and doing various extra-curriculars (ones they enjoy, not ones that are solely to get into college). Again, this might bite us at application time, but we will take that calculated risk. There is way too much status chasing, particularly in NYC. I wish the colleges would see through it more.
What do you mean a mix? Like TT for elementary and then switched?
Anonymous wrote:We had our kids in a crappy suburban public school, and now they're in slightly less crappy urban public schools, and our philosophy throughout has been Grant Allen's "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education" - there's a lot more to life than school.
One of them is a performing arts kid, which has also given her all sorts of useful related skills (if she ends up on a debate team in high school she'll be absolutely terrifying), and the other one is a coding whiz and a promising novelist; they can do algebra and churn out a 5-paragraph theme with the best of them, but that's not what their lives revolve around.
The concern I have as a fellow public school parent with a similar family philosophy is that, come high school, the choice becomes between brutally competitive pressure-cooker environments, like Stuy/LaGuardia, where the overwhelming amount of work and focus does indeed interfere with broader extra-curricular education, and the lackluster publics where a lot of kids are coasting, perhaps doing drugs, etc and your talented whiz kids would be swimming upstream. Top privates, at least in theory, give a promise of a better balance, but of course, there are many counterexamples and caveats to that as well.
I dont want to be the one to break it to you, but NYC privates have massive drinking/drug cultures, too. Kids will be kids.
Anonymous wrote:We had our kids in a crappy suburban public school, and now they're in slightly less crappy urban public schools, and our philosophy throughout has been Grant Allen's "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education" - there's a lot more to life than school.
One of them is a performing arts kid, which has also given her all sorts of useful related skills (if she ends up on a debate team in high school she'll be absolutely terrifying), and the other one is a coding whiz and a promising novelist; they can do algebra and churn out a 5-paragraph theme with the best of them, but that's not what their lives revolve around.
The concern I have as a fellow public school parent with a similar family philosophy is that, come high school, the choice becomes between brutally competitive pressure-cooker environments, like Stuy/LaGuardia, where the overwhelming amount of work and focus does indeed interfere with broader extra-curricular education, and the lackluster publics where a lot of kids are coasting, perhaps doing drugs, etc and your talented whiz kids would be swimming upstream. Top privates, at least in theory, give a promise of a better balance, but of course, there are many counterexamples and caveats to that as well.
I dont want to be the one to break it to you, but NYC privates have massive drinking/drug cultures, too. Kids will be kids.
Sure, I am aware. But is that the case with, e.g. Brearley or Trinity?
Anonymous wrote:We had our kids in a crappy suburban public school, and now they're in slightly less crappy urban public schools, and our philosophy throughout has been Grant Allen's "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education" - there's a lot more to life than school.
One of them is a performing arts kid, which has also given her all sorts of useful related skills (if she ends up on a debate team in high school she'll be absolutely terrifying), and the other one is a coding whiz and a promising novelist; they can do algebra and churn out a 5-paragraph theme with the best of them, but that's not what their lives revolve around.
The concern I have as a fellow public school parent with a similar family philosophy is that, come high school, the choice becomes between brutally competitive pressure-cooker environments, like Stuy/LaGuardia, where the overwhelming amount of work and focus does indeed interfere with broader extra-curricular education, and the lackluster publics where a lot of kids are coasting, perhaps doing drugs, etc and your talented whiz kids would be swimming upstream. Top privates, at least in theory, give a promise of a better balance, but of course, there are many counterexamples and caveats to that as well.
I dont want to be the one to break it to you, but NYC privates have massive drinking/drug cultures, too. Kids will be kids.
Sure, I am aware. But is that the case with, e.g. Brearley or Trinity?
Anonymous wrote:We had our kids in a crappy suburban public school, and now they're in slightly less crappy urban public schools, and our philosophy throughout has been Grant Allen's "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education" - there's a lot more to life than school.
One of them is a performing arts kid, which has also given her all sorts of useful related skills (if she ends up on a debate team in high school she'll be absolutely terrifying), and the other one is a coding whiz and a promising novelist; they can do algebra and churn out a 5-paragraph theme with the best of them, but that's not what their lives revolve around.
The concern I have as a fellow public school parent with a similar family philosophy is that, come high school, the choice becomes between brutally competitive pressure-cooker environments, like Stuy/LaGuardia, where the overwhelming amount of work and focus does indeed interfere with broader extra-curricular education, and the lackluster publics where a lot of kids are coasting, perhaps doing drugs, etc and your talented whiz kids would be swimming upstream. Top privates, at least in theory, give a promise of a better balance, but of course, there are many counterexamples and caveats to that as well.
I dont want to be the one to break it to you, but NYC privates have massive drinking/drug cultures, too. Kids will be kids.
Sure, I am aware. But is that the case with, e.g. Brearley or Trinity?
lol yes it’s the case with all. Of them
Can vary by kid / class but largely agree. Kids grow up fast in the city
Anonymous wrote:The concern I have as a fellow public school parent with a similar family philosophy is that, come high school, the choice becomes between brutally competitive pressure-cooker environments, like Stuy/LaGuardia, where the overwhelming amount of work and focus does indeed interfere with broader extra-curricular education, and the lackluster publics where a lot of kids are coasting, perhaps doing drugs, etc and your talented whiz kids would be swimming upstream. Top privates, at least in theory, give a promise of a better balance, but of course, there are many counterexamples and caveats to that as well.
I think there's a spectrum of pressure levels both at private and at public; Bronx Science is easier than Stuy and Brooklyn Tech is easier than Bronx Science, for example, while all three are significantly better than "lackluster." Likewise the top GenEd schools. And there are still the suburbs if none of those work out. Likewise, there are a whole lot of gradations in private school between Trinity and (say) Steiner or BWL.
Collegiate. My son is at another boys school now but we looked at PS6 and Collegiate as well. For me, it’s definitely Collegiate. But this is comparing apples and oranges.
Anonymous wrote:lol yes it’s the case with all. Of them
I am not concerned with drugs being part of some kids' lives, I am not even particularly concerned about *my kid* trying drugs at some point. What I don't want is a is a high prevalence of drugs/slacking being dominant over rigorous academic/intellectual culture -- it would just be a bad fit for who my child is.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
