Best private schools in NYC?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You don't actually *have* to go for TT, in fact there are lots of reasons to think that unless your kid is an absolute academic rock star their college prospects might even be better at a 2T where they could distinguish themselves a bit more.

Lots of people do the whole Gaston "that makes her the best, and don't I deserve the best?" thing with schools and don't necessarily stop to consider whether it's actually a good match.

Also very importantly it'll give them the time to pursue extracurriculars at a high level, which is not only a resume booster but also lets them have a little more balance in their lives (at least if they have some extracurriculars they enjoy).

I realize that, but what I've got is a very academically inclined kid who also happens to do a huge amount of ECs in the arts. TBH, she just wants to go to Stuy for science, and will probably do well there, but we'd be sad to see her let go of all the non-academic stuff she's been pouring her heart into, which is the likely outcome.

[Anonymous]

Not sure which arts, but you looked at the Juilliard or Manhattan School of Music pre-college programs? Would mean giving up her Saturdays but it would be a level of music education even beyond anything she might get in private school.

(theater is a bit harder, tends to mostly be summer programs though you can certainly load up on those; of course you could also do that with music e.g. at Interlochen)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone think any other TT would be any different in terms of demands and stress? It seems baked into any of these places

They may not be different in terms of demands and stress, but they are different in the approach they take to helping the student body manage them. If you ask me, that is really the most important responsibility of a school administration, and trinity sort of failed us a bit in that aspect.

[Anonymous]

I have a really bright kid and we largely resisted the TT pressure and focused on fit. So we did a mix of TT and non-TT schools. Admittedly we might regret this come college app time, but my kid is actually happy and calm while still working pretty hard, getting excellent grades, and doing various extra-curriculars (ones they enjoy, not ones that are solely to get into college). Again, this might bite us at application time, but we will take that calculated risk. There is way too much status chasing, particularly in NYC. I wish the colleges would see through it more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It appears that we may have the good fortune of receiving offers from Trinity and Dalton for kindergarten. Daughter is bright and loves school. Seems to have an emerging interest in STEM, but she is 4, who knows where she will go as she gets older. Logistically, both schools are convenient to us.

Would appreciate the group's opinions. The prior posts have been helpful to us - any fresh comments appreciated.

I’m actually a trinity grad with family currently at dalton. Recently had family make the choice between trinity and dalton. Chose Dalton in the end.

There’s a weird consensus among certain parents that Dalton STEM is slightly weaker than other TT’s, which I don’t agree with, but who knows?

I always think that if i could go back, I would have chosen dalton for myself, but that’s only because I tend to do better with less supervision and more academic freedom. Family there now is in Little Dalton and they absolutely adore it. I can give more specifics if you’re curious.

This is purely anecdotal, but I’ll say quickly that I wasn’t ‘happy’ at Trinity (i was a lifer), and i think that was true for a lot of us. But i wasn’t necessarily unhappy either. I did get a great education and went on to a good college, though, which was the point, i guess.

Really helpful, thanks so much! Any specifics you can share about their experience at Little Dalton would be much appreciated.

Sure!

So there were many reasons why dalton was ultimately chosen and why it’s so beloved now. I’ll list a few good and a couple bad.

First is one small deciding factor: the amount of care dalton put in once they were admitted. The acceptance letter they wrote was truly wonderful, which is a small, but pretty telling, expression of the care they put into choosing the kindergarten class. It was more than a page long and included remarkable insights into our kiddo. TBH, we sort of expected to get into trinity due to multi-generational legacy, etc., but they displayed no enthusiasm or genuine interest, which is fine. Again, when you’re applying, the schools keep a safe distance from parents. Once you’re admitted, though, dalton instantly made an effort to create a sense of community which trinity neglected. Is this the most important thing? Of course not. But it does make a bit of difference when you’re trying to decide between schools like these.

Second, when we did the visit, we loved Little Dalton’s physical space. It’s a special place. Lots of nooks and crannies, hidden hallways, a surprisingly large gym, tons of classrooms, and a sense of joyous, albeit organized, chaos in which a kid can thrive. It feels fun! Big Dalton also holds regular events for Little Dalton, which are lovely, and the older students host the younger ones - not entirely uncommon at other schools, but we like what dalton does, international day, etc. We love house system, too.

Third, their learning philosophy and the structure of their courses is more conducive to learning for youth imo. The fluidity between classes helps: ours is an advanced reader; they got to move up groups in order to stay challenged beginning in K, and the staff were wonderful in encouraging them to progress with their weekly library book all through k. The teachers are absolutely exceptional; ours still exchanges letters to his K teacher, and it’s such a nice little thing.

Fourth, the community is pretty wonderful. Parents are as involved as they want to be: there’s no pressure to be a joiner, but there certainly are more and less involved people. More than that, though, we’ve noticed that there’s an extreme lack of snootiness despite the caliber of some of the parents we’ve met. Most everyone, with a couple of notable exceptions, have been lovely, as are the kids. At Trinity, this has not always been the case, and this dates back to my dad’s days there.

Fifth, fin aid is generous, all things considered. We’re full-pay, but for tons of students and families we’re close with now, dalton has been exceedingly good at ensuring that admitted kids could attend regardless of need. One of the things we loved most about it was how they made it seem that if your child was admitted, it was for a good reason and they truly want you to be able to go.

There are downsides to dalton. For example, afterschool activities fill up FAST. The signup goes up, and the spots for certain classes go in, like, two minutes. It took us 2x to get STEAM and chess (dalton chess is extremely competitive though), and 3x to get tennis. Again, at dalton as anywhere, rich kids will have an advantage in certain things. But we do believe that Dalton puts in sincere effort to make things as fair as possible.

Most importantly, the kiddo loves it there. Still hates getting going in the morning, but by the time they get to school, they’re off to the races, and when they come home, they’re full of stories about things they’ve learned, etc. There’s a lot more, but that’s enough for now. We just love dalton. Like I said above, it’ll be great for some people, not so great for others, but for us, it’s a perfect fit. And I won’t taint your judgment with my memories as a trinity survivor, but there were lots of lows and a few highs…

Could you say more about what it was like as a Trinity survivor? The lower school seems so happy

The lower school is totally fine. I have very happy memories through fifth grade or so. Around seventh grade, the pressure starts to pick up. Then it becomes unrelenting. It gets truly bad, and the competition is so extreme.

I want to mention something quickly: everyone seems to think that purely rich kids get into ivies, that they’re unqualified and that they inflate the number of acceptances to ivy+ schools. 1) That’s not (entirely) true. Occasionally it is - i have some excellent examples from families you’ve definitely heard. But so many of the VERY rich kids/nepobabies did extraordinarily well in school and deserved to get into the schools they did. 2) In my year, around 40% went ivy+. The vast majority of us did not have our names on campus buildings or the NYPL or have parents on the nightly news, etc.

I’m pretty definitively not a genius, so I had to work nonstop from age 13-graduation to ensure that I’d get into a good college. The stress at times could be overwhelming, and there were moments of pretty profound darkness and failure. It didn’t help that my sibling, who very much is a genius, breezed through school like it was a sunday brunch. But, as so many survivors point out, it did make college much, much more tolerable, and I don’t think I could’ve gotten into the colleges i did had i gone somewhere else.

For me, I’m pretty social, so that aspect of the school was never a problem. But there are definitely people who thrive in trinity’s social environment. Others sink. Deep. There are definitely issues with bullying along class (sometimes racial) lines, which i was lucky to avoid, and there are the usual high school things like hotness rankings and some grosser stuff which i won’t go into here. Class and social cache were quite important to life at trinity though. I’m not sure how I avoided the worst of it.

There’s also a trinity bubble. You can literally go your whole school life socializing only with trinity kids, and that can leave you with a pretty warped sense of reality. I certainly suffered it a bit I’m afraid to say. But I was also so busy that my social life mostly consisted of doing things related to EC interests or schoolwork.

There are definitely good things though. I’m still friends with a ton of my fellow survivors - they’re my best and truest friends, actually. I wound up at an HYP, and after that I went to a good grad school. A lot of my current success I have to say I can attribute to some of the ethic Trinity dragged out of me, and I’ve benefited from the networks all the schools afforded me. Still, if i could do it all over again, i think i would have gone to dalton. I actually talked to my mom (a spence grad) about it recently and she agreed. My dad went to trinity, but transferred to exeter b/c he stopped enjoying it and I think he would have loved if I’d gone there.

Oh, well… next life.

Do you think things have changed at Trinity since you were there? Lower School and early years of Middle School seem quite slow though the environment is certainly very warm and welcoming for students. Have heard that the ramp up to High School is intense and new admits in 9th grade for High School overwhelmingly dominate academically. Did the surveyors who weren't from donor families, URM or recruited athletes in your class do well with college admissions? I imagine the admit rate for that cohort would be well below the 40% that's often ascribed to the overall class.

Honestly, no. I want to be careful with how I phrase things. I don’t want to discourage anyone from attending, because certain people do thrive there, although i don’t think anyone actually loves trinity. I saw another parent talking about their child entering the upper school and that they’ve had a largely positive experience with the school so far, and that’s great. But being a parent is enormously different than being a student, obviously, and the student experience is extraordinarily intense.

It’s not solely because of the academics - the trinity parent said they’re manageable, and they’re exactly right: they’re just barely manageable. But so many students are miserable trying to manage their academics and extracurriculars. It’s constant stress, and teachers, while top rate, have incredibly high expectations and aren’t the most welcoming. They’re actually strangely cliquish and have clear favorites. All of this is fine: i actually benefited from this and in some sick way, I enjoyed the stress of the academics and always being busy. But most of my friends were capital U unhappy. So was i. At certain points, I probably edged on full-blown depression. I just eked my way through. And the emphasis and pressure to make it look easy is just as important. I stopped going to ad hocs for help at the beginning of sophomore year cause i didn’t want to make it look like i needed help.

You’ll say, as a parent and a fully-matured adult, that this was a stupid thing to do. It was my fault to inflict harm on myself this way. You’re right. It was, and it made my life harder. But I was 15, and the environment made me feel and my friends feel like this was something you needed to do for respect.

I’m not going to get into the social aspects of it. Not gonna talk about the swamp, the partying, homecoming, etc. A lot of it is just par for the course in high school. But there is ABSOLUTELY a social hierarchy at trinity, and even though i graduated more than a decade ago, i still believe it exists. I don’t think trinity cares about changing these things as long as they continue to have the results they have. I also think that, since trinity has such a collection of fabulously wealthy and famous families, everything heightened. You feel the social pressure much more acutely than you would at another school. But again, it just comes with the territory of going to a school like trinity. My best friend left sophomore year to go to choate, which she LOVED fwiw, and there was a hierarchy there, too, however it was far less pronounced, according to her.

My point is the experience of a student and parent are vastly different, and the differences between lower, middle, and upper school are drastic and pronounced. Trinity can actually do damage to you if you let it. But if you manage to make it through, the results can be worth it. Like i said before, I got into an HYP (the same as my sibling), went to a good grad school afterward, and have had a successful career so far. Could i have done that without having a kind of shitty high school experience? I don’t know. But I will say that, deep, deep down, I’d be very concerned with sending my kid to trinity for high school.

Sorry, just realized I only answered your initial question. No, I don’t think things have changed at trinity since I graduated. Maybe there are minor changes, but as an institution I’m sure it’s stayed the same. Incoming students often come from peer institutions or are top students elsewhere. Many are gifted, but like everywhere else, some do well, some don’t. Survivors, who by definition weren’t counseled out, did just as well as newly admitted students. It depends on the year. generally there’s a healthy mix of kids who get into top schools. Again it depends on the year. as a rule, if you manage to do well at trinity, you’ll get into a good college. Many people with b’s and c’s got into schools like Michigan, for example. People also overestimate the number of extremely well-connected students we had per class. Also, trinity athletes? Maybe a couple squash players here and there, but come on… if you’re a talented athlete, you should go to boarding school.

[Anonymous]

Our kid is at an accelerated public middle school. Most teachers are great, some so-so. Facilities are cr*p. Kids are almost universally smart, mostly nice and always intellectually challenging each other. The latter is probably the reason DC is very happy there; we also don't care about status/materialistic things at all. We looked at a number of privates, and even among the TT, all but HM and Trinity seemed like they would be a step down in STEM (at least from what we could gather). Humanities would probably be a step up. Not sure how manageable the social adjustment would be.

[Anonymous]

PS6 or Collegiate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We looked at a number of privates, and even among the TT, all but HM and Trinity seemed like they would be a step down in STEM (at least from what we could gather). Humanities would probably be a step up. Not sure how manageable the social adjustment would be.

My sense is that over the last decade or so, private schools have coalesced towards an approach to math where they go through the standard elements of a math curriculum at this same speed for everyone, a bit more slowly than an accelerated program at a public school: a pace which they expect more-or-less every student can keep up, at least with help. Then with the advanced kids they teach them a bunch of additional math to fill out the year, but everyone gets the same core, so it's easy to move people up / down between years and no one is permanently on a slow track. (and the pace is still fast enough to let anyone who wants to take calculus senior year)

So I wouldn't necessarily judge private school math curricula by course catalogs or curriculum websites - it's going to be a lot more influenced by how good at math the top 1/3 or so of students are, because the teachers will figure out a way to keep the honors class occupied.

Humanities: yeah, I think the key thing there is that with smaller classes they do a lot more graded writing (because the teachers have time to grade it all) and there's more opportunity to participate in group discussions.

I expect the class size law will close this gap somewhat, though, and the new ELA curricula too. For example, a key element of Wit & Wisdom is that even in elementary school everybody reads the same book and discusses it, which is going to generate a lot more of the sort of Socratic debates we associate with "good" humanities education compared to everybody working on their "Just Right" Level Q whatevers in the bad old Calkins days.

Anonymous wrote:
PS6 or Collegiate?

I mean that's kind of an apples to oranges comparison - do you want your kid at a school with girls or with only boys? Do you want them at the same place all 13 years? Collegiate's reputation is not at a particular peak right now, it could recover or it could get worse, and if your kid is bright enough for Collegiate now they should have lots of interesting choices for middle and high school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PS6 or Collegiate?

did you get into collegiate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It appears that we may have the good fortune of receiving offers from Trinity and Dalton for kindergarten. Daughter is bright and loves school. Seems to have an emerging interest in STEM, but she is 4, who knows where she will go as she gets older. Logistically, both schools are convenient to us.

Would appreciate the group's opinions. The prior posts have been helpful to us - any fresh comments appreciated.

I’m actually a trinity grad with family currently at dalton. Recently had family make the choice between trinity and dalton. Chose Dalton in the end.

There’s a weird consensus among certain parents that Dalton STEM is slightly weaker than other TT’s, which I don’t agree with, but who knows?

I always think that if i could go back, I would have chosen dalton for myself, but that’s only because I tend to do better with less supervision and more academic freedom. Family there now is in Little Dalton and they absolutely adore it. I can give more specifics if you’re curious.

This is purely anecdotal, but I’ll say quickly that I wasn’t ‘happy’ at Trinity (i was a lifer), and i think that was true for a lot of us. But i wasn’t necessarily unhappy either. I did get a great education and went on to a good college, though, which was the point, i guess.

Really helpful, thanks so much! Any specifics you can share about their experience at Little Dalton would be much appreciated.

Sure!

So there were many reasons why dalton was ultimately chosen and why it’s so beloved now. I’ll list a few good and a couple bad.

First is one small deciding factor: the amount of care dalton put in once they were admitted. The acceptance letter they wrote was truly wonderful, which is a small, but pretty telling, expression of the care they put into choosing the kindergarten class. It was more than a page long and included remarkable insights into our kiddo. TBH, we sort of expected to get into trinity due to multi-generational legacy, etc., but they displayed no enthusiasm or genuine interest, which is fine. Again, when you’re applying, the schools keep a safe distance from parents. Once you’re admitted, though, dalton instantly made an effort to create a sense of community which trinity neglected. Is this the most important thing? Of course not. But it does make a bit of difference when you’re trying to decide between schools like these.

Second, when we did the visit, we loved Little Dalton’s physical space. It’s a special place. Lots of nooks and crannies, hidden hallways, a surprisingly large gym, tons of classrooms, and a sense of joyous, albeit organized, chaos in which a kid can thrive. It feels fun! Big Dalton also holds regular events for Little Dalton, which are lovely, and the older students host the younger ones - not entirely uncommon at other schools, but we like what dalton does, international day, etc. We love house system, too.

Third, their learning philosophy and the structure of their courses is more conducive to learning for youth imo. The fluidity between classes helps: ours is an advanced reader; they got to move up groups in order to stay challenged beginning in K, and the staff were wonderful in encouraging them to progress with their weekly library book all through k. The teachers are absolutely exceptional; ours still exchanges letters to his K teacher, and it’s such a nice little thing.

Fourth, the community is pretty wonderful. Parents are as involved as they want to be: there’s no pressure to be a joiner, but there certainly are more and less involved people. More than that, though, we’ve noticed that there’s an extreme lack of snootiness despite the caliber of some of the parents we’ve met. Most everyone, with a couple of notable exceptions, have been lovely, as are the kids. At Trinity, this has not always been the case, and this dates back to my dad’s days there.

Fifth, fin aid is generous, all things considered. We’re full-pay, but for tons of students and families we’re close with now, dalton has been exceedingly good at ensuring that admitted kids could attend regardless of need. One of the things we loved most about it was how they made it seem that if your child was admitted, it was for a good reason and they truly want you to be able to go.

There are downsides to dalton. For example, afterschool activities fill up FAST. The signup goes up, and the spots for certain classes go in, like, two minutes. It took us 2x to get STEAM and chess (dalton chess is extremely competitive though), and 3x to get tennis. Again, at dalton as anywhere, rich kids will have an advantage in certain things. But we do believe that Dalton puts in sincere effort to make things as fair as possible.

Most importantly, the kiddo loves it there. Still hates getting going in the morning, but by the time they get to school, they’re off to the races, and when they come home, they’re full of stories about things they’ve learned, etc. There’s a lot more, but that’s enough for now. We just love dalton. Like I said above, it’ll be great for some people, not so great for others, but for us, it’s a perfect fit. And I won’t taint your judgment with my memories as a trinity survivor, but there were lots of lows and a few highs…

Could you say more about what it was like as a Trinity survivor? The lower school seems so happy

The lower school is totally fine. I have very happy memories through fifth grade or so. Around seventh grade, the pressure starts to pick up. Then it becomes unrelenting. It gets truly bad, and the competition is so extreme.

I want to mention something quickly: everyone seems to think that purely rich kids get into ivies, that they’re unqualified and that they inflate the number of acceptances to ivy+ schools. 1) That’s not (entirely) true. Occasionally it is - i have some excellent examples from families you’ve definitely heard. But so many of the VERY rich kids/nepobabies did extraordinarily well in school and deserved to get into the schools they did. 2) In my year, around 40% went ivy+. The vast majority of us did not have our names on campus buildings or the NYPL or have parents on the nightly news, etc.

I’m pretty definitively not a genius, so I had to work nonstop from age 13-graduation to ensure that I’d get into a good college. The stress at times could be overwhelming, and there were moments of pretty profound darkness and failure. It didn’t help that my sibling, who very much is a genius, breezed through school like it was a sunday brunch. But, as so many survivors point out, it did make college much, much more tolerable, and I don’t think I could’ve gotten into the colleges i did had i gone somewhere else.

For me, I’m pretty social, so that aspect of the school was never a problem. But there are definitely people who thrive in trinity’s social environment. Others sink. Deep. There are definitely issues with bullying along class (sometimes racial) lines, which i was lucky to avoid, and there are the usual high school things like hotness rankings and some grosser stuff which i won’t go into here. Class and social cache were quite important to life at trinity though. I’m not sure how I avoided the worst of it.

There’s also a trinity bubble. You can literally go your whole school life socializing only with trinity kids, and that can leave you with a pretty warped sense of reality. I certainly suffered it a bit I’m afraid to say. But I was also so busy that my social life mostly consisted of doing things related to EC interests or schoolwork.

There are definitely good things though. I’m still friends with a ton of my fellow survivors - they’re my best and truest friends, actually. I wound up at an HYP, and after that I went to a good grad school. A lot of my current success I have to say I can attribute to some of the ethic Trinity dragged out of me, and I’ve benefited from the networks all the schools afforded me. Still, if i could do it all over again, i think i would have gone to dalton. I actually talked to my mom (a spence grad) about it recently and she agreed. My dad went to trinity, but transferred to exeter b/c he stopped enjoying it and I think he would have loved if I’d gone there.

Oh, well… next life.

Do you think things have changed at Trinity since you were there? Lower School and early years of Middle School seem quite slow though the environment is certainly very warm and welcoming for students. Have heard that the ramp up to High School is intense and new admits in 9th grade for High School overwhelmingly dominate academically. Did the surveyors who weren't from donor families, URM or recruited athletes in your class do well with college admissions? I imagine the admit rate for that cohort would be well below the 40% that's often ascribed to the overall class.

Honestly, no. I want to be careful with how I phrase things. I don’t want to discourage anyone from attending, because certain people do thrive there, although i don’t think anyone actually loves trinity. I saw another parent talking about their child entering the upper school and that they’ve had a largely positive experience with the school so far, and that’s great. But being a parent is enormously different than being a student, obviously, and the student experience is extraordinarily intense.

It’s not solely because of the academics - the trinity parent said they’re manageable, and they’re exactly right: they’re just barely manageable. But so many students are miserable trying to manage their academics and extracurriculars. It’s constant stress, and teachers, while top rate, have incredibly high expectations and aren’t the most welcoming. They’re actually strangely cliquish and have clear favorites. All of this is fine: i actually benefited from this and in some sick way, I enjoyed the stress of the academics and always being busy. But most of my friends were capital U unhappy. So was i. At certain points, I probably edged on full-blown depression. I just eked my way through. And the emphasis and pressure to make it look easy is just as important. I stopped going to ad hocs for help at the beginning of sophomore year cause i didn’t want to make it look like i needed help.

You’ll say, as a parent and a fully-matured adult, that this was a stupid thing to do. It was my fault to inflict harm on myself this way. You’re right. It was, and it made my life harder. But I was 15, and the environment made me feel and my friends feel like this was something you needed to do for respect.

I’m not going to get into the social aspects of it. Not gonna talk about the swamp, the partying, homecoming, etc. A lot of it is just par for the course in high school. But there is ABSOLUTELY a social hierarchy at trinity, and even though i graduated more than a decade ago, i still believe it exists. I don’t think trinity cares about changing these things as long as they continue to have the results they have. I also think that, since trinity has such a collection of fabulously wealthy and famous families, everything heightened. You feel the social pressure much more acutely than you would at another school. But again, it just comes with the territory of going to a school like trinity. My best friend left sophomore year to go to choate, which she LOVED fwiw, and there was a hierarchy there, too, however it was far less pronounced, according to her.

My point is the experience of a student and parent are vastly different, and the differences between lower, middle, and upper school are drastic and pronounced. Trinity can actually do damage to you if you let it. But if you manage to make it through, the results can be worth it. Like i said before, I got into an HYP (the same as my sibling), went to a good grad school afterward, and have had a successful career so far. Could i have done that without having a kind of shitty high school experience? I don’t know. But I will say that, deep, deep down, I’d be very concerned with sending my kid to trinity for high school.

What is the social hierarchy at Trinity? How would a normal NYC rich but nothing mind blowing family fit in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PS6 or Collegiate?

PS6. Though that is an odd pair. Collegiate used to have a really great eclectic mix. There are still some nice kids there but it has moved more heavily towards status obsessed d bags with situational ethics and values.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It appears that we may have the good fortune of receiving offers from Trinity and Dalton for kindergarten. Daughter is bright and loves school. Seems to have an emerging interest in STEM, but she is 4, who knows where she will go as she gets older. Logistically, both schools are convenient to us.

Would appreciate the group's opinions. The prior posts have been helpful to us - any fresh comments appreciated.

I’m actually a trinity grad with family currently at dalton. Recently had family make the choice between trinity and dalton. Chose Dalton in the end.

There’s a weird consensus among certain parents that Dalton STEM is slightly weaker than other TT’s, which I don’t agree with, but who knows?

I always think that if i could go back, I would have chosen dalton for myself, but that’s only because I tend to do better with less supervision and more academic freedom. Family there now is in Little Dalton and they absolutely adore it. I can give more specifics if you’re curious.

This is purely anecdotal, but I’ll say quickly that I wasn’t ‘happy’ at Trinity (i was a lifer), and i think that was true for a lot of us. But i wasn’t necessarily unhappy either. I did get a great education and went on to a good college, though, which was the point, i guess.

Really helpful, thanks so much! Any specifics you can share about their experience at Little Dalton would be much appreciated.

Sure!

So there were many reasons why dalton was ultimately chosen and why it’s so beloved now. I’ll list a few good and a couple bad.

First is one small deciding factor: the amount of care dalton put in once they were admitted. The acceptance letter they wrote was truly wonderful, which is a small, but pretty telling, expression of the care they put into choosing the kindergarten class. It was more than a page long and included remarkable insights into our kiddo. TBH, we sort of expected to get into trinity due to multi-generational legacy, etc., but they displayed no enthusiasm or genuine interest, which is fine. Again, when you’re applying, the schools keep a safe distance from parents. Once you’re admitted, though, dalton instantly made an effort to create a sense of community which trinity neglected. Is this the most important thing? Of course not. But it does make a bit of difference when you’re trying to decide between schools like these.

Second, when we did the visit, we loved Little Dalton’s physical space. It’s a special place. Lots of nooks and crannies, hidden hallways, a surprisingly large gym, tons of classrooms, and a sense of joyous, albeit organized, chaos in which a kid can thrive. It feels fun! Big Dalton also holds regular events for Little Dalton, which are lovely, and the older students host the younger ones - not entirely uncommon at other schools, but we like what dalton does, international day, etc. We love house system, too.

Third, their learning philosophy and the structure of their courses is more conducive to learning for youth imo. The fluidity between classes helps: ours is an advanced reader; they got to move up groups in order to stay challenged beginning in K, and the staff were wonderful in encouraging them to progress with their weekly library book all through k. The teachers are absolutely exceptional; ours still exchanges letters to his K teacher, and it’s such a nice little thing.

Fourth, the community is pretty wonderful. Parents are as involved as they want to be: there’s no pressure to be a joiner, but there certainly are more and less involved people. More than that, though, we’ve noticed that there’s an extreme lack of snootiness despite the caliber of some of the parents we’ve met. Most everyone, with a couple of notable exceptions, have been lovely, as are the kids. At Trinity, this has not always been the case, and this dates back to my dad’s days there.

Fifth, fin aid is generous, all things considered. We’re full-pay, but for tons of students and families we’re close with now, dalton has been exceedingly good at ensuring that admitted kids could attend regardless of need. One of the things we loved most about it was how they made it seem that if your child was admitted, it was for a good reason and they truly want you to be able to go.

There are downsides to dalton. For example, afterschool activities fill up FAST. The signup goes up, and the spots for certain classes go in, like, two minutes. It took us 2x to get STEAM and chess (dalton chess is extremely competitive though), and 3x to get tennis. Again, at dalton as anywhere, rich kids will have an advantage in certain things. But we do believe that Dalton puts in sincere effort to make things as fair as possible.

Most importantly, the kiddo loves it there. Still hates getting going in the morning, but by the time they get to school, they’re off to the races, and when they come home, they’re full of stories about things they’ve learned, etc. There’s a lot more, but that’s enough for now. We just love dalton. Like I said above, it’ll be great for some people, not so great for others, but for us, it’s a perfect fit. And I won’t taint your judgment with my memories as a trinity survivor, but there were lots of lows and a few highs…

Could you say more about what it was like as a Trinity survivor? The lower school seems so happy

The lower school is totally fine. I have very happy memories through fifth grade or so. Around seventh grade, the pressure starts to pick up. Then it becomes unrelenting. It gets truly bad, and the competition is so extreme.

I want to mention something quickly: everyone seems to think that purely rich kids get into ivies, that they’re unqualified and that they inflate the number of acceptances to ivy+ schools. 1) That’s not (entirely) true. Occasionally it is - i have some excellent examples from families you’ve definitely heard. But so many of the VERY rich kids/nepobabies did extraordinarily well in school and deserved to get into the schools they did. 2) In my year, around 40% went ivy+. The vast majority of us did not have our names on campus buildings or the NYPL or have parents on the nightly news, etc.

I’m pretty definitively not a genius, so I had to work nonstop from age 13-graduation to ensure that I’d get into a good college. The stress at times could be overwhelming, and there were moments of pretty profound darkness and failure. It didn’t help that my sibling, who very much is a genius, breezed through school like it was a sunday brunch. But, as so many survivors point out, it did make college much, much more tolerable, and I don’t think I could’ve gotten into the colleges i did had i gone somewhere else.

For me, I’m pretty social, so that aspect of the school was never a problem. But there are definitely people who thrive in trinity’s social environment. Others sink. Deep. There are definitely issues with bullying along class (sometimes racial) lines, which i was lucky to avoid, and there are the usual high school things like hotness rankings and some grosser stuff which i won’t go into here. Class and social cache were quite important to life at trinity though. I’m not sure how I avoided the worst of it.

There’s also a trinity bubble. You can literally go your whole school life socializing only with trinity kids, and that can leave you with a pretty warped sense of reality. I certainly suffered it a bit I’m afraid to say. But I was also so busy that my social life mostly consisted of doing things related to EC interests or schoolwork.

There are definitely good things though. I’m still friends with a ton of my fellow survivors - they’re my best and truest friends, actually. I wound up at an HYP, and after that I went to a good grad school. A lot of my current success I have to say I can attribute to some of the ethic Trinity dragged out of me, and I’ve benefited from the networks all the schools afforded me. Still, if i could do it all over again, i think i would have gone to dalton. I actually talked to my mom (a spence grad) about it recently and she agreed. My dad went to trinity, but transferred to exeter b/c he stopped enjoying it and I think he would have loved if I’d gone there.

Oh, well… next life.

Do you think things have changed at Trinity since you were there? Lower School and early years of Middle School seem quite slow though the environment is certainly very warm and welcoming for students. Have heard that the ramp up to High School is intense and new admits in 9th grade for High School overwhelmingly dominate academically. Did the surveyors who weren't from donor families, URM or recruited athletes in your class do well with college admissions? I imagine the admit rate for that cohort would be well below the 40% that's often ascribed to the overall class.

Honestly, no. I want to be careful with how I phrase things. I don’t want to discourage anyone from attending, because certain people do thrive there, although i don’t think anyone actually loves trinity. I saw another parent talking about their child entering the upper school and that they’ve had a largely positive experience with the school so far, and that’s great. But being a parent is enormously different than being a student, obviously, and the student experience is extraordinarily intense.

It’s not solely because of the academics - the trinity parent said they’re manageable, and they’re exactly right: they’re just barely manageable. But so many students are miserable trying to manage their academics and extracurriculars. It’s constant stress, and teachers, while top rate, have incredibly high expectations and aren’t the most welcoming. They’re actually strangely cliquish and have clear favorites. All of this is fine: i actually benefited from this and in some sick way, I enjoyed the stress of the academics and always being busy. But most of my friends were capital U unhappy. So was i. At certain points, I probably edged on full-blown depression. I just eked my way through. And the emphasis and pressure to make it look easy is just as important. I stopped going to ad hocs for help at the beginning of sophomore year cause i didn’t want to make it look like i needed help.

You’ll say, as a parent and a fully-matured adult, that this was a stupid thing to do. It was my fault to inflict harm on myself this way. You’re right. It was, and it made my life harder. But I was 15, and the environment made me feel and my friends feel like this was something you needed to do for respect.

I’m not going to get into the social aspects of it. Not gonna talk about the swamp, the partying, homecoming, etc. A lot of it is just par for the course in high school. But there is ABSOLUTELY a social hierarchy at trinity, and even though i graduated more than a decade ago, i still believe it exists. I don’t think trinity cares about changing these things as long as they continue to have the results they have. I also think that, since trinity has such a collection of fabulously wealthy and famous families, everything heightened. You feel the social pressure much more acutely than you would at another school. But again, it just comes with the territory of going to a school like trinity. My best friend left sophomore year to go to choate, which she LOVED fwiw, and there was a hierarchy there, too, however it was far less pronounced, according to her.

My point is the experience of a student and parent are vastly different, and the differences between lower, middle, and upper school are drastic and pronounced. Trinity can actually do damage to you if you let it. But if you manage to make it through, the results can be worth it. Like i said before, I got into an HYP (the same as my sibling), went to a good grad school afterward, and have had a successful career so far. Could i have done that without having a kind of shitty high school experience? I don’t know. But I will say that, deep, deep down, I’d be very concerned with sending my kid to trinity for high school.

What is the social hierarchy at Trinity? How would a normal NYC rich but nothing mind blowing family fit in?

We fit your description and are having a great experience. Lots of friends (both parents and kids).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PS6 or Collegiate?

PS6. Though that is an odd pair. Collegiate used to have a really great eclectic mix. There are still some nice kids there but it has moved more heavily towards status obsessed d bags with situational ethics and values.

Ditto

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It appears that we may have the good fortune of receiving offers from Trinity and Dalton for kindergarten. Daughter is bright and loves school. Seems to have an emerging interest in STEM, but she is 4, who knows where she will go as she gets older. Logistically, both schools are convenient to us.

Would appreciate the group's opinions. The prior posts have been helpful to us - any fresh comments appreciated.

I’m actually a trinity grad with family currently at dalton. Recently had family make the choice between trinity and dalton. Chose Dalton in the end.

There’s a weird consensus among certain parents that Dalton STEM is slightly weaker than other TT’s, which I don’t agree with, but who knows?

I always think that if i could go back, I would have chosen dalton for myself, but that’s only because I tend to do better with less supervision and more academic freedom. Family there now is in Little Dalton and they absolutely adore it. I can give more specifics if you’re curious.

This is purely anecdotal, but I’ll say quickly that I wasn’t ‘happy’ at Trinity (i was a lifer), and i think that was true for a lot of us. But i wasn’t necessarily unhappy either. I did get a great education and went on to a good college, though, which was the point, i guess.

Really helpful, thanks so much! Any specifics you can share about their experience at Little Dalton would be much appreciated.

Sure!

So there were many reasons why dalton was ultimately chosen and why it’s so beloved now. I’ll list a few good and a couple bad.

First is one small deciding factor: the amount of care dalton put in once they were admitted. The acceptance letter they wrote was truly wonderful, which is a small, but pretty telling, expression of the care they put into choosing the kindergarten class. It was more than a page long and included remarkable insights into our kiddo. TBH, we sort of expected to get into trinity due to multi-generational legacy, etc., but they displayed no enthusiasm or genuine interest, which is fine. Again, when you’re applying, the schools keep a safe distance from parents. Once you’re admitted, though, dalton instantly made an effort to create a sense of community which trinity neglected. Is this the most important thing? Of course not. But it does make a bit of difference when you’re trying to decide between schools like these.

Second, when we did the visit, we loved Little Dalton’s physical space. It’s a special place. Lots of nooks and crannies, hidden hallways, a surprisingly large gym, tons of classrooms, and a sense of joyous, albeit organized, chaos in which a kid can thrive. It feels fun! Big Dalton also holds regular events for Little Dalton, which are lovely, and the older students host the younger ones - not entirely uncommon at other schools, but we like what dalton does, international day, etc. We love house system, too.

Third, their learning philosophy and the structure of their courses is more conducive to learning for youth imo. The fluidity between classes helps: ours is an advanced reader; they got to move up groups in order to stay challenged beginning in K, and the staff were wonderful in encouraging them to progress with their weekly library book all through k. The teachers are absolutely exceptional; ours still exchanges letters to his K teacher, and it’s such a nice little thing.

Fourth, the community is pretty wonderful. Parents are as involved as they want to be: there’s no pressure to be a joiner, but there certainly are more and less involved people. More than that, though, we’ve noticed that there’s an extreme lack of snootiness despite the caliber of some of the parents we’ve met. Most everyone, with a couple of notable exceptions, have been lovely, as are the kids. At Trinity, this has not always been the case, and this dates back to my dad’s days there.

Fifth, fin aid is generous, all things considered. We’re full-pay, but for tons of students and families we’re close with now, dalton has been exceedingly good at ensuring that admitted kids could attend regardless of need. One of the things we loved most about it was how they made it seem that if your child was admitted, it was for a good reason and they truly want you to be able to go.

There are downsides to dalton. For example, afterschool activities fill up FAST. The signup goes up, and the spots for certain classes go in, like, two minutes. It took us 2x to get STEAM and chess (dalton chess is extremely competitive though), and 3x to get tennis. Again, at dalton as anywhere, rich kids will have an advantage in certain things. But we do believe that Dalton puts in sincere effort to make things as fair as possible.

Most importantly, the kiddo loves it there. Still hates getting going in the morning, but by the time they get to school, they’re off to the races, and when they come home, they’re full of stories about things they’ve learned, etc. There’s a lot more, but that’s enough for now. We just love dalton. Like I said above, it’ll be great for some people, not so great for others, but for us, it’s a perfect fit. And I won’t taint your judgment with my memories as a trinity survivor, but there were lots of lows and a few highs…

Could you say more about what it was like as a Trinity survivor? The lower school seems so happy

The lower school is totally fine. I have very happy memories through fifth grade or so. Around seventh grade, the pressure starts to pick up. Then it becomes unrelenting. It gets truly bad, and the competition is so extreme.

I want to mention something quickly: everyone seems to think that purely rich kids get into ivies, that they’re unqualified and that they inflate the number of acceptances to ivy+ schools. 1) That’s not (entirely) true. Occasionally it is - i have some excellent examples from families you’ve definitely heard. But so many of the VERY rich kids/nepobabies did extraordinarily well in school and deserved to get into the schools they did. 2) In my year, around 40% went ivy+. The vast majority of us did not have our names on campus buildings or the NYPL or have parents on the nightly news, etc.

I’m pretty definitively not a genius, so I had to work nonstop from age 13-graduation to ensure that I’d get into a good college. The stress at times could be overwhelming, and there were moments of pretty profound darkness and failure. It didn’t help that my sibling, who very much is a genius, breezed through school like it was a sunday brunch. But, as so many survivors point out, it did make college much, much more tolerable, and I don’t think I could’ve gotten into the colleges i did had i gone somewhere else.

For me, I’m pretty social, so that aspect of the school was never a problem. But there are definitely people who thrive in trinity’s social environment. Others sink. Deep. There are definitely issues with bullying along class (sometimes racial) lines, which i was lucky to avoid, and there are the usual high school things like hotness rankings and some grosser stuff which i won’t go into here. Class and social cache were quite important to life at trinity though. I’m not sure how I avoided the worst of it.

There’s also a trinity bubble. You can literally go your whole school life socializing only with trinity kids, and that can leave you with a pretty warped sense of reality. I certainly suffered it a bit I’m afraid to say. But I was also so busy that my social life mostly consisted of doing things related to EC interests or schoolwork.

There are definitely good things though. I’m still friends with a ton of my fellow survivors - they’re my best and truest friends, actually. I wound up at an HYP, and after that I went to a good grad school. A lot of my current success I have to say I can attribute to some of the ethic Trinity dragged out of me, and I’ve benefited from the networks all the schools afforded me. Still, if i could do it all over again, i think i would have gone to dalton. I actually talked to my mom (a spence grad) about it recently and she agreed. My dad went to trinity, but transferred to exeter b/c he stopped enjoying it and I think he would have loved if I’d gone there.

Oh, well… next life.

Do you think things have changed at Trinity since you were there? Lower School and early years of Middle School seem quite slow though the environment is certainly very warm and welcoming for students. Have heard that the ramp up to High School is intense and new admits in 9th grade for High School overwhelmingly dominate academically. Did the surveyors who weren't from donor families, URM or recruited athletes in your class do well with college admissions? I imagine the admit rate for that cohort would be well below the 40% that's often ascribed to the overall class.

Honestly, no. I want to be careful with how I phrase things. I don’t want to discourage anyone from attending, because certain people do thrive there, although i don’t think anyone actually loves trinity. I saw another parent talking about their child entering the upper school and that they’ve had a largely positive experience with the school so far, and that’s great. But being a parent is enormously different than being a student, obviously, and the student experience is extraordinarily intense.

It’s not solely because of the academics - the trinity parent said they’re manageable, and they’re exactly right: they’re just barely manageable. But so many students are miserable trying to manage their academics and extracurriculars. It’s constant stress, and teachers, while top rate, have incredibly high expectations and aren’t the most welcoming. They’re actually strangely cliquish and have clear favorites. All of this is fine: i actually benefited from this and in some sick way, I enjoyed the stress of the academics and always being busy. But most of my friends were capital U unhappy. So was i. At certain points, I probably edged on full-blown depression. I just eked my way through. And the emphasis and pressure to make it look easy is just as important. I stopped going to ad hocs for help at the beginning of sophomore year cause i didn’t want to make it look like i needed help.

You’ll say, as a parent and a fully-matured adult, that this was a stupid thing to do. It was my fault to inflict harm on myself this way. You’re right. It was, and it made my life harder. But I was 15, and the environment made me feel and my friends feel like this was something you needed to do for respect.

I’m not going to get into the social aspects of it. Not gonna talk about the swamp, the partying, homecoming, etc. A lot of it is just par for the course in high school. But there is ABSOLUTELY a social hierarchy at trinity, and even though i graduated more than a decade ago, i still believe it exists. I don’t think trinity cares about changing these things as long as they continue to have the results they have. I also think that, since trinity has such a collection of fabulously wealthy and famous families, everything heightened. You feel the social pressure much more acutely than you would at another school. But again, it just comes with the territory of going to a school like trinity. My best friend left sophomore year to go to choate, which she LOVED fwiw, and there was a hierarchy there, too, however it was far less pronounced, according to her.

My point is the experience of a student and parent are vastly different, and the differences between lower, middle, and upper school are drastic and pronounced. Trinity can actually do damage to you if you let it. But if you manage to make it through, the results can be worth it. Like i said before, I got into an HYP (the same as my sibling), went to a good grad school afterward, and have had a successful career so far. Could i have done that without having a kind of shitty high school experience? I don’t know. But I will say that, deep, deep down, I’d be very concerned with sending my kid to trinity for high school.

I'm a Trinity grad from the 1990s - who upthread said I had PTSD from the experience. I realize I went a long time ago but I wanted to chime in about going to school with really wealthy and famous families. It was incredibly demoralizing how much these kids were favored by the administration when I was there. They were appointed leadership roles that they did not deserve but got solely because they needed more for their applications. Every.single.one went onto an Ivy. I will say, it was not just Trinity kids. I had friends in other schools who were the children of famous CEOs and the like who all did extremely well in college admissions. Yes, some of them definitely deserved it but not all. That's what you get for living in NYC and being in the private school world so you have to accept it but it's a bitter pill to swallow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It appears that we may have the good fortune of receiving offers from Trinity and Dalton for kindergarten. Daughter is bright and loves school. Seems to have an emerging interest in STEM, but she is 4, who knows where she will go as she gets older. Logistically, both schools are convenient to us.

Would appreciate the group's opinions. The prior posts have been helpful to us - any fresh comments appreciated.

I’m actually a trinity grad with family currently at dalton. Recently had family make the choice between trinity and dalton. Chose Dalton in the end.

There’s a weird consensus among certain parents that Dalton STEM is slightly weaker than other TT’s, which I don’t agree with, but who knows?

I always think that if i could go back, I would have chosen dalton for myself, but that’s only because I tend to do better with less supervision and more academic freedom. Family there now is in Little Dalton and they absolutely adore it. I can give more specifics if you’re curious.

This is purely anecdotal, but I’ll say quickly that I wasn’t ‘happy’ at Trinity (i was a lifer), and i think that was true for a lot of us. But i wasn’t necessarily unhappy either. I did get a great education and went on to a good college, though, which was the point, i guess.

Really helpful, thanks so much! Any specifics you can share about their experience at Little Dalton would be much appreciated.

Sure!

So there were many reasons why dalton was ultimately chosen and why it’s so beloved now. I’ll list a few good and a couple bad.

First is one small deciding factor: the amount of care dalton put in once they were admitted. The acceptance letter they wrote was truly wonderful, which is a small, but pretty telling, expression of the care they put into choosing the kindergarten class. It was more than a page long and included remarkable insights into our kiddo. TBH, we sort of expected to get into trinity due to multi-generational legacy, etc., but they displayed no enthusiasm or genuine interest, which is fine. Again, when you’re applying, the schools keep a safe distance from parents. Once you’re admitted, though, dalton instantly made an effort to create a sense of community which trinity neglected. Is this the most important thing? Of course not. But it does make a bit of difference when you’re trying to decide between schools like these.

Second, when we did the visit, we loved Little Dalton’s physical space. It’s a special place. Lots of nooks and crannies, hidden hallways, a surprisingly large gym, tons of classrooms, and a sense of joyous, albeit organized, chaos in which a kid can thrive. It feels fun! Big Dalton also holds regular events for Little Dalton, which are lovely, and the older students host the younger ones - not entirely uncommon at other schools, but we like what dalton does, international day, etc. We love house system, too.

Third, their learning philosophy and the structure of their courses is more conducive to learning for youth imo. The fluidity between classes helps: ours is an advanced reader; they got to move up groups in order to stay challenged beginning in K, and the staff were wonderful in encouraging them to progress with their weekly library book all through k. The teachers are absolutely exceptional; ours still exchanges letters to his K teacher, and it’s such a nice little thing.

Fourth, the community is pretty wonderful. Parents are as involved as they want to be: there’s no pressure to be a joiner, but there certainly are more and less involved people. More than that, though, we’ve noticed that there’s an extreme lack of snootiness despite the caliber of some of the parents we’ve met. Most everyone, with a couple of notable exceptions, have been lovely, as are the kids. At Trinity, this has not always been the case, and this dates back to my dad’s days there.

Fifth, fin aid is generous, all things considered. We’re full-pay, but for tons of students and families we’re close with now, dalton has been exceedingly good at ensuring that admitted kids could attend regardless of need. One of the things we loved most about it was how they made it seem that if your child was admitted, it was for a good reason and they truly want you to be able to go.

There are downsides to dalton. For example, afterschool activities fill up FAST. The signup goes up, and the spots for certain classes go in, like, two minutes. It took us 2x to get STEAM and chess (dalton chess is extremely competitive though), and 3x to get tennis. Again, at dalton as anywhere, rich kids will have an advantage in certain things. But we do believe that Dalton puts in sincere effort to make things as fair as possible.

Most importantly, the kiddo loves it there. Still hates getting going in the morning, but by the time they get to school, they’re off to the races, and when they come home, they’re full of stories about things they’ve learned, etc. There’s a lot more, but that’s enough for now. We just love dalton. Like I said above, it’ll be great for some people, not so great for others, but for us, it’s a perfect fit. And I won’t taint your judgment with my memories as a trinity survivor, but there were lots of lows and a few highs…

Could you say more about what it was like as a Trinity survivor? The lower school seems so happy

The lower school is totally fine. I have very happy memories through fifth grade or so. Around seventh grade, the pressure starts to pick up. Then it becomes unrelenting. It gets truly bad, and the competition is so extreme.

I want to mention something quickly: everyone seems to think that purely rich kids get into ivies, that they’re unqualified and that they inflate the number of acceptances to ivy+ schools. 1) That’s not (entirely) true. Occasionally it is - i have some excellent examples from families you’ve definitely heard. But so many of the VERY rich kids/nepobabies did extraordinarily well in school and deserved to get into the schools they did. 2) In my year, around 40% went ivy+. The vast majority of us did not have our names on campus buildings or the NYPL or have parents on the nightly news, etc.

I’m pretty definitively not a genius, so I had to work nonstop from age 13-graduation to ensure that I’d get into a good college. The stress at times could be overwhelming, and there were moments of pretty profound darkness and failure. It didn’t help that my sibling, who very much is a genius, breezed through school like it was a sunday brunch. But, as so many survivors point out, it did make college much, much more tolerable, and I don’t think I could’ve gotten into the colleges i did had i gone somewhere else.

For me, I’m pretty social, so that aspect of the school was never a problem. But there are definitely people who thrive in trinity’s social environment. Others sink. Deep. There are definitely issues with bullying along class (sometimes racial) lines, which i was lucky to avoid, and there are the usual high school things like hotness rankings and some grosser stuff which i won’t go into here. Class and social cache were quite important to life at trinity though. I’m not sure how I avoided the worst of it.

There’s also a trinity bubble. You can literally go your whole school life socializing only with trinity kids, and that can leave you with a pretty warped sense of reality. I certainly suffered it a bit I’m afraid to say. But I was also so busy that my social life mostly consisted of doing things related to EC interests or schoolwork.

There are definitely good things though. I’m still friends with a ton of my fellow survivors - they’re my best and truest friends, actually. I wound up at an HYP, and after that I went to a good grad school. A lot of my current success I have to say I can attribute to some of the ethic Trinity dragged out of me, and I’ve benefited from the networks all the schools afforded me. Still, if i could do it all over again, i think i would have gone to dalton. I actually talked to my mom (a spence grad) about it recently and she agreed. My dad went to trinity, but transferred to exeter b/c he stopped enjoying it and I think he would have loved if I’d gone there.

Oh, well… next life.

Do you think things have changed at Trinity since you were there? Lower School and early years of Middle School seem quite slow though the environment is certainly very warm and welcoming for students. Have heard that the ramp up to High School is intense and new admits in 9th grade for High School overwhelmingly dominate academically. Did the surveyors who weren't from donor families, URM or recruited athletes in your class do well with college admissions? I imagine the admit rate for that cohort would be well below the 40% that's often ascribed to the overall class.

Honestly, no. I want to be careful with how I phrase things. I don’t want to discourage anyone from attending, because certain people do thrive there, although i don’t think anyone actually loves trinity. I saw another parent talking about their child entering the upper school and that they’ve had a largely positive experience with the school so far, and that’s great. But being a parent is enormously different than being a student, obviously, and the student experience is extraordinarily intense.

It’s not solely because of the academics - the trinity parent said they’re manageable, and they’re exactly right: they’re just barely manageable. But so many students are miserable trying to manage their academics and extracurriculars. It’s constant stress, and teachers, while top rate, have incredibly high expectations and aren’t the most welcoming. They’re actually strangely cliquish and have clear favorites. All of this is fine: i actually benefited from this and in some sick way, I enjoyed the stress of the academics and always being busy. But most of my friends were capital U unhappy. So was i. At certain points, I probably edged on full-blown depression. I just eked my way through. And the emphasis and pressure to make it look easy is just as important. I stopped going to ad hocs for help at the beginning of sophomore year cause i didn’t want to make it look like i needed help.

You’ll say, as a parent and a fully-matured adult, that this was a stupid thing to do. It was my fault to inflict harm on myself this way. You’re right. It was, and it made my life harder. But I was 15, and the environment made me feel and my friends feel like this was something you needed to do for respect.

I’m not going to get into the social aspects of it. Not gonna talk about the swamp, the partying, homecoming, etc. A lot of it is just par for the course in high school. But there is ABSOLUTELY a social hierarchy at trinity, and even though i graduated more than a decade ago, i still believe it exists. I don’t think trinity cares about changing these things as long as they continue to have the results they have. I also think that, since trinity has such a collection of fabulously wealthy and famous families, everything heightened. You feel the social pressure much more acutely than you would at another school. But again, it just comes with the territory of going to a school like trinity. My best friend left sophomore year to go to choate, which she LOVED fwiw, and there was a hierarchy there, too, however it was far less pronounced, according to her.

My point is the experience of a student and parent are vastly different, and the differences between lower, middle, and upper school are drastic and pronounced. Trinity can actually do damage to you if you let it. But if you manage to make it through, the results can be worth it. Like i said before, I got into an HYP (the same as my sibling), went to a good grad school afterward, and have had a successful career so far. Could i have done that without having a kind of shitty high school experience? I don’t know. But I will say that, deep, deep down, I’d be very concerned with sending my kid to trinity for high school.

I'm a Trinity grad from the 1990s - who upthread said I had PTSD from the experience. I realize I went a long time ago but I wanted to chime in about going to school with really wealthy and famous families. It was incredibly demoralizing how much these kids were favored by the administration when I was there. They were appointed leadership roles that they did not deserve but got solely because they needed more for their applications. Every.single.one went onto an Ivy. I will say, it was not just Trinity kids. I had friends in other schools who were the children of famous CEOs and the like who all did extremely well in college admissions. Yes, some of them definitely deserved it but not all. That's what you get for living in NYC and being in the private school world so you have to accept it but it's a bitter pill to swallow.

That definitely does sound brutal. However would you say that the downside from these social dynamics outweigh the benefits that these TT NYC private schools purportedly provide in terms of fostering better critical thinking, writing, soft skills, etc. We have two kids in Lower School at a NYC private and we weigh moving to a top suburb all the time (slower pace, >$200k in annual post-tax savings and we don't have to commute). We've stayed for the time being because suburban HS seems like a meaningless grind to see who can eke out a 0.1 higher weighted GPA while taking 15 APs. It seems like all students at a top school have to grind it out in some shape or form so better to do it on things that actually foster critical thinking and in an environment with good teachers rather than spend 4 years memorizing textbooks?