Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

Funny, he still does that.

But his education at one of the best law schools in the nation, his past employment as a judge, well, that matters not a whit? Suuuuuure. The Honorable Judge Kavanaugh has an impressive record that speaks for itself --called evidence, as opposed to a confused woman who has no evidence other than spittle and mumbling of a past she cannot remember.

I guess you're discounting the ABA then? Or you missed it?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/28/american-bar-association-had-kavanaugh-concerns-years-ago-republicans-dismissed-those-too/?utm_term=.8d162e2222f8

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

Funny, he still does that.

But his education at one of the best law schools in the nation, his past employment as a judge, well, that matters not a whit? Suuuuuure. The Honorable Judge Kavanaugh has an impressive record that speaks for itself --called evidence, as opposed to a confused woman who has no evidence other than spittle and mumbling of a past she cannot remember.

Wipe he spittle off your own mouth and that of the Kav. Liars gonna lie.

BUT I WENT TO YALE!!!!!!!!!!

That's going to make such an excellent t-shirt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much divisiveness, so much rancor. Can't we pull together as Americans, around a simple truth?

Here goes: Brett Kavanaugh is sniveling, sneering, conniving, entitled, lying douchebag with a cheesy blow-waved hair-do and an alcoholic's complexion.

Surely, whomever we are, whatever our "politics" are, we can unite around a central truth like this. Let's all do our part to let the healing start.

Seems as if you need to go back to 4th grade and learn the difference between opinion and fact, pp.

Brett Kavanaugh is a sniveling, sneering, conniving, entitled, lying douchebag with a cheesy blow-waved hair-do and an alcoholic's complexion. Pass it on!

You seem, um, how should I put it... um, so mature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This is the bottom line. And, the Democrats know this and decided it was time for a smear campaign.

Hey guys, it's me -- the democratic smear campaign organizer.

Looks like our political hit of Kavanaugh was a great success!

So now it's time to start cooking up our next smear campaign. Who else wants to volunteer to go in the national spotlight as an accuser of a supreme court justice nominee? You can see how much fun Ford is having and I bet you just can't wait to be in her place for the next go-around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much divisiveness, so much rancor. Can't we pull together as Americans, around a simple truth?

Here goes: Brett Kavanaugh is sniveling, sneering, conniving, entitled, lying douchebag with a cheesy blow-waved hair-do and an alcoholic's complexion.

Surely, whomever we are, whatever our "politics" are, we can unite around a central truth like this. Let's all do our part to let the healing start.

Seems as if you need to go back to 4th grade and learn the difference between opinion and fact, pp.

Actually my 2nd grader was testing me on that this morning. It's more basic than 4th grade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

And how do you know that? Is that just your feminist world view?

The Renate Alumnus brag, shoving his dick in a woman's face at a party, pinning down and groping Dr. Ford in front of his buddy -- laughing. It's all of a piece. It's a performance for the other men in the room.

"For men in male-dominated contexts like the military, male-male relations have a very powerful influence on their sexual and social relations with women. For some men, male-male relations take priority over male-female non-sexual relations ... and platonic friendships with women are dangerously feminising and rare if not impossible. This creates the bizarre situation where males who have female friends risk being seen as ‘gay.’ Sex with women ... is a key path to status among male peers. And telling stories and boasting about sexual exploits is part of male-male peer cultures.”

Sometimes, Flood said, that homosocial dynamic lends itself to sexual assault, humiliation, and rape in the name of male bonding. “Male bonding is part and parcel of some men’s violence against women. For example, the cultures and collective rituals of male bonding among closely knit male fraternities and male athletes on college campuses foster tolerance toward or even perpetration of sexual assault against women. Rape is more likely in fraternities that practice greater gender segregation. ... Rape may be both a means to and an expression of male bonding, especially when it’s perpetrated by groups of males."
. . .
Many of Kavanaugh’s defenders, from Rod Dreher to Bari Weiss, have trotted out the hoary “boys will be boys” defense. But what might be most striking about the story of Renate Schroeder Dolphin is that it reveals the dark societal heart of what that means. All too often, being “boys” — that is, forging a masculine identity — means the sexual humiliation and degradation of women, for the benefit of an audience of other men."

https://www.vox.com/2018/9/26/17902214/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-accusers-renate-schroeder-male-bonding

I think a lot of people here are in a war with the patriarchy and will do anything to bring down this made up thing. None of these thing you site have been proven but you condemn all based on these things. So yep I will not support you in made up war.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

Funny, he still does that.

But his education at one of the best law schools in the nation, his past employment as a judge, well, that matters not a whit? Suuuuuure. The Honorable Judge Kavanaugh has an impressive record that speaks for itself --called evidence, as opposed to a confused woman who has no evidence other than spittle and mumbling of a past she cannot remember.

It matters not a whit because he is a perjurer with $400,000 in debt (that we know of) paid off by some mystery benefactor and he is a partisan hackwho can’t control his temper. You insulting women is just par for the course, but it doesn’t change his basic unsuitability for the Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

Funny, he still does that.

But his education at one of the best law schools in the nation, his past employment as a judge, well, that matters not a whit? Suuuuuure. The Honorable Judge Kavanaugh has an impressive record that speaks for itself --called evidence, as opposed to a confused woman who has no evidence other than spittle and mumbling of a past she cannot remember.

Careful. Your misogyny is showing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

Funny, he still does that.

But his education at one of the best law schools in the nation, his past employment as a judge, well, that matters not a whit? Suuuuuure. The Honorable Judge Kavanaugh has an impressive record that speaks for itself --called evidence, as opposed to a confused woman who has no evidence other than spittle and mumbling of a past she cannot remember.

I guess you're discounting the ABA then? Or you missed it?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/28/american-bar-association-had-kavanaugh-concerns-years-ago-republicans-dismissed-those-too/?utm_term=.8d162e2222f8

The ABA president was probably a democrat, or possible bribed by democrats to speak against Kavanaugh: From your Washington Compost (as Mark Levin calls it):

“The ABA president’s opinion doesn’t alter the fact that Judge Kavanaugh received a very well-qualified rating from the ABA standing committee, and the standing committee did not join this letter,” Grassley said, as Republicans prepared to vote.

Not everyone dismissed the warning. “The ABA said it made that request because of its — quote — respect for the rule of law and due process under law,” Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) told the committee...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

Funny, he still does that.

But his education at one of the best law schools in the nation, his past employment as a judge, well, that matters not a whit? Suuuuuure. The Honorable Judge Kavanaugh has an impressive record that speaks for itself --called evidence, as opposed to a confused woman who has no evidence other than spittle and mumbling of a past she cannot remember.

This was my take. Never should have had the silly hearing to begin with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

And how do you know that? Is that just your feminist world view?

The Renate Alumnus brag, shoving his dick in a woman's face at a party, pinning down and groping Dr. Ford in front of his buddy -- laughing. It's all of a piece. It's a performance for the other men in the room.

"For men in male-dominated contexts like the military, male-male relations have a very powerful influence on their sexual and social relations with women. For some men, male-male relations take priority over male-female non-sexual relations ... and platonic friendships with women are dangerously feminising and rare if not impossible. This creates the bizarre situation where males who have female friends risk being seen as ‘gay.’ Sex with women ... is a key path to status among male peers. And telling stories and boasting about sexual exploits is part of male-male peer cultures.”

Sometimes, Flood said, that homosocial dynamic lends itself to sexual assault, humiliation, and rape in the name of male bonding. “Male bonding is part and parcel of some men’s violence against women. For example, the cultures and collective rituals of male bonding among closely knit male fraternities and male athletes on college campuses foster tolerance toward or even perpetration of sexual assault against women. Rape is more likely in fraternities that practice greater gender segregation. ... Rape may be both a means to and an expression of male bonding, especially when it’s perpetrated by groups of males."
. . .
Many of Kavanaugh’s defenders, from Rod Dreher to Bari Weiss, have trotted out the hoary “boys will be boys” defense. But what might be most striking about the story of Renate Schroeder Dolphin is that it reveals the dark societal heart of what that means. All too often, being “boys” — that is, forging a masculine identity — means the sexual humiliation and degradation of women, for the benefit of an audience of other men."

https://www.vox.com/2018/9/26/17902214/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-accusers-renate-schroeder-male-bonding

I think a lot of people here are in a war with the patriarchy and will do anything to bring down this made up thing. None of these thing you site have been proven but you condemn all based on these things. So yep I will not support you in made up war.

In other words you support the patriarchy. Got it. You do you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of people here are in a war with the patriarchy and will do anything to bring down this made up thing. None of these thing you site have been proven but you condemn all based on these things. So yep I will not support you in made up war.

You think the patriarchy isn’t real?

Just when you think you’ve reached the bottom of the Trumpster denial barrel, they open up a new floor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

And how do you know that? Is that just your feminist world view?

The Renate Alumnus brag, shoving his dick in a woman's face at a party, pinning down and groping Dr. Ford in front of his buddy -- laughing. It's all of a piece. It's a performance for the other men in the room.

"For men in male-dominated contexts like the military, male-male relations have a very powerful influence on their sexual and social relations with women. For some men, male-male relations take priority over male-female non-sexual relations ... and platonic friendships with women are dangerously feminising and rare if not impossible. This creates the bizarre situation where males who have female friends risk being seen as ‘gay.’ Sex with women ... is a key path to status among male peers. And telling stories and boasting about sexual exploits is part of male-male peer cultures.”

Sometimes, Flood said, that homosocial dynamic lends itself to sexual assault, humiliation, and rape in the name of male bonding. “Male bonding is part and parcel of some men’s violence against women. For example, the cultures and collective rituals of male bonding among closely knit male fraternities and male athletes on college campuses foster tolerance toward or even perpetration of sexual assault against women. Rape is more likely in fraternities that practice greater gender segregation. ... Rape may be both a means to and an expression of male bonding, especially when it’s perpetrated by groups of males."
. . .
Many of Kavanaugh’s defenders, from Rod Dreher to Bari Weiss, have trotted out the hoary “boys will be boys” defense. But what might be most striking about the story of Renate Schroeder Dolphin is that it reveals the dark societal heart of what that means. All too often, being “boys” — that is, forging a masculine identity — means the sexual humiliation and degradation of women, for the benefit of an audience of other men."

https://www.vox.com/2018/9/26/17902214/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-accusers-renate-schroeder-male-bonding

I think a lot of people here are in a war with the patriarchy and will do anything to bring down this made up thing. None of these thing you site have been proven but you condemn all based on these things. So yep I will not support you in made up war.

Lol, swipe left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

Funny, he still does that.

But his education at one of the best law schools in the nation, his past employment as a judge, well, that matters not a whit? Suuuuuure. The Honorable Judge Kavanaugh has an impressive record that speaks for itself --called evidence, as opposed to a confused woman who has no evidence other than spittle and mumbling of a past she cannot remember.

I guess you're discounting the ABA then? Or you missed it?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/28/american-bar-association-had-kavanaugh-concerns-years-ago-republicans-dismissed-those-too/?utm_term=.8d162e2222f8

The ABA president was probably a democrat, or possible bribed by democrats to speak against Kavanaugh: From your Washington Compost (as Mark Levin calls it):

“The ABA president’s opinion doesn’t alter the fact that Judge Kavanaugh received a very well-qualified rating from the ABA standing committee, and the standing committee did not join this letter,” Grassley said, as Republicans prepared to vote.

Not everyone dismissed the warning. “The ABA said it made that request because of its — quote — respect for the rule of law and due process under law,” Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) told the committee...

I actually meant his previous downgrade. But I guess reading an article by the Washington Compost is too difficult for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we all just agree that Kavanaugh was that stereotypical douchey horndog jock and he did awful lot to conceal or fudge his words during the testimony resulting him coming off overly defensive?

I wouldn't go with "horndog." Having sex wasn't his goal when he was abusing women -- rather, he was using women as a prop to impress his friends.

Funny, he still does that.

But his education at one of the best law schools in the nation, his past employment as a judge, well, that matters not a whit? Suuuuuure. The Honorable Judge Kavanaugh has an impressive record that speaks for itself --called evidence, as opposed to a confused woman who has no evidence other than spittle and mumbling of a past she cannot remember.

Careful. Your misogyny is showing.

I think the reality is showing.