2025 Boys Private School Results /Game Schedules/ Commentary

[Anonymous]

The “loaded” 2025s beat one good team last year and that was Spaulding, a semi finalist in the MIA. Why will things be different this spring?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The “loaded” 2025s beat one good team last year and that was Spaulding, a semi finalist in the MIA. Why will things be different this spring?

Who is the "loaded" 2025?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The “loaded” 2025s beat one good team last year and that was Spaulding, a semi finalist in the MIA. Why will things be different this spring?

?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The “loaded” 2025s beat one good team last year and that was Spaulding, a semi finalist in the MIA. Why will things be different this spring?

Who is Spaulding from the MIA? I know of *Spalding* from the MIAA...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I analyzed the teams based on:

- How many D1 commits
- How many of those are high level programs
- how many of the commits are seniors
- Does the team have a strong Fogo and or goalie
- Is there a solid coaching staff

Bullis
Landon
SJC
Gonzaga
Prep
DeMatha
GC
PVI

Decent base assessment, but the '27s will start to make an impact this year, and the odd '28.

[Anonymous]

2027 starters/impact players ( fill in the blank)

Bullis - 1
Landon - 0
SJC - 1 + fogo?
Gonzaga - ?
Prep - 2
DeMatha - ?
GC - 2?
PVI - ?

[Anonymous]

2027 starters/impact players ( fill in the blank)

Bullis - 1
Landon - 0
SJC - 1 + fogo?
Gonzaga - ?
Prep - 2
DeMatha - ?
GC - 2?
PVI - ?
Heights 2+
STA 5+

[Anonymous]

2027 will not make a significant difference. There are outliers like Epstein and Duenkel but it’s rare. One or two 16 year olds will not change outcomes by much. You need men. Not boys.

[Anonymous]

2027 starters/impact players ( fill in the blank)

Bullis - 1
Landon - 0
SJC - 1 + fogo?
Gonzaga - ?
Prep - 2
DeMatha - ?
GC - 2?
PVI - ?
Heights 2+
STA 5+
SSSAS ?
EP ?

[Anonymous]

wasn't impressed with any of the 27's last year except for the defensive middie at Bullis.

[Anonymous]

2027 starters/impact players ( fill in the blank)

Bullis - 1
Landon - 0
SJC - 1 + fogo?
Gonzaga - ?
Prep - 2
DeMatha - ?
GC - 2?
PVI - ?
Heights 2+
STA 5+
SSSAS ?
EP ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:2027 will not make a significant difference. There are outliers like Epstein and Duenkel but it’s rare. One or two 16 year olds will not change outcomes by much. You need men. Not boys.

SJC started 6 Sophmores last year and they were difference makers so I disagree. There will be Sophmores making a difference on teams this year as well.

[Anonymous]

Of course the 6 sophomores for SJC last year were "difference makers"... according to the SJC parent or booster.

Maybe 2 of them were impact players

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course the 6 sophomores for SJC last year were "difference makers"... according to the SJC parent or booster.

Maybe 2 of them were impact players

Correct.. the Goalie and the Pole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:wasn't impressed with any of the 27's last year except for the defensive middie at Bullis.

He is the only one and maybe the 2nd line middie who was with DCE and move to NL this fall.