Lock him up indictment FL

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
[Post New]06/21/2023 18:21
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Video here:

Hahahahahahaha Trumpbots noticed that Trump is out there with Bret Baier incriminating himself.

He incriminated himself dozens of times during his presidency***. I can’t believe they’re still feeling betrayed.
[Post New]06/22/2023 20:02
quote
Anonymous

[Post New]06/22/2023 20:34
quote
Anonymous
[Post New]06/22/2023 20:35
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


The President cannot be above the law.
[Post New]06/23/2023 11:47
quote
Anonymous
Trump Prosecutors Struggled Over Motives. Then They Heard the Tape.

[Post New]06/23/2023 12:34
quote
Anonymous


Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.


[Post New]06/23/2023 17:00
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.



The WSJ news part has always been fine. It’s their Op-ed pages where the nut jobs come out.
[Post New]06/23/2023 17:03
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.



The WSJ news part has always been fine. It’s their Op-ed pages where the nut jobs come out.

+1
[Post New]06/23/2023 19:33
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.



The WSJ news part has always been fine. It’s their Op-ed pages where the nut jobs come out.

That doesn’t make it better, and while I don’t have the energy to go run down a bunch of links you won’t read, I’m pretty sure that WSJ’s coverage is as slanted as all right wing media is. There’s a reason that all Republicans have all the same talking points down to the weird term or new person’s name no one outside the wingnutsphere has ever heard of.
[Post New]06/23/2023 20:12
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.



The WSJ news part has always been fine. It’s their Op-ed pages where the nut jobs come out.

That doesn’t make it better, and while I don’t have the energy to go run down a bunch of links you won’t read, I’m pretty sure that WSJ’s coverage is as slanted as all right wing media is. There’s a reason that all Republicans have all the same talking points down to the weird term or new person’s name no one outside the wingnutsphere has ever heard of.

A friend of mine worked for the WSJ for years. The rightward lurch has definitely lost them some very good reporters.
[Post New]06/23/2023 20:12
quote
Anonymous
[Post New]06/25/2023 13:45
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


This is fantastic info. Thanks for posting. She has a lot of good info
[Post New]06/25/2023 14:12
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


This is fantastic info. Thanks for posting. She has a lot of good info

You’re welcome! I knew August sounded optimistically soon given the national security issues.
[Post New]06/25/2023 14:18
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The President cannot be above the law.


Ex FBI does not have declassification powers.
[Post New]06/25/2023 14:36
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The President cannot be above the law.


Ex FBI does not have declassification powers.

Ex Presidents don’t either.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: 

Search   Recent Topics   Hottest Topics