Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

It’s obviously direct, but Amber is doing well so far. She’s been well-coached, good job by her lawyers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched his testimony, he does have charisma but then when I heard the awful things he texted to his friend about his then girlfriend it made me sick. Why marry a girl you call every nasty name in the book and talk about her dying. Disgusting even if you’re drunk and high. It is clear they are both disturbed and we’re equally abusive in different ways. I’m shocked he wanted all this stuff to come out and file suit. I’d be shocked if he won.

Prepare to be shocked. He’s at the mercy of a jury, not the judge. It will either rule in his favor or be deadlocked.

If he’s hoping for some sort of jury nullification I would think you wod want this case tried in California and Fairfax county where you can throw a rock and hit a lawyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Premature but I think Depp will win this. Or they will settle.

He’s not going to win. And she won’t settle because she’s broke. She wrote an op-Ed saying he was abusive. With the texts about killing her and the testimony of their shared marriage therapist it seems that at the very least there’s enough there to show some amount of emotional abuse (unless in the op Ed she said it’s physical). I think Amber was MORE abusive but that doesn’t show that her implying he was abusive isn’t the truth.

I’m leaning towards this although I think Johnny has already won in the public eye. The public eye does not matter though. Semantics do.

Ambers op Ed stated “domestic abuse”. It’s clear from the evidence it was pointing towards Johnny. Now it comes down to who wrote it for the Defense lawyers. This is Why the judge was pushing the plaintiffs to include the Twitter evidence and case law into evidence for defamation and who wrote it. If the defense did, it would be mute.

Now the deceiving factor in my opinion is the down to the legal definition of “domestic abuse”. Domestic abuse l, while most common people would assume domestic violence but actually the definition can include abuse as physical, emotional, financial, sexual, and physiological. If ambers team can prove Johnny was any of these, not just violent, then they win in my opinion.

It really doesn't matter if he wins in court. In the public eye, he's winning and is likely to start getting movie offers again - which will lead to him having a nice income again.

If it doesn’t matter if he wins in court why do the lawsuit? He could’ve written a book instead

More people are watching the trial than will read a book. Plus less people will read his book if they believe he's an abuser. In the trial you get to hear his defense against her claims, and the back and forth that ensues. It's not just one sided.

Also, the charisma that he still has would not be conveyed in a book. I would never have guessed it -- I thought he was too far gone, but I do think he could make a come back.

Except he almost certainly would’ve done a big interview for promo for a book. Also it’s not the taxpayers job to fund frivolous litigation for his image. Totally inappropriate.

That could be said about many trials.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s obviously direct, but Amber is doing well so far. She’s been well-coached, good job by her lawyers.

Kinda. She’s obviously acting it up for the jury. She does not come off as authentic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obviously direct, but Amber is doing well so far. She’s been well-coached, good job by her lawyers.

Kinda. She’s obviously acting it up for the jury. She does not come off as authentic.

I mean, I am JD biased and I’m really trying to be fair here. In a few instances I felt like we as overselling and being too flowery (like Dr. Curry testified, funnily enough) but overall she is coming off very well.

[Anonymous]

Sorry, felt like she was overselling.

[Anonymous]

I had a extremely jealous ex and some of this really rings true so it’s very hard to know who is acting or lying.

[Anonymous]

Where she said she felt pretty in the dress she was wearing. That was so completely over acted.

[Anonymous]

Did he really call her “kid” all the time?

[Anonymous]

Here we have one single person on a planet who had no idea about the infamous tattoo - "Wino(na) forever".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obviously direct, but Amber is doing well so far. She’s been well-coached, good job by her lawyers.

Kinda. She’s obviously acting it up for the jury. She does not come off as authentic.

She seems like she’s acting and reciting a monologue.

[Anonymous]

OK, so maybe its tipping into over exaggerated now.

[Anonymous]

Jesus, people thought Depp was a good storyteller, she’s not bad either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obviously direct, but Amber is doing well so far. She’s been well-coached, good job by her lawyers.

Kinda. She’s obviously acting it up for the jury. She does not come off as authentic.

She seems like she’s acting and reciting a monologue.

I thought the same! Talking about the dirty carpet, etc. Goin for an oscar. But if it's real ofc I feel bad.

[Anonymous]

Johnny is clearly drawing to distract himself from this. He hasn’t looked at her once. This must suck so hard to hear.