|
I’ve tried this a few times with beef, and it lasted comes out dry as shoe leather. I’d like to try it with chicken breasts, but it calls for no liquid. I don’t want dinner to be ruined. Anyone made it and have it turn out ok with no liquid except for the 1/4 cup of brine?
https://www.saltandlavender.com/mississippi-chicken/ |
| Why on earth would you make this with beef? Of course it came out Dry! The butter and chicken will have enough liquid – chicken releases liquid liquids as it cooks. |
|
I make Mississippi roast with beef all the time in the crock pot and it comes out tender and juicy without fail. I use well-marbled chuck. I substituted top round once and that wasn’t as tender.
https://belleofthekitchen.com/mississippi-pot-roast/ |
|
Ignore pp. they clearly don’t realize the original version of this recipe uses beef 🙄.
Anyways, I’ve tried it with beef and found it.. not very good. I cannot imagine how someone would think chicken breasts (aka the driest crappiest meat ever) would have more juice than a beef pot roast. But it also has butter, so there is more liquid than just the meat 1/4 cup. I’d try it with chicken thighs per her note. Great reviews, I’m a little intrigued. |
It’s a classic beef dish, dimwit. You likely didn’t cook the beef long enough to relax the proteins. As intended, it is fall-apart delicious with beef. |
| I've never made that recipe, but if I did I'd use thighs instead of breasts. |
| Looks vulgar |
This is possible, but it’s shrunken and dry after about 3 hours on high. I made it with a former crockpot and it was delicious, but I got a new cuisinart one and it cooks super fast. |
Unfortunately, my family doesn’t eat dark meat. |
They will not know it’s “dark meat” once is shredded and covered in sauce. |
My husband definitely will! |
Cook it on low overnight. Use a good quality chuck. Never went wrong for us. |
I've used this recipe multiple times, too. Never dry. |
Tell him to make his own dinner? |
What cut of beef do you use? |